Jeep News The latest news from the industry.

Motor Trend compares 2012 Jeep Wrangler with its 1945 CJ forebearer

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-29-2011, 04:58 PM
  #1  
work work jeep repeat
Thread Starter
 
jeepadmin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 1,607
Arrow Motor Trend compares 2012 Jeep Wrangler with its 1945 CJ forebearer

Filed under: Classics, SUV, Videos, Jeep, Police/Emergency, Off-Road



It has been over 70 years since the first Jeep rolled off the assembly line. The legendary off-road machine was instrumental to the Allied victory in World War II, and it became such a big hit with servicemen that the CJ was built for civilians after the war.

More than 65 years after that first commercial CJ hit the streets, the Jeep name is still going strong. But how much different is the 1945 CJ than the current Wrangler? Motor Trend looked into the transformation of the Jeep, and it translated its findings into an informative video.

Hit the jump
to watch the video for yourself. The latest Wrangler may be two feet longer, nearly twice as heavy and feature almost five times more power than the original CJ, but the functionality that makes the Jeep a big hit with off-road enthusiast remains intact.Continue reading Motor Trend compares 2012 Jeep Wrangler with its 1945 CJ forebearer

Motor Trend compares 2012 Jeep Wrangler with its 1945 CJ forebearer originally appeared on Autoblog on Mon, 29 Aug 2011 16:27:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.



Permalink | Email this | Comments



More...
jeepadmin is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jeep videos
Jeep Videos - Pictures
0
03-10-2008 11:35 AM
Brian French
Jeep Mailing List
102
10-08-2004 02:57 PM
Brian French
Jeep Mailing List
6
09-27-2004 04:27 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: Motor Trend compares 2012 Jeep Wrangler with its 1945 CJ forebearer



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:06 PM.

Page generated in 0.07833 seconds with 10 queries