Re: Yet another biggest tires post (But this time for a Grand)
I think they were talking about the Real Cherokees:
http://www.cfsja.org/rigs/members.html#cherokee God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Steve wrote: > > Hi Bill, > > Just letting the OP know that he's got a date with a Sawzall if he opts > for 32s and that he may get more than a little rubbing with stock > wheels. Yes, the chart states this (although it should have the 'proper > wheel offset crucial' asterisk in that cell), but I thought a little > embellishment was in order. > > I don't know about other vehicles on the chart, but the '84-up Cherokee' > row is insane. It says 31s will fit stock with no cutting. No way. 29s > might fit stock, but 30s need a 1-2" boost to clear properly. 31s need > 3". It says 33x12.50 will fit 3" with 'major trimming'. That's an > understatement. Maybe someone's tried it, but I've never seen it. I've > got 33x10.50 with 4.5" and when the front is fully flexed they just > barely clear the ceiling with extended bump stops and the well liners > removed. Also, the chart is misleading in what it doesn't say. There are > commercially available XJ lifts 6, 8" and beyond that allow 34, 35"+ > tires. The chart omits this and thus implies 33x12.50 is the max size > for an XJ. Bah! Am I babbling again? :) > > With this one row so bad, I wonder if the rest is any good. Do the > CJ/YJ/TJ rows look okay? > > Steve |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:55 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands