Right, the 4.2 was carb'd, the 2.5 I4 was FI, that was your choice....there
was no FI I6 available in the Wrangler in 89. I don;t think you need to
bother looking up that website, because virtually EVERY OTHER website on the
subject indicates there was NO FI I-6 available in 89. Either the website
you mention was wrong or you read it wrong.

"Robb S via CarKB.com" <forum@CarKB.com> wrote in message
news:531AFA098035A@CarKB.com...
> no no no,
> like I said, I need a week or two, just working too many hours right now
> to
> search the web for where I found it, in 89, it stated there was a carb or
> FI
> motor, and after that, they were all FI......
> In 91, they went from the 4.2 to the 4.0....and yes they were fuel
> injected..
> ..
> I believe people are confusing the introduction of the 4.0 in 91, to the
> introduction of fuel injection to the lineup. And, Billy Ray, send me a
> email address and I'll email you pics of my jeep......or post your address
> here.......even better....
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>The I-4 was FI in 89, was it not? That's probably were Robb is confused...
>>
>>>6 was not offered with fuel injection in 89 or 90. dont mislead people
>>>
>>[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> > Thanks!
>
>
> --
> Message posted via CarKB.com
> http://www.carkb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/jeep-cars/200508/1

 

probably



"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:Q-ednWJdFOy2zJveRVn-ig@comcast.com...
> The I-4 was FI in 89, was it not? That's probably were Robb is confused...
>
> "IsellJeeps" <jsprauer2000@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:zF0Ne.2880$Z%6.543@newssvr17.news.prodigy.com ...
> >6 was not offered with fuel injection in 89 or 90. dont mislead people
> >
> >
> >
> > "Robb S via CarKB.com" <forum@CarKB.com> wrote in message
> > news:5300E61395380@CarKB.com...
> >> Not true, in 89, the 6 was offered with carbs or fuel injection.....
> >>
> >> IsellJeeps wrote:
> >> >6 cyl 89's & 90's were all carbs
> >> >
> >> >> fuel injection was offered in 89 and newer models.....
> >> >> in 89, there was either a carb or fuel injection, then in 90, fuel
> > injection..
> >> >[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Thanks!
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Message posted via http://www.carkb.com
> >
> >
>
>

 

probably



"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:Q-ednWJdFOy2zJveRVn-ig@comcast.com...
> The I-4 was FI in 89, was it not? That's probably were Robb is confused...
>
> "IsellJeeps" <jsprauer2000@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:zF0Ne.2880$Z%6.543@newssvr17.news.prodigy.com ...
> >6 was not offered with fuel injection in 89 or 90. dont mislead people
> >
> >
> >
> > "Robb S via CarKB.com" <forum@CarKB.com> wrote in message
> > news:5300E61395380@CarKB.com...
> >> Not true, in 89, the 6 was offered with carbs or fuel injection.....
> >>
> >> IsellJeeps wrote:
> >> >6 cyl 89's & 90's were all carbs
> >> >
> >> >> fuel injection was offered in 89 and newer models.....
> >> >> in 89, there was either a carb or fuel injection, then in 90, fuel
> > injection..
> >> >[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Thanks!
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Message posted via http://www.carkb.com
> >
> >
>
>

 

probably



"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:Q-ednWJdFOy2zJveRVn-ig@comcast.com...
> The I-4 was FI in 89, was it not? That's probably were Robb is confused...
>
> "IsellJeeps" <jsprauer2000@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:zF0Ne.2880$Z%6.543@newssvr17.news.prodigy.com ...
> >6 was not offered with fuel injection in 89 or 90. dont mislead people
> >
> >
> >
> > "Robb S via CarKB.com" <forum@CarKB.com> wrote in message
> > news:5300E61395380@CarKB.com...
> >> Not true, in 89, the 6 was offered with carbs or fuel injection.....
> >>
> >> IsellJeeps wrote:
> >> >6 cyl 89's & 90's were all carbs
> >> >
> >> >> fuel injection was offered in 89 and newer models.....
> >> >> in 89, there was either a carb or fuel injection, then in 90, fuel
> > injection..
> >> >[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Thanks!
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Message posted via http://www.carkb.com
> >
> >
>
>

 

probably



"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:Q-ednWJdFOy2zJveRVn-ig@comcast.com...
> The I-4 was FI in 89, was it not? That's probably were Robb is confused...
>
> "IsellJeeps" <jsprauer2000@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:zF0Ne.2880$Z%6.543@newssvr17.news.prodigy.com ...
> >6 was not offered with fuel injection in 89 or 90. dont mislead people
> >
> >
> >
> > "Robb S via CarKB.com" <forum@CarKB.com> wrote in message
> > news:5300E61395380@CarKB.com...
> >> Not true, in 89, the 6 was offered with carbs or fuel injection.....
> >>
> >> IsellJeeps wrote:
> >> >6 cyl 89's & 90's were all carbs
> >> >
> >> >> fuel injection was offered in 89 and newer models.....
> >> >> in 89, there was either a carb or fuel injection, then in 90, fuel
> > injection..
> >> >[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> > Thanks!
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Message posted via http://www.carkb.com
> >
> >
>
>

 

The 2.5L was fuel injected in '89 but the 4.2L still being installed in
the Wrangler in 89 and 90 was carbed. The fuel injected 4.0L was
introduced into the Wrangler in '91. The Cherokee had the fuel injected
4.0L in 89 though.

Jerry

Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> Right, the 4.2 was carb'd, the 2.5 I4 was FI, that was your choice....there
> was no FI I6 available in the Wrangler in 89. I don;t think you need to
> bother looking up that website, because virtually EVERY OTHER website on the
> subject indicates there was NO FI I-6 available in 89. Either the website
> you mention was wrong or you read it wrong.
>
> "Robb S via CarKB.com" <forum@CarKB.com> wrote in message
> news:531AFA098035A@CarKB.com...
>
>>no no no,
>>like I said, I need a week or two, just working too many hours right now
>>to
>>search the web for where I found it, in 89, it stated there was a carb or
>>FI
>>motor, and after that, they were all FI......
>>In 91, they went from the 4.2 to the 4.0....and yes they were fuel
>>injected..
>>..
>>I believe people are confusing the introduction of the 4.0 in 91, to the
>>introduction of fuel injection to the lineup. And, Billy Ray, send me a
>>email address and I'll email you pics of my jeep......or post your address
>>here.......even better....
>>
>>Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>>>The I-4 was FI in 89, was it not? That's probably were Robb is confused...
>>>
>>>
>>>>6 was not offered with fuel injection in 89 or 90. dont mislead people
>>>>
>>>
>>>[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Thanks!
>>
>>
>>--
>>Message posted via CarKB.com
>>http://www.carkb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/jeep-cars/200508/1
>
>
>

--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/

 

The 2.5L was fuel injected in '89 but the 4.2L still being installed in
the Wrangler in 89 and 90 was carbed. The fuel injected 4.0L was
introduced into the Wrangler in '91. The Cherokee had the fuel injected
4.0L in 89 though.

Jerry

Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> Right, the 4.2 was carb'd, the 2.5 I4 was FI, that was your choice....there
> was no FI I6 available in the Wrangler in 89. I don;t think you need to
> bother looking up that website, because virtually EVERY OTHER website on the
> subject indicates there was NO FI I-6 available in 89. Either the website
> you mention was wrong or you read it wrong.
>
> "Robb S via CarKB.com" <forum@CarKB.com> wrote in message
> news:531AFA098035A@CarKB.com...
>
>>no no no,
>>like I said, I need a week or two, just working too many hours right now
>>to
>>search the web for where I found it, in 89, it stated there was a carb or
>>FI
>>motor, and after that, they were all FI......
>>In 91, they went from the 4.2 to the 4.0....and yes they were fuel
>>injected..
>>..
>>I believe people are confusing the introduction of the 4.0 in 91, to the
>>introduction of fuel injection to the lineup. And, Billy Ray, send me a
>>email address and I'll email you pics of my jeep......or post your address
>>here.......even better....
>>
>>Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>>>The I-4 was FI in 89, was it not? That's probably were Robb is confused...
>>>
>>>
>>>>6 was not offered with fuel injection in 89 or 90. dont mislead people
>>>>
>>>
>>>[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Thanks!
>>
>>
>>--
>>Message posted via CarKB.com
>>http://www.carkb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/jeep-cars/200508/1
>
>
>

--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/

 

The 2.5L was fuel injected in '89 but the 4.2L still being installed in
the Wrangler in 89 and 90 was carbed. The fuel injected 4.0L was
introduced into the Wrangler in '91. The Cherokee had the fuel injected
4.0L in 89 though.

Jerry

Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> Right, the 4.2 was carb'd, the 2.5 I4 was FI, that was your choice....there
> was no FI I6 available in the Wrangler in 89. I don;t think you need to
> bother looking up that website, because virtually EVERY OTHER website on the
> subject indicates there was NO FI I-6 available in 89. Either the website
> you mention was wrong or you read it wrong.
>
> "Robb S via CarKB.com" <forum@CarKB.com> wrote in message
> news:531AFA098035A@CarKB.com...
>
>>no no no,
>>like I said, I need a week or two, just working too many hours right now
>>to
>>search the web for where I found it, in 89, it stated there was a carb or
>>FI
>>motor, and after that, they were all FI......
>>In 91, they went from the 4.2 to the 4.0....and yes they were fuel
>>injected..
>>..
>>I believe people are confusing the introduction of the 4.0 in 91, to the
>>introduction of fuel injection to the lineup. And, Billy Ray, send me a
>>email address and I'll email you pics of my jeep......or post your address
>>here.......even better....
>>
>>Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>>>The I-4 was FI in 89, was it not? That's probably were Robb is confused...
>>>
>>>
>>>>6 was not offered with fuel injection in 89 or 90. dont mislead people
>>>>
>>>
>>>[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Thanks!
>>
>>
>>--
>>Message posted via CarKB.com
>>http://www.carkb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/jeep-cars/200508/1
>
>
>

--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/

 

The 2.5L was fuel injected in '89 but the 4.2L still being installed in
the Wrangler in 89 and 90 was carbed. The fuel injected 4.0L was
introduced into the Wrangler in '91. The Cherokee had the fuel injected
4.0L in 89 though.

Jerry

Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> Right, the 4.2 was carb'd, the 2.5 I4 was FI, that was your choice....there
> was no FI I6 available in the Wrangler in 89. I don;t think you need to
> bother looking up that website, because virtually EVERY OTHER website on the
> subject indicates there was NO FI I-6 available in 89. Either the website
> you mention was wrong or you read it wrong.
>
> "Robb S via CarKB.com" <forum@CarKB.com> wrote in message
> news:531AFA098035A@CarKB.com...
>
>>no no no,
>>like I said, I need a week or two, just working too many hours right now
>>to
>>search the web for where I found it, in 89, it stated there was a carb or
>>FI
>>motor, and after that, they were all FI......
>>In 91, they went from the 4.2 to the 4.0....and yes they were fuel
>>injected..
>>..
>>I believe people are confusing the introduction of the 4.0 in 91, to the
>>introduction of fuel injection to the lineup. And, Billy Ray, send me a
>>email address and I'll email you pics of my jeep......or post your address
>>here.......even better....
>>
>>Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>>>The I-4 was FI in 89, was it not? That's probably were Robb is confused...
>>>
>>>
>>>>6 was not offered with fuel injection in 89 or 90. dont mislead people
>>>>
>>>
>>>[quoted text clipped - 8 lines]
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Thanks!
>>
>>
>>--
>>Message posted via CarKB.com
>>http://www.carkb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/jeep-cars/200508/1
>
>
>

--
Jerry Bransford
PP-ASEL N6TAY
See the Geezer Jeep at
http://members.***.net/jerrypb/

 

Holy Crap Mike....did you bang his wife while he was licking his dogs ***
and he's jealous????

Seriously, what's up his ****?

When I'm going to do something I don't know much about, then I get all the
info I can from all sources. It's up to me to figure out what's
questionable and what will work.....
I make the decision based on that and it's ME who is responsible for what I
do and what I spend....

Frig, is there any accountability these days?
"I didn't mean to shoot the guy....the gun companies but the gun in my hand,
and the local law enforcement weren't around to take it off of me...it's
THEIR fault!!!"

Where was birth control when you needed it eh!

"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:4304CB46.DC3602ED@sympatico.ca...
> Oh just FYI.
>
> You can't believe everything you read.
>
> Ending up with a 'trailer queen' by default ain't much good for
> 'braggin' rights'.
>
> A fool and his money are soon parted.
>
> And I make enough errors in my posts for you to pick at without making
> up things or taking them out of context which just makes you look the
> bigger fool. In those flywheel posts, 'I' mentioned a 258 engine. Carl
> finally figured out we all were talking different engines.
>
> If all you can do is show your lack of reading comprehension to try and
> pick my posts apart, then don't bother replying, eh.
>
> Mike
>
> "Robb S via CarKB.com" wrote:
>>
>> I see the ----- FINALLY came out of his corner.........
>>
>> Well, michael the -----, I have stated that fact based on many websites I
>> have visited, which I personally feel to be credible.
>> AND, It sticks in my mind specifically because I own a 89 YJ, and EVERY
>> time
>> I read it, I think to myself that I should have done a little more
>> research,
>> and bought a fuel injected version instead........
>> But, seeing as I got a great deal on the jeep I bought, it offsets
>> itself.....
>> ..
>> NOW -----, PUNK,
>> I do not have the time for the next couple of weeks, but I WILL follow up
>> on
>> those sites, and shove that pile of dogshit right back in your
>> face.......and
>> post that information.
>> trailerqueen hater.........
>> BY THE WAY....... I'm building a trailer queen you f*cking queer........
>> your envious of them because you just don't have the cash to do what they
>> are
>> doing.....
>> everyone who 4by's know's, it's smarter to tow a rig to the trail, rather
>> than drive, break and get stuck in butt ---- egypt..........with no way
>> home..
>> ....
>> Maybe MR. KNOW IT ALL will have all the answers, just like you did for
>> poor
>> Carl, who was trying to figure out where the pilot bearing should go, and
>> you
>> KNEW that no vehicles came with a pilot in the flywheel.........
>> And.....Bill I respect you and your knowledge, Personally I think you are
>> a
>> Jeep god, and am not tossin crap in your direction, but if you want to
>> report
>> me for this violation tooooooo
>> go right ahead........You did it before.........didn't make much of a
>> difference.......
>> I'm still gonna CRAP on MIKE because I STILL haven't received an
>> apology......
>> ....but really don't expect one,,,,,,, because he's canadian.........
>> most canadian's I've met are polite and courteous........but .......then
>> there's MIKE
>> and the rest of the pussie's who won't fight the terrorists.......like
>> the
>> French........
>> GAME ON!!!!!
>>
>> Mike Romain wrote:
>> >Man you are just sooo full of total ---- it is painful to ignore it.
>> >
>> >Mike
>> >86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
>> >88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>> >
>> >> Not true, in 89, the 6 was offered with carbs or fuel injection.....
>> >>
>> >[quoted text clipped - 5 lines]
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > Thanks!
>>
>> --
>> Message posted via http://www.carkb.com