where's the THRILL in driving?
Guest
Posts: n/a
"TJim" <jim@ranlet.nospam.com> wrote in message news:<J4GdnXLeT9ogGAuiRVn-uA@comcast.com>...
> " YOu can help me out get out this ugly nation. TEll you government and tell
> Swizerland government offers me a job and place to live I would be so happy
> to leave this prison nation. "
>
> Ohhhhh! OK, I get it now. You would like me to ask the Swiss government to
> provide you with a job and a home, right? So you're not only upset at the
> way people treated the "Indians" 200 years ago (which, it seems is all our
> fault...), but you won't move to Switzerland because they won't provide you
> with a job and a house? You want a "free ride", then? Why don't you get
> your own job and buy your own house like the rest of us do?
>
> [To everyone else: I know I said I wasn't going to post to this thread
> anymore, but it just kills me to have someone like this call everyone fat
> pigs and then say he wants some government to provide him with a job and a
> house at their taxpayers' expense. Seems like he's just a parasite.
> Sorry.]
>
You didn't get your own house. You didn't built your own house. You
stolen
in the first place. Was that your land? No. NO tribes never sold land.
You
thief stoled it and claiming this is my land. Do you think I would
believe in the white man history book? No. The land was taken by force
and by genocidal policy which Adolf Hitler was inspired it. They built
the white man society
called it as "Freedom or the land of free people or the land of
democratcy."
They are probably true for white race only. yes it was free for white
men.
Now white men took over all the land in America called as their
terroritory.
Some even suggested to me they are native it. Excuse sir, "Arn't you
not the
immgrant from Europe who took it by force?" Is not that the truth?
White men
said everybody is free playing the same level field which is
obviously lying!
The racism is still here. White men created their own nation and
claiming
everybody has chance to join. No no not after they took over
everything!
No thanx I don't join it!
> --
> Jim
>
> "Leo Lee" <leeleo93@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:53467eb7.0310211626.48c843ea@posting.google.c om...
> > "TJim" <jim@ranlet.nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:<fYCdnd7H3bse1AiiRVn-gg@comcast.com>...
> > > LOL! Hey, Baudolino!! You're defending this a$$hole and he hates you,
> too.
> > > Do you still like him?
> > >
> > > Free is free. It means you can't be arrested for criticizing your
> > > government and you can move around as you wish. Calling all Americans
> "fat
> > > pigs" and saying you "hate all America" is just being a jerk. If you
> came
> > > here and don't like it, quit whining and get out. Go back home if it's
> so
> > > much better. We don't want you here. Go away. You're not contributing
> > > anything useful to our country or to civil society.
> > >
> >
> > Over 100 nation on earth you will not be punished for critisizing
> > bitching whining against their govenrment. Don't be proud! The world
> > is
> > more free and more democratic and more civic than your stolen nation
> > ever going to be.
> >
> > YOu can help me out get out this ugly nation. TEll you government
> > and tell
> > Swizerland government offers me a job and place to live I would be so
> > happy
> > to leave this prison nation.
> >
> > Some day I will singing "Bye bye America! Bye bye the facist prison
> > society! I'm finally in peace and free! I will never sad and fearful
> > again!"
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > --
> > > Jim
> > >
> > >
> > > "Leo Lee" <leeleo93@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > news:53467eb7.0310202303.5f47c13e@posting.google.c om...
> > > > "Baudolino" <Baudolino@eco.org> wrote in message
> news:<GU0lb.6999$Uz6.5676@newsread1.news.atl.earth link.net>...
> > > > > "CJimmie in Iowa" <jslaird@trvnet.net> wrote in message
> > > > > news:bn2006$b6n$1@ins22.netins.net...
> > > > > > Hay Leo Lee; Get a hair cut and get a real job
> > > > > >
> > > > > > America is a Great Place.
> > > > >
> > > > > Besides:
> > > > > - Roads are ----
> > > > > - Dope is illegal
> > > > > - You have to be 21 to drink
> > > > > - Healthcare sucks
> > > > > - Environment!??
> > > > > - 100 times more likely to get shot that almost anywhere else
> > > > > - News is a joke
> > > > > - Education is embarrasing (assembly line thinking designed after
> Brave
> New
> > > > > World)
> > > > > - Remember that sagging three in the Ohio?
> > > > >
> > > > > But, as offspring sings: But everything he lacks well he makes up in
> denial
> > > > >
> > > > > But yeah, great is the good word, I would only like to see that more
> people
> > > > > here would like to aim for perfection.
> > > > >
> > > > > > And when I hear some Jack *** spew Like you do it
> > > > > > tells me one thing. You need to be on the receiving end of my 9
> and
> 1/2
> > > > > > boot. If you don't like it here well then get the f--k out.
> Your
> > > > > > probably getting all kinds of federal aid free sh-t hand out's and
> your
> > > > > > talking with your mouth full of American food you *** wipe.
> > > > >
> > > > > Check out the immigration rules, checking the quality of his
> English, he
> has
> > > > > been here too short to apply for all those benefits.
> > > > > Besides, if everything here that saw something they didn't like
> would
> move
> > > > > out, the place would be as developed in 50 years as it is now. Open
> your
> > > > > mind!
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Baloney BS! You are too ------- ignorant or you've been misled by
> > > > all
> > > > those lying education and media. You can't answer how long I've been
> > > > here because I'm suffering the speech problem. I admit I can't write
> > > > well. My speech problem is getting worst. So don't assume that I'm
> > > > some kind of late immigrant! You ugly ------- stereotyping is ----ign
> > > > too much to begin with.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > > Standing on
> > > > > > free men's soil and talking like that will get your *** kicked.
> > > > > >
> > > > > LOL, do you see the stupity in this! I must agree here with Leo, if
> people
> > > > > yell free and threaten to kick you because of what you say,
> something
> must
> > > > > be wrong. In a real free country even communists would be welcome.
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > GET OUT YOU UNGRATEFUL *****.
> > > > > >
> > > > > The-he land of the freeee, and the hooome of the brave!
> > > >
> > > > free to be brainwashed. Home of the gay!
> " YOu can help me out get out this ugly nation. TEll you government and tell
> Swizerland government offers me a job and place to live I would be so happy
> to leave this prison nation. "
>
> Ohhhhh! OK, I get it now. You would like me to ask the Swiss government to
> provide you with a job and a home, right? So you're not only upset at the
> way people treated the "Indians" 200 years ago (which, it seems is all our
> fault...), but you won't move to Switzerland because they won't provide you
> with a job and a house? You want a "free ride", then? Why don't you get
> your own job and buy your own house like the rest of us do?
>
> [To everyone else: I know I said I wasn't going to post to this thread
> anymore, but it just kills me to have someone like this call everyone fat
> pigs and then say he wants some government to provide him with a job and a
> house at their taxpayers' expense. Seems like he's just a parasite.
> Sorry.]
>
You didn't get your own house. You didn't built your own house. You
stolen
in the first place. Was that your land? No. NO tribes never sold land.
You
thief stoled it and claiming this is my land. Do you think I would
believe in the white man history book? No. The land was taken by force
and by genocidal policy which Adolf Hitler was inspired it. They built
the white man society
called it as "Freedom or the land of free people or the land of
democratcy."
They are probably true for white race only. yes it was free for white
men.
Now white men took over all the land in America called as their
terroritory.
Some even suggested to me they are native it. Excuse sir, "Arn't you
not the
immgrant from Europe who took it by force?" Is not that the truth?
White men
said everybody is free playing the same level field which is
obviously lying!
The racism is still here. White men created their own nation and
claiming
everybody has chance to join. No no not after they took over
everything!
No thanx I don't join it!
> --
> Jim
>
> "Leo Lee" <leeleo93@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:53467eb7.0310211626.48c843ea@posting.google.c om...
> > "TJim" <jim@ranlet.nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:<fYCdnd7H3bse1AiiRVn-gg@comcast.com>...
> > > LOL! Hey, Baudolino!! You're defending this a$$hole and he hates you,
> too.
> > > Do you still like him?
> > >
> > > Free is free. It means you can't be arrested for criticizing your
> > > government and you can move around as you wish. Calling all Americans
> "fat
> > > pigs" and saying you "hate all America" is just being a jerk. If you
> came
> > > here and don't like it, quit whining and get out. Go back home if it's
> so
> > > much better. We don't want you here. Go away. You're not contributing
> > > anything useful to our country or to civil society.
> > >
> >
> > Over 100 nation on earth you will not be punished for critisizing
> > bitching whining against their govenrment. Don't be proud! The world
> > is
> > more free and more democratic and more civic than your stolen nation
> > ever going to be.
> >
> > YOu can help me out get out this ugly nation. TEll you government
> > and tell
> > Swizerland government offers me a job and place to live I would be so
> > happy
> > to leave this prison nation.
> >
> > Some day I will singing "Bye bye America! Bye bye the facist prison
> > society! I'm finally in peace and free! I will never sad and fearful
> > again!"
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > --
> > > Jim
> > >
> > >
> > > "Leo Lee" <leeleo93@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > > news:53467eb7.0310202303.5f47c13e@posting.google.c om...
> > > > "Baudolino" <Baudolino@eco.org> wrote in message
> news:<GU0lb.6999$Uz6.5676@newsread1.news.atl.earth link.net>...
> > > > > "CJimmie in Iowa" <jslaird@trvnet.net> wrote in message
> > > > > news:bn2006$b6n$1@ins22.netins.net...
> > > > > > Hay Leo Lee; Get a hair cut and get a real job
> > > > > >
> > > > > > America is a Great Place.
> > > > >
> > > > > Besides:
> > > > > - Roads are ----
> > > > > - Dope is illegal
> > > > > - You have to be 21 to drink
> > > > > - Healthcare sucks
> > > > > - Environment!??
> > > > > - 100 times more likely to get shot that almost anywhere else
> > > > > - News is a joke
> > > > > - Education is embarrasing (assembly line thinking designed after
> Brave
> New
> > > > > World)
> > > > > - Remember that sagging three in the Ohio?
> > > > >
> > > > > But, as offspring sings: But everything he lacks well he makes up in
> denial
> > > > >
> > > > > But yeah, great is the good word, I would only like to see that more
> people
> > > > > here would like to aim for perfection.
> > > > >
> > > > > > And when I hear some Jack *** spew Like you do it
> > > > > > tells me one thing. You need to be on the receiving end of my 9
> and
> 1/2
> > > > > > boot. If you don't like it here well then get the f--k out.
> Your
> > > > > > probably getting all kinds of federal aid free sh-t hand out's and
> your
> > > > > > talking with your mouth full of American food you *** wipe.
> > > > >
> > > > > Check out the immigration rules, checking the quality of his
> English, he
> has
> > > > > been here too short to apply for all those benefits.
> > > > > Besides, if everything here that saw something they didn't like
> would
> move
> > > > > out, the place would be as developed in 50 years as it is now. Open
> your
> > > > > mind!
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Baloney BS! You are too ------- ignorant or you've been misled by
> > > > all
> > > > those lying education and media. You can't answer how long I've been
> > > > here because I'm suffering the speech problem. I admit I can't write
> > > > well. My speech problem is getting worst. So don't assume that I'm
> > > > some kind of late immigrant! You ugly ------- stereotyping is ----ign
> > > > too much to begin with.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > > Standing on
> > > > > > free men's soil and talking like that will get your *** kicked.
> > > > > >
> > > > > LOL, do you see the stupity in this! I must agree here with Leo, if
> people
> > > > > yell free and threaten to kick you because of what you say,
> something
> must
> > > > > be wrong. In a real free country even communists would be welcome.
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > GET OUT YOU UNGRATEFUL *****.
> > > > > >
> > > > > The-he land of the freeee, and the hooome of the brave!
> > > >
> > > > free to be brainwashed. Home of the gay!
Guest
Posts: n/a
That's a strange argument for the abolition of subsidies on home ownership.
The British government let similar subsidies 'wither on the vine years
ago', just saying that further subsidy was not justified in the economic
climate and was unfair vis-a-vis renters (of which there are not that many
in the private sector). (UK tax breaks applied to houses and flats.)
DAS
--
---
NB: To reply directly replace "nospam" with "schmetterling"
---
"Ingo Braune" <ingo.braune@web.de> wrote in message
news:3F96C604.900@web.de...
> Dori Schmetterling wrote:
>
> [Ende der Eigenheimförderung in Deutschland]
>
> > Very curious. How does this manifest itself? What law, for example?
>
> Up 'til now a person who build/bought a house to live in it could deduct
> a certain amount of the payments made for the house from his/her
> taxable income, additionally there were advantages for people with lower
> income.
> With ever rising national debt the government has come to the
> conclusion, that this is not only money they need to throw into
> different pits, but that there is also a possibility to declare this
> tax relief to be a subvention for something that is not desirable for
> the general public, as people living in their own, 1 or 2-story houses
> consume more space and energy than people living in a rented flat in a
> bigger house. To declare the coming cuts they kind of pushed forward the
> environment minister. ;-^
>
> Ingo
>
The British government let similar subsidies 'wither on the vine years
ago', just saying that further subsidy was not justified in the economic
climate and was unfair vis-a-vis renters (of which there are not that many
in the private sector). (UK tax breaks applied to houses and flats.)
DAS
--
---
NB: To reply directly replace "nospam" with "schmetterling"
---
"Ingo Braune" <ingo.braune@web.de> wrote in message
news:3F96C604.900@web.de...
> Dori Schmetterling wrote:
>
> [Ende der Eigenheimförderung in Deutschland]
>
> > Very curious. How does this manifest itself? What law, for example?
>
> Up 'til now a person who build/bought a house to live in it could deduct
> a certain amount of the payments made for the house from his/her
> taxable income, additionally there were advantages for people with lower
> income.
> With ever rising national debt the government has come to the
> conclusion, that this is not only money they need to throw into
> different pits, but that there is also a possibility to declare this
> tax relief to be a subvention for something that is not desirable for
> the general public, as people living in their own, 1 or 2-story houses
> consume more space and energy than people living in a rented flat in a
> bigger house. To declare the coming cuts they kind of pushed forward the
> environment minister. ;-^
>
> Ingo
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
That's a strange argument for the abolition of subsidies on home ownership.
The British government let similar subsidies 'wither on the vine years
ago', just saying that further subsidy was not justified in the economic
climate and was unfair vis-a-vis renters (of which there are not that many
in the private sector). (UK tax breaks applied to houses and flats.)
DAS
--
---
NB: To reply directly replace "nospam" with "schmetterling"
---
"Ingo Braune" <ingo.braune@web.de> wrote in message
news:3F96C604.900@web.de...
> Dori Schmetterling wrote:
>
> [Ende der Eigenheimförderung in Deutschland]
>
> > Very curious. How does this manifest itself? What law, for example?
>
> Up 'til now a person who build/bought a house to live in it could deduct
> a certain amount of the payments made for the house from his/her
> taxable income, additionally there were advantages for people with lower
> income.
> With ever rising national debt the government has come to the
> conclusion, that this is not only money they need to throw into
> different pits, but that there is also a possibility to declare this
> tax relief to be a subvention for something that is not desirable for
> the general public, as people living in their own, 1 or 2-story houses
> consume more space and energy than people living in a rented flat in a
> bigger house. To declare the coming cuts they kind of pushed forward the
> environment minister. ;-^
>
> Ingo
>
The British government let similar subsidies 'wither on the vine years
ago', just saying that further subsidy was not justified in the economic
climate and was unfair vis-a-vis renters (of which there are not that many
in the private sector). (UK tax breaks applied to houses and flats.)
DAS
--
---
NB: To reply directly replace "nospam" with "schmetterling"
---
"Ingo Braune" <ingo.braune@web.de> wrote in message
news:3F96C604.900@web.de...
> Dori Schmetterling wrote:
>
> [Ende der Eigenheimförderung in Deutschland]
>
> > Very curious. How does this manifest itself? What law, for example?
>
> Up 'til now a person who build/bought a house to live in it could deduct
> a certain amount of the payments made for the house from his/her
> taxable income, additionally there were advantages for people with lower
> income.
> With ever rising national debt the government has come to the
> conclusion, that this is not only money they need to throw into
> different pits, but that there is also a possibility to declare this
> tax relief to be a subvention for something that is not desirable for
> the general public, as people living in their own, 1 or 2-story houses
> consume more space and energy than people living in a rented flat in a
> bigger house. To declare the coming cuts they kind of pushed forward the
> environment minister. ;-^
>
> Ingo
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
That's a strange argument for the abolition of subsidies on home ownership.
The British government let similar subsidies 'wither on the vine years
ago', just saying that further subsidy was not justified in the economic
climate and was unfair vis-a-vis renters (of which there are not that many
in the private sector). (UK tax breaks applied to houses and flats.)
DAS
--
---
NB: To reply directly replace "nospam" with "schmetterling"
---
"Ingo Braune" <ingo.braune@web.de> wrote in message
news:3F96C604.900@web.de...
> Dori Schmetterling wrote:
>
> [Ende der Eigenheimförderung in Deutschland]
>
> > Very curious. How does this manifest itself? What law, for example?
>
> Up 'til now a person who build/bought a house to live in it could deduct
> a certain amount of the payments made for the house from his/her
> taxable income, additionally there were advantages for people with lower
> income.
> With ever rising national debt the government has come to the
> conclusion, that this is not only money they need to throw into
> different pits, but that there is also a possibility to declare this
> tax relief to be a subvention for something that is not desirable for
> the general public, as people living in their own, 1 or 2-story houses
> consume more space and energy than people living in a rented flat in a
> bigger house. To declare the coming cuts they kind of pushed forward the
> environment minister. ;-^
>
> Ingo
>
The British government let similar subsidies 'wither on the vine years
ago', just saying that further subsidy was not justified in the economic
climate and was unfair vis-a-vis renters (of which there are not that many
in the private sector). (UK tax breaks applied to houses and flats.)
DAS
--
---
NB: To reply directly replace "nospam" with "schmetterling"
---
"Ingo Braune" <ingo.braune@web.de> wrote in message
news:3F96C604.900@web.de...
> Dori Schmetterling wrote:
>
> [Ende der Eigenheimförderung in Deutschland]
>
> > Very curious. How does this manifest itself? What law, for example?
>
> Up 'til now a person who build/bought a house to live in it could deduct
> a certain amount of the payments made for the house from his/her
> taxable income, additionally there were advantages for people with lower
> income.
> With ever rising national debt the government has come to the
> conclusion, that this is not only money they need to throw into
> different pits, but that there is also a possibility to declare this
> tax relief to be a subvention for something that is not desirable for
> the general public, as people living in their own, 1 or 2-story houses
> consume more space and energy than people living in a rented flat in a
> bigger house. To declare the coming cuts they kind of pushed forward the
> environment minister. ;-^
>
> Ingo
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Leo Lee" <leeleo93@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:53467eb7.0310222226.76cf5445@posting.google.c om...
> "Napalm Heart" <olsonfam*nospam*@iserv.net> wrote in message
news:<vpc924hqa9fk21@corp.supernews.com>...
> > "Leo Lee" <leeleo93@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:53467eb7.0310211626.48c843ea@posting.google.c om...
> > > "TJim" <jim@ranlet.nospam.com> wrote in message
> > >
> > Typical socialist mindset. "Give me, give me. The world owes
me!"
> > The world doesn't owe you or anyone else a damn thing. You sound
like
> > a convict that can't admit his own faults and looks for others to
> > blame all of his problems on.
> >
> > P.S. The people in Europe didn't look much thinner as a group
than
> > the people do here when I was there in June.
> >
> > Ken
>
> Your kind of American fat-*** argument is not going to make this
> world
> better and makes wonder why you Americans are so ------- naive and
> ignorant. Your argument is like bipartians crap. Who wants to argue
> Conservative vs Liberal? It's same ------- bipartian talk like
> Democrat vs Republican talk. No wonder why you argument is fat-***
> like Rush Limbaugh, the fat-*** drug addict.
> Albert Einstien was the greatest socialist mind ever to live. Oh
yeah
> the fascist American accused the great mind as a communist.
>
> Hey I'm going to stop here I'm not wasting time to argue same
fat-***
> stupid naive American citizen.
Now you're deluded and confused. I said you have a socialist mindset,
not communist. You're revealing more about yourself than you know.
You'll definitely make the world a better place when you leave it.
You won't stop. You can't handle not having the last word. You can't
even make a relevant comment to the main idea of my statement.
P.S. You better keep a closer watch on Euro-politics. The socialists
are losing.
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Leo Lee" <leeleo93@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:53467eb7.0310222226.76cf5445@posting.google.c om...
> "Napalm Heart" <olsonfam*nospam*@iserv.net> wrote in message
news:<vpc924hqa9fk21@corp.supernews.com>...
> > "Leo Lee" <leeleo93@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:53467eb7.0310211626.48c843ea@posting.google.c om...
> > > "TJim" <jim@ranlet.nospam.com> wrote in message
> > >
> > Typical socialist mindset. "Give me, give me. The world owes
me!"
> > The world doesn't owe you or anyone else a damn thing. You sound
like
> > a convict that can't admit his own faults and looks for others to
> > blame all of his problems on.
> >
> > P.S. The people in Europe didn't look much thinner as a group
than
> > the people do here when I was there in June.
> >
> > Ken
>
> Your kind of American fat-*** argument is not going to make this
> world
> better and makes wonder why you Americans are so ------- naive and
> ignorant. Your argument is like bipartians crap. Who wants to argue
> Conservative vs Liberal? It's same ------- bipartian talk like
> Democrat vs Republican talk. No wonder why you argument is fat-***
> like Rush Limbaugh, the fat-*** drug addict.
> Albert Einstien was the greatest socialist mind ever to live. Oh
yeah
> the fascist American accused the great mind as a communist.
>
> Hey I'm going to stop here I'm not wasting time to argue same
fat-***
> stupid naive American citizen.
Now you're deluded and confused. I said you have a socialist mindset,
not communist. You're revealing more about yourself than you know.
You'll definitely make the world a better place when you leave it.
You won't stop. You can't handle not having the last word. You can't
even make a relevant comment to the main idea of my statement.
P.S. You better keep a closer watch on Euro-politics. The socialists
are losing.
Guest
Posts: n/a
"Leo Lee" <leeleo93@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:53467eb7.0310222226.76cf5445@posting.google.c om...
> "Napalm Heart" <olsonfam*nospam*@iserv.net> wrote in message
news:<vpc924hqa9fk21@corp.supernews.com>...
> > "Leo Lee" <leeleo93@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:53467eb7.0310211626.48c843ea@posting.google.c om...
> > > "TJim" <jim@ranlet.nospam.com> wrote in message
> > >
> > Typical socialist mindset. "Give me, give me. The world owes
me!"
> > The world doesn't owe you or anyone else a damn thing. You sound
like
> > a convict that can't admit his own faults and looks for others to
> > blame all of his problems on.
> >
> > P.S. The people in Europe didn't look much thinner as a group
than
> > the people do here when I was there in June.
> >
> > Ken
>
> Your kind of American fat-*** argument is not going to make this
> world
> better and makes wonder why you Americans are so ------- naive and
> ignorant. Your argument is like bipartians crap. Who wants to argue
> Conservative vs Liberal? It's same ------- bipartian talk like
> Democrat vs Republican talk. No wonder why you argument is fat-***
> like Rush Limbaugh, the fat-*** drug addict.
> Albert Einstien was the greatest socialist mind ever to live. Oh
yeah
> the fascist American accused the great mind as a communist.
>
> Hey I'm going to stop here I'm not wasting time to argue same
fat-***
> stupid naive American citizen.
Now you're deluded and confused. I said you have a socialist mindset,
not communist. You're revealing more about yourself than you know.
You'll definitely make the world a better place when you leave it.
You won't stop. You can't handle not having the last word. You can't
even make a relevant comment to the main idea of my statement.
P.S. You better keep a closer watch on Euro-politics. The socialists
are losing.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Baudolino wrote:
> "rickety" <ricklugg@knickers.iname.com> wrote in message
> news:3f96e7b5$1@rpc1284.daytonoh.ncr.com...
>>
>> I can just remember the little Dutch Grannij (!), rubber bands wound
>> tight in the DAF66 clipping the front of my friend's Lotus Europa,
>> careening across the pavement towards the supermarket door, and then
>> the brake lights going on!
>>
> Well, size wise there isn't a big difference between the DAF and a
> shopping cart. So, was the turn intentional or a mistake? Did she
> flip your friend off?
The Europa was literally cut off from the wheels forward, the Daf tipped
from riding over the front (and we both thought we saw the drvie belts, so
it was rolling as much as a renault 4 on an 80kph corner). I think the turn
into the shop front was accidental. Albert Hein shopping carts are much
smaller than US ones!
Both my friend and I both swore that the grannij and her passenger were
having a conversation eye to eye throughout the event that only ended when
they stopped at the shop front.
The other funny thing was that despite shoppers running in all directions to
avoid being Daffed, the police were unable to find a single witness. It
wasn't too bad. Whether things are still the same, the rule then was to
"yield to traffic from the right" and that's where we were. So "no fault" on
my colleague.
Shame about the Lotus, it was totalled and Pete ended up getting a Triumph
Dolomite Sprint.
--
Rickety
> "rickety" <ricklugg@knickers.iname.com> wrote in message
> news:3f96e7b5$1@rpc1284.daytonoh.ncr.com...
>>
>> I can just remember the little Dutch Grannij (!), rubber bands wound
>> tight in the DAF66 clipping the front of my friend's Lotus Europa,
>> careening across the pavement towards the supermarket door, and then
>> the brake lights going on!
>>
> Well, size wise there isn't a big difference between the DAF and a
> shopping cart. So, was the turn intentional or a mistake? Did she
> flip your friend off?
The Europa was literally cut off from the wheels forward, the Daf tipped
from riding over the front (and we both thought we saw the drvie belts, so
it was rolling as much as a renault 4 on an 80kph corner). I think the turn
into the shop front was accidental. Albert Hein shopping carts are much
smaller than US ones!
Both my friend and I both swore that the grannij and her passenger were
having a conversation eye to eye throughout the event that only ended when
they stopped at the shop front.
The other funny thing was that despite shoppers running in all directions to
avoid being Daffed, the police were unable to find a single witness. It
wasn't too bad. Whether things are still the same, the rule then was to
"yield to traffic from the right" and that's where we were. So "no fault" on
my colleague.
Shame about the Lotus, it was totalled and Pete ended up getting a Triumph
Dolomite Sprint.
--
Rickety
Guest
Posts: n/a
Baudolino wrote:
> "rickety" <ricklugg@knickers.iname.com> wrote in message
> news:3f96e7b5$1@rpc1284.daytonoh.ncr.com...
>>
>> I can just remember the little Dutch Grannij (!), rubber bands wound
>> tight in the DAF66 clipping the front of my friend's Lotus Europa,
>> careening across the pavement towards the supermarket door, and then
>> the brake lights going on!
>>
> Well, size wise there isn't a big difference between the DAF and a
> shopping cart. So, was the turn intentional or a mistake? Did she
> flip your friend off?
The Europa was literally cut off from the wheels forward, the Daf tipped
from riding over the front (and we both thought we saw the drvie belts, so
it was rolling as much as a renault 4 on an 80kph corner). I think the turn
into the shop front was accidental. Albert Hein shopping carts are much
smaller than US ones!
Both my friend and I both swore that the grannij and her passenger were
having a conversation eye to eye throughout the event that only ended when
they stopped at the shop front.
The other funny thing was that despite shoppers running in all directions to
avoid being Daffed, the police were unable to find a single witness. It
wasn't too bad. Whether things are still the same, the rule then was to
"yield to traffic from the right" and that's where we were. So "no fault" on
my colleague.
Shame about the Lotus, it was totalled and Pete ended up getting a Triumph
Dolomite Sprint.
--
Rickety
> "rickety" <ricklugg@knickers.iname.com> wrote in message
> news:3f96e7b5$1@rpc1284.daytonoh.ncr.com...
>>
>> I can just remember the little Dutch Grannij (!), rubber bands wound
>> tight in the DAF66 clipping the front of my friend's Lotus Europa,
>> careening across the pavement towards the supermarket door, and then
>> the brake lights going on!
>>
> Well, size wise there isn't a big difference between the DAF and a
> shopping cart. So, was the turn intentional or a mistake? Did she
> flip your friend off?
The Europa was literally cut off from the wheels forward, the Daf tipped
from riding over the front (and we both thought we saw the drvie belts, so
it was rolling as much as a renault 4 on an 80kph corner). I think the turn
into the shop front was accidental. Albert Hein shopping carts are much
smaller than US ones!
Both my friend and I both swore that the grannij and her passenger were
having a conversation eye to eye throughout the event that only ended when
they stopped at the shop front.
The other funny thing was that despite shoppers running in all directions to
avoid being Daffed, the police were unable to find a single witness. It
wasn't too bad. Whether things are still the same, the rule then was to
"yield to traffic from the right" and that's where we were. So "no fault" on
my colleague.
Shame about the Lotus, it was totalled and Pete ended up getting a Triumph
Dolomite Sprint.
--
Rickety
Guest
Posts: n/a
Baudolino wrote:
> "rickety" <ricklugg@knickers.iname.com> wrote in message
> news:3f96e7b5$1@rpc1284.daytonoh.ncr.com...
>>
>> I can just remember the little Dutch Grannij (!), rubber bands wound
>> tight in the DAF66 clipping the front of my friend's Lotus Europa,
>> careening across the pavement towards the supermarket door, and then
>> the brake lights going on!
>>
> Well, size wise there isn't a big difference between the DAF and a
> shopping cart. So, was the turn intentional or a mistake? Did she
> flip your friend off?
The Europa was literally cut off from the wheels forward, the Daf tipped
from riding over the front (and we both thought we saw the drvie belts, so
it was rolling as much as a renault 4 on an 80kph corner). I think the turn
into the shop front was accidental. Albert Hein shopping carts are much
smaller than US ones!
Both my friend and I both swore that the grannij and her passenger were
having a conversation eye to eye throughout the event that only ended when
they stopped at the shop front.
The other funny thing was that despite shoppers running in all directions to
avoid being Daffed, the police were unable to find a single witness. It
wasn't too bad. Whether things are still the same, the rule then was to
"yield to traffic from the right" and that's where we were. So "no fault" on
my colleague.
Shame about the Lotus, it was totalled and Pete ended up getting a Triumph
Dolomite Sprint.
--
Rickety
> "rickety" <ricklugg@knickers.iname.com> wrote in message
> news:3f96e7b5$1@rpc1284.daytonoh.ncr.com...
>>
>> I can just remember the little Dutch Grannij (!), rubber bands wound
>> tight in the DAF66 clipping the front of my friend's Lotus Europa,
>> careening across the pavement towards the supermarket door, and then
>> the brake lights going on!
>>
> Well, size wise there isn't a big difference between the DAF and a
> shopping cart. So, was the turn intentional or a mistake? Did she
> flip your friend off?
The Europa was literally cut off from the wheels forward, the Daf tipped
from riding over the front (and we both thought we saw the drvie belts, so
it was rolling as much as a renault 4 on an 80kph corner). I think the turn
into the shop front was accidental. Albert Hein shopping carts are much
smaller than US ones!
Both my friend and I both swore that the grannij and her passenger were
having a conversation eye to eye throughout the event that only ended when
they stopped at the shop front.
The other funny thing was that despite shoppers running in all directions to
avoid being Daffed, the police were unable to find a single witness. It
wasn't too bad. Whether things are still the same, the rule then was to
"yield to traffic from the right" and that's where we were. So "no fault" on
my colleague.
Shame about the Lotus, it was totalled and Pete ended up getting a Triumph
Dolomite Sprint.
--
Rickety


