what exactly happened here?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: what exactly happened here?
On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 17:36:44 -0700, "L.W.(Bill) ------ III"
<----------@***.net> wrote:
>Hi Ted,
> You've got it, I don't have a life, so this is just plain fun, it's
>a game to see how many user names and actual Internet Service Provider
>accounts I can have closed, of course I don't go after them until I get
>a real charter violation,
You're lying, Billy.
>like crossposting, language
Crossposting isn't a violation in an alt.group, billy. Language isn't
one either.
> or advertising.
You advertise in every post you make. In fact, you spam too. If your
"friends" in ramjw pop in to alt.binaries.pictures.drag-racing, for
example, they'll see the hundred or so spam posts you've made.
>And never do I get mad,
Liar.
>but will get even if possible.
No, you won't. You'll get kook awards. Eventually, *** will get
tired of your antics and find that it's just not worth the few bucks
you spend to keep you. You'll then claim that you meant to lose that
account and go somewhere more expensive for connectivity. That's
what kooks like you do.
> So, those that
>don't want to watch, simple filter my address out.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>The Lord of Eltingville wrote:
>>
>>
>> The only thing I'd disagree with about what Kate said was that Bill's
>> tormentors are angry. They're not. They're having fun, and they're
>> having it at his expense (and at the expense of anyone else who takes it
>> marginally seriously).
>>
>> To break it down:
>>
>> * Bill's the one spending time and effort sifting through headers and
>> trying to track down the posts' origins.
>>
>> * Bill's the one spending time and effort to report his findings to
>> providers who may/may not care about what's happening -- if they're
>> even the appropriate providers in the first place.
>>
>> * Bill's the one spending time and effort to respond to each post.
>>
>> And ultimately:
>>
>> * Bill's naive enough to think that all his time and effort is going
>> to make a bit of difference because as quickly as he might be
>> able to get an account nuked, new ones are created.
>>
>> * Bill keeps encouraging them to continue by obediently fetching every
>> stick that's thrown.
>>
>> Unless Bill (and anyone else who's getting upset by what he brought
>> here) learns to simply ignore posts that offend/don't interest him/them,
>> it's going to continue...and probably escalate. Like it or not, there's
>> ~25 years of usenet history to back that up.
>>
>> ~Ted (returning to lurker mode)
>>
>> --
>> .
--
Just your average Joe.
<----------@***.net> wrote:
>Hi Ted,
> You've got it, I don't have a life, so this is just plain fun, it's
>a game to see how many user names and actual Internet Service Provider
>accounts I can have closed, of course I don't go after them until I get
>a real charter violation,
You're lying, Billy.
>like crossposting, language
Crossposting isn't a violation in an alt.group, billy. Language isn't
one either.
> or advertising.
You advertise in every post you make. In fact, you spam too. If your
"friends" in ramjw pop in to alt.binaries.pictures.drag-racing, for
example, they'll see the hundred or so spam posts you've made.
>And never do I get mad,
Liar.
>but will get even if possible.
No, you won't. You'll get kook awards. Eventually, *** will get
tired of your antics and find that it's just not worth the few bucks
you spend to keep you. You'll then claim that you meant to lose that
account and go somewhere more expensive for connectivity. That's
what kooks like you do.
> So, those that
>don't want to watch, simple filter my address out.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>The Lord of Eltingville wrote:
>>
>>
>> The only thing I'd disagree with about what Kate said was that Bill's
>> tormentors are angry. They're not. They're having fun, and they're
>> having it at his expense (and at the expense of anyone else who takes it
>> marginally seriously).
>>
>> To break it down:
>>
>> * Bill's the one spending time and effort sifting through headers and
>> trying to track down the posts' origins.
>>
>> * Bill's the one spending time and effort to report his findings to
>> providers who may/may not care about what's happening -- if they're
>> even the appropriate providers in the first place.
>>
>> * Bill's the one spending time and effort to respond to each post.
>>
>> And ultimately:
>>
>> * Bill's naive enough to think that all his time and effort is going
>> to make a bit of difference because as quickly as he might be
>> able to get an account nuked, new ones are created.
>>
>> * Bill keeps encouraging them to continue by obediently fetching every
>> stick that's thrown.
>>
>> Unless Bill (and anyone else who's getting upset by what he brought
>> here) learns to simply ignore posts that offend/don't interest him/them,
>> it's going to continue...and probably escalate. Like it or not, there's
>> ~25 years of usenet history to back that up.
>>
>> ~Ted (returning to lurker mode)
>>
>> --
>> .
--
Just your average Joe.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: what exactly happened here?
On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 17:36:44 -0700, "L.W.(Bill) ------ III"
<----------@***.net> wrote:
>Hi Ted,
> You've got it, I don't have a life, so this is just plain fun, it's
>a game to see how many user names and actual Internet Service Provider
>accounts I can have closed, of course I don't go after them until I get
>a real charter violation,
You're lying, Billy.
>like crossposting, language
Crossposting isn't a violation in an alt.group, billy. Language isn't
one either.
> or advertising.
You advertise in every post you make. In fact, you spam too. If your
"friends" in ramjw pop in to alt.binaries.pictures.drag-racing, for
example, they'll see the hundred or so spam posts you've made.
>And never do I get mad,
Liar.
>but will get even if possible.
No, you won't. You'll get kook awards. Eventually, *** will get
tired of your antics and find that it's just not worth the few bucks
you spend to keep you. You'll then claim that you meant to lose that
account and go somewhere more expensive for connectivity. That's
what kooks like you do.
> So, those that
>don't want to watch, simple filter my address out.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>The Lord of Eltingville wrote:
>>
>>
>> The only thing I'd disagree with about what Kate said was that Bill's
>> tormentors are angry. They're not. They're having fun, and they're
>> having it at his expense (and at the expense of anyone else who takes it
>> marginally seriously).
>>
>> To break it down:
>>
>> * Bill's the one spending time and effort sifting through headers and
>> trying to track down the posts' origins.
>>
>> * Bill's the one spending time and effort to report his findings to
>> providers who may/may not care about what's happening -- if they're
>> even the appropriate providers in the first place.
>>
>> * Bill's the one spending time and effort to respond to each post.
>>
>> And ultimately:
>>
>> * Bill's naive enough to think that all his time and effort is going
>> to make a bit of difference because as quickly as he might be
>> able to get an account nuked, new ones are created.
>>
>> * Bill keeps encouraging them to continue by obediently fetching every
>> stick that's thrown.
>>
>> Unless Bill (and anyone else who's getting upset by what he brought
>> here) learns to simply ignore posts that offend/don't interest him/them,
>> it's going to continue...and probably escalate. Like it or not, there's
>> ~25 years of usenet history to back that up.
>>
>> ~Ted (returning to lurker mode)
>>
>> --
>> .
--
Just your average Joe.
<----------@***.net> wrote:
>Hi Ted,
> You've got it, I don't have a life, so this is just plain fun, it's
>a game to see how many user names and actual Internet Service Provider
>accounts I can have closed, of course I don't go after them until I get
>a real charter violation,
You're lying, Billy.
>like crossposting, language
Crossposting isn't a violation in an alt.group, billy. Language isn't
one either.
> or advertising.
You advertise in every post you make. In fact, you spam too. If your
"friends" in ramjw pop in to alt.binaries.pictures.drag-racing, for
example, they'll see the hundred or so spam posts you've made.
>And never do I get mad,
Liar.
>but will get even if possible.
No, you won't. You'll get kook awards. Eventually, *** will get
tired of your antics and find that it's just not worth the few bucks
you spend to keep you. You'll then claim that you meant to lose that
account and go somewhere more expensive for connectivity. That's
what kooks like you do.
> So, those that
>don't want to watch, simple filter my address out.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>The Lord of Eltingville wrote:
>>
>>
>> The only thing I'd disagree with about what Kate said was that Bill's
>> tormentors are angry. They're not. They're having fun, and they're
>> having it at his expense (and at the expense of anyone else who takes it
>> marginally seriously).
>>
>> To break it down:
>>
>> * Bill's the one spending time and effort sifting through headers and
>> trying to track down the posts' origins.
>>
>> * Bill's the one spending time and effort to report his findings to
>> providers who may/may not care about what's happening -- if they're
>> even the appropriate providers in the first place.
>>
>> * Bill's the one spending time and effort to respond to each post.
>>
>> And ultimately:
>>
>> * Bill's naive enough to think that all his time and effort is going
>> to make a bit of difference because as quickly as he might be
>> able to get an account nuked, new ones are created.
>>
>> * Bill keeps encouraging them to continue by obediently fetching every
>> stick that's thrown.
>>
>> Unless Bill (and anyone else who's getting upset by what he brought
>> here) learns to simply ignore posts that offend/don't interest him/them,
>> it's going to continue...and probably escalate. Like it or not, there's
>> ~25 years of usenet history to back that up.
>>
>> ~Ted (returning to lurker mode)
>>
>> --
>> .
--
Just your average Joe.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: what exactly happened here?
"jbjeep" <jbjeep@saw.net> wrote in message
news:3r7r42p1afmmlbuoou38qq6d3rd1jvrl83@4ax.com...
: Cool.
:
: I went out with a neighbor in his old CJ on Sunday - nothing serious, more
just
: trucking around in the woods talking and laughing - a little light
wheeling here and
: there. I swear my face hurts from grinning all day! Damn, but that was
fun!!!
: Between him and the large wet dog that kept thinking that my lap was a
good place to
: try to sit. <grin> I havent had that good a day in a long long time!
: -jenn
:
:
Sounds like a good day Jenn..
Heck, the only two spots we even got off the pavement were one place headed
towards a cache and in about 60 feet there was a little bitty sign that
prohibited vehicles.
The other was at a turn around that went up a steep bank on one side or out
the road on the other, I chose the bank. Nope, didn't hardly even get any
dirt on the tires..
You said that you didn't get cloth seats, what DID you get?
Kate
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: what exactly happened here?
"jbjeep" <jbjeep@saw.net> wrote in message
news:3r7r42p1afmmlbuoou38qq6d3rd1jvrl83@4ax.com...
: Cool.
:
: I went out with a neighbor in his old CJ on Sunday - nothing serious, more
just
: trucking around in the woods talking and laughing - a little light
wheeling here and
: there. I swear my face hurts from grinning all day! Damn, but that was
fun!!!
: Between him and the large wet dog that kept thinking that my lap was a
good place to
: try to sit. <grin> I havent had that good a day in a long long time!
: -jenn
:
:
Sounds like a good day Jenn..
Heck, the only two spots we even got off the pavement were one place headed
towards a cache and in about 60 feet there was a little bitty sign that
prohibited vehicles.
The other was at a turn around that went up a steep bank on one side or out
the road on the other, I chose the bank. Nope, didn't hardly even get any
dirt on the tires..
You said that you didn't get cloth seats, what DID you get?
Kate
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: what exactly happened here?
"jbjeep" <jbjeep@saw.net> wrote in message
news:3r7r42p1afmmlbuoou38qq6d3rd1jvrl83@4ax.com...
: Cool.
:
: I went out with a neighbor in his old CJ on Sunday - nothing serious, more
just
: trucking around in the woods talking and laughing - a little light
wheeling here and
: there. I swear my face hurts from grinning all day! Damn, but that was
fun!!!
: Between him and the large wet dog that kept thinking that my lap was a
good place to
: try to sit. <grin> I havent had that good a day in a long long time!
: -jenn
:
:
Sounds like a good day Jenn..
Heck, the only two spots we even got off the pavement were one place headed
towards a cache and in about 60 feet there was a little bitty sign that
prohibited vehicles.
The other was at a turn around that went up a steep bank on one side or out
the road on the other, I chose the bank. Nope, didn't hardly even get any
dirt on the tires..
You said that you didn't get cloth seats, what DID you get?
Kate
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: what exactly happened here?
> Bring them on, this going to be more fun than I've had in a long
> time!
> God Bless Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Pathetically, that's one of the few statements you've made that appears to
be true.
Now /that/ is the sign of a true loser.
That and AOL.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: what exactly happened here?
> Bring them on, this going to be more fun than I've had in a long
> time!
> God Bless Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Pathetically, that's one of the few statements you've made that appears to
be true.
Now /that/ is the sign of a true loser.
That and AOL.
