Well, it's not exactly CAMO paint.....
#51
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Well, it's not exactly CAMO paint.....
On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 15:50:14 -0500, the following appeared
in rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by "DougW"
<post.replies@invalid.address>:
>Bob Casanova did pass the time by typing:
>
>> I guess that depends on where you're trying to hide...
>
>Yes, and that paintjob would be perfect cammo at about
>1000' of salt water or 8' of concrete.
....or both.
Sounds reasonable... ;-)
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
in rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by "DougW"
<post.replies@invalid.address>:
>Bob Casanova did pass the time by typing:
>
>> I guess that depends on where you're trying to hide...
>
>Yes, and that paintjob would be perfect cammo at about
>1000' of salt water or 8' of concrete.
....or both.
Sounds reasonable... ;-)
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
#52
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Well, it's not exactly CAMO paint.....
On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 15:50:14 -0500, the following appeared
in rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by "DougW"
<post.replies@invalid.address>:
>Bob Casanova did pass the time by typing:
>
>> I guess that depends on where you're trying to hide...
>
>Yes, and that paintjob would be perfect cammo at about
>1000' of salt water or 8' of concrete.
....or both.
Sounds reasonable... ;-)
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
in rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by "DougW"
<post.replies@invalid.address>:
>Bob Casanova did pass the time by typing:
>
>> I guess that depends on where you're trying to hide...
>
>Yes, and that paintjob would be perfect cammo at about
>1000' of salt water or 8' of concrete.
....or both.
Sounds reasonable... ;-)
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
#53
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Well, it's not exactly CAMO paint.....
On Sun, 24 Apr 2005 15:50:14 -0500, the following appeared
in rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by "DougW"
<post.replies@invalid.address>:
>Bob Casanova did pass the time by typing:
>
>> I guess that depends on where you're trying to hide...
>
>Yes, and that paintjob would be perfect cammo at about
>1000' of salt water or 8' of concrete.
....or both.
Sounds reasonable... ;-)
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
in rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by "DougW"
<post.replies@invalid.address>:
>Bob Casanova did pass the time by typing:
>
>> I guess that depends on where you're trying to hide...
>
>Yes, and that paintjob would be perfect cammo at about
>1000' of salt water or 8' of concrete.
....or both.
Sounds reasonable... ;-)
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
#54
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Well, it's not exactly CAMO paint.....
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 10:13:20 -0700, the following appeared
in rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by "Jeff Strickland"
<spamcatcher@yahoo.net>:
Yeah, a high-speed link can correct a lot of problems, but
unfortunately overpriced butt-ugly jeeps aren't among
them...
>I tried ot look at this link over the weekend with my DialUp connection, and
>it took forever to load and the Jeep is butt ugly. I thought the file didn't
>load right. I looked this morning with my T1 or DSL or whatever the Hell we
>have here, and it loaded much faster, but the Jeep is still butt ugly.
>
>Amazingly, it's still overpriced too ...
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
in rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by "Jeff Strickland"
<spamcatcher@yahoo.net>:
Yeah, a high-speed link can correct a lot of problems, but
unfortunately overpriced butt-ugly jeeps aren't among
them...
>I tried ot look at this link over the weekend with my DialUp connection, and
>it took forever to load and the Jeep is butt ugly. I thought the file didn't
>load right. I looked this morning with my T1 or DSL or whatever the Hell we
>have here, and it loaded much faster, but the Jeep is still butt ugly.
>
>Amazingly, it's still overpriced too ...
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
#55
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Well, it's not exactly CAMO paint.....
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 10:13:20 -0700, the following appeared
in rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by "Jeff Strickland"
<spamcatcher@yahoo.net>:
Yeah, a high-speed link can correct a lot of problems, but
unfortunately overpriced butt-ugly jeeps aren't among
them...
>I tried ot look at this link over the weekend with my DialUp connection, and
>it took forever to load and the Jeep is butt ugly. I thought the file didn't
>load right. I looked this morning with my T1 or DSL or whatever the Hell we
>have here, and it loaded much faster, but the Jeep is still butt ugly.
>
>Amazingly, it's still overpriced too ...
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
in rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by "Jeff Strickland"
<spamcatcher@yahoo.net>:
Yeah, a high-speed link can correct a lot of problems, but
unfortunately overpriced butt-ugly jeeps aren't among
them...
>I tried ot look at this link over the weekend with my DialUp connection, and
>it took forever to load and the Jeep is butt ugly. I thought the file didn't
>load right. I looked this morning with my T1 or DSL or whatever the Hell we
>have here, and it loaded much faster, but the Jeep is still butt ugly.
>
>Amazingly, it's still overpriced too ...
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
#56
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Well, it's not exactly CAMO paint.....
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 10:13:20 -0700, the following appeared
in rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by "Jeff Strickland"
<spamcatcher@yahoo.net>:
Yeah, a high-speed link can correct a lot of problems, but
unfortunately overpriced butt-ugly jeeps aren't among
them...
>I tried ot look at this link over the weekend with my DialUp connection, and
>it took forever to load and the Jeep is butt ugly. I thought the file didn't
>load right. I looked this morning with my T1 or DSL or whatever the Hell we
>have here, and it loaded much faster, but the Jeep is still butt ugly.
>
>Amazingly, it's still overpriced too ...
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
in rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by "Jeff Strickland"
<spamcatcher@yahoo.net>:
Yeah, a high-speed link can correct a lot of problems, but
unfortunately overpriced butt-ugly jeeps aren't among
them...
>I tried ot look at this link over the weekend with my DialUp connection, and
>it took forever to load and the Jeep is butt ugly. I thought the file didn't
>load right. I looked this morning with my T1 or DSL or whatever the Hell we
>have here, and it loaded much faster, but the Jeep is still butt ugly.
>
>Amazingly, it's still overpriced too ...
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
#57
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Well, it's not exactly CAMO paint.....
On Mon, 25 Apr 2005 10:13:20 -0700, the following appeared
in rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by "Jeff Strickland"
<spamcatcher@yahoo.net>:
Yeah, a high-speed link can correct a lot of problems, but
unfortunately overpriced butt-ugly jeeps aren't among
them...
>I tried ot look at this link over the weekend with my DialUp connection, and
>it took forever to load and the Jeep is butt ugly. I thought the file didn't
>load right. I looked this morning with my T1 or DSL or whatever the Hell we
>have here, and it loaded much faster, but the Jeep is still butt ugly.
>
>Amazingly, it's still overpriced too ...
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
in rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by "Jeff Strickland"
<spamcatcher@yahoo.net>:
Yeah, a high-speed link can correct a lot of problems, but
unfortunately overpriced butt-ugly jeeps aren't among
them...
>I tried ot look at this link over the weekend with my DialUp connection, and
>it took forever to load and the Jeep is butt ugly. I thought the file didn't
>load right. I looked this morning with my T1 or DSL or whatever the Hell we
>have here, and it loaded much faster, but the Jeep is still butt ugly.
>
>Amazingly, it's still overpriced too ...
--
Bob C.
"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless
#58
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Well, it's not exactly CAMO paint.....
all it needs is a good coat of mud.
"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
news:S7Aae.17577$L64.11571@okepread07...
> twaldron did pass the time by typing:
>> http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...543120497&rd=1
>
> Well, that's got to be the ugliest f-ing thing
> I've seen short of the barbie Jeep.
>
> Maby someone with money will buy it and give it
> a proper paintjob.
>
> I do know some trails in texas, lots of mesquite...
>
>
> --
> DougW
>
"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
news:S7Aae.17577$L64.11571@okepread07...
> twaldron did pass the time by typing:
>> http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...543120497&rd=1
>
> Well, that's got to be the ugliest f-ing thing
> I've seen short of the barbie Jeep.
>
> Maby someone with money will buy it and give it
> a proper paintjob.
>
> I do know some trails in texas, lots of mesquite...
>
>
> --
> DougW
>
#59
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Well, it's not exactly CAMO paint.....
all it needs is a good coat of mud.
"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
news:S7Aae.17577$L64.11571@okepread07...
> twaldron did pass the time by typing:
>> http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...543120497&rd=1
>
> Well, that's got to be the ugliest f-ing thing
> I've seen short of the barbie Jeep.
>
> Maby someone with money will buy it and give it
> a proper paintjob.
>
> I do know some trails in texas, lots of mesquite...
>
>
> --
> DougW
>
"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
news:S7Aae.17577$L64.11571@okepread07...
> twaldron did pass the time by typing:
>> http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...543120497&rd=1
>
> Well, that's got to be the ugliest f-ing thing
> I've seen short of the barbie Jeep.
>
> Maby someone with money will buy it and give it
> a proper paintjob.
>
> I do know some trails in texas, lots of mesquite...
>
>
> --
> DougW
>
#60
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Well, it's not exactly CAMO paint.....
all it needs is a good coat of mud.
"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
news:S7Aae.17577$L64.11571@okepread07...
> twaldron did pass the time by typing:
>> http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...543120497&rd=1
>
> Well, that's got to be the ugliest f-ing thing
> I've seen short of the barbie Jeep.
>
> Maby someone with money will buy it and give it
> a proper paintjob.
>
> I do know some trails in texas, lots of mesquite...
>
>
> --
> DougW
>
"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
news:S7Aae.17577$L64.11571@okepread07...
> twaldron did pass the time by typing:
>> http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...543120497&rd=1
>
> Well, that's got to be the ugliest f-ing thing
> I've seen short of the barbie Jeep.
>
> Maby someone with money will buy it and give it
> a proper paintjob.
>
> I do know some trails in texas, lots of mesquite...
>
>
> --
> DougW
>