UPDATE: Fuel injection conv, can't pass smog. The final solution.
05-29-2004, 03:57 PM
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: UPDATE: Fuel injection conv, can't pass smog. The final solution.
I think the load is out of whack. Spinning a stock tire on a roller is
way different than spinning a 33 on the roller. Add mud or AT treads
and the load rises again.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> You mean you're gear so.... high you can't get to run as slow a
> fifteen miles an hour for that test?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> > "Bone P.A." wrote:
> >
> > It was the tires/wheels setup. I am running 33's on 15's. The smog
> > dyno can't compensate for that setup. So we put on stock sized
> > tires/wheels and she pass with flying colors. So what do you think of
> > that? Pass the word around. Thanks and good luck.
way different than spinning a 33 on the roller. Add mud or AT treads
and the load rises again.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> You mean you're gear so.... high you can't get to run as slow a
> fifteen miles an hour for that test?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> > "Bone P.A." wrote:
> >
> > It was the tires/wheels setup. I am running 33's on 15's. The smog
> > dyno can't compensate for that setup. So we put on stock sized
> > tires/wheels and she pass with flying colors. So what do you think of
> > that? Pass the word around. Thanks and good luck.
05-29-2004, 03:57 PM
#12
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: UPDATE: Fuel injection conv, can't pass smog. The final solution.
I think the load is out of whack. Spinning a stock tire on a roller is
way different than spinning a 33 on the roller. Add mud or AT treads
and the load rises again.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> You mean you're gear so.... high you can't get to run as slow a
> fifteen miles an hour for that test?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> > "Bone P.A." wrote:
> >
> > It was the tires/wheels setup. I am running 33's on 15's. The smog
> > dyno can't compensate for that setup. So we put on stock sized
> > tires/wheels and she pass with flying colors. So what do you think of
> > that? Pass the word around. Thanks and good luck.
way different than spinning a 33 on the roller. Add mud or AT treads
and the load rises again.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> You mean you're gear so.... high you can't get to run as slow a
> fifteen miles an hour for that test?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> > "Bone P.A." wrote:
> >
> > It was the tires/wheels setup. I am running 33's on 15's. The smog
> > dyno can't compensate for that setup. So we put on stock sized
> > tires/wheels and she pass with flying colors. So what do you think of
> > that? Pass the word around. Thanks and good luck.
05-29-2004, 03:57 PM
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: UPDATE: Fuel injection conv, can't pass smog. The final solution.
I think the load is out of whack. Spinning a stock tire on a roller is
way different than spinning a 33 on the roller. Add mud or AT treads
and the load rises again.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> You mean you're gear so.... high you can't get to run as slow a
> fifteen miles an hour for that test?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> > "Bone P.A." wrote:
> >
> > It was the tires/wheels setup. I am running 33's on 15's. The smog
> > dyno can't compensate for that setup. So we put on stock sized
> > tires/wheels and she pass with flying colors. So what do you think of
> > that? Pass the word around. Thanks and good luck.
way different than spinning a 33 on the roller. Add mud or AT treads
and the load rises again.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> You mean you're gear so.... high you can't get to run as slow a
> fifteen miles an hour for that test?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> > "Bone P.A." wrote:
> >
> > It was the tires/wheels setup. I am running 33's on 15's. The smog
> > dyno can't compensate for that setup. So we put on stock sized
> > tires/wheels and she pass with flying colors. So what do you think of
> > that? Pass the word around. Thanks and good luck.
05-29-2004, 03:58 PM
#14
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: UPDATE: Fuel injection conv, can't pass smog. The final solution.
NO. As explained to me, @25mph on their dyno they look at wheel speed not
mph or rpm. My tires is 33", sotck is less, they reference off stock. With
larger tires you have lower rev's at low rev's engine run lean puts out more
pollutants. Increase the rev less pollutants. Therefore smaller tires higher
rev's less pollutants. My gearing is only 4.10
mph or rpm. My tires is 33", sotck is less, they reference off stock. With
larger tires you have lower rev's at low rev's engine run lean puts out more
pollutants. Increase the rev less pollutants. Therefore smaller tires higher
rev's less pollutants. My gearing is only 4.10
05-29-2004, 03:58 PM
#15
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: UPDATE: Fuel injection conv, can't pass smog. The final solution.
NO. As explained to me, @25mph on their dyno they look at wheel speed not
mph or rpm. My tires is 33", sotck is less, they reference off stock. With
larger tires you have lower rev's at low rev's engine run lean puts out more
pollutants. Increase the rev less pollutants. Therefore smaller tires higher
rev's less pollutants. My gearing is only 4.10
mph or rpm. My tires is 33", sotck is less, they reference off stock. With
larger tires you have lower rev's at low rev's engine run lean puts out more
pollutants. Increase the rev less pollutants. Therefore smaller tires higher
rev's less pollutants. My gearing is only 4.10
05-29-2004, 03:58 PM
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: UPDATE: Fuel injection conv, can't pass smog. The final solution.
NO. As explained to me, @25mph on their dyno they look at wheel speed not
mph or rpm. My tires is 33", sotck is less, they reference off stock. With
larger tires you have lower rev's at low rev's engine run lean puts out more
pollutants. Increase the rev less pollutants. Therefore smaller tires higher
rev's less pollutants. My gearing is only 4.10
mph or rpm. My tires is 33", sotck is less, they reference off stock. With
larger tires you have lower rev's at low rev's engine run lean puts out more
pollutants. Increase the rev less pollutants. Therefore smaller tires higher
rev's less pollutants. My gearing is only 4.10
05-29-2004, 03:58 PM
#17
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: UPDATE: Fuel injection conv, can't pass smog. The final solution.
NO. As explained to me, @25mph on their dyno they look at wheel speed not
mph or rpm. My tires is 33", sotck is less, they reference off stock. With
larger tires you have lower rev's at low rev's engine run lean puts out more
pollutants. Increase the rev less pollutants. Therefore smaller tires higher
rev's less pollutants. My gearing is only 4.10
mph or rpm. My tires is 33", sotck is less, they reference off stock. With
larger tires you have lower rev's at low rev's engine run lean puts out more
pollutants. Increase the rev less pollutants. Therefore smaller tires higher
rev's less pollutants. My gearing is only 4.10
05-29-2004, 03:58 PM
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: UPDATE: Fuel injection conv, can't pass smog. The final solution.
Well my Bronco has 33"s on a worst 3.00 ratio and it is a little
dirtier at the slow speed, but no where near failing:
http://----------.com/smog.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Bone P.A." wrote:
>
> NO. As explained to me, @25mph on their dyno they look at wheel speed not
> mph or rpm. My tires is 33", sotck is less, they reference off stock. With
> larger tires you have lower rev's at low rev's engine run lean puts out more
> pollutants. Increase the rev less pollutants. Therefore smaller tires higher
> rev's less pollutants. My gearing is only 4.10
dirtier at the slow speed, but no where near failing:
http://----------.com/smog.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Bone P.A." wrote:
>
> NO. As explained to me, @25mph on their dyno they look at wheel speed not
> mph or rpm. My tires is 33", sotck is less, they reference off stock. With
> larger tires you have lower rev's at low rev's engine run lean puts out more
> pollutants. Increase the rev less pollutants. Therefore smaller tires higher
> rev's less pollutants. My gearing is only 4.10
05-29-2004, 03:58 PM
#19
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: UPDATE: Fuel injection conv, can't pass smog. The final solution.
Well my Bronco has 33"s on a worst 3.00 ratio and it is a little
dirtier at the slow speed, but no where near failing:
http://----------.com/smog.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Bone P.A." wrote:
>
> NO. As explained to me, @25mph on their dyno they look at wheel speed not
> mph or rpm. My tires is 33", sotck is less, they reference off stock. With
> larger tires you have lower rev's at low rev's engine run lean puts out more
> pollutants. Increase the rev less pollutants. Therefore smaller tires higher
> rev's less pollutants. My gearing is only 4.10
dirtier at the slow speed, but no where near failing:
http://----------.com/smog.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Bone P.A." wrote:
>
> NO. As explained to me, @25mph on their dyno they look at wheel speed not
> mph or rpm. My tires is 33", sotck is less, they reference off stock. With
> larger tires you have lower rev's at low rev's engine run lean puts out more
> pollutants. Increase the rev less pollutants. Therefore smaller tires higher
> rev's less pollutants. My gearing is only 4.10
05-29-2004, 03:58 PM
#20
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: UPDATE: Fuel injection conv, can't pass smog. The final solution.
Well my Bronco has 33"s on a worst 3.00 ratio and it is a little
dirtier at the slow speed, but no where near failing:
http://----------.com/smog.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Bone P.A." wrote:
>
> NO. As explained to me, @25mph on their dyno they look at wheel speed not
> mph or rpm. My tires is 33", sotck is less, they reference off stock. With
> larger tires you have lower rev's at low rev's engine run lean puts out more
> pollutants. Increase the rev less pollutants. Therefore smaller tires higher
> rev's less pollutants. My gearing is only 4.10
dirtier at the slow speed, but no where near failing:
http://----------.com/smog.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"Bone P.A." wrote:
>
> NO. As explained to me, @25mph on their dyno they look at wheel speed not
> mph or rpm. My tires is 33", sotck is less, they reference off stock. With
> larger tires you have lower rev's at low rev's engine run lean puts out more
> pollutants. Increase the rev less pollutants. Therefore smaller tires higher
> rev's less pollutants. My gearing is only 4.10