Unlimited 4 door
11-15-2006, 07:37 PM
#61
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Unlimited 4 door
The AMC I-6 was offered in the CJ's and the AMC Pacers, were they not? A
Pacer engine in a Jeep?
"Outatime" <WhoKnows@here.com> wrote in message
news:YeqdndW7R63XOcbYnZ2dnUVZ_sydnZ2d@softcom.net. ..
> I_AM_Raptor@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>> Only one thing kept me from picking one up: Lack of power.
>
> I figured as much. DC will spend 5 years playing with HP and torque
> numbers until sales drop to the point where they will either dump the
> entire line or bring back the straight-6, which ain't bloody likely in my
> lifetime.
>
> Whoever says the V-6 is a smart replacement for the I-6 is full of
> HORSEHOCKY. I was RIGHT. Mess with something that just flat-out WORKS,
> and you shoot yourself in the foot.
>
> A minivan engine in a Wrangler. Who, in their worst nightmare, could have
> ever imagined such horror. Worse, I'd bet that V-sucks is heavier than
> the I-6 as well. So much for progress. Newer ain't better.
>
Pacer engine in a Jeep?
"Outatime" <WhoKnows@here.com> wrote in message
news:YeqdndW7R63XOcbYnZ2dnUVZ_sydnZ2d@softcom.net. ..
> I_AM_Raptor@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>> Only one thing kept me from picking one up: Lack of power.
>
> I figured as much. DC will spend 5 years playing with HP and torque
> numbers until sales drop to the point where they will either dump the
> entire line or bring back the straight-6, which ain't bloody likely in my
> lifetime.
>
> Whoever says the V-6 is a smart replacement for the I-6 is full of
> HORSEHOCKY. I was RIGHT. Mess with something that just flat-out WORKS,
> and you shoot yourself in the foot.
>
> A minivan engine in a Wrangler. Who, in their worst nightmare, could have
> ever imagined such horror. Worse, I'd bet that V-sucks is heavier than
> the I-6 as well. So much for progress. Newer ain't better.
>
11-15-2006, 08:01 PM
#62
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Unlimited 4 door
Did you forget about Slick Willie and our missile technology?
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Which Bush the First worked hard to get.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Which Bush the First worked hard to get.
11-15-2006, 08:01 PM
#63
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Unlimited 4 door
Did you forget about Slick Willie and our missile technology?
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Which Bush the First worked hard to get.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Which Bush the First worked hard to get.
11-15-2006, 08:01 PM
#64
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Unlimited 4 door
Did you forget about Slick Willie and our missile technology?
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Which Bush the First worked hard to get.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Which Bush the First worked hard to get.
11-15-2006, 09:59 PM
#65
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Unlimited 4 door
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 02:11:28 GMT, Brett Ryan <bsryan@houston.rr.com>
wrote:
>Jim,
> I have no idea as to how they ride but I've seen one up close and the
>thing is BIG compared to the previous Wrangler. It is big enough to
>make a Scrambler out of if Jeep wanted to (which would be a better use
>of that wheel base than the 4 door for me).
>
>JimG wrote:
>> Unlimited Rubicon to be specific. Anyone tried one of these yet? How do
>> they ride? Do they approach (mind you I say "approach") the ride of a....
>> say Tahoe?
>>
I'd think it would be about the closest thing you'll ever get to a new
XJ, wouldn't it ('cept for the loss of the 4 litre, of course)?
Mark
'93 XJ
wrote:
>Jim,
> I have no idea as to how they ride but I've seen one up close and the
>thing is BIG compared to the previous Wrangler. It is big enough to
>make a Scrambler out of if Jeep wanted to (which would be a better use
>of that wheel base than the 4 door for me).
>
>JimG wrote:
>> Unlimited Rubicon to be specific. Anyone tried one of these yet? How do
>> they ride? Do they approach (mind you I say "approach") the ride of a....
>> say Tahoe?
>>
I'd think it would be about the closest thing you'll ever get to a new
XJ, wouldn't it ('cept for the loss of the 4 litre, of course)?
Mark
'93 XJ
11-15-2006, 09:59 PM
#66
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Unlimited 4 door
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 02:11:28 GMT, Brett Ryan <bsryan@houston.rr.com>
wrote:
>Jim,
> I have no idea as to how they ride but I've seen one up close and the
>thing is BIG compared to the previous Wrangler. It is big enough to
>make a Scrambler out of if Jeep wanted to (which would be a better use
>of that wheel base than the 4 door for me).
>
>JimG wrote:
>> Unlimited Rubicon to be specific. Anyone tried one of these yet? How do
>> they ride? Do they approach (mind you I say "approach") the ride of a....
>> say Tahoe?
>>
I'd think it would be about the closest thing you'll ever get to a new
XJ, wouldn't it ('cept for the loss of the 4 litre, of course)?
Mark
'93 XJ
wrote:
>Jim,
> I have no idea as to how they ride but I've seen one up close and the
>thing is BIG compared to the previous Wrangler. It is big enough to
>make a Scrambler out of if Jeep wanted to (which would be a better use
>of that wheel base than the 4 door for me).
>
>JimG wrote:
>> Unlimited Rubicon to be specific. Anyone tried one of these yet? How do
>> they ride? Do they approach (mind you I say "approach") the ride of a....
>> say Tahoe?
>>
I'd think it would be about the closest thing you'll ever get to a new
XJ, wouldn't it ('cept for the loss of the 4 litre, of course)?
Mark
'93 XJ
11-15-2006, 09:59 PM
#67
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Unlimited 4 door
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 02:11:28 GMT, Brett Ryan <bsryan@houston.rr.com>
wrote:
>Jim,
> I have no idea as to how they ride but I've seen one up close and the
>thing is BIG compared to the previous Wrangler. It is big enough to
>make a Scrambler out of if Jeep wanted to (which would be a better use
>of that wheel base than the 4 door for me).
>
>JimG wrote:
>> Unlimited Rubicon to be specific. Anyone tried one of these yet? How do
>> they ride? Do they approach (mind you I say "approach") the ride of a....
>> say Tahoe?
>>
I'd think it would be about the closest thing you'll ever get to a new
XJ, wouldn't it ('cept for the loss of the 4 litre, of course)?
Mark
'93 XJ
wrote:
>Jim,
> I have no idea as to how they ride but I've seen one up close and the
>thing is BIG compared to the previous Wrangler. It is big enough to
>make a Scrambler out of if Jeep wanted to (which would be a better use
>of that wheel base than the 4 door for me).
>
>JimG wrote:
>> Unlimited Rubicon to be specific. Anyone tried one of these yet? How do
>> they ride? Do they approach (mind you I say "approach") the ride of a....
>> say Tahoe?
>>
I'd think it would be about the closest thing you'll ever get to a new
XJ, wouldn't it ('cept for the loss of the 4 litre, of course)?
Mark
'93 XJ
11-15-2006, 10:07 PM
#68
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Unlimited 4 door
It was in a Jeep before it was in a Pacer, so you could say it was a
Jeep engine in a Pacer <G>.
Although actually it's roots go a LONG way back as a Nash/Rambler
engine, and a great engine it is.
Guys correct me if I'm wrong, but if I were to do something stupid like
trade my XJ in for the nearest equivalent Liberty wouldn't I get
something heavier, slower, with worse gas mileage, lower reliability,
and of course a REALLY big hole in my bank account?
Jeff DeWitt
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> The AMC I-6 was offered in the CJ's and the AMC Pacers, were they not? A
> Pacer engine in a Jeep?
>
> "Outatime" <WhoKnows@here.com> wrote in message
> news:YeqdndW7R63XOcbYnZ2dnUVZ_sydnZ2d@softcom.net. ..
>
>>I_AM_Raptor@hotmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Only one thing kept me from picking one up: Lack of power.
>>
>>I figured as much. DC will spend 5 years playing with HP and torque
>>numbers until sales drop to the point where they will either dump the
>>entire line or bring back the straight-6, which ain't bloody likely in my
>>lifetime.
>>
>>Whoever says the V-6 is a smart replacement for the I-6 is full of
>>HORSEHOCKY. I was RIGHT. Mess with something that just flat-out WORKS,
>>and you shoot yourself in the foot.
>>
>>A minivan engine in a Wrangler. Who, in their worst nightmare, could have
>>ever imagined such horror. Worse, I'd bet that V-sucks is heavier than
>>the I-6 as well. So much for progress. Newer ain't better.
>>
>
>
>
Jeep engine in a Pacer <G>.
Although actually it's roots go a LONG way back as a Nash/Rambler
engine, and a great engine it is.
Guys correct me if I'm wrong, but if I were to do something stupid like
trade my XJ in for the nearest equivalent Liberty wouldn't I get
something heavier, slower, with worse gas mileage, lower reliability,
and of course a REALLY big hole in my bank account?
Jeff DeWitt
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> The AMC I-6 was offered in the CJ's and the AMC Pacers, were they not? A
> Pacer engine in a Jeep?
>
> "Outatime" <WhoKnows@here.com> wrote in message
> news:YeqdndW7R63XOcbYnZ2dnUVZ_sydnZ2d@softcom.net. ..
>
>>I_AM_Raptor@hotmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Only one thing kept me from picking one up: Lack of power.
>>
>>I figured as much. DC will spend 5 years playing with HP and torque
>>numbers until sales drop to the point where they will either dump the
>>entire line or bring back the straight-6, which ain't bloody likely in my
>>lifetime.
>>
>>Whoever says the V-6 is a smart replacement for the I-6 is full of
>>HORSEHOCKY. I was RIGHT. Mess with something that just flat-out WORKS,
>>and you shoot yourself in the foot.
>>
>>A minivan engine in a Wrangler. Who, in their worst nightmare, could have
>>ever imagined such horror. Worse, I'd bet that V-sucks is heavier than
>>the I-6 as well. So much for progress. Newer ain't better.
>>
>
>
>
11-15-2006, 10:07 PM
#69
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Unlimited 4 door
It was in a Jeep before it was in a Pacer, so you could say it was a
Jeep engine in a Pacer <G>.
Although actually it's roots go a LONG way back as a Nash/Rambler
engine, and a great engine it is.
Guys correct me if I'm wrong, but if I were to do something stupid like
trade my XJ in for the nearest equivalent Liberty wouldn't I get
something heavier, slower, with worse gas mileage, lower reliability,
and of course a REALLY big hole in my bank account?
Jeff DeWitt
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> The AMC I-6 was offered in the CJ's and the AMC Pacers, were they not? A
> Pacer engine in a Jeep?
>
> "Outatime" <WhoKnows@here.com> wrote in message
> news:YeqdndW7R63XOcbYnZ2dnUVZ_sydnZ2d@softcom.net. ..
>
>>I_AM_Raptor@hotmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Only one thing kept me from picking one up: Lack of power.
>>
>>I figured as much. DC will spend 5 years playing with HP and torque
>>numbers until sales drop to the point where they will either dump the
>>entire line or bring back the straight-6, which ain't bloody likely in my
>>lifetime.
>>
>>Whoever says the V-6 is a smart replacement for the I-6 is full of
>>HORSEHOCKY. I was RIGHT. Mess with something that just flat-out WORKS,
>>and you shoot yourself in the foot.
>>
>>A minivan engine in a Wrangler. Who, in their worst nightmare, could have
>>ever imagined such horror. Worse, I'd bet that V-sucks is heavier than
>>the I-6 as well. So much for progress. Newer ain't better.
>>
>
>
>
Jeep engine in a Pacer <G>.
Although actually it's roots go a LONG way back as a Nash/Rambler
engine, and a great engine it is.
Guys correct me if I'm wrong, but if I were to do something stupid like
trade my XJ in for the nearest equivalent Liberty wouldn't I get
something heavier, slower, with worse gas mileage, lower reliability,
and of course a REALLY big hole in my bank account?
Jeff DeWitt
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> The AMC I-6 was offered in the CJ's and the AMC Pacers, were they not? A
> Pacer engine in a Jeep?
>
> "Outatime" <WhoKnows@here.com> wrote in message
> news:YeqdndW7R63XOcbYnZ2dnUVZ_sydnZ2d@softcom.net. ..
>
>>I_AM_Raptor@hotmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Only one thing kept me from picking one up: Lack of power.
>>
>>I figured as much. DC will spend 5 years playing with HP and torque
>>numbers until sales drop to the point where they will either dump the
>>entire line or bring back the straight-6, which ain't bloody likely in my
>>lifetime.
>>
>>Whoever says the V-6 is a smart replacement for the I-6 is full of
>>HORSEHOCKY. I was RIGHT. Mess with something that just flat-out WORKS,
>>and you shoot yourself in the foot.
>>
>>A minivan engine in a Wrangler. Who, in their worst nightmare, could have
>>ever imagined such horror. Worse, I'd bet that V-sucks is heavier than
>>the I-6 as well. So much for progress. Newer ain't better.
>>
>
>
>
11-15-2006, 10:07 PM
#70
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Unlimited 4 door
It was in a Jeep before it was in a Pacer, so you could say it was a
Jeep engine in a Pacer <G>.
Although actually it's roots go a LONG way back as a Nash/Rambler
engine, and a great engine it is.
Guys correct me if I'm wrong, but if I were to do something stupid like
trade my XJ in for the nearest equivalent Liberty wouldn't I get
something heavier, slower, with worse gas mileage, lower reliability,
and of course a REALLY big hole in my bank account?
Jeff DeWitt
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> The AMC I-6 was offered in the CJ's and the AMC Pacers, were they not? A
> Pacer engine in a Jeep?
>
> "Outatime" <WhoKnows@here.com> wrote in message
> news:YeqdndW7R63XOcbYnZ2dnUVZ_sydnZ2d@softcom.net. ..
>
>>I_AM_Raptor@hotmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Only one thing kept me from picking one up: Lack of power.
>>
>>I figured as much. DC will spend 5 years playing with HP and torque
>>numbers until sales drop to the point where they will either dump the
>>entire line or bring back the straight-6, which ain't bloody likely in my
>>lifetime.
>>
>>Whoever says the V-6 is a smart replacement for the I-6 is full of
>>HORSEHOCKY. I was RIGHT. Mess with something that just flat-out WORKS,
>>and you shoot yourself in the foot.
>>
>>A minivan engine in a Wrangler. Who, in their worst nightmare, could have
>>ever imagined such horror. Worse, I'd bet that V-sucks is heavier than
>>the I-6 as well. So much for progress. Newer ain't better.
>>
>
>
>
Jeep engine in a Pacer <G>.
Although actually it's roots go a LONG way back as a Nash/Rambler
engine, and a great engine it is.
Guys correct me if I'm wrong, but if I were to do something stupid like
trade my XJ in for the nearest equivalent Liberty wouldn't I get
something heavier, slower, with worse gas mileage, lower reliability,
and of course a REALLY big hole in my bank account?
Jeff DeWitt
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> The AMC I-6 was offered in the CJ's and the AMC Pacers, were they not? A
> Pacer engine in a Jeep?
>
> "Outatime" <WhoKnows@here.com> wrote in message
> news:YeqdndW7R63XOcbYnZ2dnUVZ_sydnZ2d@softcom.net. ..
>
>>I_AM_Raptor@hotmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Only one thing kept me from picking one up: Lack of power.
>>
>>I figured as much. DC will spend 5 years playing with HP and torque
>>numbers until sales drop to the point where they will either dump the
>>entire line or bring back the straight-6, which ain't bloody likely in my
>>lifetime.
>>
>>Whoever says the V-6 is a smart replacement for the I-6 is full of
>>HORSEHOCKY. I was RIGHT. Mess with something that just flat-out WORKS,
>>and you shoot yourself in the foot.
>>
>>A minivan engine in a Wrangler. Who, in their worst nightmare, could have
>>ever imagined such horror. Worse, I'd bet that V-sucks is heavier than
>>the I-6 as well. So much for progress. Newer ain't better.
>>
>
>
>
