Outatime wrote:
> Two points here:
>
> 1. I don't watch TV. My display is attached only to my DVD player.
>
> 2. I don't watch TV is because of its delusionary nature.
>
> "Meeting" a quality female isn't the same as "meeting" one on TV.

Wow aren't you the grizzled one. let me address your 2 points:

1. I don't care, and didn't ask for you to share your peculiarities with
us, I was being conversational. I don't think it merited the abrasive
reply.

2. Again who really cares? You have some sort of television OCD, that's
great for you, I'm glad you're proud enough of this to share it twice.

"Meeting" that's more like 3 points, and BTW "quality female" is
something you might say as you're looking a horse in the mouth... I can
just picture it, mountain man type, red flannel shirt, more facial hair
than face, "yessum, that right thar's grade A quality female".

--
Simon
"I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein

 

Outatime wrote:
> Two points here:
>
> 1. I don't watch TV. My display is attached only to my DVD player.
>
> 2. I don't watch TV is because of its delusionary nature.
>
> "Meeting" a quality female isn't the same as "meeting" one on TV.

Wow aren't you the grizzled one. let me address your 2 points:

1. I don't care, and didn't ask for you to share your peculiarities with
us, I was being conversational. I don't think it merited the abrasive
reply.

2. Again who really cares? You have some sort of television OCD, that's
great for you, I'm glad you're proud enough of this to share it twice.

"Meeting" that's more like 3 points, and BTW "quality female" is
something you might say as you're looking a horse in the mouth... I can
just picture it, mountain man type, red flannel shirt, more facial hair
than face, "yessum, that right thar's grade A quality female".

--
Simon
"I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein