L.Mayan

Thanks very much for the link, Bill. Great info.

God bless America and you, too.

Larry


"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:3F957BD2.A8E59385@***.net...
> http://mywebpages.comcast.net/jjacob...faq.htm#np_229
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> "L.Mayan" wrote:
> >
> > I need a new transfer case for my '85 Jeep Wagoneer. Mine is a New
Process
> > Gear Model 229 AM, ***'y.No. 89530 00159, Serial No. 1 23 86 1, Ratio
261.
> >
> > Can I use a Model 228 AM, ***'y.No. 89530 03970, Serial No. 7 1 85 2,
Ratio
> > 261 as a replacement.
> >
> > What is the difference between the 228 AM and 229 AM models?
> >
> > Thank you for any advice you can offer.
> >
> > Larry

L.Mayan

Thanks very much for the link, Bill. Great info.

God bless America and you, too.

Larry


"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:3F957BD2.A8E59385@***.net...
> http://mywebpages.comcast.net/jjacob...faq.htm#np_229
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> "L.Mayan" wrote:
> >
> > I need a new transfer case for my '85 Jeep Wagoneer. Mine is a New
Process
> > Gear Model 229 AM, ***'y.No. 89530 00159, Serial No. 1 23 86 1, Ratio
261.
> >
> > Can I use a Model 228 AM, ***'y.No. 89530 03970, Serial No. 7 1 85 2,
Ratio
> > 261 as a replacement.
> >
> > What is the difference between the 228 AM and 229 AM models?
> >
> > Thank you for any advice you can offer.
> >
> > Larry

L.Mayan

Thanks very much for the link, Bill. Great info.

God bless America and you, too.

Larry


"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:3F957BD2.A8E59385@***.net...
> http://mywebpages.comcast.net/jjacob...faq.htm#np_229
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> "L.Mayan" wrote:
> >
> > I need a new transfer case for my '85 Jeep Wagoneer. Mine is a New
Process
> > Gear Model 229 AM, ***'y.No. 89530 00159, Serial No. 1 23 86 1, Ratio
261.
> >
> > Can I use a Model 228 AM, ***'y.No. 89530 03970, Serial No. 7 1 85 2,
Ratio
> > 261 as a replacement.
> >
> > What is the difference between the 228 AM and 229 AM models?
> >
> > Thank you for any advice you can offer.
> >
> > Larry

Kevin Sperle

I have a guy deciding if he wants it right now, but I think he's gonna pass.
He was talking about putting it in a CJ behind a 360/727 combo. I'm
guessing he's gonna come to the realization that the 229 is just TOO big to
put in a CJ. If you're interested I'll give him one more day to get back to
me otherwise you can have it.

I was originally asking $150, I have since lowered it to $100 just to get it
out of my garage. It came from a GW we parted out. We verified that it
worked before removing it, but other than that I don't know much about it's
condition or # of miles on it.

I even have it crated up and ready to ship (I lost a previous buyer at the
last minute). I have pictures etc..

Let me know.

It is located in 81503 and I bet it weighs about 100 pounds (with the crate)
if you wanna look at shipping costs.

"L.Mayan" <simplelife8@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:38ilb.9830$Ec1.888914@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> Thanks very much for the info, Kevin. Also, what kind of deal can I get on
> your 229?
>
> Thank you again.
> Larry
>
>
> "Kevin Sperle" <ksperle@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1Nblb.1088$Yp5.7177@news.uswest.net...
> > As far as I have read, the 228/229 are a direct swap. The main
difference
> > is that the 228 does not use a vicious coupler like the 229. Some
people
> > see that as an advantage (no special fluid inside the vicous coupler),
> some
> > people say it's a downgrade (229 is a limited slip T/C). Depends who
you
> > want to beleive. Try a google search there's info out there, but it is
> not
> > the easiest to find. I had some info saved, but I think I deleteed it
> when
> > I cleaned out emails reacently.
> >
> > Best bet is to try the forums at www.ifsja.org. If you ask someone
there
> > they can explain it better than I.
> >
> > Let me know if you need decide to stay with the 229. I just happen to
be
> > selling one cheap.
> >
> > "L.Mayan" <simplelife8@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
> > news:ID8lb.187801$0v4.14510450@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> > > I need a new transfer case for my '85 Jeep Wagoneer. Mine is a New
> Process
> > > Gear Model 229 AM, ***'y.No. 89530 00159, Serial No. 1 23 86 1, Ratio
> 261.
> > >
> > > Can I use a Model 228 AM, ***'y.No. 89530 03970, Serial No. 7 1 85 2,
> > Ratio
> > > 261 as a replacement.
> > >
> > > What is the difference between the 228 AM and 229 AM models?
> > >
> > > Thank you for any advice you can offer.
> > >
> > > Larry
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

Kevin Sperle

I have a guy deciding if he wants it right now, but I think he's gonna pass.
He was talking about putting it in a CJ behind a 360/727 combo. I'm
guessing he's gonna come to the realization that the 229 is just TOO big to
put in a CJ. If you're interested I'll give him one more day to get back to
me otherwise you can have it.

I was originally asking $150, I have since lowered it to $100 just to get it
out of my garage. It came from a GW we parted out. We verified that it
worked before removing it, but other than that I don't know much about it's
condition or # of miles on it.

I even have it crated up and ready to ship (I lost a previous buyer at the
last minute). I have pictures etc..

Let me know.

It is located in 81503 and I bet it weighs about 100 pounds (with the crate)
if you wanna look at shipping costs.

"L.Mayan" <simplelife8@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:38ilb.9830$Ec1.888914@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> Thanks very much for the info, Kevin. Also, what kind of deal can I get on
> your 229?
>
> Thank you again.
> Larry
>
>
> "Kevin Sperle" <ksperle@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1Nblb.1088$Yp5.7177@news.uswest.net...
> > As far as I have read, the 228/229 are a direct swap. The main
difference
> > is that the 228 does not use a vicious coupler like the 229. Some
people
> > see that as an advantage (no special fluid inside the vicous coupler),
> some
> > people say it's a downgrade (229 is a limited slip T/C). Depends who
you
> > want to beleive. Try a google search there's info out there, but it is
> not
> > the easiest to find. I had some info saved, but I think I deleteed it
> when
> > I cleaned out emails reacently.
> >
> > Best bet is to try the forums at www.ifsja.org. If you ask someone
there
> > they can explain it better than I.
> >
> > Let me know if you need decide to stay with the 229. I just happen to
be
> > selling one cheap.
> >
> > "L.Mayan" <simplelife8@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
> > news:ID8lb.187801$0v4.14510450@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> > > I need a new transfer case for my '85 Jeep Wagoneer. Mine is a New
> Process
> > > Gear Model 229 AM, ***'y.No. 89530 00159, Serial No. 1 23 86 1, Ratio
> 261.
> > >
> > > Can I use a Model 228 AM, ***'y.No. 89530 03970, Serial No. 7 1 85 2,
> > Ratio
> > > 261 as a replacement.
> > >
> > > What is the difference between the 228 AM and 229 AM models?
> > >
> > > Thank you for any advice you can offer.
> > >
> > > Larry
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

Kevin Sperle

I have a guy deciding if he wants it right now, but I think he's gonna pass.
He was talking about putting it in a CJ behind a 360/727 combo. I'm
guessing he's gonna come to the realization that the 229 is just TOO big to
put in a CJ. If you're interested I'll give him one more day to get back to
me otherwise you can have it.

I was originally asking $150, I have since lowered it to $100 just to get it
out of my garage. It came from a GW we parted out. We verified that it
worked before removing it, but other than that I don't know much about it's
condition or # of miles on it.

I even have it crated up and ready to ship (I lost a previous buyer at the
last minute). I have pictures etc..

Let me know.

It is located in 81503 and I bet it weighs about 100 pounds (with the crate)
if you wanna look at shipping costs.

"L.Mayan" <simplelife8@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:38ilb.9830$Ec1.888914@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> Thanks very much for the info, Kevin. Also, what kind of deal can I get on
> your 229?
>
> Thank you again.
> Larry
>
>
> "Kevin Sperle" <ksperle@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1Nblb.1088$Yp5.7177@news.uswest.net...
> > As far as I have read, the 228/229 are a direct swap. The main
difference
> > is that the 228 does not use a vicious coupler like the 229. Some
people
> > see that as an advantage (no special fluid inside the vicous coupler),
> some
> > people say it's a downgrade (229 is a limited slip T/C). Depends who
you
> > want to beleive. Try a google search there's info out there, but it is
> not
> > the easiest to find. I had some info saved, but I think I deleteed it
> when
> > I cleaned out emails reacently.
> >
> > Best bet is to try the forums at www.ifsja.org. If you ask someone
there
> > they can explain it better than I.
> >
> > Let me know if you need decide to stay with the 229. I just happen to
be
> > selling one cheap.
> >
> > "L.Mayan" <simplelife8@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
> > news:ID8lb.187801$0v4.14510450@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> > > I need a new transfer case for my '85 Jeep Wagoneer. Mine is a New
> Process
> > > Gear Model 229 AM, ***'y.No. 89530 00159, Serial No. 1 23 86 1, Ratio
> 261.
> > >
> > > Can I use a Model 228 AM, ***'y.No. 89530 03970, Serial No. 7 1 85 2,
> > Ratio
> > > 261 as a replacement.
> > >
> > > What is the difference between the 228 AM and 229 AM models?
> > >
> > > Thank you for any advice you can offer.
> > >
> > > Larry
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

L.Mayan

Thanks, Kevin. Let me know about the guy who's still deciding. I checked UPS
and from your Zip to mine (19953), 100 lbs. in a 24"x24"x24" crate costs
about $75 to ship via UPS Ground. I'll give this deal some serious
thought...


"Kevin Sperle" <ksperle@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:LNilb.142$wQ1.136673@news.uswest.net...
> I have a guy deciding if he wants it right now, but I think he's gonna
pass.
> He was talking about putting it in a CJ behind a 360/727 combo. I'm
> guessing he's gonna come to the realization that the 229 is just TOO big
to
> put in a CJ. If you're interested I'll give him one more day to get back
to
> me otherwise you can have it.
>
> I was originally asking $150, I have since lowered it to $100 just to get
it
> out of my garage. It came from a GW we parted out. We verified that it
> worked before removing it, but other than that I don't know much about
it's
> condition or # of miles on it.
>
> I even have it crated up and ready to ship (I lost a previous buyer at the
> last minute). I have pictures etc..
>
> Let me know.
>
> It is located in 81503 and I bet it weighs about 100 pounds (with the
crate)
> if you wanna look at shipping costs.
>
> "L.Mayan" <simplelife8@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
> news:38ilb.9830$Ec1.888914@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> > Thanks very much for the info, Kevin. Also, what kind of deal can I get
on
> > your 229?
> >
> > Thank you again.
> > Larry
> >
> >
> > "Kevin Sperle" <ksperle@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:1Nblb.1088$Yp5.7177@news.uswest.net...
> > > As far as I have read, the 228/229 are a direct swap. The main
> difference
> > > is that the 228 does not use a vicious coupler like the 229. Some
> people
> > > see that as an advantage (no special fluid inside the vicous coupler),
> > some
> > > people say it's a downgrade (229 is a limited slip T/C). Depends who
> you
> > > want to beleive. Try a google search there's info out there, but it
is
> > not
> > > the easiest to find. I had some info saved, but I think I deleteed it
> > when
> > > I cleaned out emails reacently.
> > >
> > > Best bet is to try the forums at www.ifsja.org. If you ask someone
> there
> > > they can explain it better than I.
> > >
> > > Let me know if you need decide to stay with the 229. I just happen to
> be
> > > selling one cheap.
> > >
> > > "L.Mayan" <simplelife8@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
> > > news:ID8lb.187801$0v4.14510450@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> > > > I need a new transfer case for my '85 Jeep Wagoneer. Mine is a New
> > Process
> > > > Gear Model 229 AM, ***'y.No. 89530 00159, Serial No. 1 23 86 1,
Ratio
> > 261.
> > > >
> > > > Can I use a Model 228 AM, ***'y.No. 89530 03970, Serial No. 7 1 85
2,
> > > Ratio
> > > > 261 as a replacement.
> > > >
> > > > What is the difference between the 228 AM and 229 AM models?
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for any advice you can offer.
> > > >
> > > > Larry
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

L.Mayan

Thanks, Kevin. Let me know about the guy who's still deciding. I checked UPS
and from your Zip to mine (19953), 100 lbs. in a 24"x24"x24" crate costs
about $75 to ship via UPS Ground. I'll give this deal some serious
thought...


"Kevin Sperle" <ksperle@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:LNilb.142$wQ1.136673@news.uswest.net...
> I have a guy deciding if he wants it right now, but I think he's gonna
pass.
> He was talking about putting it in a CJ behind a 360/727 combo. I'm
> guessing he's gonna come to the realization that the 229 is just TOO big
to
> put in a CJ. If you're interested I'll give him one more day to get back
to
> me otherwise you can have it.
>
> I was originally asking $150, I have since lowered it to $100 just to get
it
> out of my garage. It came from a GW we parted out. We verified that it
> worked before removing it, but other than that I don't know much about
it's
> condition or # of miles on it.
>
> I even have it crated up and ready to ship (I lost a previous buyer at the
> last minute). I have pictures etc..
>
> Let me know.
>
> It is located in 81503 and I bet it weighs about 100 pounds (with the
crate)
> if you wanna look at shipping costs.
>
> "L.Mayan" <simplelife8@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
> news:38ilb.9830$Ec1.888914@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> > Thanks very much for the info, Kevin. Also, what kind of deal can I get
on
> > your 229?
> >
> > Thank you again.
> > Larry
> >
> >
> > "Kevin Sperle" <ksperle@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:1Nblb.1088$Yp5.7177@news.uswest.net...
> > > As far as I have read, the 228/229 are a direct swap. The main
> difference
> > > is that the 228 does not use a vicious coupler like the 229. Some
> people
> > > see that as an advantage (no special fluid inside the vicous coupler),
> > some
> > > people say it's a downgrade (229 is a limited slip T/C). Depends who
> you
> > > want to beleive. Try a google search there's info out there, but it
is
> > not
> > > the easiest to find. I had some info saved, but I think I deleteed it
> > when
> > > I cleaned out emails reacently.
> > >
> > > Best bet is to try the forums at www.ifsja.org. If you ask someone
> there
> > > they can explain it better than I.
> > >
> > > Let me know if you need decide to stay with the 229. I just happen to
> be
> > > selling one cheap.
> > >
> > > "L.Mayan" <simplelife8@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
> > > news:ID8lb.187801$0v4.14510450@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> > > > I need a new transfer case for my '85 Jeep Wagoneer. Mine is a New
> > Process
> > > > Gear Model 229 AM, ***'y.No. 89530 00159, Serial No. 1 23 86 1,
Ratio
> > 261.
> > > >
> > > > Can I use a Model 228 AM, ***'y.No. 89530 03970, Serial No. 7 1 85
2,
> > > Ratio
> > > > 261 as a replacement.
> > > >
> > > > What is the difference between the 228 AM and 229 AM models?
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for any advice you can offer.
> > > >
> > > > Larry
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

L.Mayan

Thanks, Kevin. Let me know about the guy who's still deciding. I checked UPS
and from your Zip to mine (19953), 100 lbs. in a 24"x24"x24" crate costs
about $75 to ship via UPS Ground. I'll give this deal some serious
thought...


"Kevin Sperle" <ksperle@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:LNilb.142$wQ1.136673@news.uswest.net...
> I have a guy deciding if he wants it right now, but I think he's gonna
pass.
> He was talking about putting it in a CJ behind a 360/727 combo. I'm
> guessing he's gonna come to the realization that the 229 is just TOO big
to
> put in a CJ. If you're interested I'll give him one more day to get back
to
> me otherwise you can have it.
>
> I was originally asking $150, I have since lowered it to $100 just to get
it
> out of my garage. It came from a GW we parted out. We verified that it
> worked before removing it, but other than that I don't know much about
it's
> condition or # of miles on it.
>
> I even have it crated up and ready to ship (I lost a previous buyer at the
> last minute). I have pictures etc..
>
> Let me know.
>
> It is located in 81503 and I bet it weighs about 100 pounds (with the
crate)
> if you wanna look at shipping costs.
>
> "L.Mayan" <simplelife8@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
> news:38ilb.9830$Ec1.888914@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> > Thanks very much for the info, Kevin. Also, what kind of deal can I get
on
> > your 229?
> >
> > Thank you again.
> > Larry
> >
> >
> > "Kevin Sperle" <ksperle@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:1Nblb.1088$Yp5.7177@news.uswest.net...
> > > As far as I have read, the 228/229 are a direct swap. The main
> difference
> > > is that the 228 does not use a vicious coupler like the 229. Some
> people
> > > see that as an advantage (no special fluid inside the vicous coupler),
> > some
> > > people say it's a downgrade (229 is a limited slip T/C). Depends who
> you
> > > want to beleive. Try a google search there's info out there, but it
is
> > not
> > > the easiest to find. I had some info saved, but I think I deleteed it
> > when
> > > I cleaned out emails reacently.
> > >
> > > Best bet is to try the forums at www.ifsja.org. If you ask someone
> there
> > > they can explain it better than I.
> > >
> > > Let me know if you need decide to stay with the 229. I just happen to
> be
> > > selling one cheap.
> > >
> > > "L.Mayan" <simplelife8@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
> > > news:ID8lb.187801$0v4.14510450@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> > > > I need a new transfer case for my '85 Jeep Wagoneer. Mine is a New
> > Process
> > > > Gear Model 229 AM, ***'y.No. 89530 00159, Serial No. 1 23 86 1,
Ratio
> > 261.
> > > >
> > > > Can I use a Model 228 AM, ***'y.No. 89530 03970, Serial No. 7 1 85
2,
> > > Ratio
> > > > 261 as a replacement.
> > > >
> > > > What is the difference between the 228 AM and 229 AM models?
> > > >
> > > > Thank you for any advice you can offer.
> > > >
> > > > Larry
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>

Kevin Sperle

I think you can get even cheaper through FedEx freight. I'd have to call
them an ask though. You might have to have a FedEx freight facility in your
general are though.

This is what FedEx freight came back with on your zip code

Requested location 19953
Service center FED
FEDERALSBURG
4810 WILLIAMSBURG ROAD
HURLOCK , MD 21643
Local:
Phone: 1.888.893.0005
Fax: 1.410.943.8533
Manager: DEXTER MAXWELL

"L.Mayan" <simplelife8@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:ivjlb.9915$Ec1.897880@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> Thanks, Kevin. Let me know about the guy who's still deciding. I checked
UPS
> and from your Zip to mine (19953), 100 lbs. in a 24"x24"x24" crate costs
> about $75 to ship via UPS Ground. I'll give this deal some serious
> thought...
>
>
> "Kevin Sperle" <ksperle@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:LNilb.142$wQ1.136673@news.uswest.net...
> > I have a guy deciding if he wants it right now, but I think he's gonna
> pass.
> > He was talking about putting it in a CJ behind a 360/727 combo. I'm
> > guessing he's gonna come to the realization that the 229 is just TOO big
> to
> > put in a CJ. If you're interested I'll give him one more day to get
back
> to
> > me otherwise you can have it.
> >
> > I was originally asking $150, I have since lowered it to $100 just to
get
> it
> > out of my garage. It came from a GW we parted out. We verified that it
> > worked before removing it, but other than that I don't know much about
> it's
> > condition or # of miles on it.
> >
> > I even have it crated up and ready to ship (I lost a previous buyer at
the
> > last minute). I have pictures etc..
> >
> > Let me know.
> >
> > It is located in 81503 and I bet it weighs about 100 pounds (with the
> crate)
> > if you wanna look at shipping costs.
> >
> > "L.Mayan" <simplelife8@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
> > news:38ilb.9830$Ec1.888914@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> > > Thanks very much for the info, Kevin. Also, what kind of deal can I
get
> on
> > > your 229?
> > >
> > > Thank you again.
> > > Larry
> > >
> > >
> > > "Kevin Sperle" <ksperle@nospam.hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > > news:1Nblb.1088$Yp5.7177@news.uswest.net...
> > > > As far as I have read, the 228/229 are a direct swap. The main
> > difference
> > > > is that the 228 does not use a vicious coupler like the 229. Some
> > people
> > > > see that as an advantage (no special fluid inside the vicous
coupler),
> > > some
> > > > people say it's a downgrade (229 is a limited slip T/C). Depends
who
> > you
> > > > want to beleive. Try a google search there's info out there, but it
> is
> > > not
> > > > the easiest to find. I had some info saved, but I think I deleteed
it
> > > when
> > > > I cleaned out emails reacently.
> > > >
> > > > Best bet is to try the forums at www.ifsja.org. If you ask someone
> > there
> > > > they can explain it better than I.
> > > >
> > > > Let me know if you need decide to stay with the 229. I just happen
to
> > be
> > > > selling one cheap.
> > > >
> > > > "L.Mayan" <simplelife8@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
> > > > news:ID8lb.187801$0v4.14510450@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> > > > > I need a new transfer case for my '85 Jeep Wagoneer. Mine is a New
> > > Process
> > > > > Gear Model 229 AM, ***'y.No. 89530 00159, Serial No. 1 23 86 1,
> Ratio
> > > 261.
> > > > >
> > > > > Can I use a Model 228 AM, ***'y.No. 89530 03970, Serial No. 7 1 85
> 2,
> > > > Ratio
> > > > > 261 as a replacement.
> > > > >
> > > > > What is the difference between the 228 AM and 229 AM models?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you for any advice you can offer.
> > > > >
> > > > > Larry
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>