|
Re: Trail(er) trash and Nature Nazis
Tis why they made rocksalt & shotguns?
Troy |
Re: Trail(er) trash and Nature Nazis
Tis why they made rocksalt & shotguns?
Troy |
Re: Trail(er) trash and Nature Nazis
The Nazi's were the "National Socialist German Workers Party", which is
hardly far right! Jeff DeWitt R. Lander wrote: > I replied to your Limbaugh-script comments using my original subject > header, not your altered one. > > You forget that the Nazis were far-right punks with no respect for > "lower life forms." They shared traits with modern right-wingers who > think nature should yield at will beneath their Jeep tires. Don't > pretend you're operating on some higher moral plain with all your lies > about endless frontiers. > > R. Lander > > Corey Shuman wrote: > >>Nice agenda, but complete --------. Sorry, but Id like to see any proof >>of this other than just your unsubstantiated ramblings. >>Maybe you should define what you think an enviromentalist is, because >>if you are talking about your average hippie hiker, out on his bike or >>walking through the trails they leave more impact than the average 4wd >>trail rider. Powerbar wrappers, feces and "biodegradable" toilet paper >>to name a few, oh and the ability to turn an area upside down to >>accomodate their extended camping stays. >> >>But since you are on a roll, lets explore your extremely flawed logic. >>The "Conquer Nature" mentality is the reason you even have these spots >>to enjoy. Mining companys, prospectors and railroad companys were out >>here not to conquer nature but to make a living from it and make it a >>livable space at the same time. This land is our land, not yours not >>ours, but OUR land collectively, that means that what may be fun to >>some is not fun to other but you tolerate or are at least respectful to >>each other. >> >>Since you have so much to say about this, I assume that you have >>positioned yourself to do something about it though, right. You are out >>every weekend cleaning up the trails and organizing groups to monitor >>the land, right? Id be willing to be not. You know the history and >>geography of the lands you visit and leave them in a better state than >>when you arrived. Right? >> >>Sorry, but you just really have no clue as to what you are talking >>about here. There is plenty of wild frontier, unexplored canyons, >>mountains and valleys. But you have to be motivated to get out there >>and usually it is the offroader who has that drive and sense of >>adventure. The average enviromentalist waits for an area to be opened >>up, then wanders in and says it should be closed to the very same >>people who found it. Great logic, if it wasnt for the explorers you >>guys wouldnt have any areas to whine about. >> >>So keep this kind of unsubstatiated BS on the SUWA and other >>short-sighted groups sites, cause it holds no water here. >> >>Sincerely, >> >>Corey T. Shuman >>cshuman@goldrushexepeditions.com >>www.goldrushexpeditions.com >> >>R. Lander wrote: >> >>>The "respect" for nature shown by offroad enthusiasts is documented by >>>all the cans, bottles and wrappers they toss on scenic trails. The >>>Rubicon near Lake Tahoe shows how these anthropocentric mouth-breathers >>>view the land. They can't be bothered carrying a trash bag and packing >>>it out. No room in the Jeep or some other excuse. >>> >>>People with a conquer-nature mentality have little respect for its >>>sanctity. The show stealer is their fancy machinery, not the land. >>>Nature is just another place to make noise and whoop it up. It's hard >>>to prove, but the number of offroad litterers is probably at least 25%. >>>It goes beyond a few rotten apples making the rest look bad. >>> >>>It's very simple: people who bash environmentalism don't respect the >>>environment that much. They talk of "extremism" but effective >>>protection will always seem extreme to those who want land UNprotected. >>>Environmental problems are people problems and more people create more >>>impact. Population can't continue without stealing more land. That's >>>the crux of all these conflicts. It's not about shadowy entities trying >>>to block your rights, it's more people fighting over less acreage. >>> >>>In the lower 48 states, there's no real frontier left. We don't need >>>more machines, noise and trail(er) trash invading the last wild, quiet >>>places. Be happy with all the trails you've got. If you find those >>>trails overcrowded, blame human overbreeding, not environmentalism. >>> >>>R. Lander > > |
Re: Trail(er) trash and Nature Nazis
The Nazi's were the "National Socialist German Workers Party", which is
hardly far right! Jeff DeWitt R. Lander wrote: > I replied to your Limbaugh-script comments using my original subject > header, not your altered one. > > You forget that the Nazis were far-right punks with no respect for > "lower life forms." They shared traits with modern right-wingers who > think nature should yield at will beneath their Jeep tires. Don't > pretend you're operating on some higher moral plain with all your lies > about endless frontiers. > > R. Lander > > Corey Shuman wrote: > >>Nice agenda, but complete --------. Sorry, but Id like to see any proof >>of this other than just your unsubstantiated ramblings. >>Maybe you should define what you think an enviromentalist is, because >>if you are talking about your average hippie hiker, out on his bike or >>walking through the trails they leave more impact than the average 4wd >>trail rider. Powerbar wrappers, feces and "biodegradable" toilet paper >>to name a few, oh and the ability to turn an area upside down to >>accomodate their extended camping stays. >> >>But since you are on a roll, lets explore your extremely flawed logic. >>The "Conquer Nature" mentality is the reason you even have these spots >>to enjoy. Mining companys, prospectors and railroad companys were out >>here not to conquer nature but to make a living from it and make it a >>livable space at the same time. This land is our land, not yours not >>ours, but OUR land collectively, that means that what may be fun to >>some is not fun to other but you tolerate or are at least respectful to >>each other. >> >>Since you have so much to say about this, I assume that you have >>positioned yourself to do something about it though, right. You are out >>every weekend cleaning up the trails and organizing groups to monitor >>the land, right? Id be willing to be not. You know the history and >>geography of the lands you visit and leave them in a better state than >>when you arrived. Right? >> >>Sorry, but you just really have no clue as to what you are talking >>about here. There is plenty of wild frontier, unexplored canyons, >>mountains and valleys. But you have to be motivated to get out there >>and usually it is the offroader who has that drive and sense of >>adventure. The average enviromentalist waits for an area to be opened >>up, then wanders in and says it should be closed to the very same >>people who found it. Great logic, if it wasnt for the explorers you >>guys wouldnt have any areas to whine about. >> >>So keep this kind of unsubstatiated BS on the SUWA and other >>short-sighted groups sites, cause it holds no water here. >> >>Sincerely, >> >>Corey T. Shuman >>cshuman@goldrushexepeditions.com >>www.goldrushexpeditions.com >> >>R. Lander wrote: >> >>>The "respect" for nature shown by offroad enthusiasts is documented by >>>all the cans, bottles and wrappers they toss on scenic trails. The >>>Rubicon near Lake Tahoe shows how these anthropocentric mouth-breathers >>>view the land. They can't be bothered carrying a trash bag and packing >>>it out. No room in the Jeep or some other excuse. >>> >>>People with a conquer-nature mentality have little respect for its >>>sanctity. The show stealer is their fancy machinery, not the land. >>>Nature is just another place to make noise and whoop it up. It's hard >>>to prove, but the number of offroad litterers is probably at least 25%. >>>It goes beyond a few rotten apples making the rest look bad. >>> >>>It's very simple: people who bash environmentalism don't respect the >>>environment that much. They talk of "extremism" but effective >>>protection will always seem extreme to those who want land UNprotected. >>>Environmental problems are people problems and more people create more >>>impact. Population can't continue without stealing more land. That's >>>the crux of all these conflicts. It's not about shadowy entities trying >>>to block your rights, it's more people fighting over less acreage. >>> >>>In the lower 48 states, there's no real frontier left. We don't need >>>more machines, noise and trail(er) trash invading the last wild, quiet >>>places. Be happy with all the trails you've got. If you find those >>>trails overcrowded, blame human overbreeding, not environmentalism. >>> >>>R. Lander > > |
Re: Trail(er) trash and Nature Nazis
The Nazi's were the "National Socialist German Workers Party", which is
hardly far right! Jeff DeWitt R. Lander wrote: > I replied to your Limbaugh-script comments using my original subject > header, not your altered one. > > You forget that the Nazis were far-right punks with no respect for > "lower life forms." They shared traits with modern right-wingers who > think nature should yield at will beneath their Jeep tires. Don't > pretend you're operating on some higher moral plain with all your lies > about endless frontiers. > > R. Lander > > Corey Shuman wrote: > >>Nice agenda, but complete --------. Sorry, but Id like to see any proof >>of this other than just your unsubstantiated ramblings. >>Maybe you should define what you think an enviromentalist is, because >>if you are talking about your average hippie hiker, out on his bike or >>walking through the trails they leave more impact than the average 4wd >>trail rider. Powerbar wrappers, feces and "biodegradable" toilet paper >>to name a few, oh and the ability to turn an area upside down to >>accomodate their extended camping stays. >> >>But since you are on a roll, lets explore your extremely flawed logic. >>The "Conquer Nature" mentality is the reason you even have these spots >>to enjoy. Mining companys, prospectors and railroad companys were out >>here not to conquer nature but to make a living from it and make it a >>livable space at the same time. This land is our land, not yours not >>ours, but OUR land collectively, that means that what may be fun to >>some is not fun to other but you tolerate or are at least respectful to >>each other. >> >>Since you have so much to say about this, I assume that you have >>positioned yourself to do something about it though, right. You are out >>every weekend cleaning up the trails and organizing groups to monitor >>the land, right? Id be willing to be not. You know the history and >>geography of the lands you visit and leave them in a better state than >>when you arrived. Right? >> >>Sorry, but you just really have no clue as to what you are talking >>about here. There is plenty of wild frontier, unexplored canyons, >>mountains and valleys. But you have to be motivated to get out there >>and usually it is the offroader who has that drive and sense of >>adventure. The average enviromentalist waits for an area to be opened >>up, then wanders in and says it should be closed to the very same >>people who found it. Great logic, if it wasnt for the explorers you >>guys wouldnt have any areas to whine about. >> >>So keep this kind of unsubstatiated BS on the SUWA and other >>short-sighted groups sites, cause it holds no water here. >> >>Sincerely, >> >>Corey T. Shuman >>cshuman@goldrushexepeditions.com >>www.goldrushexpeditions.com >> >>R. Lander wrote: >> >>>The "respect" for nature shown by offroad enthusiasts is documented by >>>all the cans, bottles and wrappers they toss on scenic trails. The >>>Rubicon near Lake Tahoe shows how these anthropocentric mouth-breathers >>>view the land. They can't be bothered carrying a trash bag and packing >>>it out. No room in the Jeep or some other excuse. >>> >>>People with a conquer-nature mentality have little respect for its >>>sanctity. The show stealer is their fancy machinery, not the land. >>>Nature is just another place to make noise and whoop it up. It's hard >>>to prove, but the number of offroad litterers is probably at least 25%. >>>It goes beyond a few rotten apples making the rest look bad. >>> >>>It's very simple: people who bash environmentalism don't respect the >>>environment that much. They talk of "extremism" but effective >>>protection will always seem extreme to those who want land UNprotected. >>>Environmental problems are people problems and more people create more >>>impact. Population can't continue without stealing more land. That's >>>the crux of all these conflicts. It's not about shadowy entities trying >>>to block your rights, it's more people fighting over less acreage. >>> >>>In the lower 48 states, there's no real frontier left. We don't need >>>more machines, noise and trail(er) trash invading the last wild, quiet >>>places. Be happy with all the trails you've got. If you find those >>>trails overcrowded, blame human overbreeding, not environmentalism. >>> >>>R. Lander > > |
Re: Trail(er) trash
"R. Lander" <r_lander60@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1149175697.422954.235760@f6g2000cwb.googlegro ups.com... > The "respect" for nature shown by offroad enthusiasts is documented by > all the cans, bottles and wrappers they toss on scenic trails. The > Rubicon near Lake Tahoe shows how these anthropocentric mouth-breathers > view the land. They can't be bothered carrying a trash bag and packing > it out. No room in the Jeep or some other excuse. > > People with a conquer-nature mentality have little respect for its > sanctity. The show stealer is their fancy machinery, not the land. > Nature is just another place to make noise and whoop it up. It's hard > to prove, but the number of offroad litterers is probably at least 25%. > It goes beyond a few rotten apples making the rest look bad. > > It's very simple: people who bash environmentalism don't respect the > environment that much. They talk of "extremism" but effective > protection will always seem extreme to those who want land UNprotected. > Environmental problems are people problems and more people create more > impact. Population can't continue without stealing more land. That's > the crux of all these conflicts. It's not about shadowy entities trying > to block your rights, it's more people fighting over less acreage. > > In the lower 48 states, there's no real frontier left. We don't need > more machines, noise and trail(er) trash invading the last wild, quiet > places. Be happy with all the trails you've got. If you find those > trails overcrowded, blame human overbreeding, not environmentalism. > > R. Lander What utter -------- !!! What makes you think any one group is any more responsible for leaving trash on the trails ? Where I hike I see the same trash on the trails and these are hiking trails only. It's not unusual to hike in 6-8 miles and find beer bottles and cans, candy wrappers, plastic bottles, empty propane cylinders and anything else you can imagine. I just can't figure out how someone can manage to hike in with a case of beer but can't carry the empties out. Some people are just slobs, the method of transportation does not matter. It is a few bad apples that ruin things for everyone else. > |
Re: Trail(er) trash
"R. Lander" <r_lander60@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1149175697.422954.235760@f6g2000cwb.googlegro ups.com... > The "respect" for nature shown by offroad enthusiasts is documented by > all the cans, bottles and wrappers they toss on scenic trails. The > Rubicon near Lake Tahoe shows how these anthropocentric mouth-breathers > view the land. They can't be bothered carrying a trash bag and packing > it out. No room in the Jeep or some other excuse. > > People with a conquer-nature mentality have little respect for its > sanctity. The show stealer is their fancy machinery, not the land. > Nature is just another place to make noise and whoop it up. It's hard > to prove, but the number of offroad litterers is probably at least 25%. > It goes beyond a few rotten apples making the rest look bad. > > It's very simple: people who bash environmentalism don't respect the > environment that much. They talk of "extremism" but effective > protection will always seem extreme to those who want land UNprotected. > Environmental problems are people problems and more people create more > impact. Population can't continue without stealing more land. That's > the crux of all these conflicts. It's not about shadowy entities trying > to block your rights, it's more people fighting over less acreage. > > In the lower 48 states, there's no real frontier left. We don't need > more machines, noise and trail(er) trash invading the last wild, quiet > places. Be happy with all the trails you've got. If you find those > trails overcrowded, blame human overbreeding, not environmentalism. > > R. Lander What utter -------- !!! What makes you think any one group is any more responsible for leaving trash on the trails ? Where I hike I see the same trash on the trails and these are hiking trails only. It's not unusual to hike in 6-8 miles and find beer bottles and cans, candy wrappers, plastic bottles, empty propane cylinders and anything else you can imagine. I just can't figure out how someone can manage to hike in with a case of beer but can't carry the empties out. Some people are just slobs, the method of transportation does not matter. It is a few bad apples that ruin things for everyone else. > |
Re: Trail(er) trash
"R. Lander" <r_lander60@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1149175697.422954.235760@f6g2000cwb.googlegro ups.com... > The "respect" for nature shown by offroad enthusiasts is documented by > all the cans, bottles and wrappers they toss on scenic trails. The > Rubicon near Lake Tahoe shows how these anthropocentric mouth-breathers > view the land. They can't be bothered carrying a trash bag and packing > it out. No room in the Jeep or some other excuse. > > People with a conquer-nature mentality have little respect for its > sanctity. The show stealer is their fancy machinery, not the land. > Nature is just another place to make noise and whoop it up. It's hard > to prove, but the number of offroad litterers is probably at least 25%. > It goes beyond a few rotten apples making the rest look bad. > > It's very simple: people who bash environmentalism don't respect the > environment that much. They talk of "extremism" but effective > protection will always seem extreme to those who want land UNprotected. > Environmental problems are people problems and more people create more > impact. Population can't continue without stealing more land. That's > the crux of all these conflicts. It's not about shadowy entities trying > to block your rights, it's more people fighting over less acreage. > > In the lower 48 states, there's no real frontier left. We don't need > more machines, noise and trail(er) trash invading the last wild, quiet > places. Be happy with all the trails you've got. If you find those > trails overcrowded, blame human overbreeding, not environmentalism. > > R. Lander What utter -------- !!! What makes you think any one group is any more responsible for leaving trash on the trails ? Where I hike I see the same trash on the trails and these are hiking trails only. It's not unusual to hike in 6-8 miles and find beer bottles and cans, candy wrappers, plastic bottles, empty propane cylinders and anything else you can imagine. I just can't figure out how someone can manage to hike in with a case of beer but can't carry the empties out. Some people are just slobs, the method of transportation does not matter. It is a few bad apples that ruin things for everyone else. > |
Re: Trail(er) trash and Nature Nazis
Jeff DeWitt wrote:
> The Nazi's were the "National Socialist German Workers Party", which is > hardly far right! > > Jeff DeWitt > Ah, another "student of history". The Nazis were a fascist organization. You can't get much further to the right than that. Don't let the use of the word Socialist fool you. They were no more Socialist than any Peoples Democratic Republic is Democratic. If you don't understand the terms used in the debate look them up. I suggest Google or even a good dictionary. :-) Oh yes, one more thing. Stop cross posting. -- FRH |
Re: Trail(er) trash and Nature Nazis
Jeff DeWitt wrote:
> The Nazi's were the "National Socialist German Workers Party", which is > hardly far right! > > Jeff DeWitt > Ah, another "student of history". The Nazis were a fascist organization. You can't get much further to the right than that. Don't let the use of the word Socialist fool you. They were no more Socialist than any Peoples Democratic Republic is Democratic. If you don't understand the terms used in the debate look them up. I suggest Google or even a good dictionary. :-) Oh yes, one more thing. Stop cross posting. -- FRH |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:13 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands