Trail(er) trash
#471
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Trail(er) trash
Jeff DeWitt wrote:
> dan wrote:
>
>> Jeff DeWitt wrote:
>>
>>> Ahh the left doesn't pander to greed so that's why they've created
>>> all these government handout programs?
>>
>>
>>
>> Exactly. I'll leave it as an exercise for the reader to figure out
>> why. HINT: examine the targets of the left's vs. the right's largess.
>>
>>> Is that why they go into absolute hysterical hissy fits when anyone
>>> suggests doing anything to fix the Social Security debacle?
>>
>>
>>
>> Never seen this phenomenon. I DO notice that leftists do go into
>> hysterics whenever REPUBLICANS introduce legislation claiming it will
>> "fix" Social Security when the actual effect will be the destruction
>> of SS, while divvying up the existing spoils amongst Republican donors...
>
>
> You need to get out more <G>.
>
> There have been a number of plans to do something about SS, but the
> lefties always start bleating about how it's going to cut the benefits
> of the poor old people (and invariably whatever the plan is does no such
> thing, and doesn't effect current recipients at all). Fact of the
> matter is that SS is basically a Ponzi scheme and while it CAN'T be
> fixed, it can be turned into something that makes economic sense.
Plans based on thin-air numbers are rarely productive, and I have yet to
see a Republican plan based on anything but.
Of course, both Parties are guilty of changing the plan from what is was
to whatever it is now.
>>> While both sides do it the left has done an exceptionally good job of
>>> learning the lesson "He who robs Peter to pay Paul can be certain of
>>> the support of Paul".
>>
>>
>>
>> Funny, I thought that was the operating philosophy of the Republican
>> Party, with the proviso that Paul has more money than Peter to start
>> with...
>
>
> No, you have it backwards, that's the Democrat's philosophy, they always
> want to raise taxes on the "evil rich" to give more to the "poor" (in
> other words take money from one group to buy votes from the other.
Whoosh.
> Jeff DeWitt
>
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>> Jeff DeWitt
>>>
>>> R. Lander wrote:
>>>
>>>> billy ray wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> You may have something there.
>>>>>
>>>>> If the liberals and Demoncrats could keep their pants zipped the
>>>>> population
>>>>> would drop severely and decent people might again populate the earth.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> People with low IQs on both fringes should go the www.vhemt.org route.
>>>> But the far-Right is worse than the far-Left because they get elected
>>>> more often. Why? Because most people are greedy and the Right is all
>>>> about pandering to greed. They created the Me Generation without really
>>>> acknowledging it. Having respect for nature is the antithesis of greed,
>>>> hence the strong correlation between Republican "values" and
>>>> anti-environmentalism.
>>>>
>>>> R. Lander
>>>>
> dan wrote:
>
>> Jeff DeWitt wrote:
>>
>>> Ahh the left doesn't pander to greed so that's why they've created
>>> all these government handout programs?
>>
>>
>>
>> Exactly. I'll leave it as an exercise for the reader to figure out
>> why. HINT: examine the targets of the left's vs. the right's largess.
>>
>>> Is that why they go into absolute hysterical hissy fits when anyone
>>> suggests doing anything to fix the Social Security debacle?
>>
>>
>>
>> Never seen this phenomenon. I DO notice that leftists do go into
>> hysterics whenever REPUBLICANS introduce legislation claiming it will
>> "fix" Social Security when the actual effect will be the destruction
>> of SS, while divvying up the existing spoils amongst Republican donors...
>
>
> You need to get out more <G>.
>
> There have been a number of plans to do something about SS, but the
> lefties always start bleating about how it's going to cut the benefits
> of the poor old people (and invariably whatever the plan is does no such
> thing, and doesn't effect current recipients at all). Fact of the
> matter is that SS is basically a Ponzi scheme and while it CAN'T be
> fixed, it can be turned into something that makes economic sense.
Plans based on thin-air numbers are rarely productive, and I have yet to
see a Republican plan based on anything but.
Of course, both Parties are guilty of changing the plan from what is was
to whatever it is now.
>>> While both sides do it the left has done an exceptionally good job of
>>> learning the lesson "He who robs Peter to pay Paul can be certain of
>>> the support of Paul".
>>
>>
>>
>> Funny, I thought that was the operating philosophy of the Republican
>> Party, with the proviso that Paul has more money than Peter to start
>> with...
>
>
> No, you have it backwards, that's the Democrat's philosophy, they always
> want to raise taxes on the "evil rich" to give more to the "poor" (in
> other words take money from one group to buy votes from the other.
Whoosh.
> Jeff DeWitt
>
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>> Jeff DeWitt
>>>
>>> R. Lander wrote:
>>>
>>>> billy ray wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> You may have something there.
>>>>>
>>>>> If the liberals and Demoncrats could keep their pants zipped the
>>>>> population
>>>>> would drop severely and decent people might again populate the earth.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> People with low IQs on both fringes should go the www.vhemt.org route.
>>>> But the far-Right is worse than the far-Left because they get elected
>>>> more often. Why? Because most people are greedy and the Right is all
>>>> about pandering to greed. They created the Me Generation without really
>>>> acknowledging it. Having respect for nature is the antithesis of greed,
>>>> hence the strong correlation between Republican "values" and
>>>> anti-environmentalism.
>>>>
>>>> R. Lander
>>>>
#472
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Trail(er) trash
Jeff DeWitt wrote:
> dan wrote:
>
>> Jeff DeWitt wrote:
>>
>>> Ahh the left doesn't pander to greed so that's why they've created
>>> all these government handout programs?
>>
>>
>>
>> Exactly. I'll leave it as an exercise for the reader to figure out
>> why. HINT: examine the targets of the left's vs. the right's largess.
>>
>>> Is that why they go into absolute hysterical hissy fits when anyone
>>> suggests doing anything to fix the Social Security debacle?
>>
>>
>>
>> Never seen this phenomenon. I DO notice that leftists do go into
>> hysterics whenever REPUBLICANS introduce legislation claiming it will
>> "fix" Social Security when the actual effect will be the destruction
>> of SS, while divvying up the existing spoils amongst Republican donors...
>
>
> You need to get out more <G>.
>
> There have been a number of plans to do something about SS, but the
> lefties always start bleating about how it's going to cut the benefits
> of the poor old people (and invariably whatever the plan is does no such
> thing, and doesn't effect current recipients at all). Fact of the
> matter is that SS is basically a Ponzi scheme and while it CAN'T be
> fixed, it can be turned into something that makes economic sense.
Plans based on thin-air numbers are rarely productive, and I have yet to
see a Republican plan based on anything but.
Of course, both Parties are guilty of changing the plan from what is was
to whatever it is now.
>>> While both sides do it the left has done an exceptionally good job of
>>> learning the lesson "He who robs Peter to pay Paul can be certain of
>>> the support of Paul".
>>
>>
>>
>> Funny, I thought that was the operating philosophy of the Republican
>> Party, with the proviso that Paul has more money than Peter to start
>> with...
>
>
> No, you have it backwards, that's the Democrat's philosophy, they always
> want to raise taxes on the "evil rich" to give more to the "poor" (in
> other words take money from one group to buy votes from the other.
Whoosh.
> Jeff DeWitt
>
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>> Jeff DeWitt
>>>
>>> R. Lander wrote:
>>>
>>>> billy ray wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> You may have something there.
>>>>>
>>>>> If the liberals and Demoncrats could keep their pants zipped the
>>>>> population
>>>>> would drop severely and decent people might again populate the earth.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> People with low IQs on both fringes should go the www.vhemt.org route.
>>>> But the far-Right is worse than the far-Left because they get elected
>>>> more often. Why? Because most people are greedy and the Right is all
>>>> about pandering to greed. They created the Me Generation without really
>>>> acknowledging it. Having respect for nature is the antithesis of greed,
>>>> hence the strong correlation between Republican "values" and
>>>> anti-environmentalism.
>>>>
>>>> R. Lander
>>>>
> dan wrote:
>
>> Jeff DeWitt wrote:
>>
>>> Ahh the left doesn't pander to greed so that's why they've created
>>> all these government handout programs?
>>
>>
>>
>> Exactly. I'll leave it as an exercise for the reader to figure out
>> why. HINT: examine the targets of the left's vs. the right's largess.
>>
>>> Is that why they go into absolute hysterical hissy fits when anyone
>>> suggests doing anything to fix the Social Security debacle?
>>
>>
>>
>> Never seen this phenomenon. I DO notice that leftists do go into
>> hysterics whenever REPUBLICANS introduce legislation claiming it will
>> "fix" Social Security when the actual effect will be the destruction
>> of SS, while divvying up the existing spoils amongst Republican donors...
>
>
> You need to get out more <G>.
>
> There have been a number of plans to do something about SS, but the
> lefties always start bleating about how it's going to cut the benefits
> of the poor old people (and invariably whatever the plan is does no such
> thing, and doesn't effect current recipients at all). Fact of the
> matter is that SS is basically a Ponzi scheme and while it CAN'T be
> fixed, it can be turned into something that makes economic sense.
Plans based on thin-air numbers are rarely productive, and I have yet to
see a Republican plan based on anything but.
Of course, both Parties are guilty of changing the plan from what is was
to whatever it is now.
>>> While both sides do it the left has done an exceptionally good job of
>>> learning the lesson "He who robs Peter to pay Paul can be certain of
>>> the support of Paul".
>>
>>
>>
>> Funny, I thought that was the operating philosophy of the Republican
>> Party, with the proviso that Paul has more money than Peter to start
>> with...
>
>
> No, you have it backwards, that's the Democrat's philosophy, they always
> want to raise taxes on the "evil rich" to give more to the "poor" (in
> other words take money from one group to buy votes from the other.
Whoosh.
> Jeff DeWitt
>
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>> Jeff DeWitt
>>>
>>> R. Lander wrote:
>>>
>>>> billy ray wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> You may have something there.
>>>>>
>>>>> If the liberals and Demoncrats could keep their pants zipped the
>>>>> population
>>>>> would drop severely and decent people might again populate the earth.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> People with low IQs on both fringes should go the www.vhemt.org route.
>>>> But the far-Right is worse than the far-Left because they get elected
>>>> more often. Why? Because most people are greedy and the Right is all
>>>> about pandering to greed. They created the Me Generation without really
>>>> acknowledging it. Having respect for nature is the antithesis of greed,
>>>> hence the strong correlation between Republican "values" and
>>>> anti-environmentalism.
>>>>
>>>> R. Lander
>>>>
#473
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Trail(er) trash
I have yet to see a democratic plan for anything.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
dan wrote:
>
> Plans based on thin-air numbers are rarely productive, and I have yet to
> see a Republican plan based on anything but.
>
> Of course, both Parties are guilty of changing the plan from what is was
> to whatever it is now.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
dan wrote:
>
> Plans based on thin-air numbers are rarely productive, and I have yet to
> see a Republican plan based on anything but.
>
> Of course, both Parties are guilty of changing the plan from what is was
> to whatever it is now.
#474
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Trail(er) trash
I have yet to see a democratic plan for anything.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
dan wrote:
>
> Plans based on thin-air numbers are rarely productive, and I have yet to
> see a Republican plan based on anything but.
>
> Of course, both Parties are guilty of changing the plan from what is was
> to whatever it is now.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
dan wrote:
>
> Plans based on thin-air numbers are rarely productive, and I have yet to
> see a Republican plan based on anything but.
>
> Of course, both Parties are guilty of changing the plan from what is was
> to whatever it is now.
#475
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Trail(er) trash
I have yet to see a democratic plan for anything.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
dan wrote:
>
> Plans based on thin-air numbers are rarely productive, and I have yet to
> see a Republican plan based on anything but.
>
> Of course, both Parties are guilty of changing the plan from what is was
> to whatever it is now.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
dan wrote:
>
> Plans based on thin-air numbers are rarely productive, and I have yet to
> see a Republican plan based on anything but.
>
> Of course, both Parties are guilty of changing the plan from what is was
> to whatever it is now.
#479
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Trail(er) trash
Republican plan:
1) Head
2) ****
Earle
"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
news:dG4hg.52567$9c6.50103@dukeread11...
> L.W.(Bill) ------ III did pass the time by typing:
> > I have yet to see a democratic plan for anything.
>
> 1) head
> 2) sand
>
> --
> DougW
>
>
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
1) Head
2) ****
Earle
"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
news:dG4hg.52567$9c6.50103@dukeread11...
> L.W.(Bill) ------ III did pass the time by typing:
> > I have yet to see a democratic plan for anything.
>
> 1) head
> 2) sand
>
> --
> DougW
>
>
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
#480
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Trail(er) trash
Republican plan:
1) Head
2) ****
Earle
"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
news:dG4hg.52567$9c6.50103@dukeread11...
> L.W.(Bill) ------ III did pass the time by typing:
> > I have yet to see a democratic plan for anything.
>
> 1) head
> 2) sand
>
> --
> DougW
>
>
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
1) Head
2) ****
Earle
"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message
news:dG4hg.52567$9c6.50103@dukeread11...
> L.W.(Bill) ------ III did pass the time by typing:
> > I have yet to see a democratic plan for anything.
>
> 1) head
> 2) sand
>
> --
> DougW
>
>
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com