Like about a hundred crank horsepower:
http://www.----------.com/supercharger.jpg
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------

Jeffrey DeWitt wrote:
>
> Yes it can work, BUT to have a big enough motor to be useful it's going
> to take a LOT of electrical power to make it work. Think about the
> belts and pullies that supercharged engines use, to make an electric
> supercharger roughly comparable to one of these you are going to have to
> pull that much power out of the cars electrical system.
>
> Jeff DeWitt

 

Like about a hundred crank horsepower:
http://www.----------.com/supercharger.jpg
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------

Jeffrey DeWitt wrote:
>
> Yes it can work, BUT to have a big enough motor to be useful it's going
> to take a LOT of electrical power to make it work. Think about the
> belts and pullies that supercharged engines use, to make an electric
> supercharger roughly comparable to one of these you are going to have to
> pull that much power out of the cars electrical system.
>
> Jeff DeWitt

 

Like about a hundred crank horsepower:
http://www.----------.com/supercharger.jpg
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------

Jeffrey DeWitt wrote:
>
> Yes it can work, BUT to have a big enough motor to be useful it's going
> to take a LOT of electrical power to make it work. Think about the
> belts and pullies that supercharged engines use, to make an electric
> supercharger roughly comparable to one of these you are going to have to
> pull that much power out of the cars electrical system.
>
> Jeff DeWitt

 

Excellent Bill!

LOL
Norman
1982 CJ-7


"L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:4502543A.D7F26A57@***.net...
> A fool and their money are soon parted. And there's a sucker born
> every minute.
>
http://www.tornadofuelsaver.com/272/...85e190edfe767f
> http://www.airaid.com/
>
http://www.northerntool.com/webapp/w...ite=Performics
>
>
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> billy ray wrote:
> >
> > Shows what you know...... it is one of the fastest and most efficient
ways
> > of removing $69.95 (+ S/H) from your wallet.

 

Excellent Bill!

LOL
Norman
1982 CJ-7


"L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:4502543A.D7F26A57@***.net...
> A fool and their money are soon parted. And there's a sucker born
> every minute.
>
http://www.tornadofuelsaver.com/272/...85e190edfe767f
> http://www.airaid.com/
>
http://www.northerntool.com/webapp/w...ite=Performics
>
>
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> billy ray wrote:
> >
> > Shows what you know...... it is one of the fastest and most efficient
ways
> > of removing $69.95 (+ S/H) from your wallet.

 

Excellent Bill!

LOL
Norman
1982 CJ-7


"L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:4502543A.D7F26A57@***.net...
> A fool and their money are soon parted. And there's a sucker born
> every minute.
>
http://www.tornadofuelsaver.com/272/...85e190edfe767f
> http://www.airaid.com/
>
http://www.northerntool.com/webapp/w...ite=Performics
>
>
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> billy ray wrote:
> >
> > Shows what you know...... it is one of the fastest and most efficient
ways
> > of removing $69.95 (+ S/H) from your wallet.

 

Jeepster wrote:
> Does the little spiral shaped device known as the Tornado actually
> improve engine efficiency and power like it advertises?
>

one of the consumer sites a while ago tested a bunch of those things...
the best one produced no HP or Torque increase and only slightly lowered
MPG's the others all reduced power, torque and mileage by measurable
amounts, the worst lost something like 11HP 2 MPG and was described as
looking "like it would break apart and get sucked into the intake"

The losses were due to the gizmo actually restricting air flow.

--
Simon
"I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein

 

Jeepster wrote:
> Does the little spiral shaped device known as the Tornado actually
> improve engine efficiency and power like it advertises?
>

one of the consumer sites a while ago tested a bunch of those things...
the best one produced no HP or Torque increase and only slightly lowered
MPG's the others all reduced power, torque and mileage by measurable
amounts, the worst lost something like 11HP 2 MPG and was described as
looking "like it would break apart and get sucked into the intake"

The losses were due to the gizmo actually restricting air flow.

--
Simon
"I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein

 

Jeepster wrote:
> Does the little spiral shaped device known as the Tornado actually
> improve engine efficiency and power like it advertises?
>

one of the consumer sites a while ago tested a bunch of those things...
the best one produced no HP or Torque increase and only slightly lowered
MPG's the others all reduced power, torque and mileage by measurable
amounts, the worst lost something like 11HP 2 MPG and was described as
looking "like it would break apart and get sucked into the intake"

The losses were due to the gizmo actually restricting air flow.

--
Simon
"I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein

 

"Jeepster" <keeganlohenry@gmail.com> wrote

The Tornado 260 was used in Jeep trucks from about 63 to 65, but not in
Jeepsters. You don't need one