Re: Top Posting
"Lon" <lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote in message news:pZmdnZ0B1ZSmsl7enZ2dnUVZ_sGdnZ2d@comcast.com. .. > billy ray proclaimed: > >> "Old Crow" <walliscrow@yahoo.com> wrote in message >> news:8gf4s1dj960kso2d71gdt5cdk4s0p0ag76@4ax.com... >> >>>On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 11:22:12 -0500, "billy ray" >>><billy_ray@fuseSPAM.net> wrote: >>> >>> >>>>"Old Crow" <walliscrow@yahoo.com> wrote in message >>> >>><snip> >>> >>>>>If you've got OE set to text only instead of HTML, it's not that big a >>>>>thing to bottom post there, too. Forte' Agent(or Free Agent in my >>>>>case)does it automatically. >> >> >> >> How about we all compromise and start posting right in the middle. I >> don't mean section by section but just right smack in the middle. >> >> Would that make everyone happy? > > I > > v > o > t > e > > f > o > r > > d > i > a > g > o > l > > a > s > > a > > c > o > m > p > r > o > m > i > s > e > . > > w r o n g w a y >> >> >> >>>>I set newsgroup messages to Plain Text Only because I do not want to >>>>accidentially post, as I did once, in HTML. I got several cranky >>>>e-mails >>>>about that post. >>>> >>> >>>I'll just bet you did. >>>-- >>>Old Crow >>>'82 FLTC-P "Miss Pearl" >>>'74 XLH chopper(somebody else's baby now) >>>BS#133, SENS, TOMKAT, MAMBM, DOF#51, DH#2 >>>"There's only 1 RE" >> >> |
Re: Top Posting
"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message news:nHGwf.42082$---.163@dukeread07... > Lon did pass the time by typing: >> billy ray proclaimed: >> >>> "Old Crow" <walliscrow@yahoo.com> wrote in message >>> news:8gf4s1dj960kso2d71gdt5cdk4s0p0ag76@4ax.com... >>> >>>> On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 11:22:12 -0500, "billy ray" >>>> <billy_ray@fuseSPAM.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> "Old Crow" <walliscrow@yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>> >>>> <snip> >>>> >>>>>> If you've got OE set to text only instead of HTML, it's not that big >>>>>> a >>>>>> thing to bottom post there, too. Forte' Agent(or Free Agent in my >>>>>> case)does it automatically. >>> >>> >>> >>> How about we all compromise and start posting right in the middle. I >>> don't >>> mean section by section but just right smack in the middle. >>> >>> Would that make everyone happy? > I > > > I > a > > g > v > r > o > e > t > e > e > > > w > f > i > o > t > r > h > > > d > L > i > o > a > n > g > . > o > > l > b > > u > a > t > s > > > w > a > h > > i > c > c > o > h > m > > p > d > r > i > o > g > m > o > i > n > s > a > e > l > . > ? > ? s d r a w k c a b >> >>> >>> >>> >>>>> I set newsgroup messages to Plain Text Only because I do not want to >>>>> accidentially post, as I did once, in HTML. I got several cranky >>>>> e-mails >>>>> about that post. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I'll just bet you did. >>>> -- >>>> Old Crow >>>> '82 FLTC-P "Miss Pearl" >>>> '74 XLH chopper(somebody else's baby now) >>>> BS#133, SENS, TOMKAT, MAMBM, DOF#51, DH#2 >>>> "There's only 1 RE" > > > |
Re: Top Posting
"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message news:nHGwf.42082$---.163@dukeread07... > Lon did pass the time by typing: >> billy ray proclaimed: >> >>> "Old Crow" <walliscrow@yahoo.com> wrote in message >>> news:8gf4s1dj960kso2d71gdt5cdk4s0p0ag76@4ax.com... >>> >>>> On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 11:22:12 -0500, "billy ray" >>>> <billy_ray@fuseSPAM.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> "Old Crow" <walliscrow@yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>> >>>> <snip> >>>> >>>>>> If you've got OE set to text only instead of HTML, it's not that big >>>>>> a >>>>>> thing to bottom post there, too. Forte' Agent(or Free Agent in my >>>>>> case)does it automatically. >>> >>> >>> >>> How about we all compromise and start posting right in the middle. I >>> don't >>> mean section by section but just right smack in the middle. >>> >>> Would that make everyone happy? > I > > > I > a > > g > v > r > o > e > t > e > e > > > w > f > i > o > t > r > h > > > d > L > i > o > a > n > g > . > o > > l > b > > u > a > t > s > > > w > a > h > > i > c > c > o > h > m > > p > d > r > i > o > g > m > o > i > n > s > a > e > l > . > ? > ? s d r a w k c a b >> >>> >>> >>> >>>>> I set newsgroup messages to Plain Text Only because I do not want to >>>>> accidentially post, as I did once, in HTML. I got several cranky >>>>> e-mails >>>>> about that post. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I'll just bet you did. >>>> -- >>>> Old Crow >>>> '82 FLTC-P "Miss Pearl" >>>> '74 XLH chopper(somebody else's baby now) >>>> BS#133, SENS, TOMKAT, MAMBM, DOF#51, DH#2 >>>> "There's only 1 RE" > > > |
Re: Top Posting
"DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message news:nHGwf.42082$---.163@dukeread07... > Lon did pass the time by typing: >> billy ray proclaimed: >> >>> "Old Crow" <walliscrow@yahoo.com> wrote in message >>> news:8gf4s1dj960kso2d71gdt5cdk4s0p0ag76@4ax.com... >>> >>>> On Sun, 8 Jan 2006 11:22:12 -0500, "billy ray" >>>> <billy_ray@fuseSPAM.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> "Old Crow" <walliscrow@yahoo.com> wrote in message >>>> >>>> <snip> >>>> >>>>>> If you've got OE set to text only instead of HTML, it's not that big >>>>>> a >>>>>> thing to bottom post there, too. Forte' Agent(or Free Agent in my >>>>>> case)does it automatically. >>> >>> >>> >>> How about we all compromise and start posting right in the middle. I >>> don't >>> mean section by section but just right smack in the middle. >>> >>> Would that make everyone happy? > I > > > I > a > > g > v > r > o > e > t > e > e > > > w > f > i > o > t > r > h > > > d > L > i > o > a > n > g > . > o > > l > b > > u > a > t > s > > > w > a > h > > i > c > c > o > h > m > > p > d > r > i > o > g > m > o > i > n > s > a > e > l > . > ? > ? s d r a w k c a b >> >>> >>> >>> >>>>> I set newsgroup messages to Plain Text Only because I do not want to >>>>> accidentially post, as I did once, in HTML. I got several cranky >>>>> e-mails >>>>> about that post. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I'll just bet you did. >>>> -- >>>> Old Crow >>>> '82 FLTC-P "Miss Pearl" >>>> '74 XLH chopper(somebody else's baby now) >>>> BS#133, SENS, TOMKAT, MAMBM, DOF#51, DH#2 >>>> "There's only 1 RE" > > > |
Re: Top Posting
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006 12:10:39 -0600, "Drink" <drink@gnt.net> wrote:
> Sorry if I aggravate anyone but it's really hard to wade through the posts >when they're posted at the bottom; gotta skim all the original messages down >to the reply. A: Maybe because some people are too annoyed by top-posting. Q: Why do I not get an answer to my question(s)? A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? RJ |
Re: Top Posting
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006 12:10:39 -0600, "Drink" <drink@gnt.net> wrote:
> Sorry if I aggravate anyone but it's really hard to wade through the posts >when they're posted at the bottom; gotta skim all the original messages down >to the reply. A: Maybe because some people are too annoyed by top-posting. Q: Why do I not get an answer to my question(s)? A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? RJ |
Re: Top Posting
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006 12:10:39 -0600, "Drink" <drink@gnt.net> wrote:
> Sorry if I aggravate anyone but it's really hard to wade through the posts >when they're posted at the bottom; gotta skim all the original messages down >to the reply. A: Maybe because some people are too annoyed by top-posting. Q: Why do I not get an answer to my question(s)? A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? RJ |
Re: Top Posting
Dredge up an old post for this drivel.....
"RJ" <rj_nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:09dbs1daeh9dqf5lsd4mcni0psk5moavc9@4ax.com... > On Tue, 3 Jan 2006 12:10:39 -0600, "Drink" <drink@gnt.net> wrote: > > > Sorry if I aggravate anyone but it's really hard to wade through the posts > >when they're posted at the bottom; gotta skim all the original messages down > >to the reply. > > A: Maybe because some people are too annoyed by top-posting. > > Q: Why do I not get an answer to my question(s)? > > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. > > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > > RJ |
Re: Top Posting
Dredge up an old post for this drivel.....
"RJ" <rj_nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:09dbs1daeh9dqf5lsd4mcni0psk5moavc9@4ax.com... > On Tue, 3 Jan 2006 12:10:39 -0600, "Drink" <drink@gnt.net> wrote: > > > Sorry if I aggravate anyone but it's really hard to wade through the posts > >when they're posted at the bottom; gotta skim all the original messages down > >to the reply. > > A: Maybe because some people are too annoyed by top-posting. > > Q: Why do I not get an answer to my question(s)? > > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. > > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > > RJ |
Re: Top Posting
Dredge up an old post for this drivel.....
"RJ" <rj_nospam@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:09dbs1daeh9dqf5lsd4mcni0psk5moavc9@4ax.com... > On Tue, 3 Jan 2006 12:10:39 -0600, "Drink" <drink@gnt.net> wrote: > > > Sorry if I aggravate anyone but it's really hard to wade through the posts > >when they're posted at the bottom; gotta skim all the original messages down > >to the reply. > > A: Maybe because some people are too annoyed by top-posting. > > Q: Why do I not get an answer to my question(s)? > > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. > > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > > RJ |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:41 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands