Top Posting
 

Sorry if I aggravate anyone but it's really hard to wade through the posts
when they're posted at the bottom; gotta skim all the original messages down
to the reply.
No need to flame out or anything, just an observation. Besides, I'll be
gone for about a month anyway... again :(
See ya'll when I get back!
Best Regards to All,
Drink

Re: Top Posting
 

Drink wrote:
> Sorry if I aggravate anyone but it's really hard to wade through the posts
> when they're posted at the bottom; gotta skim all the original messages down
> to the reply.
> No need to flame out or anything, just an observation. Besides, I'll be
> gone for about a month anyway... again :(
> See ya'll when I get back!
> Best Regards to All,
> Drink
>
>













Have a good trip!

tw

__________________________________________________ ___________________
2003 TJ Rubicon * 2001 XJ Sport * 1971 Bill Stroppe Baja Bronco

"There is a very fine line between 'hobby' and 'mental illness'."

Pronunciation: 'jEp Function: noun Date: 1940

Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80" wheelbase, 1/4-ton
capacity and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in World War II.
__________________________________________________ ___________________

Re: Top Posting
 

Drink wrote:
> Sorry if I aggravate anyone but it's really hard to wade through the posts
> when they're posted at the bottom; gotta skim all the original messages down
> to the reply.
> No need to flame out or anything, just an observation. Besides, I'll be
> gone for about a month anyway... again :(
> See ya'll when I get back!
> Best Regards to All,
> Drink
>
>













Have a good trip!

tw

__________________________________________________ ___________________
2003 TJ Rubicon * 2001 XJ Sport * 1971 Bill Stroppe Baja Bronco

"There is a very fine line between 'hobby' and 'mental illness'."

Pronunciation: 'jEp Function: noun Date: 1940

Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80" wheelbase, 1/4-ton
capacity and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in World War II.
__________________________________________________ ___________________

Re: Top Posting
 

Drink wrote:
> Sorry if I aggravate anyone but it's really hard to wade through the posts
> when they're posted at the bottom; gotta skim all the original messages down
> to the reply.
> No need to flame out or anything, just an observation. Besides, I'll be
> gone for about a month anyway... again :(
> See ya'll when I get back!
> Best Regards to All,
> Drink
>
>













Have a good trip!

tw

__________________________________________________ ___________________
2003 TJ Rubicon * 2001 XJ Sport * 1971 Bill Stroppe Baja Bronco

"There is a very fine line between 'hobby' and 'mental illness'."

Pronunciation: 'jEp Function: noun Date: 1940

Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80" wheelbase, 1/4-ton
capacity and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in World War II.
__________________________________________________ ___________________

Re: Top Posting
 

On Tue, 3 Jan 2006 12:10:39 -0600, the following appeared in
rec.autos.makers.jeep+willys, posted by "Drink"
<drink@gnt.net>:

Top posting seems to be the preferred way here. Other groups
prefer bottom posts.

> Sorry if I aggravate anyone but it's really hard to wade through the posts
>when they're posted at the bottom; gotta skim all the original messages down
>to the reply.
> No need to flame out or anything, just an observation. Besides, I'll be
>gone for about a month anyway... again :(
> See ya'll when I get back!
> Best Regards to All,
> Drink
>
--

Bob C.

"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless

Re: Top Posting
 

On Tue, 3 Jan 2006 12:10:39 -0600, the following appeared in
rec.autos.makers.jeep+willys, posted by "Drink"
<drink@gnt.net>:

Top posting seems to be the preferred way here. Other groups
prefer bottom posts.

> Sorry if I aggravate anyone but it's really hard to wade through the posts
>when they're posted at the bottom; gotta skim all the original messages down
>to the reply.
> No need to flame out or anything, just an observation. Besides, I'll be
>gone for about a month anyway... again :(
> See ya'll when I get back!
> Best Regards to All,
> Drink
>
--

Bob C.

"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless

Re: Top Posting
 

On Tue, 3 Jan 2006 12:10:39 -0600, the following appeared in
rec.autos.makers.jeep+willys, posted by "Drink"
<drink@gnt.net>:

Top posting seems to be the preferred way here. Other groups
prefer bottom posts.

> Sorry if I aggravate anyone but it's really hard to wade through the posts
>when they're posted at the bottom; gotta skim all the original messages down
>to the reply.
> No need to flame out or anything, just an observation. Besides, I'll be
>gone for about a month anyway... again :(
> See ya'll when I get back!
> Best Regards to All,
> Drink
>
--

Bob C.

"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless

Re: Top Posting
 

Yes, I tend to follow what the majority of what others do. I don't know if
it's right or wrong, but I will guess someone on each newsgroup will tell
you if you are responding incorrectly.


Jim Smith



"Bob Casanova" <nospam@buzz.off> wrote in message
news:3eslr1li39qt1pi9akq4p2umbno8r0pe06@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 3 Jan 2006 12:10:39 -0600, the following appeared in
> rec.autos.makers.jeep+willys, posted by "Drink"
> <drink@gnt.net>:
>
> Top posting seems to be the preferred way here. Other groups
> prefer bottom posts.
>
>> Sorry if I aggravate anyone but it's really hard to wade through the
>> posts
>>when they're posted at the bottom; gotta skim all the original messages
>>down
>>to the reply.
>> No need to flame out or anything, just an observation. Besides, I'll be
>>gone for about a month anyway... again :(
>> See ya'll when I get back!
>> Best Regards to All,
>> Drink
>>
> --
>
> Bob C.
>
> "Evidence confirming an observation is
> evidence that the observation is wrong."
> - McNameless

Re: Top Posting
 

Yes, I tend to follow what the majority of what others do. I don't know if
it's right or wrong, but I will guess someone on each newsgroup will tell
you if you are responding incorrectly.


Jim Smith



"Bob Casanova" <nospam@buzz.off> wrote in message
news:3eslr1li39qt1pi9akq4p2umbno8r0pe06@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 3 Jan 2006 12:10:39 -0600, the following appeared in
> rec.autos.makers.jeep+willys, posted by "Drink"
> <drink@gnt.net>:
>
> Top posting seems to be the preferred way here. Other groups
> prefer bottom posts.
>
>> Sorry if I aggravate anyone but it's really hard to wade through the
>> posts
>>when they're posted at the bottom; gotta skim all the original messages
>>down
>>to the reply.
>> No need to flame out or anything, just an observation. Besides, I'll be
>>gone for about a month anyway... again :(
>> See ya'll when I get back!
>> Best Regards to All,
>> Drink
>>
> --
>
> Bob C.
>
> "Evidence confirming an observation is
> evidence that the observation is wrong."
> - McNameless

Re: Top Posting
 

Yes, I tend to follow what the majority of what others do. I don't know if
it's right or wrong, but I will guess someone on each newsgroup will tell
you if you are responding incorrectly.


Jim Smith



"Bob Casanova" <nospam@buzz.off> wrote in message
news:3eslr1li39qt1pi9akq4p2umbno8r0pe06@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 3 Jan 2006 12:10:39 -0600, the following appeared in
> rec.autos.makers.jeep+willys, posted by "Drink"
> <drink@gnt.net>:
>
> Top posting seems to be the preferred way here. Other groups
> prefer bottom posts.
>
>> Sorry if I aggravate anyone but it's really hard to wade through the
>> posts
>>when they're posted at the bottom; gotta skim all the original messages
>>down
>>to the reply.
>> No need to flame out or anything, just an observation. Besides, I'll be
>>gone for about a month anyway... again :(
>> See ya'll when I get back!
>> Best Regards to All,
>> Drink
>>
> --
>
> Bob C.
>
> "Evidence confirming an observation is
> evidence that the observation is wrong."
> - McNameless