TJ limited slip wear out?
05-25-2004, 12:05 AM
#61
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: TJ limited slip wear out?
"twaldron" <thomas@OBVIOUSrubicons.com> wrote in message
news:1jxsc.336$Xt2.304@newssvr24.news.prodigy.com. ..
> I hope so. He's so hard to understand sober. ;)
Roger, Cap'n!
>
> Jerry McG wrote:
>
> > Bill, have you been drinking???
>
> __________________________________________________ _________
> tw
>
> 03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
> 01 XJ Sport
>
> There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
> -- Dave Barry
>
> Pronunciation: 'jEp
> Function: noun
> Date: 1940
>
> Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
> A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
> 1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
> World War II.
>
> (Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
> __________________________________________________ _________
>
news:1jxsc.336$Xt2.304@newssvr24.news.prodigy.com. ..
> I hope so. He's so hard to understand sober. ;)
Roger, Cap'n!
>
> Jerry McG wrote:
>
> > Bill, have you been drinking???
>
> __________________________________________________ _________
> tw
>
> 03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
> 01 XJ Sport
>
> There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
> -- Dave Barry
>
> Pronunciation: 'jEp
> Function: noun
> Date: 1940
>
> Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
> A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
> 1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
> World War II.
>
> (Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
> __________________________________________________ _________
>
05-25-2004, 12:34 AM
#62
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: TJ limited slip wear out?
Bill,
Please enlighten the rest of us how a locker contributed to this
particular rollover where a spool would not have. Is it because it was
trying to load/unload as her front end unweighted? Either way, I think
even with a spool, at least from watching that video, her jeep
would've likely bounced a bit and gone over with that particular line;
it was getting awfully tippy... But hey, what do I know? I've only
been to Moab once, and sure as heck didn't try that particular climb
while I was there ;-)
Thanks
L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@***.net> wrote in message news:<40B247CE.1B8F1605@***.net>...
> Yes, but if you can't get it to drive off a jack stand, then he
> needs something. I vote spool, front and rear, they don't have you do
> pirouettes, like Jennifer's locker:
> http://www.----------.com/jenjeeproll.mpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> Jerry McG wrote:
> >
> > To properly test if you have a limited slip you have to get both rear wheels
> > off the ground and spin either of them forward or back wards. If the
> > opposite tire spins in the same direction you have a limited slip, if it
> > spins in the opposite diorection you've got an open differential. Even
> > severly work limited slip clutches will still lock enough to confirm a
> > limited slip with this test.
> >
> > (Note: If you have a Dana 35 DO NOT jack the rear end up by placing the jack
> > under the differential pumpkin, you can bend the axle housing if you do.)
> >
> > "Alan" <apcurtis@lucent.com> wrote in message
> > news:c8su0f$4g1@netnews.proxy.lucent.com...
> > > I tested it over the weekend by jacking up one rear tire with my floor
> jack that
> > > has it's own wheels. With the tire barely touching the ground I could
> "drive"
> > > forward. As soon as that wheel lifted completly off however, there was
> not even
> > > a hint of forward effort as the wheel just spun....
> > >
> > > I think it's definately "open" now...
> > >
> > > alan
> > >
> > > L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> > > > I think not to worry, I ran a Dana 44 limited slip that came with
> > > > the Jeep for '68 for ten years, and as far as I know it was working as
> > > > good as it ever did. Of course I made sure the tires were always the
> > > > same size a pressure. and didn't act like a squirrel pealing out around
> > > > turns.
> > > > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> > > >
> > > > Alan wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>Yikes. If it turns into that path, then I guess I'll just run
> "semi-limited"
> > > >>until I can ARB it and go 4.10s. But that might be a while so I hope
> it's not so...
> > >
Please enlighten the rest of us how a locker contributed to this
particular rollover where a spool would not have. Is it because it was
trying to load/unload as her front end unweighted? Either way, I think
even with a spool, at least from watching that video, her jeep
would've likely bounced a bit and gone over with that particular line;
it was getting awfully tippy... But hey, what do I know? I've only
been to Moab once, and sure as heck didn't try that particular climb
while I was there ;-)
Thanks
L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@***.net> wrote in message news:<40B247CE.1B8F1605@***.net>...
> Yes, but if you can't get it to drive off a jack stand, then he
> needs something. I vote spool, front and rear, they don't have you do
> pirouettes, like Jennifer's locker:
> http://www.----------.com/jenjeeproll.mpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> Jerry McG wrote:
> >
> > To properly test if you have a limited slip you have to get both rear wheels
> > off the ground and spin either of them forward or back wards. If the
> > opposite tire spins in the same direction you have a limited slip, if it
> > spins in the opposite diorection you've got an open differential. Even
> > severly work limited slip clutches will still lock enough to confirm a
> > limited slip with this test.
> >
> > (Note: If you have a Dana 35 DO NOT jack the rear end up by placing the jack
> > under the differential pumpkin, you can bend the axle housing if you do.)
> >
> > "Alan" <apcurtis@lucent.com> wrote in message
> > news:c8su0f$4g1@netnews.proxy.lucent.com...
> > > I tested it over the weekend by jacking up one rear tire with my floor
> jack that
> > > has it's own wheels. With the tire barely touching the ground I could
> "drive"
> > > forward. As soon as that wheel lifted completly off however, there was
> not even
> > > a hint of forward effort as the wheel just spun....
> > >
> > > I think it's definately "open" now...
> > >
> > > alan
> > >
> > > L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> > > > I think not to worry, I ran a Dana 44 limited slip that came with
> > > > the Jeep for '68 for ten years, and as far as I know it was working as
> > > > good as it ever did. Of course I made sure the tires were always the
> > > > same size a pressure. and didn't act like a squirrel pealing out around
> > > > turns.
> > > > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> > > >
> > > > Alan wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>Yikes. If it turns into that path, then I guess I'll just run
> "semi-limited"
> > > >>until I can ARB it and go 4.10s. But that might be a while so I hope
> it's not so...
> > >
05-25-2004, 12:34 AM
#63
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: TJ limited slip wear out?
Bill,
Please enlighten the rest of us how a locker contributed to this
particular rollover where a spool would not have. Is it because it was
trying to load/unload as her front end unweighted? Either way, I think
even with a spool, at least from watching that video, her jeep
would've likely bounced a bit and gone over with that particular line;
it was getting awfully tippy... But hey, what do I know? I've only
been to Moab once, and sure as heck didn't try that particular climb
while I was there ;-)
Thanks
L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@***.net> wrote in message news:<40B247CE.1B8F1605@***.net>...
> Yes, but if you can't get it to drive off a jack stand, then he
> needs something. I vote spool, front and rear, they don't have you do
> pirouettes, like Jennifer's locker:
> http://www.----------.com/jenjeeproll.mpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> Jerry McG wrote:
> >
> > To properly test if you have a limited slip you have to get both rear wheels
> > off the ground and spin either of them forward or back wards. If the
> > opposite tire spins in the same direction you have a limited slip, if it
> > spins in the opposite diorection you've got an open differential. Even
> > severly work limited slip clutches will still lock enough to confirm a
> > limited slip with this test.
> >
> > (Note: If you have a Dana 35 DO NOT jack the rear end up by placing the jack
> > under the differential pumpkin, you can bend the axle housing if you do.)
> >
> > "Alan" <apcurtis@lucent.com> wrote in message
> > news:c8su0f$4g1@netnews.proxy.lucent.com...
> > > I tested it over the weekend by jacking up one rear tire with my floor
> jack that
> > > has it's own wheels. With the tire barely touching the ground I could
> "drive"
> > > forward. As soon as that wheel lifted completly off however, there was
> not even
> > > a hint of forward effort as the wheel just spun....
> > >
> > > I think it's definately "open" now...
> > >
> > > alan
> > >
> > > L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> > > > I think not to worry, I ran a Dana 44 limited slip that came with
> > > > the Jeep for '68 for ten years, and as far as I know it was working as
> > > > good as it ever did. Of course I made sure the tires were always the
> > > > same size a pressure. and didn't act like a squirrel pealing out around
> > > > turns.
> > > > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> > > >
> > > > Alan wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>Yikes. If it turns into that path, then I guess I'll just run
> "semi-limited"
> > > >>until I can ARB it and go 4.10s. But that might be a while so I hope
> it's not so...
> > >
Please enlighten the rest of us how a locker contributed to this
particular rollover where a spool would not have. Is it because it was
trying to load/unload as her front end unweighted? Either way, I think
even with a spool, at least from watching that video, her jeep
would've likely bounced a bit and gone over with that particular line;
it was getting awfully tippy... But hey, what do I know? I've only
been to Moab once, and sure as heck didn't try that particular climb
while I was there ;-)
Thanks
L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@***.net> wrote in message news:<40B247CE.1B8F1605@***.net>...
> Yes, but if you can't get it to drive off a jack stand, then he
> needs something. I vote spool, front and rear, they don't have you do
> pirouettes, like Jennifer's locker:
> http://www.----------.com/jenjeeproll.mpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> Jerry McG wrote:
> >
> > To properly test if you have a limited slip you have to get both rear wheels
> > off the ground and spin either of them forward or back wards. If the
> > opposite tire spins in the same direction you have a limited slip, if it
> > spins in the opposite diorection you've got an open differential. Even
> > severly work limited slip clutches will still lock enough to confirm a
> > limited slip with this test.
> >
> > (Note: If you have a Dana 35 DO NOT jack the rear end up by placing the jack
> > under the differential pumpkin, you can bend the axle housing if you do.)
> >
> > "Alan" <apcurtis@lucent.com> wrote in message
> > news:c8su0f$4g1@netnews.proxy.lucent.com...
> > > I tested it over the weekend by jacking up one rear tire with my floor
> jack that
> > > has it's own wheels. With the tire barely touching the ground I could
> "drive"
> > > forward. As soon as that wheel lifted completly off however, there was
> not even
> > > a hint of forward effort as the wheel just spun....
> > >
> > > I think it's definately "open" now...
> > >
> > > alan
> > >
> > > L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> > > > I think not to worry, I ran a Dana 44 limited slip that came with
> > > > the Jeep for '68 for ten years, and as far as I know it was working as
> > > > good as it ever did. Of course I made sure the tires were always the
> > > > same size a pressure. and didn't act like a squirrel pealing out around
> > > > turns.
> > > > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> > > >
> > > > Alan wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>Yikes. If it turns into that path, then I guess I'll just run
> "semi-limited"
> > > >>until I can ARB it and go 4.10s. But that might be a while so I hope
> it's not so...
> > >
05-25-2004, 12:34 AM
#64
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: TJ limited slip wear out?
Bill,
Please enlighten the rest of us how a locker contributed to this
particular rollover where a spool would not have. Is it because it was
trying to load/unload as her front end unweighted? Either way, I think
even with a spool, at least from watching that video, her jeep
would've likely bounced a bit and gone over with that particular line;
it was getting awfully tippy... But hey, what do I know? I've only
been to Moab once, and sure as heck didn't try that particular climb
while I was there ;-)
Thanks
L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@***.net> wrote in message news:<40B247CE.1B8F1605@***.net>...
> Yes, but if you can't get it to drive off a jack stand, then he
> needs something. I vote spool, front and rear, they don't have you do
> pirouettes, like Jennifer's locker:
> http://www.----------.com/jenjeeproll.mpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> Jerry McG wrote:
> >
> > To properly test if you have a limited slip you have to get both rear wheels
> > off the ground and spin either of them forward or back wards. If the
> > opposite tire spins in the same direction you have a limited slip, if it
> > spins in the opposite diorection you've got an open differential. Even
> > severly work limited slip clutches will still lock enough to confirm a
> > limited slip with this test.
> >
> > (Note: If you have a Dana 35 DO NOT jack the rear end up by placing the jack
> > under the differential pumpkin, you can bend the axle housing if you do.)
> >
> > "Alan" <apcurtis@lucent.com> wrote in message
> > news:c8su0f$4g1@netnews.proxy.lucent.com...
> > > I tested it over the weekend by jacking up one rear tire with my floor
> jack that
> > > has it's own wheels. With the tire barely touching the ground I could
> "drive"
> > > forward. As soon as that wheel lifted completly off however, there was
> not even
> > > a hint of forward effort as the wheel just spun....
> > >
> > > I think it's definately "open" now...
> > >
> > > alan
> > >
> > > L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> > > > I think not to worry, I ran a Dana 44 limited slip that came with
> > > > the Jeep for '68 for ten years, and as far as I know it was working as
> > > > good as it ever did. Of course I made sure the tires were always the
> > > > same size a pressure. and didn't act like a squirrel pealing out around
> > > > turns.
> > > > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> > > >
> > > > Alan wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>Yikes. If it turns into that path, then I guess I'll just run
> "semi-limited"
> > > >>until I can ARB it and go 4.10s. But that might be a while so I hope
> it's not so...
> > >
Please enlighten the rest of us how a locker contributed to this
particular rollover where a spool would not have. Is it because it was
trying to load/unload as her front end unweighted? Either way, I think
even with a spool, at least from watching that video, her jeep
would've likely bounced a bit and gone over with that particular line;
it was getting awfully tippy... But hey, what do I know? I've only
been to Moab once, and sure as heck didn't try that particular climb
while I was there ;-)
Thanks
L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@***.net> wrote in message news:<40B247CE.1B8F1605@***.net>...
> Yes, but if you can't get it to drive off a jack stand, then he
> needs something. I vote spool, front and rear, they don't have you do
> pirouettes, like Jennifer's locker:
> http://www.----------.com/jenjeeproll.mpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> Jerry McG wrote:
> >
> > To properly test if you have a limited slip you have to get both rear wheels
> > off the ground and spin either of them forward or back wards. If the
> > opposite tire spins in the same direction you have a limited slip, if it
> > spins in the opposite diorection you've got an open differential. Even
> > severly work limited slip clutches will still lock enough to confirm a
> > limited slip with this test.
> >
> > (Note: If you have a Dana 35 DO NOT jack the rear end up by placing the jack
> > under the differential pumpkin, you can bend the axle housing if you do.)
> >
> > "Alan" <apcurtis@lucent.com> wrote in message
> > news:c8su0f$4g1@netnews.proxy.lucent.com...
> > > I tested it over the weekend by jacking up one rear tire with my floor
> jack that
> > > has it's own wheels. With the tire barely touching the ground I could
> "drive"
> > > forward. As soon as that wheel lifted completly off however, there was
> not even
> > > a hint of forward effort as the wheel just spun....
> > >
> > > I think it's definately "open" now...
> > >
> > > alan
> > >
> > > L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> > > > I think not to worry, I ran a Dana 44 limited slip that came with
> > > > the Jeep for '68 for ten years, and as far as I know it was working as
> > > > good as it ever did. Of course I made sure the tires were always the
> > > > same size a pressure. and didn't act like a squirrel pealing out around
> > > > turns.
> > > > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> > > >
> > > > Alan wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>Yikes. If it turns into that path, then I guess I'll just run
> "semi-limited"
> > > >>until I can ARB it and go 4.10s. But that might be a while so I hope
> it's not so...
> > >
05-25-2004, 12:34 AM
#65
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: TJ limited slip wear out?
Bill,
Please enlighten the rest of us how a locker contributed to this
particular rollover where a spool would not have. Is it because it was
trying to load/unload as her front end unweighted? Either way, I think
even with a spool, at least from watching that video, her jeep
would've likely bounced a bit and gone over with that particular line;
it was getting awfully tippy... But hey, what do I know? I've only
been to Moab once, and sure as heck didn't try that particular climb
while I was there ;-)
Thanks
L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@***.net> wrote in message news:<40B247CE.1B8F1605@***.net>...
> Yes, but if you can't get it to drive off a jack stand, then he
> needs something. I vote spool, front and rear, they don't have you do
> pirouettes, like Jennifer's locker:
> http://www.----------.com/jenjeeproll.mpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> Jerry McG wrote:
> >
> > To properly test if you have a limited slip you have to get both rear wheels
> > off the ground and spin either of them forward or back wards. If the
> > opposite tire spins in the same direction you have a limited slip, if it
> > spins in the opposite diorection you've got an open differential. Even
> > severly work limited slip clutches will still lock enough to confirm a
> > limited slip with this test.
> >
> > (Note: If you have a Dana 35 DO NOT jack the rear end up by placing the jack
> > under the differential pumpkin, you can bend the axle housing if you do.)
> >
> > "Alan" <apcurtis@lucent.com> wrote in message
> > news:c8su0f$4g1@netnews.proxy.lucent.com...
> > > I tested it over the weekend by jacking up one rear tire with my floor
> jack that
> > > has it's own wheels. With the tire barely touching the ground I could
> "drive"
> > > forward. As soon as that wheel lifted completly off however, there was
> not even
> > > a hint of forward effort as the wheel just spun....
> > >
> > > I think it's definately "open" now...
> > >
> > > alan
> > >
> > > L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> > > > I think not to worry, I ran a Dana 44 limited slip that came with
> > > > the Jeep for '68 for ten years, and as far as I know it was working as
> > > > good as it ever did. Of course I made sure the tires were always the
> > > > same size a pressure. and didn't act like a squirrel pealing out around
> > > > turns.
> > > > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> > > >
> > > > Alan wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>Yikes. If it turns into that path, then I guess I'll just run
> "semi-limited"
> > > >>until I can ARB it and go 4.10s. But that might be a while so I hope
> it's not so...
> > >
Please enlighten the rest of us how a locker contributed to this
particular rollover where a spool would not have. Is it because it was
trying to load/unload as her front end unweighted? Either way, I think
even with a spool, at least from watching that video, her jeep
would've likely bounced a bit and gone over with that particular line;
it was getting awfully tippy... But hey, what do I know? I've only
been to Moab once, and sure as heck didn't try that particular climb
while I was there ;-)
Thanks
L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@***.net> wrote in message news:<40B247CE.1B8F1605@***.net>...
> Yes, but if you can't get it to drive off a jack stand, then he
> needs something. I vote spool, front and rear, they don't have you do
> pirouettes, like Jennifer's locker:
> http://www.----------.com/jenjeeproll.mpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> Jerry McG wrote:
> >
> > To properly test if you have a limited slip you have to get both rear wheels
> > off the ground and spin either of them forward or back wards. If the
> > opposite tire spins in the same direction you have a limited slip, if it
> > spins in the opposite diorection you've got an open differential. Even
> > severly work limited slip clutches will still lock enough to confirm a
> > limited slip with this test.
> >
> > (Note: If you have a Dana 35 DO NOT jack the rear end up by placing the jack
> > under the differential pumpkin, you can bend the axle housing if you do.)
> >
> > "Alan" <apcurtis@lucent.com> wrote in message
> > news:c8su0f$4g1@netnews.proxy.lucent.com...
> > > I tested it over the weekend by jacking up one rear tire with my floor
> jack that
> > > has it's own wheels. With the tire barely touching the ground I could
> "drive"
> > > forward. As soon as that wheel lifted completly off however, there was
> not even
> > > a hint of forward effort as the wheel just spun....
> > >
> > > I think it's definately "open" now...
> > >
> > > alan
> > >
> > > L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:
> > > > I think not to worry, I ran a Dana 44 limited slip that came with
> > > > the Jeep for '68 for ten years, and as far as I know it was working as
> > > > good as it ever did. Of course I made sure the tires were always the
> > > > same size a pressure. and didn't act like a squirrel pealing out around
> > > > turns.
> > > > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> > > >
> > > > Alan wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>Yikes. If it turns into that path, then I guess I'll just run
> "semi-limited"
> > > >>until I can ARB it and go 4.10s. But that might be a while so I hope
> it's not so...
> > >
05-25-2004, 12:59 AM
#66
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: TJ limited slip wear out?
The outside wheel on a Detroit Locker releases and then spins
faster so the car may drive around a corner. And that's what we see
here, the rear wheel closest us released when the front right caught,
turning the TJ right and up without any drag what's so ever. Never
happen with a spool.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Bob wrote:
>
> Bill,
>
> Please enlighten the rest of us how a locker contributed to this
> particular rollover where a spool would not have. Is it because it was
> trying to load/unload as her front end unweighted? Either way, I think
> even with a spool, at least from watching that video, her jeep
> would've likely bounced a bit and gone over with that particular line;
> it was getting awfully tippy... But hey, what do I know? I've only
> been to Moab once, and sure as heck didn't try that particular climb
> while I was there ;-)
>
> Thanks
faster so the car may drive around a corner. And that's what we see
here, the rear wheel closest us released when the front right caught,
turning the TJ right and up without any drag what's so ever. Never
happen with a spool.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Bob wrote:
>
> Bill,
>
> Please enlighten the rest of us how a locker contributed to this
> particular rollover where a spool would not have. Is it because it was
> trying to load/unload as her front end unweighted? Either way, I think
> even with a spool, at least from watching that video, her jeep
> would've likely bounced a bit and gone over with that particular line;
> it was getting awfully tippy... But hey, what do I know? I've only
> been to Moab once, and sure as heck didn't try that particular climb
> while I was there ;-)
>
> Thanks
05-25-2004, 12:59 AM
#67
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: TJ limited slip wear out?
The outside wheel on a Detroit Locker releases and then spins
faster so the car may drive around a corner. And that's what we see
here, the rear wheel closest us released when the front right caught,
turning the TJ right and up without any drag what's so ever. Never
happen with a spool.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Bob wrote:
>
> Bill,
>
> Please enlighten the rest of us how a locker contributed to this
> particular rollover where a spool would not have. Is it because it was
> trying to load/unload as her front end unweighted? Either way, I think
> even with a spool, at least from watching that video, her jeep
> would've likely bounced a bit and gone over with that particular line;
> it was getting awfully tippy... But hey, what do I know? I've only
> been to Moab once, and sure as heck didn't try that particular climb
> while I was there ;-)
>
> Thanks
faster so the car may drive around a corner. And that's what we see
here, the rear wheel closest us released when the front right caught,
turning the TJ right and up without any drag what's so ever. Never
happen with a spool.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Bob wrote:
>
> Bill,
>
> Please enlighten the rest of us how a locker contributed to this
> particular rollover where a spool would not have. Is it because it was
> trying to load/unload as her front end unweighted? Either way, I think
> even with a spool, at least from watching that video, her jeep
> would've likely bounced a bit and gone over with that particular line;
> it was getting awfully tippy... But hey, what do I know? I've only
> been to Moab once, and sure as heck didn't try that particular climb
> while I was there ;-)
>
> Thanks
05-25-2004, 12:59 AM
#68
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: TJ limited slip wear out?
The outside wheel on a Detroit Locker releases and then spins
faster so the car may drive around a corner. And that's what we see
here, the rear wheel closest us released when the front right caught,
turning the TJ right and up without any drag what's so ever. Never
happen with a spool.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Bob wrote:
>
> Bill,
>
> Please enlighten the rest of us how a locker contributed to this
> particular rollover where a spool would not have. Is it because it was
> trying to load/unload as her front end unweighted? Either way, I think
> even with a spool, at least from watching that video, her jeep
> would've likely bounced a bit and gone over with that particular line;
> it was getting awfully tippy... But hey, what do I know? I've only
> been to Moab once, and sure as heck didn't try that particular climb
> while I was there ;-)
>
> Thanks
faster so the car may drive around a corner. And that's what we see
here, the rear wheel closest us released when the front right caught,
turning the TJ right and up without any drag what's so ever. Never
happen with a spool.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Bob wrote:
>
> Bill,
>
> Please enlighten the rest of us how a locker contributed to this
> particular rollover where a spool would not have. Is it because it was
> trying to load/unload as her front end unweighted? Either way, I think
> even with a spool, at least from watching that video, her jeep
> would've likely bounced a bit and gone over with that particular line;
> it was getting awfully tippy... But hey, what do I know? I've only
> been to Moab once, and sure as heck didn't try that particular climb
> while I was there ;-)
>
> Thanks
05-25-2004, 12:59 AM
#69
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: TJ limited slip wear out?
The outside wheel on a Detroit Locker releases and then spins
faster so the car may drive around a corner. And that's what we see
here, the rear wheel closest us released when the front right caught,
turning the TJ right and up without any drag what's so ever. Never
happen with a spool.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Bob wrote:
>
> Bill,
>
> Please enlighten the rest of us how a locker contributed to this
> particular rollover where a spool would not have. Is it because it was
> trying to load/unload as her front end unweighted? Either way, I think
> even with a spool, at least from watching that video, her jeep
> would've likely bounced a bit and gone over with that particular line;
> it was getting awfully tippy... But hey, what do I know? I've only
> been to Moab once, and sure as heck didn't try that particular climb
> while I was there ;-)
>
> Thanks
faster so the car may drive around a corner. And that's what we see
here, the rear wheel closest us released when the front right caught,
turning the TJ right and up without any drag what's so ever. Never
happen with a spool.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Bob wrote:
>
> Bill,
>
> Please enlighten the rest of us how a locker contributed to this
> particular rollover where a spool would not have. Is it because it was
> trying to load/unload as her front end unweighted? Either way, I think
> even with a spool, at least from watching that video, her jeep
> would've likely bounced a bit and gone over with that particular line;
> it was getting awfully tippy... But hey, what do I know? I've only
> been to Moab once, and sure as heck didn't try that particular climb
> while I was there ;-)
>
> Thanks
05-25-2004, 09:38 AM
#70
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: TJ limited slip wear out?
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:40B2D2C1.9D45CD5D@***.net...
> The outside wheel on a Detroit Locker releases and then spins
> faster so the car may drive around a corner. And that's what we see
> here, the rear wheel closest us released when the front right caught,
> turning the TJ right and up without any drag what's so ever. Never
> happen with a spool.
It looked to me like the RR was unlocked, causing the rear to push it to the
right as soon as the front started to slip. TJs have a tendency for the rear
end to steer the front in situations like that, hence the custom 4 links
triangulated at the top of the rear pumpkin. I'd say this was a group
effort!
FWIW, see Kilbys "TJ7" ferature on their website re: this issue.
http://www.kilbyenterprises.com/
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Bob wrote:
> >
> > Bill,
> >
> > Please enlighten the rest of us how a locker contributed to this
> > particular rollover where a spool would not have. Is it because it was
> > trying to load/unload as her front end unweighted? Either way, I think
> > even with a spool, at least from watching that video, her jeep
> > would've likely bounced a bit and gone over with that particular line;
> > it was getting awfully tippy... But hey, what do I know? I've only
> > been to Moab once, and sure as heck didn't try that particular climb
> > while I was there ;-)
> >
> > Thanks
