TJ gears
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: TJ gears
I didn't even know the Dana 44 was an option with the 4cyl TJ's?
Dave
http://mysite.verizon.net/res0p2es/david/index.htm
On Thu, 05 Feb 2004 16:32:04 GMT, Steve <xjlfter@bogus.com> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>When a newer TJ (4-cyl?) comes with a 4.10 ratio Dana 44 rear with
>track-lock, is it true that the carrier is the same size as the one that
>would come with 3.73 ratio? In other words, is the factory 4.10 ring
>gear thicker than a typical 4.10 ring gear in order to compensate for
>the lack of a carrier break in the TJ Dana 44?
>
>I've heard that the use of thicker 4.10 ring gears in order to avoid a
>carrier break in the TJ dates from the 1999 model year. Can anyone
>confirm this?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Steve
Dave
http://mysite.verizon.net/res0p2es/david/index.htm
On Thu, 05 Feb 2004 16:32:04 GMT, Steve <xjlfter@bogus.com> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>When a newer TJ (4-cyl?) comes with a 4.10 ratio Dana 44 rear with
>track-lock, is it true that the carrier is the same size as the one that
>would come with 3.73 ratio? In other words, is the factory 4.10 ring
>gear thicker than a typical 4.10 ring gear in order to compensate for
>the lack of a carrier break in the TJ Dana 44?
>
>I've heard that the use of thicker 4.10 ring gears in order to avoid a
>carrier break in the TJ dates from the 1999 model year. Can anyone
>confirm this?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Steve
#12
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: TJ gears
I didn't even know the Dana 44 was an option with the 4cyl TJ's?
Dave
http://mysite.verizon.net/res0p2es/david/index.htm
On Thu, 05 Feb 2004 16:32:04 GMT, Steve <xjlfter@bogus.com> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>When a newer TJ (4-cyl?) comes with a 4.10 ratio Dana 44 rear with
>track-lock, is it true that the carrier is the same size as the one that
>would come with 3.73 ratio? In other words, is the factory 4.10 ring
>gear thicker than a typical 4.10 ring gear in order to compensate for
>the lack of a carrier break in the TJ Dana 44?
>
>I've heard that the use of thicker 4.10 ring gears in order to avoid a
>carrier break in the TJ dates from the 1999 model year. Can anyone
>confirm this?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Steve
Dave
http://mysite.verizon.net/res0p2es/david/index.htm
On Thu, 05 Feb 2004 16:32:04 GMT, Steve <xjlfter@bogus.com> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>When a newer TJ (4-cyl?) comes with a 4.10 ratio Dana 44 rear with
>track-lock, is it true that the carrier is the same size as the one that
>would come with 3.73 ratio? In other words, is the factory 4.10 ring
>gear thicker than a typical 4.10 ring gear in order to compensate for
>the lack of a carrier break in the TJ Dana 44?
>
>I've heard that the use of thicker 4.10 ring gears in order to avoid a
>carrier break in the TJ dates from the 1999 model year. Can anyone
>confirm this?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Steve
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: TJ gears
I didn't even know the Dana 44 was an option with the 4cyl TJ's?
Dave
http://mysite.verizon.net/res0p2es/david/index.htm
On Thu, 05 Feb 2004 16:32:04 GMT, Steve <xjlfter@bogus.com> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>When a newer TJ (4-cyl?) comes with a 4.10 ratio Dana 44 rear with
>track-lock, is it true that the carrier is the same size as the one that
>would come with 3.73 ratio? In other words, is the factory 4.10 ring
>gear thicker than a typical 4.10 ring gear in order to compensate for
>the lack of a carrier break in the TJ Dana 44?
>
>I've heard that the use of thicker 4.10 ring gears in order to avoid a
>carrier break in the TJ dates from the 1999 model year. Can anyone
>confirm this?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Steve
Dave
http://mysite.verizon.net/res0p2es/david/index.htm
On Thu, 05 Feb 2004 16:32:04 GMT, Steve <xjlfter@bogus.com> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>When a newer TJ (4-cyl?) comes with a 4.10 ratio Dana 44 rear with
>track-lock, is it true that the carrier is the same size as the one that
>would come with 3.73 ratio? In other words, is the factory 4.10 ring
>gear thicker than a typical 4.10 ring gear in order to compensate for
>the lack of a carrier break in the TJ Dana 44?
>
>I've heard that the use of thicker 4.10 ring gears in order to avoid a
>carrier break in the TJ dates from the 1999 model year. Can anyone
>confirm this?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Steve
#14
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: TJ gears
Well, it was standard on the '48 Civilian Jeep, four cylinder.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"David C. Moller" wrote:
>
> I didn't even know the Dana 44 was an option with the 4cyl TJ's?
>
> Dave
> http://mysite.verizon.net/res0p2es/david/index.htm
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"David C. Moller" wrote:
>
> I didn't even know the Dana 44 was an option with the 4cyl TJ's?
>
> Dave
> http://mysite.verizon.net/res0p2es/david/index.htm
#15
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: TJ gears
Well, it was standard on the '48 Civilian Jeep, four cylinder.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"David C. Moller" wrote:
>
> I didn't even know the Dana 44 was an option with the 4cyl TJ's?
>
> Dave
> http://mysite.verizon.net/res0p2es/david/index.htm
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"David C. Moller" wrote:
>
> I didn't even know the Dana 44 was an option with the 4cyl TJ's?
>
> Dave
> http://mysite.verizon.net/res0p2es/david/index.htm
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: TJ gears
Well, it was standard on the '48 Civilian Jeep, four cylinder.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"David C. Moller" wrote:
>
> I didn't even know the Dana 44 was an option with the 4cyl TJ's?
>
> Dave
> http://mysite.verizon.net/res0p2es/david/index.htm
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"David C. Moller" wrote:
>
> I didn't even know the Dana 44 was an option with the 4cyl TJ's?
>
> Dave
> http://mysite.verizon.net/res0p2es/david/index.htm
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
iH2doU
Jeep Mailing List
1
07-19-2003 08:25 AM
Joseph
Jeep Mailing List
5
07-15-2003 10:39 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)