They are still producing the Cherokee (Sort of). The Chinese Jeep 2500
Guest
Posts: n/a
Guest
Posts: n/a
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 20:18:48 -0700, QX <nomail@nospam.com> wrote:
>See the link and tell us what you think:
>
>http://www.jeep.com.cn/jeep2500/about/out.html
There is also a 2700 series
2500 = 2.4 l
2700 = 2.7 l
>See the link and tell us what you think:
>
>http://www.jeep.com.cn/jeep2500/about/out.html
There is also a 2700 series
2500 = 2.4 l
2700 = 2.7 l
Guest
Posts: n/a
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 20:18:48 -0700, QX <nomail@nospam.com> wrote:
>See the link and tell us what you think:
>
>http://www.jeep.com.cn/jeep2500/about/out.html
There is also a 2700 series
2500 = 2.4 l
2700 = 2.7 l
>See the link and tell us what you think:
>
>http://www.jeep.com.cn/jeep2500/about/out.html
There is also a 2700 series
2500 = 2.4 l
2700 = 2.7 l
Guest
Posts: n/a
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 20:18:48 -0700, QX <nomail@nospam.com> wrote:
>See the link and tell us what you think:
>
>http://www.jeep.com.cn/jeep2500/about/out.html
There is also a 2700 series
2500 = 2.4 l
2700 = 2.7 l
>See the link and tell us what you think:
>
>http://www.jeep.com.cn/jeep2500/about/out.html
There is also a 2700 series
2500 = 2.4 l
2700 = 2.7 l
Guest
Posts: n/a
Slick. Too bad there isnt a 4.0.
Carl
"QX" <nomail@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:9pu2k2l75gcviuui2r2padtdl80famo59e@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 20:18:48 -0700, QX <nomail@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>>See the link and tell us what you think:
>>
>>http://www.jeep.com.cn/jeep2500/about/out.html
>
> There is also a 2700 series
>
> 2500 = 2.4 l
> 2700 = 2.7 l
Carl
"QX" <nomail@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:9pu2k2l75gcviuui2r2padtdl80famo59e@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 20:18:48 -0700, QX <nomail@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>>See the link and tell us what you think:
>>
>>http://www.jeep.com.cn/jeep2500/about/out.html
>
> There is also a 2700 series
>
> 2500 = 2.4 l
> 2700 = 2.7 l
Guest
Posts: n/a
Slick. Too bad there isnt a 4.0.
Carl
"QX" <nomail@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:9pu2k2l75gcviuui2r2padtdl80famo59e@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 20:18:48 -0700, QX <nomail@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>>See the link and tell us what you think:
>>
>>http://www.jeep.com.cn/jeep2500/about/out.html
>
> There is also a 2700 series
>
> 2500 = 2.4 l
> 2700 = 2.7 l
Carl
"QX" <nomail@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:9pu2k2l75gcviuui2r2padtdl80famo59e@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 20:18:48 -0700, QX <nomail@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>>See the link and tell us what you think:
>>
>>http://www.jeep.com.cn/jeep2500/about/out.html
>
> There is also a 2700 series
>
> 2500 = 2.4 l
> 2700 = 2.7 l
Guest
Posts: n/a
Slick. Too bad there isnt a 4.0.
Carl
"QX" <nomail@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:9pu2k2l75gcviuui2r2padtdl80famo59e@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 20:18:48 -0700, QX <nomail@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>>See the link and tell us what you think:
>>
>>http://www.jeep.com.cn/jeep2500/about/out.html
>
> There is also a 2700 series
>
> 2500 = 2.4 l
> 2700 = 2.7 l
Carl
"QX" <nomail@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:9pu2k2l75gcviuui2r2padtdl80famo59e@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 20:18:48 -0700, QX <nomail@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>>See the link and tell us what you think:
>>
>>http://www.jeep.com.cn/jeep2500/about/out.html
>
> There is also a 2700 series
>
> 2500 = 2.4 l
> 2700 = 2.7 l
Guest
Posts: n/a
Sure looks like one to me, except for the weak engine and the sunroof.
How come we never got sunroofs in our XJ's?
Jeff DeWitt
Carl wrote:
> Slick. Too bad there isnt a 4.0.
>
> Carl
>
> "QX" <nomail@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:9pu2k2l75gcviuui2r2padtdl80famo59e@4ax.com...
>
>>On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 20:18:48 -0700, QX <nomail@nospam.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>See the link and tell us what you think:
>>>
>>>http://www.jeep.com.cn/jeep2500/about/out.html
>>
>>There is also a 2700 series
>>
>>2500 = 2.4 l
>>2700 = 2.7 l
>
>
>
How come we never got sunroofs in our XJ's?
Jeff DeWitt
Carl wrote:
> Slick. Too bad there isnt a 4.0.
>
> Carl
>
> "QX" <nomail@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:9pu2k2l75gcviuui2r2padtdl80famo59e@4ax.com...
>
>>On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 20:18:48 -0700, QX <nomail@nospam.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>See the link and tell us what you think:
>>>
>>>http://www.jeep.com.cn/jeep2500/about/out.html
>>
>>There is also a 2700 series
>>
>>2500 = 2.4 l
>>2700 = 2.7 l
>
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Sure looks like one to me, except for the weak engine and the sunroof.
How come we never got sunroofs in our XJ's?
Jeff DeWitt
Carl wrote:
> Slick. Too bad there isnt a 4.0.
>
> Carl
>
> "QX" <nomail@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:9pu2k2l75gcviuui2r2padtdl80famo59e@4ax.com...
>
>>On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 20:18:48 -0700, QX <nomail@nospam.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>See the link and tell us what you think:
>>>
>>>http://www.jeep.com.cn/jeep2500/about/out.html
>>
>>There is also a 2700 series
>>
>>2500 = 2.4 l
>>2700 = 2.7 l
>
>
>
How come we never got sunroofs in our XJ's?
Jeff DeWitt
Carl wrote:
> Slick. Too bad there isnt a 4.0.
>
> Carl
>
> "QX" <nomail@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:9pu2k2l75gcviuui2r2padtdl80famo59e@4ax.com...
>
>>On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 20:18:48 -0700, QX <nomail@nospam.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>See the link and tell us what you think:
>>>
>>>http://www.jeep.com.cn/jeep2500/about/out.html
>>
>>There is also a 2700 series
>>
>>2500 = 2.4 l
>>2700 = 2.7 l
>
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Sure looks like one to me, except for the weak engine and the sunroof.
How come we never got sunroofs in our XJ's?
Jeff DeWitt
Carl wrote:
> Slick. Too bad there isnt a 4.0.
>
> Carl
>
> "QX" <nomail@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:9pu2k2l75gcviuui2r2padtdl80famo59e@4ax.com...
>
>>On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 20:18:48 -0700, QX <nomail@nospam.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>See the link and tell us what you think:
>>>
>>>http://www.jeep.com.cn/jeep2500/about/out.html
>>
>>There is also a 2700 series
>>
>>2500 = 2.4 l
>>2700 = 2.7 l
>
>
>
How come we never got sunroofs in our XJ's?
Jeff DeWitt
Carl wrote:
> Slick. Too bad there isnt a 4.0.
>
> Carl
>
> "QX" <nomail@nospam.com> wrote in message
> news:9pu2k2l75gcviuui2r2padtdl80famo59e@4ax.com...
>
>>On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 20:18:48 -0700, QX <nomail@nospam.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>See the link and tell us what you think:
>>>
>>>http://www.jeep.com.cn/jeep2500/about/out.html
>>
>>There is also a 2700 series
>>
>>2500 = 2.4 l
>>2700 = 2.7 l
>
>
>


