Temp gauge inaccurate
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Temp gauge inaccurate
By the way I'm really talking degrees not percent.
+/- 1 degree is acceptable
+/- 5 degrees is not.
There's a big difference between +15C and +20C
Same for the negative numbers :-)
FrankW wrote:
> 5% is a joke.
> Most modern temp sensors are much better than that.
>
>
>
> Professor wrote:
>
>> I think you're expecting 1% accuracy... where 5% was designed.
>>
>> Professor
>> www.telstar-electronics.com
>>
>
+/- 1 degree is acceptable
+/- 5 degrees is not.
There's a big difference between +15C and +20C
Same for the negative numbers :-)
FrankW wrote:
> 5% is a joke.
> Most modern temp sensors are much better than that.
>
>
>
> Professor wrote:
>
>> I think you're expecting 1% accuracy... where 5% was designed.
>>
>> Professor
>> www.telstar-electronics.com
>>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Temp gauge inaccurate
By the way I'm really talking degrees not percent.
+/- 1 degree is acceptable
+/- 5 degrees is not.
There's a big difference between +15C and +20C
Same for the negative numbers :-)
FrankW wrote:
> 5% is a joke.
> Most modern temp sensors are much better than that.
>
>
>
> Professor wrote:
>
>> I think you're expecting 1% accuracy... where 5% was designed.
>>
>> Professor
>> www.telstar-electronics.com
>>
>
+/- 1 degree is acceptable
+/- 5 degrees is not.
There's a big difference between +15C and +20C
Same for the negative numbers :-)
FrankW wrote:
> 5% is a joke.
> Most modern temp sensors are much better than that.
>
>
>
> Professor wrote:
>
>> I think you're expecting 1% accuracy... where 5% was designed.
>>
>> Professor
>> www.telstar-electronics.com
>>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Temp gauge inaccurate
By the way I'm really talking degrees not percent.
+/- 1 degree is acceptable
+/- 5 degrees is not.
There's a big difference between +15C and +20C
Same for the negative numbers :-)
FrankW wrote:
> 5% is a joke.
> Most modern temp sensors are much better than that.
>
>
>
> Professor wrote:
>
>> I think you're expecting 1% accuracy... where 5% was designed.
>>
>> Professor
>> www.telstar-electronics.com
>>
>
+/- 1 degree is acceptable
+/- 5 degrees is not.
There's a big difference between +15C and +20C
Same for the negative numbers :-)
FrankW wrote:
> 5% is a joke.
> Most modern temp sensors are much better than that.
>
>
>
> Professor wrote:
>
>> I think you're expecting 1% accuracy... where 5% was designed.
>>
>> Professor
>> www.telstar-electronics.com
>>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Temp gauge inaccurate
Hell, mine will start off ~+6-8 degrees and start cooling down a tad a i
get moving. Once the engine warms up it throws it off again though.
Brandonb
FrankW wrote:
> By the way I'm really talking degrees not percent.
> +/- 1 degree is acceptable
> +/- 5 degrees is not.
> There's a big difference between +15C and +20C
> Same for the negative numbers :-)
>
>
> FrankW wrote:
>
>> 5% is a joke.
>> Most modern temp sensors are much better than that.
>>
>>
>>
>> Professor wrote:
>>
>>> I think you're expecting 1% accuracy... where 5% was designed.
>>>
>>> Professor
>>> www.telstar-electronics.com
>>>
>>
>
get moving. Once the engine warms up it throws it off again though.
Brandonb
FrankW wrote:
> By the way I'm really talking degrees not percent.
> +/- 1 degree is acceptable
> +/- 5 degrees is not.
> There's a big difference between +15C and +20C
> Same for the negative numbers :-)
>
>
> FrankW wrote:
>
>> 5% is a joke.
>> Most modern temp sensors are much better than that.
>>
>>
>>
>> Professor wrote:
>>
>>> I think you're expecting 1% accuracy... where 5% was designed.
>>>
>>> Professor
>>> www.telstar-electronics.com
>>>
>>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Temp gauge inaccurate
Hell, mine will start off ~+6-8 degrees and start cooling down a tad a i
get moving. Once the engine warms up it throws it off again though.
Brandonb
FrankW wrote:
> By the way I'm really talking degrees not percent.
> +/- 1 degree is acceptable
> +/- 5 degrees is not.
> There's a big difference between +15C and +20C
> Same for the negative numbers :-)
>
>
> FrankW wrote:
>
>> 5% is a joke.
>> Most modern temp sensors are much better than that.
>>
>>
>>
>> Professor wrote:
>>
>>> I think you're expecting 1% accuracy... where 5% was designed.
>>>
>>> Professor
>>> www.telstar-electronics.com
>>>
>>
>
get moving. Once the engine warms up it throws it off again though.
Brandonb
FrankW wrote:
> By the way I'm really talking degrees not percent.
> +/- 1 degree is acceptable
> +/- 5 degrees is not.
> There's a big difference between +15C and +20C
> Same for the negative numbers :-)
>
>
> FrankW wrote:
>
>> 5% is a joke.
>> Most modern temp sensors are much better than that.
>>
>>
>>
>> Professor wrote:
>>
>>> I think you're expecting 1% accuracy... where 5% was designed.
>>>
>>> Professor
>>> www.telstar-electronics.com
>>>
>>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Temp gauge inaccurate
Hell, mine will start off ~+6-8 degrees and start cooling down a tad a i
get moving. Once the engine warms up it throws it off again though.
Brandonb
FrankW wrote:
> By the way I'm really talking degrees not percent.
> +/- 1 degree is acceptable
> +/- 5 degrees is not.
> There's a big difference between +15C and +20C
> Same for the negative numbers :-)
>
>
> FrankW wrote:
>
>> 5% is a joke.
>> Most modern temp sensors are much better than that.
>>
>>
>>
>> Professor wrote:
>>
>>> I think you're expecting 1% accuracy... where 5% was designed.
>>>
>>> Professor
>>> www.telstar-electronics.com
>>>
>>
>
get moving. Once the engine warms up it throws it off again though.
Brandonb
FrankW wrote:
> By the way I'm really talking degrees not percent.
> +/- 1 degree is acceptable
> +/- 5 degrees is not.
> There's a big difference between +15C and +20C
> Same for the negative numbers :-)
>
>
> FrankW wrote:
>
>> 5% is a joke.
>> Most modern temp sensors are much better than that.
>>
>>
>>
>> Professor wrote:
>>
>>> I think you're expecting 1% accuracy... where 5% was designed.
>>>
>>> Professor
>>> www.telstar-electronics.com
>>>
>>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Temp gauge inaccurate
Hell, mine will start off ~+6-8 degrees and start cooling down a tad a i
get moving. Once the engine warms up it throws it off again though.
Brandonb
FrankW wrote:
> By the way I'm really talking degrees not percent.
> +/- 1 degree is acceptable
> +/- 5 degrees is not.
> There's a big difference between +15C and +20C
> Same for the negative numbers :-)
>
>
> FrankW wrote:
>
>> 5% is a joke.
>> Most modern temp sensors are much better than that.
>>
>>
>>
>> Professor wrote:
>>
>>> I think you're expecting 1% accuracy... where 5% was designed.
>>>
>>> Professor
>>> www.telstar-electronics.com
>>>
>>
>
get moving. Once the engine warms up it throws it off again though.
Brandonb
FrankW wrote:
> By the way I'm really talking degrees not percent.
> +/- 1 degree is acceptable
> +/- 5 degrees is not.
> There's a big difference between +15C and +20C
> Same for the negative numbers :-)
>
>
> FrankW wrote:
>
>> 5% is a joke.
>> Most modern temp sensors are much better than that.
>>
>>
>>
>> Professor wrote:
>>
>>> I think you're expecting 1% accuracy... where 5% was designed.
>>>
>>> Professor
>>> www.telstar-electronics.com
>>>
>>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Temp gauge inaccurate
The sensors may be better than 5%... but the analog gauge movement is
more like 5%.
Professor
Check out FlashAlert at www.telstar-electronics.com
more like 5%.
Professor
Check out FlashAlert at www.telstar-electronics.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Temp gauge inaccurate
The sensors may be better than 5%... but the analog gauge movement is
more like 5%.
Professor
Check out FlashAlert at www.telstar-electronics.com
more like 5%.
Professor
Check out FlashAlert at www.telstar-electronics.com
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Temp gauge inaccurate
The sensors may be better than 5%... but the analog gauge movement is
more like 5%.
Professor
Check out FlashAlert at www.telstar-electronics.com
more like 5%.
Professor
Check out FlashAlert at www.telstar-electronics.com
