Substitute for 31x9.5R15
07-09-2003, 03:43 PM
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
Substitute for 31x9.5R15
Hi all,
'been lurking around here for a few months, (just to make sure I
wouldn't ask the stupid question everyone else asks !) and already got
a lot of info.
I am looking to get new AT-style tires for my '03TJ. I do not want to
put in a lift on it until the waranty is out, so I am limited to what
can fit on it stock (more or less). I know that I could fit 31x10.5,
but I do not want tires that wide. 31x9.5 would be perfect, but I did
not find it in any AT tire. After a little looking, I realized that
235/85R16 would be a good substitute. They work out to about 31.5x9.5.
I would install a 1" body lift, and these should fit just fine. These
tires have an E load rating or 3000# per tire, while my TJ weights
about 4000#. I am wondering if there is any downside to using tires
with that much extra load capacity ? Any other thing I should be
considering ?
Thank yall.
Alan W.
'03 TJ
Few tuffy storage boxes.
'been lurking around here for a few months, (just to make sure I
wouldn't ask the stupid question everyone else asks !) and already got
a lot of info.
I am looking to get new AT-style tires for my '03TJ. I do not want to
put in a lift on it until the waranty is out, so I am limited to what
can fit on it stock (more or less). I know that I could fit 31x10.5,
but I do not want tires that wide. 31x9.5 would be perfect, but I did
not find it in any AT tire. After a little looking, I realized that
235/85R16 would be a good substitute. They work out to about 31.5x9.5.
I would install a 1" body lift, and these should fit just fine. These
tires have an E load rating or 3000# per tire, while my TJ weights
about 4000#. I am wondering if there is any downside to using tires
with that much extra load capacity ? Any other thing I should be
considering ?
Thank yall.
Alan W.
'03 TJ
Few tuffy storage boxes.
07-09-2003, 04:59 PM
#2
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Substitute for 31x9.5R15
Your TJ can take 31x10.50s without any lift. There is a small chance that
they will rub during full lock turns, like a Uturn, but this is easily
corrected by removing the steering stop bolts and installing a washer or two
then putting them back in.
"Alan White" <a23439@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:aee7bcf.0307091143.2c2f7b2@posting.google.com ...
> Hi all,
>
> 'been lurking around here for a few months, (just to make sure I
> wouldn't ask the stupid question everyone else asks !) and already got
> a lot of info.
>
> I am looking to get new AT-style tires for my '03TJ. I do not want to
> put in a lift on it until the waranty is out, so I am limited to what
> can fit on it stock (more or less). I know that I could fit 31x10.5,
> but I do not want tires that wide. 31x9.5 would be perfect, but I did
> not find it in any AT tire. After a little looking, I realized that
> 235/85R16 would be a good substitute. They work out to about 31.5x9.5.
> I would install a 1" body lift, and these should fit just fine. These
> tires have an E load rating or 3000# per tire, while my TJ weights
> about 4000#. I am wondering if there is any downside to using tires
> with that much extra load capacity ? Any other thing I should be
> considering ?
>
> Thank yall.
>
>
> Alan W.
> '03 TJ
> Few tuffy storage boxes.
they will rub during full lock turns, like a Uturn, but this is easily
corrected by removing the steering stop bolts and installing a washer or two
then putting them back in.
"Alan White" <a23439@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:aee7bcf.0307091143.2c2f7b2@posting.google.com ...
> Hi all,
>
> 'been lurking around here for a few months, (just to make sure I
> wouldn't ask the stupid question everyone else asks !) and already got
> a lot of info.
>
> I am looking to get new AT-style tires for my '03TJ. I do not want to
> put in a lift on it until the waranty is out, so I am limited to what
> can fit on it stock (more or less). I know that I could fit 31x10.5,
> but I do not want tires that wide. 31x9.5 would be perfect, but I did
> not find it in any AT tire. After a little looking, I realized that
> 235/85R16 would be a good substitute. They work out to about 31.5x9.5.
> I would install a 1" body lift, and these should fit just fine. These
> tires have an E load rating or 3000# per tire, while my TJ weights
> about 4000#. I am wondering if there is any downside to using tires
> with that much extra load capacity ? Any other thing I should be
> considering ?
>
> Thank yall.
>
>
> Alan W.
> '03 TJ
> Few tuffy storage boxes.
07-09-2003, 07:31 PM
#3
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Substitute for 31x9.5R15
Alan,
Just wondering why you prefer a 9.5" wide tire over a 10.5" wide tire?
Brand Howard
www.jeeproject.com
Just wondering why you prefer a 9.5" wide tire over a 10.5" wide tire?
Brand Howard
www.jeeproject.com
07-10-2003, 09:45 PM
#4
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Substitute for 31x9.5R15
See the load ratings for all the BFG AT sizes here:
http://www.bfgoodrichtires.com/asset...rain_ta_kd.pdf
Tom
"Alan White" <a23439@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:aee7bcf.0307101211.2a1fab4b@posting.google.co m...
> Mostly because I need to drive in the snow in the winter. Also, the
> 235/85R16 are 1" taller than the 31x10.5 in the BFG-AT. What I would
> really like is 33x9.5, but then I would have to re-gear, lift, get a
> tire carrier, etc. Maybe when I am done with the monthly payments...
>
> What about fitting tires with a "E" load rating on a Jeep ?
> Anyone think of a reason not to ?
> Anyone did that already ?
>
> I know that the BFG-AT 245/75R16 also has an E load rating, and that
> is the same size tire that the Rubicon uses. Anyone knows what the
> load rating of the Rubi tires is ?
>
>
> "Brand Howard" <brand@jeeproject.com> wrote in message
news:<UA1Pa.71462$TJ.3674199@twister.austin.rr.com >...
> > Alan,
> >
> > Just wondering why you prefer a 9.5" wide tire over a 10.5" wide tire?
> >
> > Brand Howard
> > www.jeeproject.com
http://www.bfgoodrichtires.com/asset...rain_ta_kd.pdf
Tom
"Alan White" <a23439@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:aee7bcf.0307101211.2a1fab4b@posting.google.co m...
> Mostly because I need to drive in the snow in the winter. Also, the
> 235/85R16 are 1" taller than the 31x10.5 in the BFG-AT. What I would
> really like is 33x9.5, but then I would have to re-gear, lift, get a
> tire carrier, etc. Maybe when I am done with the monthly payments...
>
> What about fitting tires with a "E" load rating on a Jeep ?
> Anyone think of a reason not to ?
> Anyone did that already ?
>
> I know that the BFG-AT 245/75R16 also has an E load rating, and that
> is the same size tire that the Rubicon uses. Anyone knows what the
> load rating of the Rubi tires is ?
>
>
> "Brand Howard" <brand@jeeproject.com> wrote in message
news:<UA1Pa.71462$TJ.3674199@twister.austin.rr.com >...
> > Alan,
> >
> > Just wondering why you prefer a 9.5" wide tire over a 10.5" wide tire?
> >
> > Brand Howard
> > www.jeeproject.com
07-10-2003, 09:51 PM
#5
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Substitute for 31x9.5R15
I have never seen the load rating brought up before. Is this something that
really needs to be worried about? I mean my tires will hold more than my
jeep weighs, is there any harm in than? Not trying to start a war, just
interested. Has anyone else considered the load rating when purchasing an
off-road tire for a jeep before?
Brand Howard
www.jeeproject.com
really needs to be worried about? I mean my tires will hold more than my
jeep weighs, is there any harm in than? Not trying to start a war, just
interested. Has anyone else considered the load rating when purchasing an
off-road tire for a jeep before?
Brand Howard
www.jeeproject.com
07-10-2003, 10:24 PM
#6
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Substitute for 31x9.5R15
No expert here but I would think the higher load rating would ride
rougher on the street, but might have more sidewall strength for
airing down and running the rocks.
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003 01:51:11 GMT, "Brand Howard"
<brand@jeeproject.com> wrote:
>I have never seen the load rating brought up before. Is this something that
>really needs to be worried about? I mean my tires will hold more than my
>jeep weighs, is there any harm in than? Not trying to start a war, just
>interested. Has anyone else considered the load rating when purchasing an
>off-road tire for a jeep before?
>
>Brand Howard
>www.jeeproject.com
>
rougher on the street, but might have more sidewall strength for
airing down and running the rocks.
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003 01:51:11 GMT, "Brand Howard"
<brand@jeeproject.com> wrote:
>I have never seen the load rating brought up before. Is this something that
>really needs to be worried about? I mean my tires will hold more than my
>jeep weighs, is there any harm in than? Not trying to start a war, just
>interested. Has anyone else considered the load rating when purchasing an
>off-road tire for a jeep before?
>
>Brand Howard
>www.jeeproject.com
>
07-15-2003, 05:54 PM
#7
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Substitute for 31x9.5R15
I'm curious as to your opinion for an alternative to the BFG 33x9.5x15
M/T. Unfortunately they are no longer available.
One tire mechanic told me it was because they keep 'flying apart'
The smallest now available is the 33x10.5 M/T and it has a 10.5" wide
tread as you mentioned.
I ended up getting a set of Goodyear 32x11.5 MTRs.
Nice tires. I'd recommend them but then I park my CJ-7 in the winter.
JJ
On Wed, 09 Jul 2003 20:11:18 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
wrote:
>My 33x9.5 BFG muds are 7.5" wide on the tread.
>
>I only dig down when absolutely needed.
>
>The long narrow tire footprint has so many PSI on the ground that they
>just don't spin, so it is seldom needed to dig down unless I get off the
>side of a snowmobile/logging road trail.
>
>My muds have better winter traction on the street than our Cherokee with
>P235 BFG AT's on it. They measure 8.5" on the tread.
>
>I had 10.5" on the tread muds before and they were total ---- in the
>snow. I could go anywhere in 4x4 sure, but go over 35 mph and it lost
>traction. I now can keep up to the Tractor Trailers at 55 mph in a
>snowstorm with total control. Don't know where these tires lose
>traction, faster than I want to go anyway....
>
>Mike
>86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
>88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>
>"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>>
>> Mike, and others here like to quickly dig a hole down through the
>> snow to the pavement. Where I go there is no pavement nor bottom, so I
>> prefer wide floatation tires.
>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>
>> Brand Howard wrote:
>> >
>> > Alan,
>> >
>> > Just wondering why you prefer a 9.5" wide tire over a 10.5" wide tire?
>> >
>> > Brand Howard
>> > www.jeeproject.com
M/T. Unfortunately they are no longer available.
One tire mechanic told me it was because they keep 'flying apart'
The smallest now available is the 33x10.5 M/T and it has a 10.5" wide
tread as you mentioned.
I ended up getting a set of Goodyear 32x11.5 MTRs.
Nice tires. I'd recommend them but then I park my CJ-7 in the winter.
JJ
On Wed, 09 Jul 2003 20:11:18 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
wrote:
>My 33x9.5 BFG muds are 7.5" wide on the tread.
>
>I only dig down when absolutely needed.
>
>The long narrow tire footprint has so many PSI on the ground that they
>just don't spin, so it is seldom needed to dig down unless I get off the
>side of a snowmobile/logging road trail.
>
>My muds have better winter traction on the street than our Cherokee with
>P235 BFG AT's on it. They measure 8.5" on the tread.
>
>I had 10.5" on the tread muds before and they were total ---- in the
>snow. I could go anywhere in 4x4 sure, but go over 35 mph and it lost
>traction. I now can keep up to the Tractor Trailers at 55 mph in a
>snowstorm with total control. Don't know where these tires lose
>traction, faster than I want to go anyway....
>
>Mike
>86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
>88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>
>"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>>
>> Mike, and others here like to quickly dig a hole down through the
>> snow to the pavement. Where I go there is no pavement nor bottom, so I
>> prefer wide floatation tires.
>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>
>> Brand Howard wrote:
>> >
>> > Alan,
>> >
>> > Just wondering why you prefer a 9.5" wide tire over a 10.5" wide tire?
>> >
>> > Brand Howard
>> > www.jeeproject.com
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)