stock YJ wheels
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: stock YJ wheels
To be able to use the front wheel hubs from their little K Cars.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Ben wrote:
>
> Bill.. I have always wondered why Chysler went to the 5x4.5 instead of
> the 5x5.5 on the YJ, XJ, TJ models... Why not keep the 5x5.5?
>
> Ben
> 95 YJ 2.5L
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Ben wrote:
>
> Bill.. I have always wondered why Chysler went to the 5x4.5 instead of
> the 5x5.5 on the YJ, XJ, TJ models... Why not keep the 5x5.5?
>
> Ben
> 95 YJ 2.5L
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: stock YJ wheels
Precisely! Indeed, the crossover point was the basic '84 XJ, whose
powertrain they spun off to do the YJ in '86 ('87 Model Year). Saved them a
HUGE amount of money, even though it PO'd all the CJ lovers. With all the
old YJs still going strong, seems like they made a good move.
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42558028.6843C0F4@***.net...
> To be able to use the front wheel hubs from their little K Cars.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Ben wrote:
>>
>> Bill.. I have always wondered why Chysler went to the 5x4.5 instead of
>> the 5x5.5 on the YJ, XJ, TJ models... Why not keep the 5x5.5?
>>
>> Ben
>> 95 YJ 2.5L
powertrain they spun off to do the YJ in '86 ('87 Model Year). Saved them a
HUGE amount of money, even though it PO'd all the CJ lovers. With all the
old YJs still going strong, seems like they made a good move.
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42558028.6843C0F4@***.net...
> To be able to use the front wheel hubs from their little K Cars.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Ben wrote:
>>
>> Bill.. I have always wondered why Chysler went to the 5x4.5 instead of
>> the 5x5.5 on the YJ, XJ, TJ models... Why not keep the 5x5.5?
>>
>> Ben
>> 95 YJ 2.5L
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: stock YJ wheels
Precisely! Indeed, the crossover point was the basic '84 XJ, whose
powertrain they spun off to do the YJ in '86 ('87 Model Year). Saved them a
HUGE amount of money, even though it PO'd all the CJ lovers. With all the
old YJs still going strong, seems like they made a good move.
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42558028.6843C0F4@***.net...
> To be able to use the front wheel hubs from their little K Cars.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Ben wrote:
>>
>> Bill.. I have always wondered why Chysler went to the 5x4.5 instead of
>> the 5x5.5 on the YJ, XJ, TJ models... Why not keep the 5x5.5?
>>
>> Ben
>> 95 YJ 2.5L
powertrain they spun off to do the YJ in '86 ('87 Model Year). Saved them a
HUGE amount of money, even though it PO'd all the CJ lovers. With all the
old YJs still going strong, seems like they made a good move.
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42558028.6843C0F4@***.net...
> To be able to use the front wheel hubs from their little K Cars.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Ben wrote:
>>
>> Bill.. I have always wondered why Chysler went to the 5x4.5 instead of
>> the 5x5.5 on the YJ, XJ, TJ models... Why not keep the 5x5.5?
>>
>> Ben
>> 95 YJ 2.5L
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: stock YJ wheels
Precisely! Indeed, the crossover point was the basic '84 XJ, whose
powertrain they spun off to do the YJ in '86 ('87 Model Year). Saved them a
HUGE amount of money, even though it PO'd all the CJ lovers. With all the
old YJs still going strong, seems like they made a good move.
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42558028.6843C0F4@***.net...
> To be able to use the front wheel hubs from their little K Cars.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Ben wrote:
>>
>> Bill.. I have always wondered why Chysler went to the 5x4.5 instead of
>> the 5x5.5 on the YJ, XJ, TJ models... Why not keep the 5x5.5?
>>
>> Ben
>> 95 YJ 2.5L
powertrain they spun off to do the YJ in '86 ('87 Model Year). Saved them a
HUGE amount of money, even though it PO'd all the CJ lovers. With all the
old YJs still going strong, seems like they made a good move.
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42558028.6843C0F4@***.net...
> To be able to use the front wheel hubs from their little K Cars.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Ben wrote:
>>
>> Bill.. I have always wondered why Chysler went to the 5x4.5 instead of
>> the 5x5.5 on the YJ, XJ, TJ models... Why not keep the 5x5.5?
>>
>> Ben
>> 95 YJ 2.5L
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: stock YJ wheels
Precisely! Indeed, the crossover point was the basic '84 XJ, whose
powertrain they spun off to do the YJ in '86 ('87 Model Year). Saved them a
HUGE amount of money, even though it PO'd all the CJ lovers. With all the
old YJs still going strong, seems like they made a good move.
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42558028.6843C0F4@***.net...
> To be able to use the front wheel hubs from their little K Cars.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Ben wrote:
>>
>> Bill.. I have always wondered why Chysler went to the 5x4.5 instead of
>> the 5x5.5 on the YJ, XJ, TJ models... Why not keep the 5x5.5?
>>
>> Ben
>> 95 YJ 2.5L
powertrain they spun off to do the YJ in '86 ('87 Model Year). Saved them a
HUGE amount of money, even though it PO'd all the CJ lovers. With all the
old YJs still going strong, seems like they made a good move.
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42558028.6843C0F4@***.net...
> To be able to use the front wheel hubs from their little K Cars.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Ben wrote:
>>
>> Bill.. I have always wondered why Chysler went to the 5x4.5 instead of
>> the 5x5.5 on the YJ, XJ, TJ models... Why not keep the 5x5.5?
>>
>> Ben
>> 95 YJ 2.5L
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: stock YJ wheels
The 84 XJ and 86/87 YJ were build by AMC, not DC.
"SoK66" <SoK66@frontier.net> wrote in message
news:d34hes0ear@enews1.newsguy.com...
> Precisely! Indeed, the crossover point was the basic '84 XJ, whose
> powertrain they spun off to do the YJ in '86 ('87 Model Year). Saved them
a
> HUGE amount of money, even though it PO'd all the CJ lovers. With all the
> old YJs still going strong, seems like they made a good move.
>
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:42558028.6843C0F4@***.net...
> > To be able to use the front wheel hubs from their little K Cars.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Ben wrote:
> >>
> >> Bill.. I have always wondered why Chysler went to the 5x4.5 instead of
> >> the 5x5.5 on the YJ, XJ, TJ models... Why not keep the 5x5.5?
> >>
> >> Ben
> >> 95 YJ 2.5L
>
>
"SoK66" <SoK66@frontier.net> wrote in message
news:d34hes0ear@enews1.newsguy.com...
> Precisely! Indeed, the crossover point was the basic '84 XJ, whose
> powertrain they spun off to do the YJ in '86 ('87 Model Year). Saved them
a
> HUGE amount of money, even though it PO'd all the CJ lovers. With all the
> old YJs still going strong, seems like they made a good move.
>
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:42558028.6843C0F4@***.net...
> > To be able to use the front wheel hubs from their little K Cars.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Ben wrote:
> >>
> >> Bill.. I have always wondered why Chysler went to the 5x4.5 instead of
> >> the 5x5.5 on the YJ, XJ, TJ models... Why not keep the 5x5.5?
> >>
> >> Ben
> >> 95 YJ 2.5L
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: stock YJ wheels
The 84 XJ and 86/87 YJ were build by AMC, not DC.
"SoK66" <SoK66@frontier.net> wrote in message
news:d34hes0ear@enews1.newsguy.com...
> Precisely! Indeed, the crossover point was the basic '84 XJ, whose
> powertrain they spun off to do the YJ in '86 ('87 Model Year). Saved them
a
> HUGE amount of money, even though it PO'd all the CJ lovers. With all the
> old YJs still going strong, seems like they made a good move.
>
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:42558028.6843C0F4@***.net...
> > To be able to use the front wheel hubs from their little K Cars.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Ben wrote:
> >>
> >> Bill.. I have always wondered why Chysler went to the 5x4.5 instead of
> >> the 5x5.5 on the YJ, XJ, TJ models... Why not keep the 5x5.5?
> >>
> >> Ben
> >> 95 YJ 2.5L
>
>
"SoK66" <SoK66@frontier.net> wrote in message
news:d34hes0ear@enews1.newsguy.com...
> Precisely! Indeed, the crossover point was the basic '84 XJ, whose
> powertrain they spun off to do the YJ in '86 ('87 Model Year). Saved them
a
> HUGE amount of money, even though it PO'd all the CJ lovers. With all the
> old YJs still going strong, seems like they made a good move.
>
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:42558028.6843C0F4@***.net...
> > To be able to use the front wheel hubs from their little K Cars.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Ben wrote:
> >>
> >> Bill.. I have always wondered why Chysler went to the 5x4.5 instead of
> >> the 5x5.5 on the YJ, XJ, TJ models... Why not keep the 5x5.5?
> >>
> >> Ben
> >> 95 YJ 2.5L
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: stock YJ wheels
The 84 XJ and 86/87 YJ were build by AMC, not DC.
"SoK66" <SoK66@frontier.net> wrote in message
news:d34hes0ear@enews1.newsguy.com...
> Precisely! Indeed, the crossover point was the basic '84 XJ, whose
> powertrain they spun off to do the YJ in '86 ('87 Model Year). Saved them
a
> HUGE amount of money, even though it PO'd all the CJ lovers. With all the
> old YJs still going strong, seems like they made a good move.
>
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:42558028.6843C0F4@***.net...
> > To be able to use the front wheel hubs from their little K Cars.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Ben wrote:
> >>
> >> Bill.. I have always wondered why Chysler went to the 5x4.5 instead of
> >> the 5x5.5 on the YJ, XJ, TJ models... Why not keep the 5x5.5?
> >>
> >> Ben
> >> 95 YJ 2.5L
>
>
"SoK66" <SoK66@frontier.net> wrote in message
news:d34hes0ear@enews1.newsguy.com...
> Precisely! Indeed, the crossover point was the basic '84 XJ, whose
> powertrain they spun off to do the YJ in '86 ('87 Model Year). Saved them
a
> HUGE amount of money, even though it PO'd all the CJ lovers. With all the
> old YJs still going strong, seems like they made a good move.
>
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:42558028.6843C0F4@***.net...
> > To be able to use the front wheel hubs from their little K Cars.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Ben wrote:
> >>
> >> Bill.. I have always wondered why Chysler went to the 5x4.5 instead of
> >> the 5x5.5 on the YJ, XJ, TJ models... Why not keep the 5x5.5?
> >>
> >> Ben
> >> 95 YJ 2.5L
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: stock YJ wheels
The 84 XJ and 86/87 YJ were build by AMC, not DC.
"SoK66" <SoK66@frontier.net> wrote in message
news:d34hes0ear@enews1.newsguy.com...
> Precisely! Indeed, the crossover point was the basic '84 XJ, whose
> powertrain they spun off to do the YJ in '86 ('87 Model Year). Saved them
a
> HUGE amount of money, even though it PO'd all the CJ lovers. With all the
> old YJs still going strong, seems like they made a good move.
>
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:42558028.6843C0F4@***.net...
> > To be able to use the front wheel hubs from their little K Cars.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Ben wrote:
> >>
> >> Bill.. I have always wondered why Chysler went to the 5x4.5 instead of
> >> the 5x5.5 on the YJ, XJ, TJ models... Why not keep the 5x5.5?
> >>
> >> Ben
> >> 95 YJ 2.5L
>
>
"SoK66" <SoK66@frontier.net> wrote in message
news:d34hes0ear@enews1.newsguy.com...
> Precisely! Indeed, the crossover point was the basic '84 XJ, whose
> powertrain they spun off to do the YJ in '86 ('87 Model Year). Saved them
a
> HUGE amount of money, even though it PO'd all the CJ lovers. With all the
> old YJs still going strong, seems like they made a good move.
>
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:42558028.6843C0F4@***.net...
> > To be able to use the front wheel hubs from their little K Cars.
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Ben wrote:
> >>
> >> Bill.. I have always wondered why Chysler went to the 5x4.5 instead of
> >> the 5x5.5 on the YJ, XJ, TJ models... Why not keep the 5x5.5?
> >>
> >> Ben
> >> 95 YJ 2.5L
>
>
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: stock YJ wheels
Oh, you're going to get technical about who made the decision, huh? :-)
The only reason the old Chrysler Corp. bought AMC in 86 was to get Jeep, the
rest of the stuff (rebadged Eagle by Chrysler) was virtually sales-proof.
Daimler is learning that the only brand they got with any value when they
bought Chrysler was Jeep. Funny how this is all working out. With any luck
the Geremans won't kill Jeep, but it's a less than 50-50 bet IMHO.
"Steve Foley" <steve.foley@DELETE.att.net> wrote in message
news:JUv5e.807$ha3.30@trndny02...
> The 84 XJ and 86/87 YJ were build by AMC, not DC.
>
> "SoK66" <SoK66@frontier.net> wrote in message
> news:d34hes0ear@enews1.newsguy.com...
>> Precisely! Indeed, the crossover point was the basic '84 XJ, whose
>> powertrain they spun off to do the YJ in '86 ('87 Model Year). Saved them
> a
>> HUGE amount of money, even though it PO'd all the CJ lovers. With all the
>> old YJs still going strong, seems like they made a good move.
>>
>> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>> news:42558028.6843C0F4@***.net...
>> > To be able to use the front wheel hubs from their little K Cars.
>> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>> >
>> > Ben wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Bill.. I have always wondered why Chysler went to the 5x4.5 instead of
>> >> the 5x5.5 on the YJ, XJ, TJ models... Why not keep the 5x5.5?
>> >>
>> >> Ben
>> >> 95 YJ 2.5L
>>
>>
>
>
The only reason the old Chrysler Corp. bought AMC in 86 was to get Jeep, the
rest of the stuff (rebadged Eagle by Chrysler) was virtually sales-proof.
Daimler is learning that the only brand they got with any value when they
bought Chrysler was Jeep. Funny how this is all working out. With any luck
the Geremans won't kill Jeep, but it's a less than 50-50 bet IMHO.
"Steve Foley" <steve.foley@DELETE.att.net> wrote in message
news:JUv5e.807$ha3.30@trndny02...
> The 84 XJ and 86/87 YJ were build by AMC, not DC.
>
> "SoK66" <SoK66@frontier.net> wrote in message
> news:d34hes0ear@enews1.newsguy.com...
>> Precisely! Indeed, the crossover point was the basic '84 XJ, whose
>> powertrain they spun off to do the YJ in '86 ('87 Model Year). Saved them
> a
>> HUGE amount of money, even though it PO'd all the CJ lovers. With all the
>> old YJs still going strong, seems like they made a good move.
>>
>> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>> news:42558028.6843C0F4@***.net...
>> > To be able to use the front wheel hubs from their little K Cars.
>> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>> >
>> > Ben wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Bill.. I have always wondered why Chysler went to the 5x4.5 instead of
>> >> the 5x5.5 on the YJ, XJ, TJ models... Why not keep the 5x5.5?
>> >>
>> >> Ben
>> >> 95 YJ 2.5L
>>
>>
>
>