Stock Rubicons are better than Stock H2's in the mud
03-26-2006, 08:44 AM
#21
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Stock Rubicons are better than Stock H2's in the mud
And certainly not designed for use in forests... The dang things are near
seven and a half feet wide
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:tYqdnQDcmsH2CLvZRVn-gw@comcast.com...
> Yep, they were not designed for mud & rocks, they were designed to do best
> in desert sand.
>
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:44249EA8.BE9112AA@***.net...
>> That and it probably still had the diesel, you know they are, they
>> have a weight to power ratio of a slug.
>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>
>> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>>
>>> That was an H1, the H2's are worse...That guy was driving like he was
>>> afraid
>>> to break the damn thing, I guess I would too if I had paid over $50K
>
>
seven and a half feet wide
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:tYqdnQDcmsH2CLvZRVn-gw@comcast.com...
> Yep, they were not designed for mud & rocks, they were designed to do best
> in desert sand.
>
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:44249EA8.BE9112AA@***.net...
>> That and it probably still had the diesel, you know they are, they
>> have a weight to power ratio of a slug.
>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>
>> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>>
>>> That was an H1, the H2's are worse...That guy was driving like he was
>>> afraid
>>> to break the damn thing, I guess I would too if I had paid over $50K
>
>
03-26-2006, 08:44 AM
#22
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Stock Rubicons are better than Stock H2's in the mud
And certainly not designed for use in forests... The dang things are near
seven and a half feet wide
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:tYqdnQDcmsH2CLvZRVn-gw@comcast.com...
> Yep, they were not designed for mud & rocks, they were designed to do best
> in desert sand.
>
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:44249EA8.BE9112AA@***.net...
>> That and it probably still had the diesel, you know they are, they
>> have a weight to power ratio of a slug.
>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>
>> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>>
>>> That was an H1, the H2's are worse...That guy was driving like he was
>>> afraid
>>> to break the damn thing, I guess I would too if I had paid over $50K
>
>
seven and a half feet wide
"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:tYqdnQDcmsH2CLvZRVn-gw@comcast.com...
> Yep, they were not designed for mud & rocks, they were designed to do best
> in desert sand.
>
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:44249EA8.BE9112AA@***.net...
>> That and it probably still had the diesel, you know they are, they
>> have a weight to power ratio of a slug.
>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>
>> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>>
>>> That was an H1, the H2's are worse...That guy was driving like he was
>>> afraid
>>> to break the damn thing, I guess I would too if I had paid over $50K
>
>
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jeep videos
Jeep Videos - Pictures
0
04-09-2008 12:23 PM
John Mason
Jeep Mailing List
12
03-22-2005 06:15 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)