Re: Stock Rubicons are better than Stock H2's in the mud
 

And certainly not designed for use in forests... The dang things are near
seven and a half feet wide


"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:tYqdnQDcmsH2CLvZRVn-gw@comcast.com...
> Yep, they were not designed for mud & rocks, they were designed to do best
> in desert sand.
>
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:44249EA8.BE9112AA@cox.net...
>> That and it probably still had the diesel, you know they are, they
>> have a weight to power ratio of a slug.
>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>
>> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>>
>>> That was an H1, the H2's are worse...That guy was driving like he was
>>> afraid
>>> to break the damn thing, I guess I would too if I had paid over $50K
>
>

Re: Stock Rubicons are better than Stock H2's in the mud
 

And certainly not designed for use in forests... The dang things are near
seven and a half feet wide


"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:tYqdnQDcmsH2CLvZRVn-gw@comcast.com...
> Yep, they were not designed for mud & rocks, they were designed to do best
> in desert sand.
>
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:44249EA8.BE9112AA@cox.net...
>> That and it probably still had the diesel, you know they are, they
>> have a weight to power ratio of a slug.
>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>
>> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>>
>>> That was an H1, the H2's are worse...That guy was driving like he was
>>> afraid
>>> to break the damn thing, I guess I would too if I had paid over $50K
>
>