Re: Stock Rubicons are better than Stock H2's in the mud
 

That was an H1, the H2's are worse...That guy was driving like he was afraid
to break the damn thing, I guess I would too if I had paid over $50K

"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
news:44246AC5.19D1AF1D@cox.net...
> Troll, they're not any better on the trail:
> http://www.----------.com/temp/hummerxj.htm
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> FishH2O wrote:
>>
>> I saw a post asking which was better & have watched a guy get his H2
>> stuck in mud that I can drive my TJ through, which is close to the Rubi
>> with my upgrades. The H2 got pulled out by a 4 wheeler

Re: Stock Rubicons are better than Stock H2's in the mud
 

That was an H1, the H2's are worse...That guy was driving like he was afraid
to break the damn thing, I guess I would too if I had paid over $50K

"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
news:44246AC5.19D1AF1D@cox.net...
> Troll, they're not any better on the trail:
> http://www.----------.com/temp/hummerxj.htm
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> FishH2O wrote:
>>
>> I saw a post asking which was better & have watched a guy get his H2
>> stuck in mud that I can drive my TJ through, which is close to the Rubi
>> with my upgrades. The H2 got pulled out by a 4 wheeler

Re: Stock Rubicons are better than Stock H2's in the mud
 

That was an H1, the H2's are worse...That guy was driving like he was afraid
to break the damn thing, I guess I would too if I had paid over $50K

"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
news:44246AC5.19D1AF1D@cox.net...
> Troll, they're not any better on the trail:
> http://www.----------.com/temp/hummerxj.htm
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> FishH2O wrote:
>>
>> I saw a post asking which was better & have watched a guy get his H2
>> stuck in mud that I can drive my TJ through, which is close to the Rubi
>> with my upgrades. The H2 got pulled out by a 4 wheeler

Re: Stock Rubicons are better than Stock H2's in the mud
 

That and it probably still had the diesel, you know they are, they
have a weight to power ratio of a slug.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> That was an H1, the H2's are worse...That guy was driving like he was afraid
> to break the damn thing, I guess I would too if I had paid over $50K

Re: Stock Rubicons are better than Stock H2's in the mud
 

That and it probably still had the diesel, you know they are, they
have a weight to power ratio of a slug.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> That was an H1, the H2's are worse...That guy was driving like he was afraid
> to break the damn thing, I guess I would too if I had paid over $50K

Re: Stock Rubicons are better than Stock H2's in the mud
 

That and it probably still had the diesel, you know they are, they
have a weight to power ratio of a slug.
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> That was an H1, the H2's are worse...That guy was driving like he was afraid
> to break the damn thing, I guess I would too if I had paid over $50K

Re: Stock Rubicons are better than Stock H2's in the mud
 

Yep, they were not designed for mud & rocks, they were designed to do best
in desert sand.

"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
news:44249EA8.BE9112AA@cox.net...
> That and it probably still had the diesel, you know they are, they
> have a weight to power ratio of a slug.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> That was an H1, the H2's are worse...That guy was driving like he was
>> afraid
>> to break the damn thing, I guess I would too if I had paid over $50K

Re: Stock Rubicons are better than Stock H2's in the mud
 

Yep, they were not designed for mud & rocks, they were designed to do best
in desert sand.

"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
news:44249EA8.BE9112AA@cox.net...
> That and it probably still had the diesel, you know they are, they
> have a weight to power ratio of a slug.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> That was an H1, the H2's are worse...That guy was driving like he was
>> afraid
>> to break the damn thing, I guess I would too if I had paid over $50K

Re: Stock Rubicons are better than Stock H2's in the mud
 

Yep, they were not designed for mud & rocks, they were designed to do best
in desert sand.

"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
news:44249EA8.BE9112AA@cox.net...
> That and it probably still had the diesel, you know they are, they
> have a weight to power ratio of a slug.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>
>> That was an H1, the H2's are worse...That guy was driving like he was
>> afraid
>> to break the damn thing, I guess I would too if I had paid over $50K

Re: Stock Rubicons are better than Stock H2's in the mud
 

And certainly not designed for use in forests... The dang things are near
seven and a half feet wide


"Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
news:tYqdnQDcmsH2CLvZRVn-gw@comcast.com...
> Yep, they were not designed for mud & rocks, they were designed to do best
> in desert sand.
>
> "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:44249EA8.BE9112AA@cox.net...
>> That and it probably still had the diesel, you know they are, they
>> have a weight to power ratio of a slug.
>> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>
>> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>>>
>>> That was an H1, the H2's are worse...That guy was driving like he was
>>> afraid
>>> to break the damn thing, I guess I would too if I had paid over $50K
>
>