spammer domains 29 Apr 07
04-30-2007, 04:08 PM
#31
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Re: Re: spammer domains 29 Apr 07
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 06:11:38 -0500, "DougW"
<post.replies@invalid.address> wrote:
>SnoMan wrote:
>> On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 22:47:52 -0600, "Earle Horton"
>> <earle@vascongado.usa> wrote:
>>
>>> Not that it isn't interesting as all get-out...
>>
>>
>> This is but a very small fraction of the spammer domains out there and
>> none of the nasty ones either as I have seen anyway.
>
>Yea. It's only based on a few spammy DNS servers. The full list,
>for those that want to look at such things, can be found here.
>http://revbeergoggles.com/spammers/bloss/bloss.txt
>
>That post is a daily sweep of new sites.
Nice link :)
-----------------
TheSnoMan.com
<post.replies@invalid.address> wrote:
>SnoMan wrote:
>> On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 22:47:52 -0600, "Earle Horton"
>> <earle@vascongado.usa> wrote:
>>
>>> Not that it isn't interesting as all get-out...
>>
>>
>> This is but a very small fraction of the spammer domains out there and
>> none of the nasty ones either as I have seen anyway.
>
>Yea. It's only based on a few spammy DNS servers. The full list,
>for those that want to look at such things, can be found here.
>http://revbeergoggles.com/spammers/bloss/bloss.txt
>
>That post is a daily sweep of new sites.
Nice link :)
-----------------
TheSnoMan.com
04-30-2007, 04:08 PM
#32
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Re: Re: spammer domains 29 Apr 07
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 06:11:38 -0500, "DougW"
<post.replies@invalid.address> wrote:
>SnoMan wrote:
>> On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 22:47:52 -0600, "Earle Horton"
>> <earle@vascongado.usa> wrote:
>>
>>> Not that it isn't interesting as all get-out...
>>
>>
>> This is but a very small fraction of the spammer domains out there and
>> none of the nasty ones either as I have seen anyway.
>
>Yea. It's only based on a few spammy DNS servers. The full list,
>for those that want to look at such things, can be found here.
>http://revbeergoggles.com/spammers/bloss/bloss.txt
>
>That post is a daily sweep of new sites.
Nice link :)
-----------------
TheSnoMan.com
<post.replies@invalid.address> wrote:
>SnoMan wrote:
>> On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 22:47:52 -0600, "Earle Horton"
>> <earle@vascongado.usa> wrote:
>>
>>> Not that it isn't interesting as all get-out...
>>
>>
>> This is but a very small fraction of the spammer domains out there and
>> none of the nasty ones either as I have seen anyway.
>
>Yea. It's only based on a few spammy DNS servers. The full list,
>for those that want to look at such things, can be found here.
>http://revbeergoggles.com/spammers/bloss/bloss.txt
>
>That post is a daily sweep of new sites.
Nice link :)
-----------------
TheSnoMan.com
04-30-2007, 04:08 PM
#33
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Re: Re: spammer domains 29 Apr 07
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 06:11:38 -0500, "DougW"
<post.replies@invalid.address> wrote:
>SnoMan wrote:
>> On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 22:47:52 -0600, "Earle Horton"
>> <earle@vascongado.usa> wrote:
>>
>>> Not that it isn't interesting as all get-out...
>>
>>
>> This is but a very small fraction of the spammer domains out there and
>> none of the nasty ones either as I have seen anyway.
>
>Yea. It's only based on a few spammy DNS servers. The full list,
>for those that want to look at such things, can be found here.
>http://revbeergoggles.com/spammers/bloss/bloss.txt
>
>That post is a daily sweep of new sites.
Nice link :)
-----------------
TheSnoMan.com
<post.replies@invalid.address> wrote:
>SnoMan wrote:
>> On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 22:47:52 -0600, "Earle Horton"
>> <earle@vascongado.usa> wrote:
>>
>>> Not that it isn't interesting as all get-out...
>>
>>
>> This is but a very small fraction of the spammer domains out there and
>> none of the nasty ones either as I have seen anyway.
>
>Yea. It's only based on a few spammy DNS servers. The full list,
>for those that want to look at such things, can be found here.
>http://revbeergoggles.com/spammers/bloss/bloss.txt
>
>That post is a daily sweep of new sites.
Nice link :)
-----------------
TheSnoMan.com
04-30-2007, 05:33 PM
#34
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Re: Re: spammer domains 29 Apr 07
I would rather read an oil thread.
Coasty
"SnoMan" <admin@snoman.com> wrote in message
news:c6jc33dv71jpj7n958k3oh7mukhlkeg6mu@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 06:11:38 -0500, "DougW"
> <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote:
>
>>SnoMan wrote:
>>> On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 22:47:52 -0600, "Earle Horton"
>>> <earle@vascongado.usa> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Not that it isn't interesting as all get-out...
>>>
>>>
>>> This is but a very small fraction of the spammer domains out there and
>>> none of the nasty ones either as I have seen anyway.
>>
>>Yea. It's only based on a few spammy DNS servers. The full list,
>>for those that want to look at such things, can be found here.
>>http://revbeergoggles.com/spammers/bloss/bloss.txt
>>
>>That post is a daily sweep of new sites.
>
>
> Nice link :)
> -----------------
> TheSnoMan.com
Coasty
"SnoMan" <admin@snoman.com> wrote in message
news:c6jc33dv71jpj7n958k3oh7mukhlkeg6mu@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 06:11:38 -0500, "DougW"
> <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote:
>
>>SnoMan wrote:
>>> On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 22:47:52 -0600, "Earle Horton"
>>> <earle@vascongado.usa> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Not that it isn't interesting as all get-out...
>>>
>>>
>>> This is but a very small fraction of the spammer domains out there and
>>> none of the nasty ones either as I have seen anyway.
>>
>>Yea. It's only based on a few spammy DNS servers. The full list,
>>for those that want to look at such things, can be found here.
>>http://revbeergoggles.com/spammers/bloss/bloss.txt
>>
>>That post is a daily sweep of new sites.
>
>
> Nice link :)
> -----------------
> TheSnoMan.com
04-30-2007, 05:33 PM
#35
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Re: Re: spammer domains 29 Apr 07
I would rather read an oil thread.
Coasty
"SnoMan" <admin@snoman.com> wrote in message
news:c6jc33dv71jpj7n958k3oh7mukhlkeg6mu@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 06:11:38 -0500, "DougW"
> <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote:
>
>>SnoMan wrote:
>>> On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 22:47:52 -0600, "Earle Horton"
>>> <earle@vascongado.usa> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Not that it isn't interesting as all get-out...
>>>
>>>
>>> This is but a very small fraction of the spammer domains out there and
>>> none of the nasty ones either as I have seen anyway.
>>
>>Yea. It's only based on a few spammy DNS servers. The full list,
>>for those that want to look at such things, can be found here.
>>http://revbeergoggles.com/spammers/bloss/bloss.txt
>>
>>That post is a daily sweep of new sites.
>
>
> Nice link :)
> -----------------
> TheSnoMan.com
Coasty
"SnoMan" <admin@snoman.com> wrote in message
news:c6jc33dv71jpj7n958k3oh7mukhlkeg6mu@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 06:11:38 -0500, "DougW"
> <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote:
>
>>SnoMan wrote:
>>> On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 22:47:52 -0600, "Earle Horton"
>>> <earle@vascongado.usa> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Not that it isn't interesting as all get-out...
>>>
>>>
>>> This is but a very small fraction of the spammer domains out there and
>>> none of the nasty ones either as I have seen anyway.
>>
>>Yea. It's only based on a few spammy DNS servers. The full list,
>>for those that want to look at such things, can be found here.
>>http://revbeergoggles.com/spammers/bloss/bloss.txt
>>
>>That post is a daily sweep of new sites.
>
>
> Nice link :)
> -----------------
> TheSnoMan.com
04-30-2007, 05:33 PM
#36
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Re: Re: spammer domains 29 Apr 07
I would rather read an oil thread.
Coasty
"SnoMan" <admin@snoman.com> wrote in message
news:c6jc33dv71jpj7n958k3oh7mukhlkeg6mu@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 06:11:38 -0500, "DougW"
> <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote:
>
>>SnoMan wrote:
>>> On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 22:47:52 -0600, "Earle Horton"
>>> <earle@vascongado.usa> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Not that it isn't interesting as all get-out...
>>>
>>>
>>> This is but a very small fraction of the spammer domains out there and
>>> none of the nasty ones either as I have seen anyway.
>>
>>Yea. It's only based on a few spammy DNS servers. The full list,
>>for those that want to look at such things, can be found here.
>>http://revbeergoggles.com/spammers/bloss/bloss.txt
>>
>>That post is a daily sweep of new sites.
>
>
> Nice link :)
> -----------------
> TheSnoMan.com
Coasty
"SnoMan" <admin@snoman.com> wrote in message
news:c6jc33dv71jpj7n958k3oh7mukhlkeg6mu@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 06:11:38 -0500, "DougW"
> <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote:
>
>>SnoMan wrote:
>>> On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 22:47:52 -0600, "Earle Horton"
>>> <earle@vascongado.usa> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Not that it isn't interesting as all get-out...
>>>
>>>
>>> This is but a very small fraction of the spammer domains out there and
>>> none of the nasty ones either as I have seen anyway.
>>
>>Yea. It's only based on a few spammy DNS servers. The full list,
>>for those that want to look at such things, can be found here.
>>http://revbeergoggles.com/spammers/bloss/bloss.txt
>>
>>That post is a daily sweep of new sites.
>
>
> Nice link :)
> -----------------
> TheSnoMan.com
04-30-2007, 05:33 PM
#37
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Re: Re: spammer domains 29 Apr 07
I would rather read an oil thread.
Coasty
"SnoMan" <admin@snoman.com> wrote in message
news:c6jc33dv71jpj7n958k3oh7mukhlkeg6mu@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 06:11:38 -0500, "DougW"
> <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote:
>
>>SnoMan wrote:
>>> On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 22:47:52 -0600, "Earle Horton"
>>> <earle@vascongado.usa> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Not that it isn't interesting as all get-out...
>>>
>>>
>>> This is but a very small fraction of the spammer domains out there and
>>> none of the nasty ones either as I have seen anyway.
>>
>>Yea. It's only based on a few spammy DNS servers. The full list,
>>for those that want to look at such things, can be found here.
>>http://revbeergoggles.com/spammers/bloss/bloss.txt
>>
>>That post is a daily sweep of new sites.
>
>
> Nice link :)
> -----------------
> TheSnoMan.com
Coasty
"SnoMan" <admin@snoman.com> wrote in message
news:c6jc33dv71jpj7n958k3oh7mukhlkeg6mu@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 06:11:38 -0500, "DougW"
> <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote:
>
>>SnoMan wrote:
>>> On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 22:47:52 -0600, "Earle Horton"
>>> <earle@vascongado.usa> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Not that it isn't interesting as all get-out...
>>>
>>>
>>> This is but a very small fraction of the spammer domains out there and
>>> none of the nasty ones either as I have seen anyway.
>>
>>Yea. It's only based on a few spammy DNS servers. The full list,
>>for those that want to look at such things, can be found here.
>>http://revbeergoggles.com/spammers/bloss/bloss.txt
>>
>>That post is a daily sweep of new sites.
>
>
> Nice link :)
> -----------------
> TheSnoMan.com
