|
Some underbody shots of the 2005 Grand
Over on abp4x4
And a shot of the ..drooooooool.. Ford GT :) |
Re: Some underbody shots of the 2005 Grand
DougW did pass the time by typing:
> Over on abp4x4 > > And a shot of the ..drooooooool.. Ford GT :) I should say under the nym or Rev. Beergoggles. :) What can I say, the posting agent I use for binaries usually hangs out on different groups. Woo Hoo (man am *I* sunburned) -- DougW |
Re: Some underbody shots of the 2005 Grand
DougW did pass the time by typing:
> Over on abp4x4 > > And a shot of the ..drooooooool.. Ford GT :) I should say under the nym or Rev. Beergoggles. :) What can I say, the posting agent I use for binaries usually hangs out on different groups. Woo Hoo (man am *I* sunburned) -- DougW |
Re: Some underbody shots of the 2005 Grand
DougW did pass the time by typing:
> Over on abp4x4 > > And a shot of the ..drooooooool.. Ford GT :) I should say under the nym or Rev. Beergoggles. :) What can I say, the posting agent I use for binaries usually hangs out on different groups. Woo Hoo (man am *I* sunburned) -- DougW |
Re: Some underbody shots of the 2005 Grand
Only one jpg shot shows, the rest show as blank partials.
Mike 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's DougW wrote: > > DougW did pass the time by typing: > > Over on abp4x4 > > > > And a shot of the ..drooooooool.. Ford GT :) > > I should say under the nym or Rev. Beergoggles. :) > What can I say, the posting agent I use for binaries > usually hangs out on different groups. > > Woo Hoo > > (man am *I* sunburned) > > -- > DougW |
Re: Some underbody shots of the 2005 Grand
Only one jpg shot shows, the rest show as blank partials.
Mike 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's DougW wrote: > > DougW did pass the time by typing: > > Over on abp4x4 > > > > And a shot of the ..drooooooool.. Ford GT :) > > I should say under the nym or Rev. Beergoggles. :) > What can I say, the posting agent I use for binaries > usually hangs out on different groups. > > Woo Hoo > > (man am *I* sunburned) > > -- > DougW |
Re: Some underbody shots of the 2005 Grand
Only one jpg shot shows, the rest show as blank partials.
Mike 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's DougW wrote: > > DougW did pass the time by typing: > > Over on abp4x4 > > > > And a shot of the ..drooooooool.. Ford GT :) > > I should say under the nym or Rev. Beergoggles. :) > What can I say, the posting agent I use for binaries > usually hangs out on different groups. > > Woo Hoo > > (man am *I* sunburned) > > -- > DougW |
Re: Some underbody shots of the 2005 Grand
Mike Romain did pass the time by typing:
> Only one jpg shot shows, the rest show as blank partials. They are multipart. At least in IE you have to select both then say (combine and decode). In Gravity you select both then rightclick and select View. Dunno about your news reader. I'll check what Gravity is set at for breaking multiparts. It may be too small. -- DougW |
Re: Some underbody shots of the 2005 Grand
Mike Romain did pass the time by typing:
> Only one jpg shot shows, the rest show as blank partials. They are multipart. At least in IE you have to select both then say (combine and decode). In Gravity you select both then rightclick and select View. Dunno about your news reader. I'll check what Gravity is set at for breaking multiparts. It may be too small. -- DougW |
Re: Some underbody shots of the 2005 Grand
Mike Romain did pass the time by typing:
> Only one jpg shot shows, the rest show as blank partials. They are multipart. At least in IE you have to select both then say (combine and decode). In Gravity you select both then rightclick and select View. Dunno about your news reader. I'll check what Gravity is set at for breaking multiparts. It may be too small. -- DougW |
Re: Some underbody shots of the 2005 Grand
DougW did pass the time by typing:
> Mike Romain did pass the time by typing: >> Only one jpg shot shows, the rest show as blank partials. > > They are multipart. At least in IE you have to select > both then say (combine and decode). > > In Gravity you select both then rightclick and select View. > > Dunno about your news reader. > > I'll check what Gravity is set at for breaking multiparts. > It may be too small. Ok.. I had something farkled in Gravity. They should come across in single posts now (providing they are under 256k) And they should have my correct nym. :) -- DougW |
Re: Some underbody shots of the 2005 Grand
DougW did pass the time by typing:
> Mike Romain did pass the time by typing: >> Only one jpg shot shows, the rest show as blank partials. > > They are multipart. At least in IE you have to select > both then say (combine and decode). > > In Gravity you select both then rightclick and select View. > > Dunno about your news reader. > > I'll check what Gravity is set at for breaking multiparts. > It may be too small. Ok.. I had something farkled in Gravity. They should come across in single posts now (providing they are under 256k) And they should have my correct nym. :) -- DougW |
Re: Some underbody shots of the 2005 Grand
DougW did pass the time by typing:
> Mike Romain did pass the time by typing: >> Only one jpg shot shows, the rest show as blank partials. > > They are multipart. At least in IE you have to select > both then say (combine and decode). > > In Gravity you select both then rightclick and select View. > > Dunno about your news reader. > > I'll check what Gravity is set at for breaking multiparts. > It may be too small. Ok.. I had something farkled in Gravity. They should come across in single posts now (providing they are under 256k) And they should have my correct nym. :) -- DougW |
Re: Some underbody shots of the 2005 Grand
Hi Doug,
I took the liberty to repost your pictures at: http://www.----------.com/cherokee/ for others to see and shake their heads. They show the spare tire placed under the car where it eats up another ten inches of ground clearance. The plastic gas tank in the middle of the car where it will be the first thing that's high centered. And what are those things that point at the rear axle from the rear bumper, like when the axle is push up against the bump stops, do they double as a plow? And the front end, it's lower than my '89 Bird! God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ DougW wrote: > > Ok.. I had something farkled in Gravity. They should come across > in single posts now (providing they are under 256k) > > And they should have my correct nym. :) > > -- > DougW |
Re: Some underbody shots of the 2005 Grand
Hi Doug,
I took the liberty to repost your pictures at: http://www.----------.com/cherokee/ for others to see and shake their heads. They show the spare tire placed under the car where it eats up another ten inches of ground clearance. The plastic gas tank in the middle of the car where it will be the first thing that's high centered. And what are those things that point at the rear axle from the rear bumper, like when the axle is push up against the bump stops, do they double as a plow? And the front end, it's lower than my '89 Bird! God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ DougW wrote: > > Ok.. I had something farkled in Gravity. They should come across > in single posts now (providing they are under 256k) > > And they should have my correct nym. :) > > -- > DougW |
Re: Some underbody shots of the 2005 Grand
Hi Doug,
I took the liberty to repost your pictures at: http://www.----------.com/cherokee/ for others to see and shake their heads. They show the spare tire placed under the car where it eats up another ten inches of ground clearance. The plastic gas tank in the middle of the car where it will be the first thing that's high centered. And what are those things that point at the rear axle from the rear bumper, like when the axle is push up against the bump stops, do they double as a plow? And the front end, it's lower than my '89 Bird! God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ DougW wrote: > > Ok.. I had something farkled in Gravity. They should come across > in single posts now (providing they are under 256k) > > And they should have my correct nym. :) > > -- > DougW |
Re: Some underbody shots of the 2005 Grand
That would be the in fine tradition of the Wagoneer :-)
Dave Milne, Scotland '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message news:414B6AA7.A9B3C877@cox.net... > They show the spare tire placed under the car where it eats up > another ten inches of ground clearance. |
Re: Some underbody shots of the 2005 Grand
That would be the in fine tradition of the Wagoneer :-)
Dave Milne, Scotland '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message news:414B6AA7.A9B3C877@cox.net... > They show the spare tire placed under the car where it eats up > another ten inches of ground clearance. |
Re: Some underbody shots of the 2005 Grand
That would be the in fine tradition of the Wagoneer :-)
Dave Milne, Scotland '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message news:414B6AA7.A9B3C877@cox.net... > They show the spare tire placed under the car where it eats up > another ten inches of ground clearance. |
Re: Some underbody shots of the 2005 Grand
Dave Milne did pass the time by typing:
> That would be the in fine tradition of the Wagoneer :-) Yea.. after taking a real close look inside, outside, and under, I'm not so certain the Grand will be my next vehicle. While I love the idea of more power and a better AWD system, the underside just needs way too much skid protection and the dash is.. er.. to be polite, not near as nice as say the Toyota Land Cruiser or other comperable vehicles. Not that I couldn't buy two Jeeps for the Landy's price tag.. 60K owtch! > "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" wrote t... >> They show the spare tire placed under the car where it eats up >> another ten inches of ground clearance. |
Re: Some underbody shots of the 2005 Grand
Dave Milne did pass the time by typing:
> That would be the in fine tradition of the Wagoneer :-) Yea.. after taking a real close look inside, outside, and under, I'm not so certain the Grand will be my next vehicle. While I love the idea of more power and a better AWD system, the underside just needs way too much skid protection and the dash is.. er.. to be polite, not near as nice as say the Toyota Land Cruiser or other comperable vehicles. Not that I couldn't buy two Jeeps for the Landy's price tag.. 60K owtch! > "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" wrote t... >> They show the spare tire placed under the car where it eats up >> another ten inches of ground clearance. |
Re: Some underbody shots of the 2005 Grand
Dave Milne did pass the time by typing:
> That would be the in fine tradition of the Wagoneer :-) Yea.. after taking a real close look inside, outside, and under, I'm not so certain the Grand will be my next vehicle. While I love the idea of more power and a better AWD system, the underside just needs way too much skid protection and the dash is.. er.. to be polite, not near as nice as say the Toyota Land Cruiser or other comperable vehicles. Not that I couldn't buy two Jeeps for the Landy's price tag.. 60K owtch! > "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" wrote t... >> They show the spare tire placed under the car where it eats up >> another ten inches of ground clearance. |
Re: Some underbody shots of the 2005 Grand
I weep. My kids' Powerwheels jeeps have more ground clearance.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message news:414B6AA7.A9B3C877@cox.net... > Hi Doug, > I took the liberty to repost your pictures at: > http://www.----------.com/cherokee/ for others to see and shake their > heads. > They show the spare tire placed under the car where it eats up > another ten inches of ground clearance. The plastic gas tank in the > middle of the car where it will be the first thing that's high centered. > And what are those things that point at the rear axle from the rear > bumper, like when the axle is push up against the bump stops, do they > double as a plow? And the front end, it's lower than my '89 Bird! > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > DougW wrote: > > > > Ok.. I had something farkled in Gravity. They should come across > > in single posts now (providing they are under 256k) > > > > And they should have my correct nym. :) > > > > -- > > DougW |
Re: Some underbody shots of the 2005 Grand
I weep. My kids' Powerwheels jeeps have more ground clearance.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message news:414B6AA7.A9B3C877@cox.net... > Hi Doug, > I took the liberty to repost your pictures at: > http://www.----------.com/cherokee/ for others to see and shake their > heads. > They show the spare tire placed under the car where it eats up > another ten inches of ground clearance. The plastic gas tank in the > middle of the car where it will be the first thing that's high centered. > And what are those things that point at the rear axle from the rear > bumper, like when the axle is push up against the bump stops, do they > double as a plow? And the front end, it's lower than my '89 Bird! > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > DougW wrote: > > > > Ok.. I had something farkled in Gravity. They should come across > > in single posts now (providing they are under 256k) > > > > And they should have my correct nym. :) > > > > -- > > DougW |
Re: Some underbody shots of the 2005 Grand
I weep. My kids' Powerwheels jeeps have more ground clearance.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message news:414B6AA7.A9B3C877@cox.net... > Hi Doug, > I took the liberty to repost your pictures at: > http://www.----------.com/cherokee/ for others to see and shake their > heads. > They show the spare tire placed under the car where it eats up > another ten inches of ground clearance. The plastic gas tank in the > middle of the car where it will be the first thing that's high centered. > And what are those things that point at the rear axle from the rear > bumper, like when the axle is push up against the bump stops, do they > double as a plow? And the front end, it's lower than my '89 Bird! > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > DougW wrote: > > > > Ok.. I had something farkled in Gravity. They should come across > > in single posts now (providing they are under 256k) > > > > And they should have my correct nym. :) > > > > -- > > DougW |
Re: Some underbody shots of the 2005 Grand
What a joke this has become! A Ford Explorer is probably more capable off
road, this thing's no Jeep, that's for sure. "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message news:Z8idnbUYOOBpDtbcRVn-hg@comcast.com... >I weep. My kids' Powerwheels jeeps have more ground clearance. > > "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message > news:414B6AA7.A9B3C877@cox.net... >> Hi Doug, >> I took the liberty to repost your pictures at: >> http://www.----------.com/cherokee/ for others to see and shake their >> heads. >> They show the spare tire placed under the car where it eats up >> another ten inches of ground clearance. The plastic gas tank in the >> middle of the car where it will be the first thing that's high centered. >> And what are those things that point at the rear axle from the rear >> bumper, like when the axle is push up against the bump stops, do they >> double as a plow? And the front end, it's lower than my '89 Bird! >> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O >> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ >> >> DougW wrote: >> > >> > Ok.. I had something farkled in Gravity. They should come across >> > in single posts now (providing they are under 256k) >> > >> > And they should have my correct nym. :) >> > >> > -- >> > DougW > > |
Re: Some underbody shots of the 2005 Grand
What a joke this has become! A Ford Explorer is probably more capable off
road, this thing's no Jeep, that's for sure. "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message news:Z8idnbUYOOBpDtbcRVn-hg@comcast.com... >I weep. My kids' Powerwheels jeeps have more ground clearance. > > "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message > news:414B6AA7.A9B3C877@cox.net... >> Hi Doug, >> I took the liberty to repost your pictures at: >> http://www.----------.com/cherokee/ for others to see and shake their >> heads. >> They show the spare tire placed under the car where it eats up >> another ten inches of ground clearance. The plastic gas tank in the >> middle of the car where it will be the first thing that's high centered. >> And what are those things that point at the rear axle from the rear >> bumper, like when the axle is push up against the bump stops, do they >> double as a plow? And the front end, it's lower than my '89 Bird! >> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O >> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ >> >> DougW wrote: >> > >> > Ok.. I had something farkled in Gravity. They should come across >> > in single posts now (providing they are under 256k) >> > >> > And they should have my correct nym. :) >> > >> > -- >> > DougW > > |
Re: Some underbody shots of the 2005 Grand
What a joke this has become! A Ford Explorer is probably more capable off
road, this thing's no Jeep, that's for sure. "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message news:Z8idnbUYOOBpDtbcRVn-hg@comcast.com... >I weep. My kids' Powerwheels jeeps have more ground clearance. > > "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message > news:414B6AA7.A9B3C877@cox.net... >> Hi Doug, >> I took the liberty to repost your pictures at: >> http://www.----------.com/cherokee/ for others to see and shake their >> heads. >> They show the spare tire placed under the car where it eats up >> another ten inches of ground clearance. The plastic gas tank in the >> middle of the car where it will be the first thing that's high centered. >> And what are those things that point at the rear axle from the rear >> bumper, like when the axle is push up against the bump stops, do they >> double as a plow? And the front end, it's lower than my '89 Bird! >> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O >> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ >> >> DougW wrote: >> > >> > Ok.. I had something farkled in Gravity. They should come across >> > in single posts now (providing they are under 256k) >> > >> > And they should have my correct nym. :) >> > >> > -- >> > DougW > > |
Re: Some underbody shots of the 2005 Grand
Hmm. The 4.7litre Toyota LC Amazon costs 48050GBP ( 86,009 US) here, while
the Jeep GC Overland costs 34715 GBP (62,139). :-( On the plus side, I didnt pay much for my TJ (11,200 US with as many miles on it). Dave Milne, Scotland '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ "DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message news:s9L2d.46803$OZ6.37096@okepread06... > Dave Milne did pass the time by typing: > > That would be the in fine tradition of the Wagoneer :-) > > Yea.. after taking a real close look inside, outside, and under, > I'm not so certain the Grand will be my next vehicle. While I love > the idea of more power and a better AWD system, the underside just > needs way too much skid protection and the dash is.. er.. to be > polite, not near as nice as say the Toyota Land Cruiser or other > comperable vehicles. Not that I couldn't buy two Jeeps for the Landy's > price tag.. 60K owtch! > > > "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" wrote t... > >> They show the spare tire placed under the car where it eats up > >> another ten inches of ground clearance. > > > |
Re: Some underbody shots of the 2005 Grand
Hmm. The 4.7litre Toyota LC Amazon costs 48050GBP ( 86,009 US) here, while
the Jeep GC Overland costs 34715 GBP (62,139). :-( On the plus side, I didnt pay much for my TJ (11,200 US with as many miles on it). Dave Milne, Scotland '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ "DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message news:s9L2d.46803$OZ6.37096@okepread06... > Dave Milne did pass the time by typing: > > That would be the in fine tradition of the Wagoneer :-) > > Yea.. after taking a real close look inside, outside, and under, > I'm not so certain the Grand will be my next vehicle. While I love > the idea of more power and a better AWD system, the underside just > needs way too much skid protection and the dash is.. er.. to be > polite, not near as nice as say the Toyota Land Cruiser or other > comperable vehicles. Not that I couldn't buy two Jeeps for the Landy's > price tag.. 60K owtch! > > > "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" wrote t... > >> They show the spare tire placed under the car where it eats up > >> another ten inches of ground clearance. > > > |
Re: Some underbody shots of the 2005 Grand
Hmm. The 4.7litre Toyota LC Amazon costs 48050GBP ( 86,009 US) here, while
the Jeep GC Overland costs 34715 GBP (62,139). :-( On the plus side, I didnt pay much for my TJ (11,200 US with as many miles on it). Dave Milne, Scotland '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ "DougW" <post.replies@invalid.address> wrote in message news:s9L2d.46803$OZ6.37096@okepread06... > Dave Milne did pass the time by typing: > > That would be the in fine tradition of the Wagoneer :-) > > Yea.. after taking a real close look inside, outside, and under, > I'm not so certain the Grand will be my next vehicle. While I love > the idea of more power and a better AWD system, the underside just > needs way too much skid protection and the dash is.. er.. to be > polite, not near as nice as say the Toyota Land Cruiser or other > comperable vehicles. Not that I couldn't buy two Jeeps for the Landy's > price tag.. 60K owtch! > > > "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" wrote t... > >> They show the spare tire placed under the car where it eats up > >> another ten inches of ground clearance. > > > |
Re: Some underbody shots of the 2005 Grand
I wish we still had tariffs.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Dave Milne wrote: > > Hmm. The 4.7litre Toyota LC Amazon costs 48050GBP ( 86,009 US) here, while > the > Jeep GC Overland costs 34715 GBP (62,139). > > :-( > > On the plus side, I didnt pay much for my TJ (11,200 US with as many miles > on it). > > Dave Milne, Scotland > '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ |
Re: Some underbody shots of the 2005 Grand
I wish we still had tariffs.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Dave Milne wrote: > > Hmm. The 4.7litre Toyota LC Amazon costs 48050GBP ( 86,009 US) here, while > the > Jeep GC Overland costs 34715 GBP (62,139). > > :-( > > On the plus side, I didnt pay much for my TJ (11,200 US with as many miles > on it). > > Dave Milne, Scotland > '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ |
Re: Some underbody shots of the 2005 Grand
I wish we still had tariffs.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Dave Milne wrote: > > Hmm. The 4.7litre Toyota LC Amazon costs 48050GBP ( 86,009 US) here, while > the > Jeep GC Overland costs 34715 GBP (62,139). > > :-( > > On the plus side, I didnt pay much for my TJ (11,200 US with as many miles > on it). > > Dave Milne, Scotland > '91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ |
Re: Some underbody shots of the 2005 Grand
Ford got lowered big time too, to match the rice burner's bumpers.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Jerry McG wrote: > > What a joke this has become! A Ford Explorer is probably more capable off > road, this thing's no Jeep, that's for sure. |
Re: Some underbody shots of the 2005 Grand
Ford got lowered big time too, to match the rice burner's bumpers.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Jerry McG wrote: > > What a joke this has become! A Ford Explorer is probably more capable off > road, this thing's no Jeep, that's for sure. |
Re: Some underbody shots of the 2005 Grand
Ford got lowered big time too, to match the rice burner's bumpers.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Jerry McG wrote: > > What a joke this has become! A Ford Explorer is probably more capable off > road, this thing's no Jeep, that's for sure. |
Re: Some underbody shots of the 2005 Grand
Where was this again? Looks like it was taken offroad a little.
Is this the one with the Hemi? Is that doodie I see in the tire tread ;) |
Re: Some underbody shots of the 2005 Grand
Where was this again? Looks like it was taken offroad a little.
Is this the one with the Hemi? Is that doodie I see in the tire tread ;) |
Re: Some underbody shots of the 2005 Grand
Where was this again? Looks like it was taken offroad a little.
Is this the one with the Hemi? Is that doodie I see in the tire tread ;) |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:23 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands