osu

2000 Jeep Wrangles SE, 4 cycl. 2.5CC
48K, manual, CD+Tape Sound System, soft-top
looks very clean..
is it smart to buy it for $9000 from a third party?

Cherokee-LTD

"osu" <osu@osu.osu> wrote in message
news:c5a500$gos$1@charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
: 2000 Jeep Wrangles SE, 4 cycl. 2.5CC
: 48K, manual, CD+Tape Sound System, soft-top
: looks very clean..
: is it smart to buy it for $9000 from a third party?

That seems a little steep to me but I'm in Canada - I don't know your
market.
For $9000 US I think I'd want both tops at least and possibly the 4.0 for
that money.
Don't look at the 4 cyl. for fuel economy (if thats the case), it's only
marginally better than the 4.0
Don't worry about mileage on a 4.0, they're good for 200000+, 2.5 good for
150000+
Base your decision on condition... ZERO rust.
-Brian

Cherokee-LTD

"osu" <osu@osu.osu> wrote in message
news:c5a500$gos$1@charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
: 2000 Jeep Wrangles SE, 4 cycl. 2.5CC
: 48K, manual, CD+Tape Sound System, soft-top
: looks very clean..
: is it smart to buy it for $9000 from a third party?

That seems a little steep to me but I'm in Canada - I don't know your
market.
For $9000 US I think I'd want both tops at least and possibly the 4.0 for
that money.
Don't look at the 4 cyl. for fuel economy (if thats the case), it's only
marginally better than the 4.0
Don't worry about mileage on a 4.0, they're good for 200000+, 2.5 good for
150000+
Base your decision on condition... ZERO rust.
-Brian

Cherokee-LTD

"osu" <osu@osu.osu> wrote in message
news:c5a500$gos$1@charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
: 2000 Jeep Wrangles SE, 4 cycl. 2.5CC
: 48K, manual, CD+Tape Sound System, soft-top
: looks very clean..
: is it smart to buy it for $9000 from a third party?

That seems a little steep to me but I'm in Canada - I don't know your
market.
For $9000 US I think I'd want both tops at least and possibly the 4.0 for
that money.
Don't look at the 4 cyl. for fuel economy (if thats the case), it's only
marginally better than the 4.0
Don't worry about mileage on a 4.0, they're good for 200000+, 2.5 good for
150000+
Base your decision on condition... ZERO rust.
-Brian

Cherokee-LTD

"osu" <osu@osu.osu> wrote in message
news:c5a500$gos$1@charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
: 2000 Jeep Wrangles SE, 4 cycl. 2.5CC
: 48K, manual, CD+Tape Sound System, soft-top
: looks very clean..
: is it smart to buy it for $9000 from a third party?

That seems a little steep to me but I'm in Canada - I don't know your
market.
For $9000 US I think I'd want both tops at least and possibly the 4.0 for
that money.
Don't look at the 4 cyl. for fuel economy (if thats the case), it's only
marginally better than the 4.0
Don't worry about mileage on a 4.0, they're good for 200000+, 2.5 good for
150000+
Base your decision on condition... ZERO rust.
-Brian

cactuscowboy

According to NADA book values, you'd be buying at close to trade-in value.
Sounds like a good deal assuming it's in good condition.

Best regards,
Dave Rose
Cactus Cowboy
Big Wonderful Wyoming
'49 ****** Pickup (parts truck)
'62 ****** Pickup 4WD 226
'98 XJ Sport
O|||||||O


"osu" <osu@osu.osu> wrote in message
news:c5a500$gos$1@charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
> 2000 Jeep Wrangles SE, 4 cycl. 2.5CC
> 48K, manual, CD+Tape Sound System, soft-top
> looks very clean..
> is it smart to buy it for $9000 from a third party?
>
>

cactuscowboy

According to NADA book values, you'd be buying at close to trade-in value.
Sounds like a good deal assuming it's in good condition.

Best regards,
Dave Rose
Cactus Cowboy
Big Wonderful Wyoming
'49 ****** Pickup (parts truck)
'62 ****** Pickup 4WD 226
'98 XJ Sport
O|||||||O


"osu" <osu@osu.osu> wrote in message
news:c5a500$gos$1@charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
> 2000 Jeep Wrangles SE, 4 cycl. 2.5CC
> 48K, manual, CD+Tape Sound System, soft-top
> looks very clean..
> is it smart to buy it for $9000 from a third party?
>
>

cactuscowboy

According to NADA book values, you'd be buying at close to trade-in value.
Sounds like a good deal assuming it's in good condition.

Best regards,
Dave Rose
Cactus Cowboy
Big Wonderful Wyoming
'49 ****** Pickup (parts truck)
'62 ****** Pickup 4WD 226
'98 XJ Sport
O|||||||O


"osu" <osu@osu.osu> wrote in message
news:c5a500$gos$1@charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
> 2000 Jeep Wrangles SE, 4 cycl. 2.5CC
> 48K, manual, CD+Tape Sound System, soft-top
> looks very clean..
> is it smart to buy it for $9000 from a third party?
>
>

cactuscowboy

According to NADA book values, you'd be buying at close to trade-in value.
Sounds like a good deal assuming it's in good condition.

Best regards,
Dave Rose
Cactus Cowboy
Big Wonderful Wyoming
'49 ****** Pickup (parts truck)
'62 ****** Pickup 4WD 226
'98 XJ Sport
O|||||||O


"osu" <osu@osu.osu> wrote in message
news:c5a500$gos$1@charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu...
> 2000 Jeep Wrangles SE, 4 cycl. 2.5CC
> 48K, manual, CD+Tape Sound System, soft-top
> looks very clean..
> is it smart to buy it for $9000 from a third party?
>
>

osu

> That seems a little steep to me but I'm in Canada - I don't know your
> market.

> For $9000 US I think I'd want both tops at least and possibly the 4.0 for
> that money.
> Don't look at the 4 cyl. for fuel economy (if thats the case), it's only
> marginally better than the 4.0
> Don't worry about mileage on a 4.0, they're good for 200000+, 2.5 good for
> 150000+
> Base your decision on condition... ZERO rust.
> -Brian

thanx for the comment...
i checked autotrader.com, local newspaper and dealers and found that 4.0
models are around $14K.. and even 2000 SEs are around $10K. this does not
have rust and seems running smoothly. my concern is that i am going to be
moving out of country next year, and will be needing to sell it back within
18 months... i do not want to lose whole bunch of money on it by buying more
expensive than its market value.. if i were going to be a keeper, then i
wouldn't hesitate...

/topac