Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome)
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome) <--Jerry here..
JunkYard.com ?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> 1. Dennis sued D-C, not the other way around.
>
> 2. The question is irrelevant, because it's speculative and doesn't reflect
> the facts.
>
> Nathan's a good guy, and for the most part has good intentions, he just has
> some interesting ideas on copyright and trademark infringement. Although
> having naked chicks on his website proved to be his undoing because that's
> how D-C found out about it, from a legal standpoint, it doesn't matter that
> he had naked chicks on his website. The issue was he used an trademark in
> his URL's that he should not have. Later he offered to sell the URL's to
> D-C to settle the matter, but that is one of the definitions of
> cybersquatting.
>
> I know something about this, I had to deal with a cybersquatter infringing
> on my business's name this past summer.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> 1. Dennis sued D-C, not the other way around.
>
> 2. The question is irrelevant, because it's speculative and doesn't reflect
> the facts.
>
> Nathan's a good guy, and for the most part has good intentions, he just has
> some interesting ideas on copyright and trademark infringement. Although
> having naked chicks on his website proved to be his undoing because that's
> how D-C found out about it, from a legal standpoint, it doesn't matter that
> he had naked chicks on his website. The issue was he used an trademark in
> his URL's that he should not have. Later he offered to sell the URL's to
> D-C to settle the matter, but that is one of the definitions of
> cybersquatting.
>
> I know something about this, I had to deal with a cybersquatter infringing
> on my business's name this past summer.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome) <--Jerry here..
JunkYard.com ?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> 1. Dennis sued D-C, not the other way around.
>
> 2. The question is irrelevant, because it's speculative and doesn't reflect
> the facts.
>
> Nathan's a good guy, and for the most part has good intentions, he just has
> some interesting ideas on copyright and trademark infringement. Although
> having naked chicks on his website proved to be his undoing because that's
> how D-C found out about it, from a legal standpoint, it doesn't matter that
> he had naked chicks on his website. The issue was he used an trademark in
> his URL's that he should not have. Later he offered to sell the URL's to
> D-C to settle the matter, but that is one of the definitions of
> cybersquatting.
>
> I know something about this, I had to deal with a cybersquatter infringing
> on my business's name this past summer.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> 1. Dennis sued D-C, not the other way around.
>
> 2. The question is irrelevant, because it's speculative and doesn't reflect
> the facts.
>
> Nathan's a good guy, and for the most part has good intentions, he just has
> some interesting ideas on copyright and trademark infringement. Although
> having naked chicks on his website proved to be his undoing because that's
> how D-C found out about it, from a legal standpoint, it doesn't matter that
> he had naked chicks on his website. The issue was he used an trademark in
> his URL's that he should not have. Later he offered to sell the URL's to
> D-C to settle the matter, but that is one of the definitions of
> cybersquatting.
>
> I know something about this, I had to deal with a cybersquatter infringing
> on my business's name this past summer.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome)
Ditto.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
MontanaJeeper wrote:
>
> you arent still bitter because i explained panamint as operator error
> disproving your "hydraulic winches kill people" argument, are ya jer?
> :-)
>
> sheesh, bury the hatchet and lets move on already. bitter old men
> usually die that way and thats no way to spend your life. hate in
> your heart will consume you.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
MontanaJeeper wrote:
>
> you arent still bitter because i explained panamint as operator error
> disproving your "hydraulic winches kill people" argument, are ya jer?
> :-)
>
> sheesh, bury the hatchet and lets move on already. bitter old men
> usually die that way and thats no way to spend your life. hate in
> your heart will consume you.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome)
Ditto.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
MontanaJeeper wrote:
>
> you arent still bitter because i explained panamint as operator error
> disproving your "hydraulic winches kill people" argument, are ya jer?
> :-)
>
> sheesh, bury the hatchet and lets move on already. bitter old men
> usually die that way and thats no way to spend your life. hate in
> your heart will consume you.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
MontanaJeeper wrote:
>
> you arent still bitter because i explained panamint as operator error
> disproving your "hydraulic winches kill people" argument, are ya jer?
> :-)
>
> sheesh, bury the hatchet and lets move on already. bitter old men
> usually die that way and thats no way to spend your life. hate in
> your heart will consume you.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome)
Ditto.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
MontanaJeeper wrote:
>
> you arent still bitter because i explained panamint as operator error
> disproving your "hydraulic winches kill people" argument, are ya jer?
> :-)
>
> sheesh, bury the hatchet and lets move on already. bitter old men
> usually die that way and thats no way to spend your life. hate in
> your heart will consume you.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
MontanaJeeper wrote:
>
> you arent still bitter because i explained panamint as operator error
> disproving your "hydraulic winches kill people" argument, are ya jer?
> :-)
>
> sheesh, bury the hatchet and lets move on already. bitter old men
> usually die that way and thats no way to spend your life. hate in
> your heart will consume you.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome)
Ditto. I feel like we won at least one more battle after loosing
the war too Germany.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
MontanaJeeper wrote:
>
> many congratulations dennis. im truly happy to see justice done. i
> can only imagine your level of personal satisfaction by putting one
> person in particular in her place.
the war too Germany.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
MontanaJeeper wrote:
>
> many congratulations dennis. im truly happy to see justice done. i
> can only imagine your level of personal satisfaction by putting one
> person in particular in her place.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome)
Ditto. I feel like we won at least one more battle after loosing
the war too Germany.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
MontanaJeeper wrote:
>
> many congratulations dennis. im truly happy to see justice done. i
> can only imagine your level of personal satisfaction by putting one
> person in particular in her place.
the war too Germany.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
MontanaJeeper wrote:
>
> many congratulations dennis. im truly happy to see justice done. i
> can only imagine your level of personal satisfaction by putting one
> person in particular in her place.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome)
Ditto. I feel like we won at least one more battle after loosing
the war too Germany.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
MontanaJeeper wrote:
>
> many congratulations dennis. im truly happy to see justice done. i
> can only imagine your level of personal satisfaction by putting one
> person in particular in her place.
the war too Germany.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
MontanaJeeper wrote:
>
> many congratulations dennis. im truly happy to see justice done. i
> can only imagine your level of personal satisfaction by putting one
> person in particular in her place.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome) <--Jerry here..
strange - they have a different website on junkyard.com and www.junkyard.com
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:41853806.C97DCC67@***.net...
> JunkYard.com ?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > 1. Dennis sued D-C, not the other way around.
> >
> > 2. The question is irrelevant, because it's speculative and doesn't
reflect
> > the facts.
> >
> > Nathan's a good guy, and for the most part has good intentions, he just
has
> > some interesting ideas on copyright and trademark infringement. Although
> > having naked chicks on his website proved to be his undoing because
that's
> > how D-C found out about it, from a legal standpoint, it doesn't matter
that
> > he had naked chicks on his website. The issue was he used an trademark
in
> > his URL's that he should not have. Later he offered to sell the URL's
to
> > D-C to settle the matter, but that is one of the definitions of
> > cybersquatting.
> >
> > I know something about this, I had to deal with a cybersquatter
infringing
> > on my business's name this past summer.
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:41853806.C97DCC67@***.net...
> JunkYard.com ?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > 1. Dennis sued D-C, not the other way around.
> >
> > 2. The question is irrelevant, because it's speculative and doesn't
reflect
> > the facts.
> >
> > Nathan's a good guy, and for the most part has good intentions, he just
has
> > some interesting ideas on copyright and trademark infringement. Although
> > having naked chicks on his website proved to be his undoing because
that's
> > how D-C found out about it, from a legal standpoint, it doesn't matter
that
> > he had naked chicks on his website. The issue was he used an trademark
in
> > his URL's that he should not have. Later he offered to sell the URL's
to
> > D-C to settle the matter, but that is one of the definitions of
> > cybersquatting.
> >
> > I know something about this, I had to deal with a cybersquatter
infringing
> > on my business's name this past summer.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Showdown on the Rubicon (outcome) <--Jerry here..
strange - they have a different website on junkyard.com and www.junkyard.com
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:41853806.C97DCC67@***.net...
> JunkYard.com ?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > 1. Dennis sued D-C, not the other way around.
> >
> > 2. The question is irrelevant, because it's speculative and doesn't
reflect
> > the facts.
> >
> > Nathan's a good guy, and for the most part has good intentions, he just
has
> > some interesting ideas on copyright and trademark infringement. Although
> > having naked chicks on his website proved to be his undoing because
that's
> > how D-C found out about it, from a legal standpoint, it doesn't matter
that
> > he had naked chicks on his website. The issue was he used an trademark
in
> > his URL's that he should not have. Later he offered to sell the URL's
to
> > D-C to settle the matter, but that is one of the definitions of
> > cybersquatting.
> >
> > I know something about this, I had to deal with a cybersquatter
infringing
> > on my business's name this past summer.
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:41853806.C97DCC67@***.net...
> JunkYard.com ?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > 1. Dennis sued D-C, not the other way around.
> >
> > 2. The question is irrelevant, because it's speculative and doesn't
reflect
> > the facts.
> >
> > Nathan's a good guy, and for the most part has good intentions, he just
has
> > some interesting ideas on copyright and trademark infringement. Although
> > having naked chicks on his website proved to be his undoing because
that's
> > how D-C found out about it, from a legal standpoint, it doesn't matter
that
> > he had naked chicks on his website. The issue was he used an trademark
in
> > his URL's that he should not have. Later he offered to sell the URL's
to
> > D-C to settle the matter, but that is one of the definitions of
> > cybersquatting.
> >
> > I know something about this, I had to deal with a cybersquatter
infringing
> > on my business's name this past summer.
