Should I get it?
06-09-2007, 01:40 PM
#31
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Should I get it?
Aaron Meck wrote:
> Here are some photos I snapped this morning. Turns out it is a 1991,
> but teh mileage is correct at about 86k.
>
> http://picasaweb.google.com/armeck/OldJeep
>
What a piece of crap! NO WAY that is worth $300.00!! Please email me the
owner's name, address, and phone number so I can chastise him for trying
to rip off one of our NG members! Also, if you could post his zipcode
for curiosity sake only. Some people! Sheeesh!
tw
--
PLEASE REMOVE THE "OBVIOUS" TO REPLY.
> Here are some photos I snapped this morning. Turns out it is a 1991,
> but teh mileage is correct at about 86k.
>
> http://picasaweb.google.com/armeck/OldJeep
>
What a piece of crap! NO WAY that is worth $300.00!! Please email me the
owner's name, address, and phone number so I can chastise him for trying
to rip off one of our NG members! Also, if you could post his zipcode
for curiosity sake only. Some people! Sheeesh!
tw
--
PLEASE REMOVE THE "OBVIOUS" TO REPLY.
06-09-2007, 01:40 PM
#32
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Should I get it?
Aaron Meck wrote:
> Here are some photos I snapped this morning. Turns out it is a 1991,
> but teh mileage is correct at about 86k.
>
> http://picasaweb.google.com/armeck/OldJeep
>
What a piece of crap! NO WAY that is worth $300.00!! Please email me the
owner's name, address, and phone number so I can chastise him for trying
to rip off one of our NG members! Also, if you could post his zipcode
for curiosity sake only. Some people! Sheeesh!
tw
--
PLEASE REMOVE THE "OBVIOUS" TO REPLY.
> Here are some photos I snapped this morning. Turns out it is a 1991,
> but teh mileage is correct at about 86k.
>
> http://picasaweb.google.com/armeck/OldJeep
>
What a piece of crap! NO WAY that is worth $300.00!! Please email me the
owner's name, address, and phone number so I can chastise him for trying
to rip off one of our NG members! Also, if you could post his zipcode
for curiosity sake only. Some people! Sheeesh!
tw
--
PLEASE REMOVE THE "OBVIOUS" TO REPLY.
06-09-2007, 01:40 PM
#33
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Should I get it?
Aaron Meck wrote:
> Here are some photos I snapped this morning. Turns out it is a 1991,
> but teh mileage is correct at about 86k.
>
> http://picasaweb.google.com/armeck/OldJeep
>
What a piece of crap! NO WAY that is worth $300.00!! Please email me the
owner's name, address, and phone number so I can chastise him for trying
to rip off one of our NG members! Also, if you could post his zipcode
for curiosity sake only. Some people! Sheeesh!
tw
--
PLEASE REMOVE THE "OBVIOUS" TO REPLY.
> Here are some photos I snapped this morning. Turns out it is a 1991,
> but teh mileage is correct at about 86k.
>
> http://picasaweb.google.com/armeck/OldJeep
>
What a piece of crap! NO WAY that is worth $300.00!! Please email me the
owner's name, address, and phone number so I can chastise him for trying
to rip off one of our NG members! Also, if you could post his zipcode
for curiosity sake only. Some people! Sheeesh!
tw
--
PLEASE REMOVE THE "OBVIOUS" TO REPLY.
06-09-2007, 01:43 PM
#34
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Should I get it?
Aaron Meck wrote:
> Here are some photos I snapped this morning. Turns out it is a 1991,
> but teh mileage is correct at about 86k.
>
> http://picasaweb.google.com/armeck/OldJeep
>
Wow, that is almost too good to be true.
Those tire are wicked. You can run any trail with those and not worry
about traction, tall skinny tires just don't spin to dig holes.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's - Gone to the rust pile...
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
> Here are some photos I snapped this morning. Turns out it is a 1991,
> but teh mileage is correct at about 86k.
>
> http://picasaweb.google.com/armeck/OldJeep
>
Wow, that is almost too good to be true.
Those tire are wicked. You can run any trail with those and not worry
about traction, tall skinny tires just don't spin to dig holes.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's - Gone to the rust pile...
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
06-09-2007, 01:43 PM
#35
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Should I get it?
Aaron Meck wrote:
> Here are some photos I snapped this morning. Turns out it is a 1991,
> but teh mileage is correct at about 86k.
>
> http://picasaweb.google.com/armeck/OldJeep
>
Wow, that is almost too good to be true.
Those tire are wicked. You can run any trail with those and not worry
about traction, tall skinny tires just don't spin to dig holes.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's - Gone to the rust pile...
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
> Here are some photos I snapped this morning. Turns out it is a 1991,
> but teh mileage is correct at about 86k.
>
> http://picasaweb.google.com/armeck/OldJeep
>
Wow, that is almost too good to be true.
Those tire are wicked. You can run any trail with those and not worry
about traction, tall skinny tires just don't spin to dig holes.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's - Gone to the rust pile...
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
06-09-2007, 01:43 PM
#36
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Should I get it?
Aaron Meck wrote:
> Here are some photos I snapped this morning. Turns out it is a 1991,
> but teh mileage is correct at about 86k.
>
> http://picasaweb.google.com/armeck/OldJeep
>
Wow, that is almost too good to be true.
Those tire are wicked. You can run any trail with those and not worry
about traction, tall skinny tires just don't spin to dig holes.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's - Gone to the rust pile...
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
> Here are some photos I snapped this morning. Turns out it is a 1991,
> but teh mileage is correct at about 86k.
>
> http://picasaweb.google.com/armeck/OldJeep
>
Wow, that is almost too good to be true.
Those tire are wicked. You can run any trail with those and not worry
about traction, tall skinny tires just don't spin to dig holes.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's - Gone to the rust pile...
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
06-09-2007, 01:43 PM
#37
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Should I get it?
Aaron Meck wrote:
> Here are some photos I snapped this morning. Turns out it is a 1991,
> but teh mileage is correct at about 86k.
>
> http://picasaweb.google.com/armeck/OldJeep
>
Wow, that is almost too good to be true.
Those tire are wicked. You can run any trail with those and not worry
about traction, tall skinny tires just don't spin to dig holes.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's - Gone to the rust pile...
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
> Here are some photos I snapped this morning. Turns out it is a 1991,
> but teh mileage is correct at about 86k.
>
> http://picasaweb.google.com/armeck/OldJeep
>
Wow, that is almost too good to be true.
Those tire are wicked. You can run any trail with those and not worry
about traction, tall skinny tires just don't spin to dig holes.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's - Gone to the rust pile...
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)
06-09-2007, 01:49 PM
#38
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Should I get it?
I have a back seat from a 93 YJ that I would sell - shipping may be an
issue. But pick-up / meeting half way could be arranged if you are near
Milwaukee, Wi.
I also have the rear seat belts accept the 93's shoulder straps attaches to
a different sports bar configuration then what is on the 91 in the pictures.
paul
"Aaron Meck" <armeck@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1181409059.218525.153350@w5g2000hsg.googlegro ups.com...
> Here are some photos I snapped this morning. Turns out it is a 1991,
> but teh mileage is correct at about 86k.
>
> http://picasaweb.google.com/armeck/OldJeep
>
issue. But pick-up / meeting half way could be arranged if you are near
Milwaukee, Wi.
I also have the rear seat belts accept the 93's shoulder straps attaches to
a different sports bar configuration then what is on the 91 in the pictures.
paul
"Aaron Meck" <armeck@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1181409059.218525.153350@w5g2000hsg.googlegro ups.com...
> Here are some photos I snapped this morning. Turns out it is a 1991,
> but teh mileage is correct at about 86k.
>
> http://picasaweb.google.com/armeck/OldJeep
>
06-09-2007, 01:49 PM
#39
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Should I get it?
I have a back seat from a 93 YJ that I would sell - shipping may be an
issue. But pick-up / meeting half way could be arranged if you are near
Milwaukee, Wi.
I also have the rear seat belts accept the 93's shoulder straps attaches to
a different sports bar configuration then what is on the 91 in the pictures.
paul
"Aaron Meck" <armeck@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1181409059.218525.153350@w5g2000hsg.googlegro ups.com...
> Here are some photos I snapped this morning. Turns out it is a 1991,
> but teh mileage is correct at about 86k.
>
> http://picasaweb.google.com/armeck/OldJeep
>
issue. But pick-up / meeting half way could be arranged if you are near
Milwaukee, Wi.
I also have the rear seat belts accept the 93's shoulder straps attaches to
a different sports bar configuration then what is on the 91 in the pictures.
paul
"Aaron Meck" <armeck@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1181409059.218525.153350@w5g2000hsg.googlegro ups.com...
> Here are some photos I snapped this morning. Turns out it is a 1991,
> but teh mileage is correct at about 86k.
>
> http://picasaweb.google.com/armeck/OldJeep
>
06-09-2007, 01:49 PM
#40
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Should I get it?
I have a back seat from a 93 YJ that I would sell - shipping may be an
issue. But pick-up / meeting half way could be arranged if you are near
Milwaukee, Wi.
I also have the rear seat belts accept the 93's shoulder straps attaches to
a different sports bar configuration then what is on the 91 in the pictures.
paul
"Aaron Meck" <armeck@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1181409059.218525.153350@w5g2000hsg.googlegro ups.com...
> Here are some photos I snapped this morning. Turns out it is a 1991,
> but teh mileage is correct at about 86k.
>
> http://picasaweb.google.com/armeck/OldJeep
>
issue. But pick-up / meeting half way could be arranged if you are near
Milwaukee, Wi.
I also have the rear seat belts accept the 93's shoulder straps attaches to
a different sports bar configuration then what is on the 91 in the pictures.
paul
"Aaron Meck" <armeck@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1181409059.218525.153350@w5g2000hsg.googlegro ups.com...
> Here are some photos I snapped this morning. Turns out it is a 1991,
> but teh mileage is correct at about 86k.
>
> http://picasaweb.google.com/armeck/OldJeep
>
