Is the Rubicon really worth the price?
05-18-2004, 07:42 PM
#31
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Is the Rubicon really worth the price?
third.
n.
"dave" <x1236@charter.netREMOVETHIS> wrote in message
news:0jrqc.15712837$Of.2621380@news.easynews.com.. .
>
> "twaldron" <thomas@rubicons.com> wrote in message
> news:GIpqc.934$Aq4.86@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com.. .
> > YES!!!!!
>
> I'll second that.
>
>
>
n.
"dave" <x1236@charter.netREMOVETHIS> wrote in message
news:0jrqc.15712837$Of.2621380@news.easynews.com.. .
>
> "twaldron" <thomas@rubicons.com> wrote in message
> news:GIpqc.934$Aq4.86@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com.. .
> > YES!!!!!
>
> I'll second that.
>
>
>
05-18-2004, 07:42 PM
#32
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Is the Rubicon really worth the price?
third.
n.
"dave" <x1236@charter.netREMOVETHIS> wrote in message
news:0jrqc.15712837$Of.2621380@news.easynews.com.. .
>
> "twaldron" <thomas@rubicons.com> wrote in message
> news:GIpqc.934$Aq4.86@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com.. .
> > YES!!!!!
>
> I'll second that.
>
>
>
n.
"dave" <x1236@charter.netREMOVETHIS> wrote in message
news:0jrqc.15712837$Of.2621380@news.easynews.com.. .
>
> "twaldron" <thomas@rubicons.com> wrote in message
> news:GIpqc.934$Aq4.86@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com.. .
> > YES!!!!!
>
> I'll second that.
>
>
>
05-18-2004, 07:42 PM
#33
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Is the Rubicon really worth the price?
third.
n.
"dave" <x1236@charter.netREMOVETHIS> wrote in message
news:0jrqc.15712837$Of.2621380@news.easynews.com.. .
>
> "twaldron" <thomas@rubicons.com> wrote in message
> news:GIpqc.934$Aq4.86@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com.. .
> > YES!!!!!
>
> I'll second that.
>
>
>
n.
"dave" <x1236@charter.netREMOVETHIS> wrote in message
news:0jrqc.15712837$Of.2621380@news.easynews.com.. .
>
> "twaldron" <thomas@rubicons.com> wrote in message
> news:GIpqc.934$Aq4.86@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com.. .
> > YES!!!!!
>
> I'll second that.
>
>
>
05-18-2004, 08:01 PM
#34
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Is the Rubicon really worth the price?
On Tue, 18 May 2004 19:02:18 GMT, "JimG" <jimg@2muchspam.com> wrote:
>One correction - YJ years - 87-95
YJs were made from 1987-1995, but the six didn't get fuel
injection until 1991, that is why they were mentioned, I believe
Tookie - Denham Springs, LA
88YJ, 4" lift, 33" TSLs, Lock-Rights
PosiLock, 4.10s
>One correction - YJ years - 87-95
YJs were made from 1987-1995, but the six didn't get fuel
injection until 1991, that is why they were mentioned, I believe
Tookie - Denham Springs, LA
88YJ, 4" lift, 33" TSLs, Lock-Rights
PosiLock, 4.10s
05-18-2004, 08:01 PM
#35
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Is the Rubicon really worth the price?
On Tue, 18 May 2004 19:02:18 GMT, "JimG" <jimg@2muchspam.com> wrote:
>One correction - YJ years - 87-95
YJs were made from 1987-1995, but the six didn't get fuel
injection until 1991, that is why they were mentioned, I believe
Tookie - Denham Springs, LA
88YJ, 4" lift, 33" TSLs, Lock-Rights
PosiLock, 4.10s
>One correction - YJ years - 87-95
YJs were made from 1987-1995, but the six didn't get fuel
injection until 1991, that is why they were mentioned, I believe
Tookie - Denham Springs, LA
88YJ, 4" lift, 33" TSLs, Lock-Rights
PosiLock, 4.10s
05-18-2004, 08:01 PM
#36
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Is the Rubicon really worth the price?
On Tue, 18 May 2004 19:02:18 GMT, "JimG" <jimg@2muchspam.com> wrote:
>One correction - YJ years - 87-95
YJs were made from 1987-1995, but the six didn't get fuel
injection until 1991, that is why they were mentioned, I believe
Tookie - Denham Springs, LA
88YJ, 4" lift, 33" TSLs, Lock-Rights
PosiLock, 4.10s
>One correction - YJ years - 87-95
YJs were made from 1987-1995, but the six didn't get fuel
injection until 1991, that is why they were mentioned, I believe
Tookie - Denham Springs, LA
88YJ, 4" lift, 33" TSLs, Lock-Rights
PosiLock, 4.10s
05-18-2004, 08:01 PM
#37
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Is the Rubicon really worth the price?
On Tue, 18 May 2004 19:02:18 GMT, "JimG" <jimg@2muchspam.com> wrote:
>One correction - YJ years - 87-95
YJs were made from 1987-1995, but the six didn't get fuel
injection until 1991, that is why they were mentioned, I believe
Tookie - Denham Springs, LA
88YJ, 4" lift, 33" TSLs, Lock-Rights
PosiLock, 4.10s
>One correction - YJ years - 87-95
YJs were made from 1987-1995, but the six didn't get fuel
injection until 1991, that is why they were mentioned, I believe
Tookie - Denham Springs, LA
88YJ, 4" lift, 33" TSLs, Lock-Rights
PosiLock, 4.10s
05-18-2004, 11:21 PM
#38
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Is the Rubicon really worth the price?
Rory,
I have had my Rubicon since November of 2002 and am completely happy with
it. Is it worth the $$? For me, yes, it was. The extras (d44's, lockers,
ect) for me were something I probably wouldn't have done with a Sport or X
version. If I had to do it all over again, I will still buy the Rubicon.
I have owned several Jeeps including a '98 TJ sport, YJ and currently own an
'86 CJ. As far as best year and style, that really depends on what you plan
to do I guess. IMHO, i would go with a TJ, 98 or newer. I would stay away
from the 4 cylinder if your doing a lot of highway driving. The TJ has the
quad coil suspension for a great ride and there are plenty of after market
goodies as well. I like th 98 because, well, I had one, plus they added a
defeat for the clutch/ignition in the fuse box, which i don't think was
there in the 97. This is so you can rock crawl while using your ignition
to stop and start you. Hope this helps. GOOD LUCK!!
--
o||||||o o||||||o o||||||o o||||||o o||||||o o||||||o o||||||o
MJ w/ 2 TJ's (Rubi and Trevor James)
www.tazjeep.com
'03 Rubicon 33" GYMTR's 4" Tera-Long Arm
'86 CJ 7 Chevy 350 4bbl, Dana 44 rear, 33" GYMTR
"Rory" <rfay@rr.sc.com> wrote in message > Hello,
>
> Recently sold an older Cherokee (1990 4WD XJ) and then moved to SC. Now
looking for another Jeep and was wondering if the Rubicon was realy worth
the extra $$$. Also wondering what the best year and style for purchasing a
used Wrangler was.
>
> Thanks,
> Rory
I have had my Rubicon since November of 2002 and am completely happy with
it. Is it worth the $$? For me, yes, it was. The extras (d44's, lockers,
ect) for me were something I probably wouldn't have done with a Sport or X
version. If I had to do it all over again, I will still buy the Rubicon.
I have owned several Jeeps including a '98 TJ sport, YJ and currently own an
'86 CJ. As far as best year and style, that really depends on what you plan
to do I guess. IMHO, i would go with a TJ, 98 or newer. I would stay away
from the 4 cylinder if your doing a lot of highway driving. The TJ has the
quad coil suspension for a great ride and there are plenty of after market
goodies as well. I like th 98 because, well, I had one, plus they added a
defeat for the clutch/ignition in the fuse box, which i don't think was
there in the 97. This is so you can rock crawl while using your ignition
to stop and start you. Hope this helps. GOOD LUCK!!
--
o||||||o o||||||o o||||||o o||||||o o||||||o o||||||o o||||||o
MJ w/ 2 TJ's (Rubi and Trevor James)
www.tazjeep.com
'03 Rubicon 33" GYMTR's 4" Tera-Long Arm
'86 CJ 7 Chevy 350 4bbl, Dana 44 rear, 33" GYMTR
"Rory" <rfay@rr.sc.com> wrote in message > Hello,
>
> Recently sold an older Cherokee (1990 4WD XJ) and then moved to SC. Now
looking for another Jeep and was wondering if the Rubicon was realy worth
the extra $$$. Also wondering what the best year and style for purchasing a
used Wrangler was.
>
> Thanks,
> Rory
05-18-2004, 11:21 PM
#39
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Is the Rubicon really worth the price?
Rory,
I have had my Rubicon since November of 2002 and am completely happy with
it. Is it worth the $$? For me, yes, it was. The extras (d44's, lockers,
ect) for me were something I probably wouldn't have done with a Sport or X
version. If I had to do it all over again, I will still buy the Rubicon.
I have owned several Jeeps including a '98 TJ sport, YJ and currently own an
'86 CJ. As far as best year and style, that really depends on what you plan
to do I guess. IMHO, i would go with a TJ, 98 or newer. I would stay away
from the 4 cylinder if your doing a lot of highway driving. The TJ has the
quad coil suspension for a great ride and there are plenty of after market
goodies as well. I like th 98 because, well, I had one, plus they added a
defeat for the clutch/ignition in the fuse box, which i don't think was
there in the 97. This is so you can rock crawl while using your ignition
to stop and start you. Hope this helps. GOOD LUCK!!
--
o||||||o o||||||o o||||||o o||||||o o||||||o o||||||o o||||||o
MJ w/ 2 TJ's (Rubi and Trevor James)
www.tazjeep.com
'03 Rubicon 33" GYMTR's 4" Tera-Long Arm
'86 CJ 7 Chevy 350 4bbl, Dana 44 rear, 33" GYMTR
"Rory" <rfay@rr.sc.com> wrote in message > Hello,
>
> Recently sold an older Cherokee (1990 4WD XJ) and then moved to SC. Now
looking for another Jeep and was wondering if the Rubicon was realy worth
the extra $$$. Also wondering what the best year and style for purchasing a
used Wrangler was.
>
> Thanks,
> Rory
I have had my Rubicon since November of 2002 and am completely happy with
it. Is it worth the $$? For me, yes, it was. The extras (d44's, lockers,
ect) for me were something I probably wouldn't have done with a Sport or X
version. If I had to do it all over again, I will still buy the Rubicon.
I have owned several Jeeps including a '98 TJ sport, YJ and currently own an
'86 CJ. As far as best year and style, that really depends on what you plan
to do I guess. IMHO, i would go with a TJ, 98 or newer. I would stay away
from the 4 cylinder if your doing a lot of highway driving. The TJ has the
quad coil suspension for a great ride and there are plenty of after market
goodies as well. I like th 98 because, well, I had one, plus they added a
defeat for the clutch/ignition in the fuse box, which i don't think was
there in the 97. This is so you can rock crawl while using your ignition
to stop and start you. Hope this helps. GOOD LUCK!!
--
o||||||o o||||||o o||||||o o||||||o o||||||o o||||||o o||||||o
MJ w/ 2 TJ's (Rubi and Trevor James)
www.tazjeep.com
'03 Rubicon 33" GYMTR's 4" Tera-Long Arm
'86 CJ 7 Chevy 350 4bbl, Dana 44 rear, 33" GYMTR
"Rory" <rfay@rr.sc.com> wrote in message > Hello,
>
> Recently sold an older Cherokee (1990 4WD XJ) and then moved to SC. Now
looking for another Jeep and was wondering if the Rubicon was realy worth
the extra $$$. Also wondering what the best year and style for purchasing a
used Wrangler was.
>
> Thanks,
> Rory
05-18-2004, 11:21 PM
#40
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Is the Rubicon really worth the price?
Rory,
I have had my Rubicon since November of 2002 and am completely happy with
it. Is it worth the $$? For me, yes, it was. The extras (d44's, lockers,
ect) for me were something I probably wouldn't have done with a Sport or X
version. If I had to do it all over again, I will still buy the Rubicon.
I have owned several Jeeps including a '98 TJ sport, YJ and currently own an
'86 CJ. As far as best year and style, that really depends on what you plan
to do I guess. IMHO, i would go with a TJ, 98 or newer. I would stay away
from the 4 cylinder if your doing a lot of highway driving. The TJ has the
quad coil suspension for a great ride and there are plenty of after market
goodies as well. I like th 98 because, well, I had one, plus they added a
defeat for the clutch/ignition in the fuse box, which i don't think was
there in the 97. This is so you can rock crawl while using your ignition
to stop and start you. Hope this helps. GOOD LUCK!!
--
o||||||o o||||||o o||||||o o||||||o o||||||o o||||||o o||||||o
MJ w/ 2 TJ's (Rubi and Trevor James)
www.tazjeep.com
'03 Rubicon 33" GYMTR's 4" Tera-Long Arm
'86 CJ 7 Chevy 350 4bbl, Dana 44 rear, 33" GYMTR
"Rory" <rfay@rr.sc.com> wrote in message > Hello,
>
> Recently sold an older Cherokee (1990 4WD XJ) and then moved to SC. Now
looking for another Jeep and was wondering if the Rubicon was realy worth
the extra $$$. Also wondering what the best year and style for purchasing a
used Wrangler was.
>
> Thanks,
> Rory
I have had my Rubicon since November of 2002 and am completely happy with
it. Is it worth the $$? For me, yes, it was. The extras (d44's, lockers,
ect) for me were something I probably wouldn't have done with a Sport or X
version. If I had to do it all over again, I will still buy the Rubicon.
I have owned several Jeeps including a '98 TJ sport, YJ and currently own an
'86 CJ. As far as best year and style, that really depends on what you plan
to do I guess. IMHO, i would go with a TJ, 98 or newer. I would stay away
from the 4 cylinder if your doing a lot of highway driving. The TJ has the
quad coil suspension for a great ride and there are plenty of after market
goodies as well. I like th 98 because, well, I had one, plus they added a
defeat for the clutch/ignition in the fuse box, which i don't think was
there in the 97. This is so you can rock crawl while using your ignition
to stop and start you. Hope this helps. GOOD LUCK!!
--
o||||||o o||||||o o||||||o o||||||o o||||||o o||||||o o||||||o
MJ w/ 2 TJ's (Rubi and Trevor James)
www.tazjeep.com
'03 Rubicon 33" GYMTR's 4" Tera-Long Arm
'86 CJ 7 Chevy 350 4bbl, Dana 44 rear, 33" GYMTR
"Rory" <rfay@rr.sc.com> wrote in message > Hello,
>
> Recently sold an older Cherokee (1990 4WD XJ) and then moved to SC. Now
looking for another Jeep and was wondering if the Rubicon was realy worth
the extra $$$. Also wondering what the best year and style for purchasing a
used Wrangler was.
>
> Thanks,
> Rory
