Restored 1920 Dorris K-4

My Husband found it in a barn in Montana. After 4 years and
lots of work, his labor of love is 100% restored! The RV of my
Husbands dreams reaches a top speed of 15 miles per hour,
lacks front brakes, uses oil lamps for headlights and features a
dashboard intended to deflect debris rather than display information.
I included a picture below. Does anyone have
any idea of the value? Thanks!


http://tinyurl.com/3jp6b

 

Gwyneð Bennetdottir wrote:

....

Abuse reported to tinyurl and aol

The link is not for kids or quite frankly
not for adults.

--
DougW

 

On Jan 1, 11:25�am, "DougW" <I.only.read.use...@invalid.address>
wrote:
> Gwyne� Bennetdottir wrote:
>
> ...
>
> Abuse reported to tinyurl and aol

How long have you been a netKKKop?
I guess RV's are not your thing.
Pity


Restored 1920 Dorris K-4

 

Gwyneð Bennetdottir wrote:
> On Jan 1, 11:25?am, "DougW" <I.only.read.use...@invalid.address>
> wrote:
>> Gwyne? Bennetdottir wrote:
>>
>> ...
>>
>> Abuse reported to tinyurl and aol
>
> How long have you been a netKKKop?
> I guess RV's are not your thing.

That tinyurl pointed to a pornographic image not suitable for this group.

--
DougW

 

On Jan 1, 8:49�pm, "DougW" <I.only.read.use...@invalid.address> wrote:
> Gwyne� Bennetdottir wrote:
> > On Jan 1, 11:25?am, "DougW" <I.only.read.use...@invalid.address>
> > wrote:
> >> Gwyne? Bennetdottir wrote:
>
> >> ...
>
> >> Abuse reported to tinyurl and aol
>
> > How long have you been a netKKKop?
> > I guess RV's are not your thing.
>
> That tinyurl pointed to a pornographic image not suitable for this group.

That is not true.

 

>>> I guess RV's are not your thing.
>> That tinyurl pointed to a pornographic image not suitable for this group.
>
> That is not true.

Then why did tinyurl remove your link?

 

Scott in Baltimore wrote:
>>>> I guess RV's are not your thing.
>>> That tinyurl pointed to a pornographic image not suitable for this
>>> group.
>>
>> That is not true.
>
> Then why did tinyurl remove your link?

It is possible the site that image came from uses a method to poision direct links
to images. And the image was most definitly offensive, otherwise I woudn't have
posted that response. How about posting the full (non tinyfied) url.

--
DougW

 

DougW wrote:
> Gwyneð Bennetdottir wrote:
>> On Jan 1, 11:25?am, "DougW" <I.only.read.use...@invalid.address>
>> wrote:
>>> Gwyne? Bennetdottir wrote:
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> Abuse reported to tinyurl and aol
>> How long have you been a netKKKop?
>> I guess RV's are not your thing.
>
> That tinyurl pointed to a pornographic image not suitable for this group.
>

That jackass has posted ---- in fake links all over Usenet. What a looser.

Mike