I like the trucks the contractors drive in Iraq:
http://www.kk.org/streetuse/archives...ruck_armor.php

Makes me want to put a mount for a .50 cal over the rear seat of my Jeep :)

Troy


billy ray wrote:

> Worse thing is that there aren't all that many Jeeps there, the terrorists
> prefer Toyota mini pickups.

 

The problem with your way of thinking, is that we are not hurting the
"terrorists" by what we are doing in Iraq. We are just helping them to
inflame their thousand year old rivalries into civil war. You have to learn
to cut your losses in life, or you're screwed. Maybe you don't remember
Vietnam.

Earle

"Simon Juncal" <SPAMERSSUCK@usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com > wrote in
message news:cIKdnU6XMsXiicrYnZ2dnUVZ_tqdnZ2d@rcn.net...
> Earle Horton wrote:
> > I wouldn't put it that way, but it sure sounds like a good idea to me.
I
> > think you have to look at this as a vote against the Republicans, and
pretty
> > much everyone is taking it like that, not as a vote in favor of the
> > Democrats' warped social policies. Specifically, a vote against
continuing
> > to have United States citizens dying every day in Iraq.
>
> Is this what we've come to as a country? Bury your head in the sand and
> hope it all goes away?
>
> It doesn't strike people like you that it may be a bad idea to give
> terrorists a victory, thus proving to them that their tactics are good
> and that they should repeat them as much as possible?
>
> Did shrinking and covering your face with your hands in submission when
> the bully came your way EVER WORK for you Earle? Of course not, Did you
> not learn anything from that?
>
> --
> Simon
> "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

 

The problem with your way of thinking, is that we are not hurting the
"terrorists" by what we are doing in Iraq. We are just helping them to
inflame their thousand year old rivalries into civil war. You have to learn
to cut your losses in life, or you're screwed. Maybe you don't remember
Vietnam.

Earle

"Simon Juncal" <SPAMERSSUCK@usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com > wrote in
message news:cIKdnU6XMsXiicrYnZ2dnUVZ_tqdnZ2d@rcn.net...
> Earle Horton wrote:
> > I wouldn't put it that way, but it sure sounds like a good idea to me.
I
> > think you have to look at this as a vote against the Republicans, and
pretty
> > much everyone is taking it like that, not as a vote in favor of the
> > Democrats' warped social policies. Specifically, a vote against
continuing
> > to have United States citizens dying every day in Iraq.
>
> Is this what we've come to as a country? Bury your head in the sand and
> hope it all goes away?
>
> It doesn't strike people like you that it may be a bad idea to give
> terrorists a victory, thus proving to them that their tactics are good
> and that they should repeat them as much as possible?
>
> Did shrinking and covering your face with your hands in submission when
> the bully came your way EVER WORK for you Earle? Of course not, Did you
> not learn anything from that?
>
> --
> Simon
> "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

 

The problem with your way of thinking, is that we are not hurting the
"terrorists" by what we are doing in Iraq. We are just helping them to
inflame their thousand year old rivalries into civil war. You have to learn
to cut your losses in life, or you're screwed. Maybe you don't remember
Vietnam.

Earle

"Simon Juncal" <SPAMERSSUCK@usefirstinitialandlastnameATerols.com > wrote in
message news:cIKdnU6XMsXiicrYnZ2dnUVZ_tqdnZ2d@rcn.net...
> Earle Horton wrote:
> > I wouldn't put it that way, but it sure sounds like a good idea to me.
I
> > think you have to look at this as a vote against the Republicans, and
pretty
> > much everyone is taking it like that, not as a vote in favor of the
> > Democrats' warped social policies. Specifically, a vote against
continuing
> > to have United States citizens dying every day in Iraq.
>
> Is this what we've come to as a country? Bury your head in the sand and
> hope it all goes away?
>
> It doesn't strike people like you that it may be a bad idea to give
> terrorists a victory, thus proving to them that their tactics are good
> and that they should repeat them as much as possible?
>
> Did shrinking and covering your face with your hands in submission when
> the bully came your way EVER WORK for you Earle? Of course not, Did you
> not learn anything from that?
>
> --
> Simon
> "I may be wrong, but I'm not uncertain." -- Robert A. Heinlein



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

 

What exactly is the problem if the "terrorists" get stuck with a big chunk
of sand, and the rest get all the natural resources? It sounds like a good
idea to me. They can make tourist souvenirs out of it, and sell them to all
the European tourists that are sure to come, once the hostilities die down.
They can make housing out of it, and they can eat it for all I care. Maybe
if we told our "friends" the Saudis to stop funding them, they might even
calm down to the point, where all the other groups in the region could live
in peace with them.

Now don't get me wrong. I had nothing against bombing the sh*t out of a few
million Arabs and Muslims for what they did to New York, but the point where
we got hung up, was trying to help them establish a "democratic" country
afterwards. This of course refers to both Afghanistan and Iraq. Maybe
these folks didn't want a democratic form of government, or to be our
friends. Maybe all they wanted was to be left to kill each other in peace.
People in Washington act like they never read the Tar Baby story.

http://xroads.virginia.edu/%7EUG97/remus/tar-baby.html

Earle

"billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
news:61d27$45573918$422afc51$31415@FUSE.NET...
> The problem with that plan is only two of the three regions have any
natural
> resources and the group without any resources (besides sand) is where the
> terrorists are all located.
>
> The Kurds, Sunni, and Shiites have hated one another for over a thousand
> years and nothing we could do will ever change that.
>
> Worse thing is that there aren't all that many Jeeps there, the terrorists
> prefer Toyota mini pickups.
>
>
> "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
> news:b8udnVMwRa23h8rYnZ2dnUVZ_vCdnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
> > Of course the Republican leadership would never allow the Dem's plans to
> > be brough forth on the floors of Congress. Murtha's service was the only
> > reason why he was allowed to speak. And you are typically
> > mischaracterizing what he said.
> >
> > Many Republicans now agree that to restore Iraq into a single soveriegn
> > nation is going to be militarily and politically impossible, unless we
> > commit 4X as many troops as we have there now. and the best way to bring
> > this matter to a close is to restore the region to pre-WWI conditions,
> > with three soveriegn states made up of Kurds, Sunnis and Shiites, a plan
> > most recently brought up by Joe Biden, IIRC. We can keep all the "finish
> > the job" goals by encouraging this to happen, eliminate the inter-faith
> > violence, and establish a military base in the Kurd region (which is
still
> > US-friendly) from which we can continue the real war on terror without
> > continuing to paint target rings on our troops.
> >
> > What everyone's waiting for is the conclusion of the Baker commission on
> > Iraq which is supposed to be released tomorrow. I'd be surprised if this
> > wasn't mentioned.
> >
> > "billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
> > news:ef5c7$45569573$422afc51$27396@FUSE.NET...
> >> Demoncrats have had several years to formulate a plan and the only one
> >> they have mentioned on the floor of congress was a former Marine
Officer
> >> who said the US should run away like little girls.....
> >>
> >> That new congresslady from mid Ohio, who was just re-elected, called
him
> >> a coward to his face and said Marines from Ohio don't run away.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> "Earle Horton" <el_anglo_burgues@usa.com> wrote in message
> >> news:45566ab1$0$21100$88260bb3@free.teranews.com.. .
> >>> We voted out of power the guys that were supporting an unpopular war.
> >>> We
> >>> are about to find out, if anyone in Washington is really listening.
> >>> It's
> >>> been almost a week, and I haven't heard any plans for organized
retreat,
> >>> demobilization, building new VA hospitals (which we will surely need!)
> >>> or
> >>> any of the logical correlates of voting against a war. Bush is still
> >>> talking about winning the damn thing, last time I checked.
> >>>
> >>> I was happy to see Rumsfeld resign, but it would have been better if
it
> >>> were
> >>> Cheney.
> >>>
> >>> I expect that all we are really going to get out of this exercise, is
a
> >>> prescription drug benefit for seniors that we really cannot afford,
and
> >>> lots
> >>> of new taxes.
> >>>
> >>> Back to Jeeps!
> >>>
> >>> Earle
> >>>
> >>> <Matt Osborn> wrote in message
> >>> news:1bscl2dhv3nlujbgl9ksfj28btma0qocs5@4ax.com...
> >>>> And we just voted out of power the guys that would have stopped it.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sat, 11 Nov 2006 18:43:40 -0500, "Matt Macchiarolo"
> >>>> <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> >Yep, that damn Teddy Kennedy and his amnesty plan that was
> >>>> >co-sponsored
> >>> by
> >>>> >three Republicans: Sen. John McCain, Reps. Jim Kolbe and Jeff Flake
> >>>> >
> >>>> >"Rich" <harrisfam1988@verizon.net> wrote in message
> >>>> >news:MDo5h.118$xD.1@trndny08...
> >>>> >> Here you go dems, and you want the illegals to stay, you asked for
> >>>> >> it
> >>> you
> >>>> >> got it........
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> "Richard J Kinch" <kinch@truetex.com> wrote in message
> >>>> >> news:Xns9877C04D46418someconundrum@216.196.97.131. ..
> >>>> >>> Earle Horton writes:
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>>> Is this thing
> >>>> >>>> driveable? If you get somebody to follow you, is it obviously
> >>>> >>>> going
> >>>> >>>> down
> >>>> >>>> the road sideways?
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> I haven't had it back together with a straight axle.
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> I did drive it after the collision after replacing the suspension
> >>> arms,
> >>>> >>> when it had about 1/2 inch of runout on the wheel rotation (bent
> >>> axle),
> >>>> >>> and
> >>>> >>> about 1/2 inch of toe-in misalignment besides (bent axle tube).
> >>>> >>> The
> >>> tire
> >>>> >>> was audibly squirming but you didn't feel it shimmy except at
> >>>> >>> walking
> >>>> >>> speed. On wet pavement or going around turns or both, you could
> >>>> >>> feel
> >>> the
> >>>> >>> traction slipping.
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> I'm just hoping for rough driveability with a new axle and an
> >>>> >>> approximately
> >>>> >>> straightened axle tube and backing plate. The guy that hit my
> >>>> >>> son's
> >>> car
> >>>> >>> on
> >>>> >>> I-95 was a drunk, apparently illegal immigrant who took off
running
> >>> when
> >>>> >>> the FHP showed up. The perp's lowlife insurance company that
> >>>> >>> should
> >>> be
> >>>> >>> paying for this has stalled for months, so we need time to sue
them
> >>>> >>> to
> >>>> >>> pay
> >>>> >>> for the proper repairs, but in the meantime we want to get this
> >>>> >>> 10-year-old
> >>>> >>> TJ back to something ugly a college kid can still drive to class.
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> -- msosborn at msosborn dot com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

 

What exactly is the problem if the "terrorists" get stuck with a big chunk
of sand, and the rest get all the natural resources? It sounds like a good
idea to me. They can make tourist souvenirs out of it, and sell them to all
the European tourists that are sure to come, once the hostilities die down.
They can make housing out of it, and they can eat it for all I care. Maybe
if we told our "friends" the Saudis to stop funding them, they might even
calm down to the point, where all the other groups in the region could live
in peace with them.

Now don't get me wrong. I had nothing against bombing the sh*t out of a few
million Arabs and Muslims for what they did to New York, but the point where
we got hung up, was trying to help them establish a "democratic" country
afterwards. This of course refers to both Afghanistan and Iraq. Maybe
these folks didn't want a democratic form of government, or to be our
friends. Maybe all they wanted was to be left to kill each other in peace.
People in Washington act like they never read the Tar Baby story.

http://xroads.virginia.edu/%7EUG97/remus/tar-baby.html

Earle

"billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
news:61d27$45573918$422afc51$31415@FUSE.NET...
> The problem with that plan is only two of the three regions have any
natural
> resources and the group without any resources (besides sand) is where the
> terrorists are all located.
>
> The Kurds, Sunni, and Shiites have hated one another for over a thousand
> years and nothing we could do will ever change that.
>
> Worse thing is that there aren't all that many Jeeps there, the terrorists
> prefer Toyota mini pickups.
>
>
> "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
> news:b8udnVMwRa23h8rYnZ2dnUVZ_vCdnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
> > Of course the Republican leadership would never allow the Dem's plans to
> > be brough forth on the floors of Congress. Murtha's service was the only
> > reason why he was allowed to speak. And you are typically
> > mischaracterizing what he said.
> >
> > Many Republicans now agree that to restore Iraq into a single soveriegn
> > nation is going to be militarily and politically impossible, unless we
> > commit 4X as many troops as we have there now. and the best way to bring
> > this matter to a close is to restore the region to pre-WWI conditions,
> > with three soveriegn states made up of Kurds, Sunnis and Shiites, a plan
> > most recently brought up by Joe Biden, IIRC. We can keep all the "finish
> > the job" goals by encouraging this to happen, eliminate the inter-faith
> > violence, and establish a military base in the Kurd region (which is
still
> > US-friendly) from which we can continue the real war on terror without
> > continuing to paint target rings on our troops.
> >
> > What everyone's waiting for is the conclusion of the Baker commission on
> > Iraq which is supposed to be released tomorrow. I'd be surprised if this
> > wasn't mentioned.
> >
> > "billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
> > news:ef5c7$45569573$422afc51$27396@FUSE.NET...
> >> Demoncrats have had several years to formulate a plan and the only one
> >> they have mentioned on the floor of congress was a former Marine
Officer
> >> who said the US should run away like little girls.....
> >>
> >> That new congresslady from mid Ohio, who was just re-elected, called
him
> >> a coward to his face and said Marines from Ohio don't run away.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> "Earle Horton" <el_anglo_burgues@usa.com> wrote in message
> >> news:45566ab1$0$21100$88260bb3@free.teranews.com.. .
> >>> We voted out of power the guys that were supporting an unpopular war.
> >>> We
> >>> are about to find out, if anyone in Washington is really listening.
> >>> It's
> >>> been almost a week, and I haven't heard any plans for organized
retreat,
> >>> demobilization, building new VA hospitals (which we will surely need!)
> >>> or
> >>> any of the logical correlates of voting against a war. Bush is still
> >>> talking about winning the damn thing, last time I checked.
> >>>
> >>> I was happy to see Rumsfeld resign, but it would have been better if
it
> >>> were
> >>> Cheney.
> >>>
> >>> I expect that all we are really going to get out of this exercise, is
a
> >>> prescription drug benefit for seniors that we really cannot afford,
and
> >>> lots
> >>> of new taxes.
> >>>
> >>> Back to Jeeps!
> >>>
> >>> Earle
> >>>
> >>> <Matt Osborn> wrote in message
> >>> news:1bscl2dhv3nlujbgl9ksfj28btma0qocs5@4ax.com...
> >>>> And we just voted out of power the guys that would have stopped it.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sat, 11 Nov 2006 18:43:40 -0500, "Matt Macchiarolo"
> >>>> <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> >Yep, that damn Teddy Kennedy and his amnesty plan that was
> >>>> >co-sponsored
> >>> by
> >>>> >three Republicans: Sen. John McCain, Reps. Jim Kolbe and Jeff Flake
> >>>> >
> >>>> >"Rich" <harrisfam1988@verizon.net> wrote in message
> >>>> >news:MDo5h.118$xD.1@trndny08...
> >>>> >> Here you go dems, and you want the illegals to stay, you asked for
> >>>> >> it
> >>> you
> >>>> >> got it........
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> "Richard J Kinch" <kinch@truetex.com> wrote in message
> >>>> >> news:Xns9877C04D46418someconundrum@216.196.97.131. ..
> >>>> >>> Earle Horton writes:
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>>> Is this thing
> >>>> >>>> driveable? If you get somebody to follow you, is it obviously
> >>>> >>>> going
> >>>> >>>> down
> >>>> >>>> the road sideways?
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> I haven't had it back together with a straight axle.
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> I did drive it after the collision after replacing the suspension
> >>> arms,
> >>>> >>> when it had about 1/2 inch of runout on the wheel rotation (bent
> >>> axle),
> >>>> >>> and
> >>>> >>> about 1/2 inch of toe-in misalignment besides (bent axle tube).
> >>>> >>> The
> >>> tire
> >>>> >>> was audibly squirming but you didn't feel it shimmy except at
> >>>> >>> walking
> >>>> >>> speed. On wet pavement or going around turns or both, you could
> >>>> >>> feel
> >>> the
> >>>> >>> traction slipping.
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> I'm just hoping for rough driveability with a new axle and an
> >>>> >>> approximately
> >>>> >>> straightened axle tube and backing plate. The guy that hit my
> >>>> >>> son's
> >>> car
> >>>> >>> on
> >>>> >>> I-95 was a drunk, apparently illegal immigrant who took off
running
> >>> when
> >>>> >>> the FHP showed up. The perp's lowlife insurance company that
> >>>> >>> should
> >>> be
> >>>> >>> paying for this has stalled for months, so we need time to sue
them
> >>>> >>> to
> >>>> >>> pay
> >>>> >>> for the proper repairs, but in the meantime we want to get this
> >>>> >>> 10-year-old
> >>>> >>> TJ back to something ugly a college kid can still drive to class.
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> -- msosborn at msosborn dot com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

 

What exactly is the problem if the "terrorists" get stuck with a big chunk
of sand, and the rest get all the natural resources? It sounds like a good
idea to me. They can make tourist souvenirs out of it, and sell them to all
the European tourists that are sure to come, once the hostilities die down.
They can make housing out of it, and they can eat it for all I care. Maybe
if we told our "friends" the Saudis to stop funding them, they might even
calm down to the point, where all the other groups in the region could live
in peace with them.

Now don't get me wrong. I had nothing against bombing the sh*t out of a few
million Arabs and Muslims for what they did to New York, but the point where
we got hung up, was trying to help them establish a "democratic" country
afterwards. This of course refers to both Afghanistan and Iraq. Maybe
these folks didn't want a democratic form of government, or to be our
friends. Maybe all they wanted was to be left to kill each other in peace.
People in Washington act like they never read the Tar Baby story.

http://xroads.virginia.edu/%7EUG97/remus/tar-baby.html

Earle

"billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
news:61d27$45573918$422afc51$31415@FUSE.NET...
> The problem with that plan is only two of the three regions have any
natural
> resources and the group without any resources (besides sand) is where the
> terrorists are all located.
>
> The Kurds, Sunni, and Shiites have hated one another for over a thousand
> years and nothing we could do will ever change that.
>
> Worse thing is that there aren't all that many Jeeps there, the terrorists
> prefer Toyota mini pickups.
>
>
> "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
> news:b8udnVMwRa23h8rYnZ2dnUVZ_vCdnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
> > Of course the Republican leadership would never allow the Dem's plans to
> > be brough forth on the floors of Congress. Murtha's service was the only
> > reason why he was allowed to speak. And you are typically
> > mischaracterizing what he said.
> >
> > Many Republicans now agree that to restore Iraq into a single soveriegn
> > nation is going to be militarily and politically impossible, unless we
> > commit 4X as many troops as we have there now. and the best way to bring
> > this matter to a close is to restore the region to pre-WWI conditions,
> > with three soveriegn states made up of Kurds, Sunnis and Shiites, a plan
> > most recently brought up by Joe Biden, IIRC. We can keep all the "finish
> > the job" goals by encouraging this to happen, eliminate the inter-faith
> > violence, and establish a military base in the Kurd region (which is
still
> > US-friendly) from which we can continue the real war on terror without
> > continuing to paint target rings on our troops.
> >
> > What everyone's waiting for is the conclusion of the Baker commission on
> > Iraq which is supposed to be released tomorrow. I'd be surprised if this
> > wasn't mentioned.
> >
> > "billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
> > news:ef5c7$45569573$422afc51$27396@FUSE.NET...
> >> Demoncrats have had several years to formulate a plan and the only one
> >> they have mentioned on the floor of congress was a former Marine
Officer
> >> who said the US should run away like little girls.....
> >>
> >> That new congresslady from mid Ohio, who was just re-elected, called
him
> >> a coward to his face and said Marines from Ohio don't run away.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> "Earle Horton" <el_anglo_burgues@usa.com> wrote in message
> >> news:45566ab1$0$21100$88260bb3@free.teranews.com.. .
> >>> We voted out of power the guys that were supporting an unpopular war.
> >>> We
> >>> are about to find out, if anyone in Washington is really listening.
> >>> It's
> >>> been almost a week, and I haven't heard any plans for organized
retreat,
> >>> demobilization, building new VA hospitals (which we will surely need!)
> >>> or
> >>> any of the logical correlates of voting against a war. Bush is still
> >>> talking about winning the damn thing, last time I checked.
> >>>
> >>> I was happy to see Rumsfeld resign, but it would have been better if
it
> >>> were
> >>> Cheney.
> >>>
> >>> I expect that all we are really going to get out of this exercise, is
a
> >>> prescription drug benefit for seniors that we really cannot afford,
and
> >>> lots
> >>> of new taxes.
> >>>
> >>> Back to Jeeps!
> >>>
> >>> Earle
> >>>
> >>> <Matt Osborn> wrote in message
> >>> news:1bscl2dhv3nlujbgl9ksfj28btma0qocs5@4ax.com...
> >>>> And we just voted out of power the guys that would have stopped it.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sat, 11 Nov 2006 18:43:40 -0500, "Matt Macchiarolo"
> >>>> <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> >Yep, that damn Teddy Kennedy and his amnesty plan that was
> >>>> >co-sponsored
> >>> by
> >>>> >three Republicans: Sen. John McCain, Reps. Jim Kolbe and Jeff Flake
> >>>> >
> >>>> >"Rich" <harrisfam1988@verizon.net> wrote in message
> >>>> >news:MDo5h.118$xD.1@trndny08...
> >>>> >> Here you go dems, and you want the illegals to stay, you asked for
> >>>> >> it
> >>> you
> >>>> >> got it........
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> "Richard J Kinch" <kinch@truetex.com> wrote in message
> >>>> >> news:Xns9877C04D46418someconundrum@216.196.97.131. ..
> >>>> >>> Earle Horton writes:
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>>> Is this thing
> >>>> >>>> driveable? If you get somebody to follow you, is it obviously
> >>>> >>>> going
> >>>> >>>> down
> >>>> >>>> the road sideways?
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> I haven't had it back together with a straight axle.
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> I did drive it after the collision after replacing the suspension
> >>> arms,
> >>>> >>> when it had about 1/2 inch of runout on the wheel rotation (bent
> >>> axle),
> >>>> >>> and
> >>>> >>> about 1/2 inch of toe-in misalignment besides (bent axle tube).
> >>>> >>> The
> >>> tire
> >>>> >>> was audibly squirming but you didn't feel it shimmy except at
> >>>> >>> walking
> >>>> >>> speed. On wet pavement or going around turns or both, you could
> >>>> >>> feel
> >>> the
> >>>> >>> traction slipping.
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> I'm just hoping for rough driveability with a new axle and an
> >>>> >>> approximately
> >>>> >>> straightened axle tube and backing plate. The guy that hit my
> >>>> >>> son's
> >>> car
> >>>> >>> on
> >>>> >>> I-95 was a drunk, apparently illegal immigrant who took off
running
> >>> when
> >>>> >>> the FHP showed up. The perp's lowlife insurance company that
> >>>> >>> should
> >>> be
> >>>> >>> paying for this has stalled for months, so we need time to sue
them
> >>>> >>> to
> >>>> >>> pay
> >>>> >>> for the proper repairs, but in the meantime we want to get this
> >>>> >>> 10-year-old
> >>>> >>> TJ back to something ugly a college kid can still drive to class.
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> -- msosborn at msosborn dot com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

 

"billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
news:61d27$45573918$422afc51$31415@FUSE.NET...

>
> The Kurds, Sunni, and Shiites have hated one another for over a thousand
> years and nothing we could do will ever change that.
>

Exactly, which is why our "war on terror" in Iraq had degraded into a civil
war with US troops as collateral targets.

 

"billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
news:61d27$45573918$422afc51$31415@FUSE.NET...

>
> The Kurds, Sunni, and Shiites have hated one another for over a thousand
> years and nothing we could do will ever change that.
>

Exactly, which is why our "war on terror" in Iraq had degraded into a civil
war with US troops as collateral targets.

 

"billy ray" <billy_ray@SPAMfuse.net> wrote in message
news:61d27$45573918$422afc51$31415@FUSE.NET...

>
> The Kurds, Sunni, and Shiites have hated one another for over a thousand
> years and nothing we could do will ever change that.
>

Exactly, which is why our "war on terror" in Iraq had degraded into a civil
war with US troops as collateral targets.