was Re: To whomever has the problem with Bill
04-21-2006, 10:17 PM
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
was Re: To whomever has the problem with Bill
-jumbled up top posted -------- snipped-
I own this ------- newsgroup.
If you people want to negotiate with me, you're going to have to learn how
to construct a proper thread. Post replies *under* the ------- message!
Quote the entire previous message and either intersperse your reply to the
parts relative, or post at the bottom!
This way you only open the last post in the thread, read the whole thing in
one fell swoop, post your reply if desired, and your done. I refuse to open
every goddamn post in a thread and try to decipher who said what because
you all top post like ------- idiots. Top posted messages will be ignored.
Failure to follow proper posting procedures will result in a total
breakdown of negotiation, whereupon an all out flamewar will be declared.
I can be reasonable, but have no doubts, this group will become a smoking
ruin, if the above scenario comes to fruition. If you would like to avoid a
TOTAL, RELENTLESS, SHOCK AND AWE TYPE ASSAULT, you will conform to proper
posting procedures or this froup will be laid to waste.
The choice is yours Ladies and Gentlemen. Shall we dance?
-=-
This message was sent via two or more anonymous remailing services.
I own this ------- newsgroup.
If you people want to negotiate with me, you're going to have to learn how
to construct a proper thread. Post replies *under* the ------- message!
Quote the entire previous message and either intersperse your reply to the
parts relative, or post at the bottom!
This way you only open the last post in the thread, read the whole thing in
one fell swoop, post your reply if desired, and your done. I refuse to open
every goddamn post in a thread and try to decipher who said what because
you all top post like ------- idiots. Top posted messages will be ignored.
Failure to follow proper posting procedures will result in a total
breakdown of negotiation, whereupon an all out flamewar will be declared.
I can be reasonable, but have no doubts, this group will become a smoking
ruin, if the above scenario comes to fruition. If you would like to avoid a
TOTAL, RELENTLESS, SHOCK AND AWE TYPE ASSAULT, you will conform to proper
posting procedures or this froup will be laid to waste.
The choice is yours Ladies and Gentlemen. Shall we dance?
-=-
This message was sent via two or more anonymous remailing services.
04-21-2006, 10:42 PM
#2
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: was Re: To whomever has the problem with Bill
In article <ICHWDAA338828.9290740741@anonymous>, General Failure
<Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote:
> -jumbled up top posted -------- snipped-
>
> I own this ------- newsgroup.
>
> If you people want to negotiate with me, you're going to have to learn how
> to construct a proper thread. Post replies *under* the ------- message!
> Quote the entire previous message and either intersperse your reply to the
> parts relative, or post at the bottom!
>
> This way you only open the last post in the thread, read the whole thing in
> one fell swoop, post your reply if desired, and your done. I refuse to open
> every goddamn post in a thread and try to decipher who said what because
> you all top post like ------- idiots. Top posted messages will be ignored.
>
> Failure to follow proper posting procedures will result in a total
> breakdown of negotiation, whereupon an all out flamewar will be declared.
>
> I can be reasonable, but have no doubts, this group will become a smoking
> ruin, if the above scenario comes to fruition. If you would like to avoid a
> TOTAL, RELENTLESS, SHOCK AND AWE TYPE ASSAULT, you will conform to proper
> posting procedures or this froup will be laid to waste.
>
> The choice is yours Ladies and Gentlemen. Shall we dance?
Good advice. Top posting really does suck. Now, ------ has mistaken
me for one of the SPIG (Society for the Prevention of Impregnation of
Goats) and is now crossposting his replies into the ford-merc group. I
suggest if you have anything in hand that would make the old UTB proud,
now is the time.
Cordially,
CobraJet
--
Rick Brown
Creator of Usenet group: alt.hi-po.big-block-ford-mercury
<Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote:
> -jumbled up top posted -------- snipped-
>
> I own this ------- newsgroup.
>
> If you people want to negotiate with me, you're going to have to learn how
> to construct a proper thread. Post replies *under* the ------- message!
> Quote the entire previous message and either intersperse your reply to the
> parts relative, or post at the bottom!
>
> This way you only open the last post in the thread, read the whole thing in
> one fell swoop, post your reply if desired, and your done. I refuse to open
> every goddamn post in a thread and try to decipher who said what because
> you all top post like ------- idiots. Top posted messages will be ignored.
>
> Failure to follow proper posting procedures will result in a total
> breakdown of negotiation, whereupon an all out flamewar will be declared.
>
> I can be reasonable, but have no doubts, this group will become a smoking
> ruin, if the above scenario comes to fruition. If you would like to avoid a
> TOTAL, RELENTLESS, SHOCK AND AWE TYPE ASSAULT, you will conform to proper
> posting procedures or this froup will be laid to waste.
>
> The choice is yours Ladies and Gentlemen. Shall we dance?
Good advice. Top posting really does suck. Now, ------ has mistaken
me for one of the SPIG (Society for the Prevention of Impregnation of
Goats) and is now crossposting his replies into the ford-merc group. I
suggest if you have anything in hand that would make the old UTB proud,
now is the time.
Cordially,
CobraJet
--
Rick Brown
Creator of Usenet group: alt.hi-po.big-block-ford-mercury
04-21-2006, 10:42 PM
#3
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: was Re: To whomever has the problem with Bill
In article <ICHWDAA338828.9290740741@anonymous>, General Failure
<Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote:
> -jumbled up top posted -------- snipped-
>
> I own this ------- newsgroup.
>
> If you people want to negotiate with me, you're going to have to learn how
> to construct a proper thread. Post replies *under* the ------- message!
> Quote the entire previous message and either intersperse your reply to the
> parts relative, or post at the bottom!
>
> This way you only open the last post in the thread, read the whole thing in
> one fell swoop, post your reply if desired, and your done. I refuse to open
> every goddamn post in a thread and try to decipher who said what because
> you all top post like ------- idiots. Top posted messages will be ignored.
>
> Failure to follow proper posting procedures will result in a total
> breakdown of negotiation, whereupon an all out flamewar will be declared.
>
> I can be reasonable, but have no doubts, this group will become a smoking
> ruin, if the above scenario comes to fruition. If you would like to avoid a
> TOTAL, RELENTLESS, SHOCK AND AWE TYPE ASSAULT, you will conform to proper
> posting procedures or this froup will be laid to waste.
>
> The choice is yours Ladies and Gentlemen. Shall we dance?
Good advice. Top posting really does suck. Now, ------ has mistaken
me for one of the SPIG (Society for the Prevention of Impregnation of
Goats) and is now crossposting his replies into the ford-merc group. I
suggest if you have anything in hand that would make the old UTB proud,
now is the time.
Cordially,
CobraJet
--
Rick Brown
Creator of Usenet group: alt.hi-po.big-block-ford-mercury
<Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote:
> -jumbled up top posted -------- snipped-
>
> I own this ------- newsgroup.
>
> If you people want to negotiate with me, you're going to have to learn how
> to construct a proper thread. Post replies *under* the ------- message!
> Quote the entire previous message and either intersperse your reply to the
> parts relative, or post at the bottom!
>
> This way you only open the last post in the thread, read the whole thing in
> one fell swoop, post your reply if desired, and your done. I refuse to open
> every goddamn post in a thread and try to decipher who said what because
> you all top post like ------- idiots. Top posted messages will be ignored.
>
> Failure to follow proper posting procedures will result in a total
> breakdown of negotiation, whereupon an all out flamewar will be declared.
>
> I can be reasonable, but have no doubts, this group will become a smoking
> ruin, if the above scenario comes to fruition. If you would like to avoid a
> TOTAL, RELENTLESS, SHOCK AND AWE TYPE ASSAULT, you will conform to proper
> posting procedures or this froup will be laid to waste.
>
> The choice is yours Ladies and Gentlemen. Shall we dance?
Good advice. Top posting really does suck. Now, ------ has mistaken
me for one of the SPIG (Society for the Prevention of Impregnation of
Goats) and is now crossposting his replies into the ford-merc group. I
suggest if you have anything in hand that would make the old UTB proud,
now is the time.
Cordially,
CobraJet
--
Rick Brown
Creator of Usenet group: alt.hi-po.big-block-ford-mercury
04-21-2006, 10:42 PM
#4
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: was Re: To whomever has the problem with Bill
In article <ICHWDAA338828.9290740741@anonymous>, General Failure
<Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote:
> -jumbled up top posted -------- snipped-
>
> I own this ------- newsgroup.
>
> If you people want to negotiate with me, you're going to have to learn how
> to construct a proper thread. Post replies *under* the ------- message!
> Quote the entire previous message and either intersperse your reply to the
> parts relative, or post at the bottom!
>
> This way you only open the last post in the thread, read the whole thing in
> one fell swoop, post your reply if desired, and your done. I refuse to open
> every goddamn post in a thread and try to decipher who said what because
> you all top post like ------- idiots. Top posted messages will be ignored.
>
> Failure to follow proper posting procedures will result in a total
> breakdown of negotiation, whereupon an all out flamewar will be declared.
>
> I can be reasonable, but have no doubts, this group will become a smoking
> ruin, if the above scenario comes to fruition. If you would like to avoid a
> TOTAL, RELENTLESS, SHOCK AND AWE TYPE ASSAULT, you will conform to proper
> posting procedures or this froup will be laid to waste.
>
> The choice is yours Ladies and Gentlemen. Shall we dance?
Good advice. Top posting really does suck. Now, ------ has mistaken
me for one of the SPIG (Society for the Prevention of Impregnation of
Goats) and is now crossposting his replies into the ford-merc group. I
suggest if you have anything in hand that would make the old UTB proud,
now is the time.
Cordially,
CobraJet
--
Rick Brown
Creator of Usenet group: alt.hi-po.big-block-ford-mercury
<Anonymous-Remailer@See.Comment.Header> wrote:
> -jumbled up top posted -------- snipped-
>
> I own this ------- newsgroup.
>
> If you people want to negotiate with me, you're going to have to learn how
> to construct a proper thread. Post replies *under* the ------- message!
> Quote the entire previous message and either intersperse your reply to the
> parts relative, or post at the bottom!
>
> This way you only open the last post in the thread, read the whole thing in
> one fell swoop, post your reply if desired, and your done. I refuse to open
> every goddamn post in a thread and try to decipher who said what because
> you all top post like ------- idiots. Top posted messages will be ignored.
>
> Failure to follow proper posting procedures will result in a total
> breakdown of negotiation, whereupon an all out flamewar will be declared.
>
> I can be reasonable, but have no doubts, this group will become a smoking
> ruin, if the above scenario comes to fruition. If you would like to avoid a
> TOTAL, RELENTLESS, SHOCK AND AWE TYPE ASSAULT, you will conform to proper
> posting procedures or this froup will be laid to waste.
>
> The choice is yours Ladies and Gentlemen. Shall we dance?
Good advice. Top posting really does suck. Now, ------ has mistaken
me for one of the SPIG (Society for the Prevention of Impregnation of
Goats) and is now crossposting his replies into the ford-merc group. I
suggest if you have anything in hand that would make the old UTB proud,
now is the time.
Cordially,
CobraJet
--
Rick Brown
Creator of Usenet group: alt.hi-po.big-block-ford-mercury
04-21-2006, 10:47 PM
#5
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: was Re: To whomever has the problem with Bill
04-21-2006, 10:47 PM
#6
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: was Re: To whomever has the problem with Bill
04-21-2006, 10:47 PM
#7
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: was Re: To whomever has the problem with Bill