Kurt

Only a first grade educated Idiot could make statement like that, supidity
in your brain is infinite.

Joe Cali Next Generation-usa

"Kurt" <ekej51@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:<wDDjd.8540$O11.1225@newsread3.news.pas.earth link.net>...
> Only a first grade educated Idiot could make statement like that, supidity
> in your brain is infinite.

There is not a simple answer to this, half the U.S. Did not vote for
Bush and actually I believe he did not win this election. Too much BS
involved in the voting machines. The thing that pissed me off is,
people went into those machines think, Hmmmm WIll I have Social
Security, How will I put my kids, through college, How will I pay my
medical bills, was there a reason to go to war with a country that had
nothing to do with 911 etc etc. But the other voters when in " O MY
GOD, GAY MARRAGE"!!!!!! and Kerry wasn't for gay marrage, but that is
what they were told. No problem in while when we are on un-employment
lines the guy in front of me will say " I voted Bush because he was
againt gay marrage". I AM AGAINST GAY MARRAGE TOO, but I am not going
to blind myself to the real facts. More people have been killed or
have killed in the name of God then for any other reason in the
history of the world. I have no idea where they got that
information, not from God. But I am sure they said they got it from
God.

Joe Cali Next Generation-usa

"Kurt" <ekej51@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:<wDDjd.8540$O11.1225@newsread3.news.pas.earth link.net>...
> Only a first grade educated Idiot could make statement like that, supidity
> in your brain is infinite.

There is not a simple answer to this, half the U.S. Did not vote for
Bush and actually I believe he did not win this election. Too much BS
involved in the voting machines. The thing that pissed me off is,
people went into those machines think, Hmmmm WIll I have Social
Security, How will I put my kids, through college, How will I pay my
medical bills, was there a reason to go to war with a country that had
nothing to do with 911 etc etc. But the other voters when in " O MY
GOD, GAY MARRAGE"!!!!!! and Kerry wasn't for gay marrage, but that is
what they were told. No problem in while when we are on un-employment
lines the guy in front of me will say " I voted Bush because he was
againt gay marrage". I AM AGAINST GAY MARRAGE TOO, but I am not going
to blind myself to the real facts. More people have been killed or
have killed in the name of God then for any other reason in the
history of the world. I have no idea where they got that
information, not from God. But I am sure they said they got it from
God.

Napalm Heart

"Joe Cali Next Generation-usa" <NEXTGENUSA@OPTONLINE.NET> wrote in
message news:ce19fc5b.0411080843.1eb542a4@posting.google.c om...
> "Kurt" <ekej51@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:<wDDjd.8540$O11.1225@newsread3.news.pas.earth link.net>...
> > Only a first grade educated Idiot could make statement like that,
supidity
> > in your brain is infinite.
>
> There is not a simple answer to this, half the U.S. Did not vote for
> Bush and actually I believe he did not win this election. Too much
BS
> involved in the voting machines. The thing that pissed me off is,
> people went into those machines think, Hmmmm WIll I have Social
> Security, How will I put my kids, through college, How will I pay
my
> medical bills, was there a reason to go to war with a country that
had
> nothing to do with 911 etc etc. But the other voters when in " O MY
> GOD, GAY MARRAGE"!!!!!! and Kerry wasn't for gay marrage, but that
is
> what they were told. No problem in while when we are on
un-employment
> lines the guy in front of me will say " I voted Bush because he was
> againt gay marrage". I AM AGAINST GAY MARRAGE TOO, but I am not
going
> to blind myself to the real facts. More people have been killed or
> have killed in the name of God then for any other reason in the
> history of the world. I have no idea where they got that
> information, not from God. But I am sure they said they got it from
> God.

How do you know what thoughts are in people's minds? You sure missed
the mark with this voter.

Ken (MI)

Napalm Heart

"Joe Cali Next Generation-usa" <NEXTGENUSA@OPTONLINE.NET> wrote in
message news:ce19fc5b.0411080843.1eb542a4@posting.google.c om...
> "Kurt" <ekej51@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:<wDDjd.8540$O11.1225@newsread3.news.pas.earth link.net>...
> > Only a first grade educated Idiot could make statement like that,
supidity
> > in your brain is infinite.
>
> There is not a simple answer to this, half the U.S. Did not vote for
> Bush and actually I believe he did not win this election. Too much
BS
> involved in the voting machines. The thing that pissed me off is,
> people went into those machines think, Hmmmm WIll I have Social
> Security, How will I put my kids, through college, How will I pay
my
> medical bills, was there a reason to go to war with a country that
had
> nothing to do with 911 etc etc. But the other voters when in " O MY
> GOD, GAY MARRAGE"!!!!!! and Kerry wasn't for gay marrage, but that
is
> what they were told. No problem in while when we are on
un-employment
> lines the guy in front of me will say " I voted Bush because he was
> againt gay marrage". I AM AGAINST GAY MARRAGE TOO, but I am not
going
> to blind myself to the real facts. More people have been killed or
> have killed in the name of God then for any other reason in the
> history of the world. I have no idea where they got that
> information, not from God. But I am sure they said they got it from
> God.

How do you know what thoughts are in people's minds? You sure missed
the mark with this voter.

Ken (MI)

C. E. White

Joe Cali Next Generation-usa wrote:
>
> "Kurt" <ekej51@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:<wDDjd.8540$O11.1225@newsread3.news.pas.earth link.net>...
> > Only a first grade educated Idiot could make statement like that, supidity
> > in your brain is infinite.
>
> There is not a simple answer to this, half the U.S. Did not vote for
> Bush and actually I believe he did not win this election. Too much BS
> involved in the voting machines.

Why is it that every time the Democrats lose an election,
they want to blame it on the voting machines? In my
lifetime, it has appeared to me that the Democrats have been
the more likely party to try and influence election via
outright fraud or other somewhat shady means.

I do not Like "W." I voted for Kerry and was sorry he lost.
However, I don't think Bush stole the election or did
anything especially dishonest to win it. The truth is Bush
is the first president to get more than 50% of the voting
public to vote for him since 1988. Clinton never got 50%.
Neither Bush nor Gore got 50% in 2000. Instead of whining
about Bush winning, why not go out and work for a good
Democrat, so we will have someone the majority can vote for
in 2008. Think about the losers the Democrats have nominated
in the last 40 years - Humphrey, McGovern, Carter, Mondale,
Dukakis, Gore, Kerry. I left out Clinton (not a "loser"). He
wasn't exactly a great candidate and he never got 50% of the
vote either, but at least he could give a decent speech. I
only reluctantly included Carter since he won once but he
did lose to Regan. He was a lousy President, but clearly the
greatest ex-President of all time. I also left out Johnson
(he didn't lose, just quit). He was just a crook and an SOB.

If the Democrats keep nominating candidates like Gore and
Kerry, I doubt we can expect the Democrats to win. Dull,
dull, dull, no real achievements, can't give a speech, no
vision, etc. Face it, if Bush beat you, you must really
suck.

Ed

C. E. White

Joe Cali Next Generation-usa wrote:
>
> "Kurt" <ekej51@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:<wDDjd.8540$O11.1225@newsread3.news.pas.earth link.net>...
> > Only a first grade educated Idiot could make statement like that, supidity
> > in your brain is infinite.
>
> There is not a simple answer to this, half the U.S. Did not vote for
> Bush and actually I believe he did not win this election. Too much BS
> involved in the voting machines.

Why is it that every time the Democrats lose an election,
they want to blame it on the voting machines? In my
lifetime, it has appeared to me that the Democrats have been
the more likely party to try and influence election via
outright fraud or other somewhat shady means.

I do not Like "W." I voted for Kerry and was sorry he lost.
However, I don't think Bush stole the election or did
anything especially dishonest to win it. The truth is Bush
is the first president to get more than 50% of the voting
public to vote for him since 1988. Clinton never got 50%.
Neither Bush nor Gore got 50% in 2000. Instead of whining
about Bush winning, why not go out and work for a good
Democrat, so we will have someone the majority can vote for
in 2008. Think about the losers the Democrats have nominated
in the last 40 years - Humphrey, McGovern, Carter, Mondale,
Dukakis, Gore, Kerry. I left out Clinton (not a "loser"). He
wasn't exactly a great candidate and he never got 50% of the
vote either, but at least he could give a decent speech. I
only reluctantly included Carter since he won once but he
did lose to Regan. He was a lousy President, but clearly the
greatest ex-President of all time. I also left out Johnson
(he didn't lose, just quit). He was just a crook and an SOB.

If the Democrats keep nominating candidates like Gore and
Kerry, I doubt we can expect the Democrats to win. Dull,
dull, dull, no real achievements, can't give a speech, no
vision, etc. Face it, if Bush beat you, you must really
suck.

Ed

C. E. White

Joe Cali Next Generation-usa wrote:
>
> "Kurt" <ekej51@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:<wDDjd.8540$O11.1225@newsread3.news.pas.earth link.net>...
> > Only a first grade educated Idiot could make statement like that, supidity
> > in your brain is infinite.
>
> There is not a simple answer to this, half the U.S. Did not vote for
> Bush and actually I believe he did not win this election. Too much BS
> involved in the voting machines.

Why is it that every time the Democrats lose an election,
they want to blame it on the voting machines? In my
lifetime, it has appeared to me that the Democrats have been
the more likely party to try and influence election via
outright fraud or other somewhat shady means.

I do not Like "W." I voted for Kerry and was sorry he lost.
However, I don't think Bush stole the election or did
anything especially dishonest to win it. The truth is Bush
is the first president to get more than 50% of the voting
public to vote for him since 1988. Clinton never got 50%.
Neither Bush nor Gore got 50% in 2000. Instead of whining
about Bush winning, why not go out and work for a good
Democrat, so we will have someone the majority can vote for
in 2008. Think about the losers the Democrats have nominated
in the last 40 years - Humphrey, McGovern, Carter, Mondale,
Dukakis, Gore, Kerry. I left out Clinton (not a "loser"). He
wasn't exactly a great candidate and he never got 50% of the
vote either, but at least he could give a decent speech. I
only reluctantly included Carter since he won once but he
did lose to Regan. He was a lousy President, but clearly the
greatest ex-President of all time. I also left out Johnson
(he didn't lose, just quit). He was just a crook and an SOB.

If the Democrats keep nominating candidates like Gore and
Kerry, I doubt we can expect the Democrats to win. Dull,
dull, dull, no real achievements, can't give a speech, no
vision, etc. Face it, if Bush beat you, you must really
suck.

Ed