Re: Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! __________==___ utivro
#71
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!!
"K5" <K58814@yahoo.com> writes:
>"Brian Talley" <btalley@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message
>news:azvkd.119$Mg.91@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
>> At least Arafat's condition is still stable. Let me know if it changes.
>It changed: he's dead. This month is shaping up pretty good.
Only if you're making money from selling arms or promoting
instability and fear.
--
/"\ Bernd Felsche - Innovative Reckoning, Perth, Western Australia
\ / ASCII ribbon campaign | I'm a .signature virus!
X against HTML mail | Copy me into your ~/.signature
/ \ and postings | to help me ------!
>"Brian Talley" <btalley@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message
>news:azvkd.119$Mg.91@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
>> At least Arafat's condition is still stable. Let me know if it changes.
>It changed: he's dead. This month is shaping up pretty good.
Only if you're making money from selling arms or promoting
instability and fear.
--
/"\ Bernd Felsche - Innovative Reckoning, Perth, Western Australia
\ / ASCII ribbon campaign | I'm a .signature virus!
X against HTML mail | Copy me into your ~/.signature
/ \ and postings | to help me ------!
#72
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!!
"K5" <K58814@yahoo.com> writes:
>"Brian Talley" <btalley@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message
>news:azvkd.119$Mg.91@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
>> At least Arafat's condition is still stable. Let me know if it changes.
>It changed: he's dead. This month is shaping up pretty good.
Only if you're making money from selling arms or promoting
instability and fear.
--
/"\ Bernd Felsche - Innovative Reckoning, Perth, Western Australia
\ / ASCII ribbon campaign | I'm a .signature virus!
X against HTML mail | Copy me into your ~/.signature
/ \ and postings | to help me ------!
>"Brian Talley" <btalley@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message
>news:azvkd.119$Mg.91@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
>> At least Arafat's condition is still stable. Let me know if it changes.
>It changed: he's dead. This month is shaping up pretty good.
Only if you're making money from selling arms or promoting
instability and fear.
--
/"\ Bernd Felsche - Innovative Reckoning, Perth, Western Australia
\ / ASCII ribbon campaign | I'm a .signature virus!
X against HTML mail | Copy me into your ~/.signature
/ \ and postings | to help me ------!
#73
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! __________==___ utivro
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 21:15:30 GMT, Brian Talley
<btalley@rochester.rr.com> wrote:
>Rev Turd Fredericks wrote:
>> On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 23:45:10 GMT, "Mike64Bug" <mfkoch
>> REMOVE@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>Take into consideration the efforts of Clinton to decrease
>>>>funding for intelligence-gathering agencies. Also, consider the
>>>>efforts by Jamie Gorelick (who was also on the 9/11 Commission)
>>>>who mandated that the FBI and CIA could not, legally, share
>>>>information. I don't think it's reasonable to expect Bush to
>>>>get US intelligence back on its feet in the few months he was
>>>>in office before 9/11.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Nice call again Brian. You're right, 9/11 occurred because of
>>>Clinton not Bush. Clinton spent his eight years wiping out
>>>our intelligence gathering ability. After all, the cold war was over,
>>>what was there to be afraid of?
>>>
>>>>>>Mike
>>>
>> Nah, 9/11 happened because a bunch of sand ******* don't like America
>> and decided to fly planes into buildings. Trying to blame it on past
>> and present presidents is a misappropriation of blame. Blame it on the
>> shitty kook religion the terrorists believe in and *their* leaders who
>> actively encourage that behavior.
>
>This won't win any awards for eloquence, but it is correct. The
>blame for the event goes to those who chose to fly planes into
>buildings and a field.
>
>But anyone who would suggest that Bush is to blame for failing to
>prevent 9/11 is not well-informed.
>
Not eloquent? It was my best prose :-)
<btalley@rochester.rr.com> wrote:
>Rev Turd Fredericks wrote:
>> On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 23:45:10 GMT, "Mike64Bug" <mfkoch
>> REMOVE@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>Take into consideration the efforts of Clinton to decrease
>>>>funding for intelligence-gathering agencies. Also, consider the
>>>>efforts by Jamie Gorelick (who was also on the 9/11 Commission)
>>>>who mandated that the FBI and CIA could not, legally, share
>>>>information. I don't think it's reasonable to expect Bush to
>>>>get US intelligence back on its feet in the few months he was
>>>>in office before 9/11.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Nice call again Brian. You're right, 9/11 occurred because of
>>>Clinton not Bush. Clinton spent his eight years wiping out
>>>our intelligence gathering ability. After all, the cold war was over,
>>>what was there to be afraid of?
>>>
>>>>>>Mike
>>>
>> Nah, 9/11 happened because a bunch of sand ******* don't like America
>> and decided to fly planes into buildings. Trying to blame it on past
>> and present presidents is a misappropriation of blame. Blame it on the
>> shitty kook religion the terrorists believe in and *their* leaders who
>> actively encourage that behavior.
>
>This won't win any awards for eloquence, but it is correct. The
>blame for the event goes to those who chose to fly planes into
>buildings and a field.
>
>But anyone who would suggest that Bush is to blame for failing to
>prevent 9/11 is not well-informed.
>
Not eloquent? It was my best prose :-)
#74
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! __________==___ utivro
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 21:15:30 GMT, Brian Talley
<btalley@rochester.rr.com> wrote:
>Rev Turd Fredericks wrote:
>> On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 23:45:10 GMT, "Mike64Bug" <mfkoch
>> REMOVE@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>Take into consideration the efforts of Clinton to decrease
>>>>funding for intelligence-gathering agencies. Also, consider the
>>>>efforts by Jamie Gorelick (who was also on the 9/11 Commission)
>>>>who mandated that the FBI and CIA could not, legally, share
>>>>information. I don't think it's reasonable to expect Bush to
>>>>get US intelligence back on its feet in the few months he was
>>>>in office before 9/11.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Nice call again Brian. You're right, 9/11 occurred because of
>>>Clinton not Bush. Clinton spent his eight years wiping out
>>>our intelligence gathering ability. After all, the cold war was over,
>>>what was there to be afraid of?
>>>
>>>>>>Mike
>>>
>> Nah, 9/11 happened because a bunch of sand ******* don't like America
>> and decided to fly planes into buildings. Trying to blame it on past
>> and present presidents is a misappropriation of blame. Blame it on the
>> shitty kook religion the terrorists believe in and *their* leaders who
>> actively encourage that behavior.
>
>This won't win any awards for eloquence, but it is correct. The
>blame for the event goes to those who chose to fly planes into
>buildings and a field.
>
>But anyone who would suggest that Bush is to blame for failing to
>prevent 9/11 is not well-informed.
>
Not eloquent? It was my best prose :-)
<btalley@rochester.rr.com> wrote:
>Rev Turd Fredericks wrote:
>> On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 23:45:10 GMT, "Mike64Bug" <mfkoch
>> REMOVE@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>Take into consideration the efforts of Clinton to decrease
>>>>funding for intelligence-gathering agencies. Also, consider the
>>>>efforts by Jamie Gorelick (who was also on the 9/11 Commission)
>>>>who mandated that the FBI and CIA could not, legally, share
>>>>information. I don't think it's reasonable to expect Bush to
>>>>get US intelligence back on its feet in the few months he was
>>>>in office before 9/11.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Nice call again Brian. You're right, 9/11 occurred because of
>>>Clinton not Bush. Clinton spent his eight years wiping out
>>>our intelligence gathering ability. After all, the cold war was over,
>>>what was there to be afraid of?
>>>
>>>>>>Mike
>>>
>> Nah, 9/11 happened because a bunch of sand ******* don't like America
>> and decided to fly planes into buildings. Trying to blame it on past
>> and present presidents is a misappropriation of blame. Blame it on the
>> shitty kook religion the terrorists believe in and *their* leaders who
>> actively encourage that behavior.
>
>This won't win any awards for eloquence, but it is correct. The
>blame for the event goes to those who chose to fly planes into
>buildings and a field.
>
>But anyone who would suggest that Bush is to blame for failing to
>prevent 9/11 is not well-informed.
>
Not eloquent? It was my best prose :-)
#75
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! __________==___ utivro
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 21:15:30 GMT, Brian Talley
<btalley@rochester.rr.com> wrote:
>Rev Turd Fredericks wrote:
>> On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 23:45:10 GMT, "Mike64Bug" <mfkoch
>> REMOVE@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>Take into consideration the efforts of Clinton to decrease
>>>>funding for intelligence-gathering agencies. Also, consider the
>>>>efforts by Jamie Gorelick (who was also on the 9/11 Commission)
>>>>who mandated that the FBI and CIA could not, legally, share
>>>>information. I don't think it's reasonable to expect Bush to
>>>>get US intelligence back on its feet in the few months he was
>>>>in office before 9/11.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Nice call again Brian. You're right, 9/11 occurred because of
>>>Clinton not Bush. Clinton spent his eight years wiping out
>>>our intelligence gathering ability. After all, the cold war was over,
>>>what was there to be afraid of?
>>>
>>>>>>Mike
>>>
>> Nah, 9/11 happened because a bunch of sand ******* don't like America
>> and decided to fly planes into buildings. Trying to blame it on past
>> and present presidents is a misappropriation of blame. Blame it on the
>> shitty kook religion the terrorists believe in and *their* leaders who
>> actively encourage that behavior.
>
>This won't win any awards for eloquence, but it is correct. The
>blame for the event goes to those who chose to fly planes into
>buildings and a field.
>
>But anyone who would suggest that Bush is to blame for failing to
>prevent 9/11 is not well-informed.
>
Not eloquent? It was my best prose :-)
<btalley@rochester.rr.com> wrote:
>Rev Turd Fredericks wrote:
>> On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 23:45:10 GMT, "Mike64Bug" <mfkoch
>> REMOVE@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>Take into consideration the efforts of Clinton to decrease
>>>>funding for intelligence-gathering agencies. Also, consider the
>>>>efforts by Jamie Gorelick (who was also on the 9/11 Commission)
>>>>who mandated that the FBI and CIA could not, legally, share
>>>>information. I don't think it's reasonable to expect Bush to
>>>>get US intelligence back on its feet in the few months he was
>>>>in office before 9/11.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Nice call again Brian. You're right, 9/11 occurred because of
>>>Clinton not Bush. Clinton spent his eight years wiping out
>>>our intelligence gathering ability. After all, the cold war was over,
>>>what was there to be afraid of?
>>>
>>>>>>Mike
>>>
>> Nah, 9/11 happened because a bunch of sand ******* don't like America
>> and decided to fly planes into buildings. Trying to blame it on past
>> and present presidents is a misappropriation of blame. Blame it on the
>> shitty kook religion the terrorists believe in and *their* leaders who
>> actively encourage that behavior.
>
>This won't win any awards for eloquence, but it is correct. The
>blame for the event goes to those who chose to fly planes into
>buildings and a field.
>
>But anyone who would suggest that Bush is to blame for failing to
>prevent 9/11 is not well-informed.
>
Not eloquent? It was my best prose :-)
#76
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!!
"Bernd Felsche" <bernie@innovative.iinet.net.au> wrote in message
news:mccb62x2ej.ln2@innovative.iinet.net.au...
> >It changed: he's dead. This month is shaping up pretty good.
> Only if you're making money from selling arms or promoting instability and
fear.
I forgot: even before the month started, things already were looking good;
John Howard was re-elected. That must really **** you off.
news:mccb62x2ej.ln2@innovative.iinet.net.au...
> >It changed: he's dead. This month is shaping up pretty good.
> Only if you're making money from selling arms or promoting instability and
fear.
I forgot: even before the month started, things already were looking good;
John Howard was re-elected. That must really **** you off.
#77
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!!
"Bernd Felsche" <bernie@innovative.iinet.net.au> wrote in message
news:mccb62x2ej.ln2@innovative.iinet.net.au...
> >It changed: he's dead. This month is shaping up pretty good.
> Only if you're making money from selling arms or promoting instability and
fear.
I forgot: even before the month started, things already were looking good;
John Howard was re-elected. That must really **** you off.
news:mccb62x2ej.ln2@innovative.iinet.net.au...
> >It changed: he's dead. This month is shaping up pretty good.
> Only if you're making money from selling arms or promoting instability and
fear.
I forgot: even before the month started, things already were looking good;
John Howard was re-elected. That must really **** you off.
#78
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!!
"Bernd Felsche" <bernie@innovative.iinet.net.au> wrote in message
news:mccb62x2ej.ln2@innovative.iinet.net.au...
> >It changed: he's dead. This month is shaping up pretty good.
> Only if you're making money from selling arms or promoting instability and
fear.
I forgot: even before the month started, things already were looking good;
John Howard was re-elected. That must really **** you off.
news:mccb62x2ej.ln2@innovative.iinet.net.au...
> >It changed: he's dead. This month is shaping up pretty good.
> Only if you're making money from selling arms or promoting instability and
fear.
I forgot: even before the month started, things already were looking good;
John Howard was re-elected. That must really **** you off.
#79
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! __________==___ utivro
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 21:38:48 -0800, the following appeared
in rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by "K5"
<K58814@yahoo.com>:
>"Brian Talley" <btalley@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message
>news:azvkd.119$Mg.91@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
>> At least Arafat's condition is still stable. Let me know if it changes.
>It changed: he's dead.
....and it's expected to remain stable.
> This month is shaping up pretty good.
Yep.
--
Bob C.
Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
(without the spaces, of course)
"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
- Isaac Asimov
in rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by "K5"
<K58814@yahoo.com>:
>"Brian Talley" <btalley@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message
>news:azvkd.119$Mg.91@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
>> At least Arafat's condition is still stable. Let me know if it changes.
>It changed: he's dead.
....and it's expected to remain stable.
> This month is shaping up pretty good.
Yep.
--
Bob C.
Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
(without the spaces, of course)
"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
- Isaac Asimov
#80
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! __________==___ utivro
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 21:38:48 -0800, the following appeared
in rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by "K5"
<K58814@yahoo.com>:
>"Brian Talley" <btalley@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message
>news:azvkd.119$Mg.91@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
>> At least Arafat's condition is still stable. Let me know if it changes.
>It changed: he's dead.
....and it's expected to remain stable.
> This month is shaping up pretty good.
Yep.
--
Bob C.
Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
(without the spaces, of course)
"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
- Isaac Asimov
in rec.autos.makers.jeep+******, posted by "K5"
<K58814@yahoo.com>:
>"Brian Talley" <btalley@rochester.rr.com> wrote in message
>news:azvkd.119$Mg.91@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
>> At least Arafat's condition is still stable. Let me know if it changes.
>It changed: he's dead.
....and it's expected to remain stable.
> This month is shaping up pretty good.
Yep.
--
Bob C.
Reply to Bob-Casanova @ worldnet.att.net
(without the spaces, of course)
"The most exciting phrase to hear in science,
the one that heralds new discoveries, is not
'Eureka!' but 'That's funny...'"
- Isaac Asimov