Jeeps Canada - Jeep Forums

Re: L.W.\(Bill\) ------ III is a spamming ----KKhead.

   
Old 10-18-2007, 02:44 PM
  #31  
Jeff Strickland
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: NOMINATION: Bill ------ for the Pickett and Special Ops Cody awards (was Re: L.W.\(Bill\) ------ III is a spamming ----KKhead.
The sad thing is, you guys are bigger dumb ----s than Bill ever was.



 
Reply
Old 10-18-2007, 03:42 PM
  #32  
Archie Leach
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: NOMINATION: Bill ------ for the Pickett and Special Ops Cody awards (was Re: L.W.\(Bill\) ------ III is a spamming ----KKhead.
"Jeff Strickland" <crwlr@verizon.net> wrote:

>The sad thing is, you guys are bigger dumb ----s than Bill ever was.

Well, thanks for that insight, Jeff.

I mean, except for the repetitive crap of 24Bit®, you're totally
_wrong_, but thanks anyway.



 
Reply
Old 10-18-2007, 03:42 PM
  #33  
Archie Leach
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: NOMINATION: Bill ------ for the Pickett and Special Ops Cody awards (was Re: L.W.\(Bill\) ------ III is a spamming ----KKhead.
"Jeff Strickland" <crwlr@verizon.net> wrote:

>The sad thing is, you guys are bigger dumb ----s than Bill ever was.

Well, thanks for that insight, Jeff.

I mean, except for the repetitive crap of 24Bit®, you're totally
_wrong_, but thanks anyway.



 
Reply
Old 10-18-2007, 03:42 PM
  #34  
Archie Leach
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: NOMINATION: Bill ------ for the Pickett and Special Ops Cody awards (was Re: L.W.\(Bill\) ------ III is a spamming ----KKhead.
"Jeff Strickland" <crwlr@verizon.net> wrote:

>The sad thing is, you guys are bigger dumb ----s than Bill ever was.

Well, thanks for that insight, Jeff.

I mean, except for the repetitive crap of 24Bit®, you're totally
_wrong_, but thanks anyway.



 
Reply
Old 10-18-2007, 04:29 PM
  #35  
Gary L. Burnore
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: NOMINATION: Bill ------ for the Pickett and Special Ops Cody awards (was Re: L.W.\(Bill\) ------ III is a spamming ----KKhead.
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 09:31:46 -0500, Archie Leach <archie@antispam.ham>
wrote:

>Self explanatory. Second at your leisure.
>
>"L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III" <LWBill------@------.net> wrote:
>
>>Re-sent to abuse@databasix.com as plcymgmt@databasix.com is as fake as you
>>are!!!!
>>
>>Return-Path: <>
>>Received: from n054.sc0.he.tucows.com (64.97.160.108) by n065.sc0.cp.net
>>(7.2.066)
>> id 46564A7000C0FC61 for lw------@------.net; Thu, 18 Oct 2007
>>02:54:07 +0000
>>Received: by n054.sc0.he.tucows.com (7.2.069.1) id 47163E9A0001A24B for
>>lw------@------.net; Thu, 18 Oct 2007 02:56:40 +0000
>>From: Mail Delivery Service <postmaster@bouncemessage.net>
>>Subject: Delivery Status Notification
>>To: lw------@------.net
>>Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 02:56:40 +0000
>>Message-ID: <47163E9A0001A24A@n054.sc0.he.tucows.com>
>>X-CP-Transaction-ID: 47163E9A0001A201
>>X-CP-For: plcymgmt@databasix.com
>>MIME-Version: 1.0
>>Content-Type: Multipart/Report; report-type=delivery-status;
>>boundary="========/47163E9A0001A201/n054.sc0.he.tucows.com"
>>
>>- These recipients of your message have been processed by the mail server:
>>plcymgmt@databasix.com; Failed; 5.3.0 (other or undefined mail system
>>status)
>>
>> Remote MTA mx0.netbasix.net: network error

He can't figure out why his mail bounces. :)

--
gburnore at DataBasix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.| Official Proof of Purchase
================================================== =========================
 
Reply
Old 10-18-2007, 04:29 PM
  #36  
Gary L. Burnore
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: NOMINATION: Bill ------ for the Pickett and Special Ops Cody awards (was Re: L.W.\(Bill\) ------ III is a spamming ----KKhead.
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 09:31:46 -0500, Archie Leach <archie@antispam.ham>
wrote:

>Self explanatory. Second at your leisure.
>
>"L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III" <LWBill------@------.net> wrote:
>
>>Re-sent to abuse@databasix.com as plcymgmt@databasix.com is as fake as you
>>are!!!!
>>
>>Return-Path: <>
>>Received: from n054.sc0.he.tucows.com (64.97.160.108) by n065.sc0.cp.net
>>(7.2.066)
>> id 46564A7000C0FC61 for lw------@------.net; Thu, 18 Oct 2007
>>02:54:07 +0000
>>Received: by n054.sc0.he.tucows.com (7.2.069.1) id 47163E9A0001A24B for
>>lw------@------.net; Thu, 18 Oct 2007 02:56:40 +0000
>>From: Mail Delivery Service <postmaster@bouncemessage.net>
>>Subject: Delivery Status Notification
>>To: lw------@------.net
>>Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 02:56:40 +0000
>>Message-ID: <47163E9A0001A24A@n054.sc0.he.tucows.com>
>>X-CP-Transaction-ID: 47163E9A0001A201
>>X-CP-For: plcymgmt@databasix.com
>>MIME-Version: 1.0
>>Content-Type: Multipart/Report; report-type=delivery-status;
>>boundary="========/47163E9A0001A201/n054.sc0.he.tucows.com"
>>
>>- These recipients of your message have been processed by the mail server:
>>plcymgmt@databasix.com; Failed; 5.3.0 (other or undefined mail system
>>status)
>>
>> Remote MTA mx0.netbasix.net: network error

He can't figure out why his mail bounces. :)

--
gburnore at DataBasix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.| Official Proof of Purchase
================================================== =========================
 
Reply
Old 10-18-2007, 04:29 PM
  #37  
Gary L. Burnore
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: NOMINATION: Bill ------ for the Pickett and Special Ops Cody awards (was Re: L.W.\(Bill\) ------ III is a spamming ----KKhead.
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 09:31:46 -0500, Archie Leach <archie@antispam.ham>
wrote:

>Self explanatory. Second at your leisure.
>
>"L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III" <LWBill------@------.net> wrote:
>
>>Re-sent to abuse@databasix.com as plcymgmt@databasix.com is as fake as you
>>are!!!!
>>
>>Return-Path: <>
>>Received: from n054.sc0.he.tucows.com (64.97.160.108) by n065.sc0.cp.net
>>(7.2.066)
>> id 46564A7000C0FC61 for lw------@------.net; Thu, 18 Oct 2007
>>02:54:07 +0000
>>Received: by n054.sc0.he.tucows.com (7.2.069.1) id 47163E9A0001A24B for
>>lw------@------.net; Thu, 18 Oct 2007 02:56:40 +0000
>>From: Mail Delivery Service <postmaster@bouncemessage.net>
>>Subject: Delivery Status Notification
>>To: lw------@------.net
>>Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 02:56:40 +0000
>>Message-ID: <47163E9A0001A24A@n054.sc0.he.tucows.com>
>>X-CP-Transaction-ID: 47163E9A0001A201
>>X-CP-For: plcymgmt@databasix.com
>>MIME-Version: 1.0
>>Content-Type: Multipart/Report; report-type=delivery-status;
>>boundary="========/47163E9A0001A201/n054.sc0.he.tucows.com"
>>
>>- These recipients of your message have been processed by the mail server:
>>plcymgmt@databasix.com; Failed; 5.3.0 (other or undefined mail system
>>status)
>>
>> Remote MTA mx0.netbasix.net: network error

He can't figure out why his mail bounces. :)

--
gburnore at DataBasix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.| Official Proof of Purchase
================================================== =========================
 
Reply
Old 10-18-2007, 04:43 PM
  #38  
=?iso-8859-1?q?Pink_Freud=A9=AE?=
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: NOMINATION: Bill ------ for the Pickett and Special Ops Cody awards (was Re: L.W.\(Bill\) ------ III is a spamming ----KKhead.
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 16:29:46 -0400, Gary L. Burnore wrote:

> On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 09:31:46 -0500, Archie Leach <archie@antispam.ham>
> wrote:
>
>>Self explanatory. Second at your leisure.
>>
>>"L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III" <LWBill------@------.net> wrote:
>>
>>>Re-sent to abuse@databasix.com as plcymgmt@databasix.com is as fake as you
>>>are!!!!
>>>
>>>Return-Path: <>
>>>Received: from n054.sc0.he.tucows.com (64.97.160.108) by n065.sc0.cp.net
>>>(7.2.066)
>>> id 46564A7000C0FC61 for lw------@------.net; Thu, 18 Oct 2007
>>>02:54:07 +0000
>>>Received: by n054.sc0.he.tucows.com (7.2.069.1) id 47163E9A0001A24B for
>>>lw------@------.net; Thu, 18 Oct 2007 02:56:40 +0000
>>>From: Mail Delivery Service <postmaster@bouncemessage.net>
>>>Subject: Delivery Status Notification
>>>To: lw------@------.net
>>>Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 02:56:40 +0000
>>>Message-ID: <47163E9A0001A24A@n054.sc0.he.tucows.com>
>>>X-CP-Transaction-ID: 47163E9A0001A201
>>>X-CP-For: plcymgmt@databasix.com
>>>MIME-Version: 1.0
>>>Content-Type: Multipart/Report; report-type=delivery-status;
>>>boundary="========/47163E9A0001A201/n054.sc0.he.tucows.com"
>>>
>>>- These recipients of your message have been processed by the mail server:
>>>plcymgmt@databasix.com; Failed; 5.3.0 (other or undefined mail system
>>>status)
>>>
>>> Remote MTA mx0.netbasix.net: network error
>
> He can't figure out why his mail bounces. :)


Or why his ***** don't.....



--
Men hate those to whom they have to lie.

-Victor Hugo, poet, novelist, and
dramatist (1802-1885)

 
Reply
Old 10-18-2007, 04:43 PM
  #39  
=?iso-8859-1?q?Pink_Freud=A9=AE?=
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: NOMINATION: Bill ------ for the Pickett and Special Ops Cody awards (was Re: L.W.\(Bill\) ------ III is a spamming ----KKhead.
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 16:29:46 -0400, Gary L. Burnore wrote:

> On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 09:31:46 -0500, Archie Leach <archie@antispam.ham>
> wrote:
>
>>Self explanatory. Second at your leisure.
>>
>>"L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III" <LWBill------@------.net> wrote:
>>
>>>Re-sent to abuse@databasix.com as plcymgmt@databasix.com is as fake as you
>>>are!!!!
>>>
>>>Return-Path: <>
>>>Received: from n054.sc0.he.tucows.com (64.97.160.108) by n065.sc0.cp.net
>>>(7.2.066)
>>> id 46564A7000C0FC61 for lw------@------.net; Thu, 18 Oct 2007
>>>02:54:07 +0000
>>>Received: by n054.sc0.he.tucows.com (7.2.069.1) id 47163E9A0001A24B for
>>>lw------@------.net; Thu, 18 Oct 2007 02:56:40 +0000
>>>From: Mail Delivery Service <postmaster@bouncemessage.net>
>>>Subject: Delivery Status Notification
>>>To: lw------@------.net
>>>Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 02:56:40 +0000
>>>Message-ID: <47163E9A0001A24A@n054.sc0.he.tucows.com>
>>>X-CP-Transaction-ID: 47163E9A0001A201
>>>X-CP-For: plcymgmt@databasix.com
>>>MIME-Version: 1.0
>>>Content-Type: Multipart/Report; report-type=delivery-status;
>>>boundary="========/47163E9A0001A201/n054.sc0.he.tucows.com"
>>>
>>>- These recipients of your message have been processed by the mail server:
>>>plcymgmt@databasix.com; Failed; 5.3.0 (other or undefined mail system
>>>status)
>>>
>>> Remote MTA mx0.netbasix.net: network error
>
> He can't figure out why his mail bounces. :)


Or why his ***** don't.....



--
Men hate those to whom they have to lie.

-Victor Hugo, poet, novelist, and
dramatist (1802-1885)

 
Reply
Old 10-18-2007, 04:43 PM
  #40  
=?iso-8859-1?q?Pink_Freud=A9=AE?=
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: NOMINATION: Bill ------ for the Pickett and Special Ops Cody awards (was Re: L.W.\(Bill\) ------ III is a spamming ----KKhead.
On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 16:29:46 -0400, Gary L. Burnore wrote:

> On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 09:31:46 -0500, Archie Leach <archie@antispam.ham>
> wrote:
>
>>Self explanatory. Second at your leisure.
>>
>>"L.W. \(Bill\) ------ III" <LWBill------@------.net> wrote:
>>
>>>Re-sent to abuse@databasix.com as plcymgmt@databasix.com is as fake as you
>>>are!!!!
>>>
>>>Return-Path: <>
>>>Received: from n054.sc0.he.tucows.com (64.97.160.108) by n065.sc0.cp.net
>>>(7.2.066)
>>> id 46564A7000C0FC61 for lw------@------.net; Thu, 18 Oct 2007
>>>02:54:07 +0000
>>>Received: by n054.sc0.he.tucows.com (7.2.069.1) id 47163E9A0001A24B for
>>>lw------@------.net; Thu, 18 Oct 2007 02:56:40 +0000
>>>From: Mail Delivery Service <postmaster@bouncemessage.net>
>>>Subject: Delivery Status Notification
>>>To: lw------@------.net
>>>Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 02:56:40 +0000
>>>Message-ID: <47163E9A0001A24A@n054.sc0.he.tucows.com>
>>>X-CP-Transaction-ID: 47163E9A0001A201
>>>X-CP-For: plcymgmt@databasix.com
>>>MIME-Version: 1.0
>>>Content-Type: Multipart/Report; report-type=delivery-status;
>>>boundary="========/47163E9A0001A201/n054.sc0.he.tucows.com"
>>>
>>>- These recipients of your message have been processed by the mail server:
>>>plcymgmt@databasix.com; Failed; 5.3.0 (other or undefined mail system
>>>status)
>>>
>>> Remote MTA mx0.netbasix.net: network error
>
> He can't figure out why his mail bounces. :)


Or why his ***** don't.....



--
Men hate those to whom they have to lie.

-Victor Hugo, poet, novelist, and
dramatist (1802-1885)

 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Advanced Search
Quick Reply: Re: L.W.\(Bill\) ------ III is a spamming ----KKhead.


Reply Closed Thread Share

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:41 PM.

Page generated in 0.14549 seconds with 19 queries