Re: how "tight" should the crankshaft be with new bearings?
04-05-2004, 09:40 PM
#21
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: how "tight" should the crankshaft be with new bearings?
We've figured out that's for the four cylinder:
http://www.----------.com/TChain.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
mic canic wrote:
>
> mr roman heres the parts number the tensoner you say doesn't EXIST!!! for the 4.0
> 33003440
http://www.----------.com/TChain.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
mic canic wrote:
>
> mr roman heres the parts number the tensoner you say doesn't EXIST!!! for the 4.0
> 33003440
04-05-2004, 10:17 PM
#22
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: how "tight" should the crankshaft be with new bearings?
Yup, here's a picture of the front of a 4.0 showing the timing gears:
<http://www.autoparts4jeep.com/car_en...es---AMC-242LB
-1.html>
That tensioner stands right out, doesn't it? And this guy works for a Jeep
stealership???
Chris
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:40720A83.4AD4D83E@***.net...
> We've figured out that's for the four cylinder:
> http://www.----------.com/TChain.jpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> mic canic wrote:
> >
> > mr roman heres the parts number the tensoner you say doesn't EXIST!!!
for the 4.0
> > 33003440
<http://www.autoparts4jeep.com/car_en...es---AMC-242LB
-1.html>
That tensioner stands right out, doesn't it? And this guy works for a Jeep
stealership???
Chris
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:40720A83.4AD4D83E@***.net...
> We've figured out that's for the four cylinder:
> http://www.----------.com/TChain.jpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> mic canic wrote:
> >
> > mr roman heres the parts number the tensoner you say doesn't EXIST!!!
for the 4.0
> > 33003440
04-05-2004, 10:17 PM
#23
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: how "tight" should the crankshaft be with new bearings?
Yup, here's a picture of the front of a 4.0 showing the timing gears:
<http://www.autoparts4jeep.com/car_en...es---AMC-242LB
-1.html>
That tensioner stands right out, doesn't it? And this guy works for a Jeep
stealership???
Chris
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:40720A83.4AD4D83E@***.net...
> We've figured out that's for the four cylinder:
> http://www.----------.com/TChain.jpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> mic canic wrote:
> >
> > mr roman heres the parts number the tensoner you say doesn't EXIST!!!
for the 4.0
> > 33003440
<http://www.autoparts4jeep.com/car_en...es---AMC-242LB
-1.html>
That tensioner stands right out, doesn't it? And this guy works for a Jeep
stealership???
Chris
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:40720A83.4AD4D83E@***.net...
> We've figured out that's for the four cylinder:
> http://www.----------.com/TChain.jpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> mic canic wrote:
> >
> > mr roman heres the parts number the tensoner you say doesn't EXIST!!!
for the 4.0
> > 33003440
04-05-2004, 10:17 PM
#24
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: how "tight" should the crankshaft be with new bearings?
Yup, here's a picture of the front of a 4.0 showing the timing gears:
<http://www.autoparts4jeep.com/car_en...es---AMC-242LB
-1.html>
That tensioner stands right out, doesn't it? And this guy works for a Jeep
stealership???
Chris
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:40720A83.4AD4D83E@***.net...
> We've figured out that's for the four cylinder:
> http://www.----------.com/TChain.jpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> mic canic wrote:
> >
> > mr roman heres the parts number the tensoner you say doesn't EXIST!!!
for the 4.0
> > 33003440
<http://www.autoparts4jeep.com/car_en...es---AMC-242LB
-1.html>
That tensioner stands right out, doesn't it? And this guy works for a Jeep
stealership???
Chris
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:40720A83.4AD4D83E@***.net...
> We've figured out that's for the four cylinder:
> http://www.----------.com/TChain.jpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> mic canic wrote:
> >
> > mr roman heres the parts number the tensoner you say doesn't EXIST!!!
for the 4.0
> > 33003440
04-05-2004, 10:17 PM
#25
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: how "tight" should the crankshaft be with new bearings?
Yup, here's a picture of the front of a 4.0 showing the timing gears:
<http://www.autoparts4jeep.com/car_en...es---AMC-242LB
-1.html>
That tensioner stands right out, doesn't it? And this guy works for a Jeep
stealership???
Chris
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:40720A83.4AD4D83E@***.net...
> We've figured out that's for the four cylinder:
> http://www.----------.com/TChain.jpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> mic canic wrote:
> >
> > mr roman heres the parts number the tensoner you say doesn't EXIST!!!
for the 4.0
> > 33003440
<http://www.autoparts4jeep.com/car_en...es---AMC-242LB
-1.html>
That tensioner stands right out, doesn't it? And this guy works for a Jeep
stealership???
Chris
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:40720A83.4AD4D83E@***.net...
> We've figured out that's for the four cylinder:
> http://www.----------.com/TChain.jpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> mic canic wrote:
> >
> > mr roman heres the parts number the tensoner you say doesn't EXIST!!!
for the 4.0
> > 33003440
04-06-2004, 08:11 PM
#26
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: how "tight" should the crankshaft be with new bearings?
you right it's work in both ero-2.5 all. ero 4.0 all. as the part listing shows
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
> We've figured out that's for the four cylinder:
> http://www.----------.com/TChain.jpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> mic canic wrote:
> >
> > mr roman heres the parts number the tensoner you say doesn't EXIST!!! for the 4.0
> > 33003440
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
> We've figured out that's for the four cylinder:
> http://www.----------.com/TChain.jpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> mic canic wrote:
> >
> > mr roman heres the parts number the tensoner you say doesn't EXIST!!! for the 4.0
> > 33003440
04-06-2004, 08:11 PM
#27
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: how "tight" should the crankshaft be with new bearings?
you right it's work in both ero-2.5 all. ero 4.0 all. as the part listing shows
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
> We've figured out that's for the four cylinder:
> http://www.----------.com/TChain.jpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> mic canic wrote:
> >
> > mr roman heres the parts number the tensoner you say doesn't EXIST!!! for the 4.0
> > 33003440
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
> We've figured out that's for the four cylinder:
> http://www.----------.com/TChain.jpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> mic canic wrote:
> >
> > mr roman heres the parts number the tensoner you say doesn't EXIST!!! for the 4.0
> > 33003440
04-06-2004, 08:11 PM
#28
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: how "tight" should the crankshaft be with new bearings?
you right it's work in both ero-2.5 all. ero 4.0 all. as the part listing shows
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
> We've figured out that's for the four cylinder:
> http://www.----------.com/TChain.jpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> mic canic wrote:
> >
> > mr roman heres the parts number the tensoner you say doesn't EXIST!!! for the 4.0
> > 33003440
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
> We've figured out that's for the four cylinder:
> http://www.----------.com/TChain.jpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> mic canic wrote:
> >
> > mr roman heres the parts number the tensoner you say doesn't EXIST!!! for the 4.0
> > 33003440
04-06-2004, 08:11 PM
#29
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: how "tight" should the crankshaft be with new bearings?
you right it's work in both ero-2.5 all. ero 4.0 all. as the part listing shows
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
> We've figured out that's for the four cylinder:
> http://www.----------.com/TChain.jpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> mic canic wrote:
> >
> > mr roman heres the parts number the tensoner you say doesn't EXIST!!! for the 4.0
> > 33003440
"L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
> We've figured out that's for the four cylinder:
> http://www.----------.com/TChain.jpg
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:--------------------
>
> mic canic wrote:
> >
> > mr roman heres the parts number the tensoner you say doesn't EXIST!!! for the 4.0
> > 33003440
04-07-2004, 02:52 AM
#30
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: how "tight" should the crankshaft be with new bearings?
Are you claiming the 4.0 does use a tensioner ?
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"mic canic" <dbrider@cac.net> wrote in message
news:407346FE.7812DCBB@cac.net...
> you right it's work in both ero-2.5 all. ero 4.0 all. as the part listing
shows
>
> "L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> > We've figured out that's for the four cylinder:
> > http://www.----------.com/TChain.jpg
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:--------------------
> >
> > mic canic wrote:
> > >
> > > mr roman heres the parts number the tensoner you say doesn't EXIST!!!
for the 4.0
> > > 33003440
>
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"mic canic" <dbrider@cac.net> wrote in message
news:407346FE.7812DCBB@cac.net...
> you right it's work in both ero-2.5 all. ero 4.0 all. as the part listing
shows
>
> "L.W.(ßill) ------ III" wrote:
>
> > We've figured out that's for the four cylinder:
> > http://www.----------.com/TChain.jpg
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:--------------------
> >
> > mic canic wrote:
> > >
> > > mr roman heres the parts number the tensoner you say doesn't EXIST!!!
for the 4.0
> > > 33003440
>
