Re: how "tight" should the crankshaft be with new bearings?
"Refinish King" <noneofyourbusiness@neveryoumind.nospam.com> wrote in message news:%zNac.8164$Hs1.2774@fe03.usenetserver.com... > If they did that: > > They're asking for a crack to happen. Read the manual, for every crank, > there is a specified fillet radius! > > Refinish King A radiused fillet is less likely to crack than a sharply ground one, re the stress raiser phenomenon we have discussed before.. I think that more often than not, the fillet is not intented to be left overly large...it is probably a result of less than precise machining. It can interfere with the edge of the bearing, just as "c" said. I never heard of anyone using narrower bearings, but they do 'relieve' the edge of the bearing where it might contact the fillet. Seems I have seen a special tool to do this, but don't have one myself. |
Re: how "tight" should the crankshaft be with new bearings?
"Refinish King" <noneofyourbusiness@neveryoumind.nospam.com> wrote in message news:%zNac.8164$Hs1.2774@fe03.usenetserver.com... > If they did that: > > They're asking for a crack to happen. Read the manual, for every crank, > there is a specified fillet radius! > > Refinish King A radiused fillet is less likely to crack than a sharply ground one, re the stress raiser phenomenon we have discussed before.. I think that more often than not, the fillet is not intented to be left overly large...it is probably a result of less than precise machining. It can interfere with the edge of the bearing, just as "c" said. I never heard of anyone using narrower bearings, but they do 'relieve' the edge of the bearing where it might contact the fillet. Seems I have seen a special tool to do this, but don't have one myself. |
Re: how "tight" should the crankshaft be with new bearings?
"Refinish King" <noneofyourbusiness@neveryoumind.nospam.com> wrote in message news:%zNac.8164$Hs1.2774@fe03.usenetserver.com... > If they did that: > > They're asking for a crack to happen. Read the manual, for every crank, > there is a specified fillet radius! > > Refinish King A radiused fillet is less likely to crack than a sharply ground one, re the stress raiser phenomenon we have discussed before.. I think that more often than not, the fillet is not intented to be left overly large...it is probably a result of less than precise machining. It can interfere with the edge of the bearing, just as "c" said. I never heard of anyone using narrower bearings, but they do 'relieve' the edge of the bearing where it might contact the fillet. Seems I have seen a special tool to do this, but don't have one myself. |
Re: how "tight" should the crankshaft be with new bearings?
It's called a bearing knife or bearing scraper:
But, if you have an excessively large fillet radius, especially in a cast iron crankshaft. that is the perfect place for a radial crack to begin. The fillet radius should be ground with the stone dressed to the propper radius for the crankshaft in the machine. Refinish King "HLS" <Sorry@nospam> wrote in message news:10719qskrk8ad4f@corp.supernews.com... > > "Refinish King" <noneofyourbusiness@neveryoumind.nospam.com> wrote in > message news:%zNac.8164$Hs1.2774@fe03.usenetserver.com... > > If they did that: > > > > They're asking for a crack to happen. Read the manual, for every crank, > > there is a specified fillet radius! > > > > Refinish King > > A radiused fillet is less likely to crack than a sharply ground one, re the > stress raiser > phenomenon we have discussed before.. I think that more often than not, the > fillet > is not intented to be left overly large...it is probably a result of less > than precise machining. > > It can interfere with the edge of the bearing, just as "c" said. > > I never heard of anyone using narrower bearings, but they do 'relieve' the > edge of the > bearing where it might contact the fillet. > > Seems I have seen a special tool to do this, but don't have one myself. > > |
Re: how "tight" should the crankshaft be with new bearings?
It's called a bearing knife or bearing scraper:
But, if you have an excessively large fillet radius, especially in a cast iron crankshaft. that is the perfect place for a radial crack to begin. The fillet radius should be ground with the stone dressed to the propper radius for the crankshaft in the machine. Refinish King "HLS" <Sorry@nospam> wrote in message news:10719qskrk8ad4f@corp.supernews.com... > > "Refinish King" <noneofyourbusiness@neveryoumind.nospam.com> wrote in > message news:%zNac.8164$Hs1.2774@fe03.usenetserver.com... > > If they did that: > > > > They're asking for a crack to happen. Read the manual, for every crank, > > there is a specified fillet radius! > > > > Refinish King > > A radiused fillet is less likely to crack than a sharply ground one, re the > stress raiser > phenomenon we have discussed before.. I think that more often than not, the > fillet > is not intented to be left overly large...it is probably a result of less > than precise machining. > > It can interfere with the edge of the bearing, just as "c" said. > > I never heard of anyone using narrower bearings, but they do 'relieve' the > edge of the > bearing where it might contact the fillet. > > Seems I have seen a special tool to do this, but don't have one myself. > > |
Re: how "tight" should the crankshaft be with new bearings?
It's called a bearing knife or bearing scraper:
But, if you have an excessively large fillet radius, especially in a cast iron crankshaft. that is the perfect place for a radial crack to begin. The fillet radius should be ground with the stone dressed to the propper radius for the crankshaft in the machine. Refinish King "HLS" <Sorry@nospam> wrote in message news:10719qskrk8ad4f@corp.supernews.com... > > "Refinish King" <noneofyourbusiness@neveryoumind.nospam.com> wrote in > message news:%zNac.8164$Hs1.2774@fe03.usenetserver.com... > > If they did that: > > > > They're asking for a crack to happen. Read the manual, for every crank, > > there is a specified fillet radius! > > > > Refinish King > > A radiused fillet is less likely to crack than a sharply ground one, re the > stress raiser > phenomenon we have discussed before.. I think that more often than not, the > fillet > is not intented to be left overly large...it is probably a result of less > than precise machining. > > It can interfere with the edge of the bearing, just as "c" said. > > I never heard of anyone using narrower bearings, but they do 'relieve' the > edge of the > bearing where it might contact the fillet. > > Seems I have seen a special tool to do this, but don't have one myself. > > |
Re: how "tight" should the crankshaft be with new bearings?
It's called a bearing knife or bearing scraper:
But, if you have an excessively large fillet radius, especially in a cast iron crankshaft. that is the perfect place for a radial crack to begin. The fillet radius should be ground with the stone dressed to the propper radius for the crankshaft in the machine. Refinish King "HLS" <Sorry@nospam> wrote in message news:10719qskrk8ad4f@corp.supernews.com... > > "Refinish King" <noneofyourbusiness@neveryoumind.nospam.com> wrote in > message news:%zNac.8164$Hs1.2774@fe03.usenetserver.com... > > If they did that: > > > > They're asking for a crack to happen. Read the manual, for every crank, > > there is a specified fillet radius! > > > > Refinish King > > A radiused fillet is less likely to crack than a sharply ground one, re the > stress raiser > phenomenon we have discussed before.. I think that more often than not, the > fillet > is not intented to be left overly large...it is probably a result of less > than precise machining. > > It can interfere with the edge of the bearing, just as "c" said. > > I never heard of anyone using narrower bearings, but they do 'relieve' the > edge of the > bearing where it might contact the fillet. > > Seems I have seen a special tool to do this, but don't have one myself. > > |
Re: how "tight" should the crankshaft be with new bearings?
I guess Lunati and all of the other aftermarket crank manufacturers have
been doing it wrong all these years. http://www.holley.com/HiOctn/ProdLin...CSGenInfo.html It is common knowledge that a radius reduces the chance for a stress crack by ditributing the stresses evenly across the radius. The bigger the radius, the more area to absorbs stresses. Chris "Refinish King" <noneofyourbusiness@neveryoumind.nospam.com> wrote in message news:SK4cc.4262$Em4.2316@fe03.usenetserver.com... > It's called a bearing knife or bearing scraper: > > But, if you have an excessively large fillet radius, especially in a cast > iron crankshaft. that is the perfect place for a radial crack to begin. > > The fillet radius should be ground with the stone dressed to the propper > radius for the crankshaft in the machine. > > Refinish King > > > "HLS" <Sorry@nospam> wrote in message > news:10719qskrk8ad4f@corp.supernews.com... > > > > "Refinish King" <noneofyourbusiness@neveryoumind.nospam.com> wrote in > > message news:%zNac.8164$Hs1.2774@fe03.usenetserver.com... > > > If they did that: > > > > > > They're asking for a crack to happen. Read the manual, for every crank, > > > there is a specified fillet radius! > > > > > > Refinish King > > > > A radiused fillet is less likely to crack than a sharply ground one, re > the > > stress raiser > > phenomenon we have discussed before.. I think that more often than not, > the > > fillet > > is not intented to be left overly large...it is probably a result of less > > than precise machining. > > > > It can interfere with the edge of the bearing, just as "c" said. > > > > I never heard of anyone using narrower bearings, but they do 'relieve' the > > edge of the > > bearing where it might contact the fillet. > > > > Seems I have seen a special tool to do this, but don't have one myself. > > > > > > > |
Re: how "tight" should the crankshaft be with new bearings?
I guess Lunati and all of the other aftermarket crank manufacturers have
been doing it wrong all these years. http://www.holley.com/HiOctn/ProdLin...CSGenInfo.html It is common knowledge that a radius reduces the chance for a stress crack by ditributing the stresses evenly across the radius. The bigger the radius, the more area to absorbs stresses. Chris "Refinish King" <noneofyourbusiness@neveryoumind.nospam.com> wrote in message news:SK4cc.4262$Em4.2316@fe03.usenetserver.com... > It's called a bearing knife or bearing scraper: > > But, if you have an excessively large fillet radius, especially in a cast > iron crankshaft. that is the perfect place for a radial crack to begin. > > The fillet radius should be ground with the stone dressed to the propper > radius for the crankshaft in the machine. > > Refinish King > > > "HLS" <Sorry@nospam> wrote in message > news:10719qskrk8ad4f@corp.supernews.com... > > > > "Refinish King" <noneofyourbusiness@neveryoumind.nospam.com> wrote in > > message news:%zNac.8164$Hs1.2774@fe03.usenetserver.com... > > > If they did that: > > > > > > They're asking for a crack to happen. Read the manual, for every crank, > > > there is a specified fillet radius! > > > > > > Refinish King > > > > A radiused fillet is less likely to crack than a sharply ground one, re > the > > stress raiser > > phenomenon we have discussed before.. I think that more often than not, > the > > fillet > > is not intented to be left overly large...it is probably a result of less > > than precise machining. > > > > It can interfere with the edge of the bearing, just as "c" said. > > > > I never heard of anyone using narrower bearings, but they do 'relieve' the > > edge of the > > bearing where it might contact the fillet. > > > > Seems I have seen a special tool to do this, but don't have one myself. > > > > > > > |
Re: how "tight" should the crankshaft be with new bearings?
I guess Lunati and all of the other aftermarket crank manufacturers have
been doing it wrong all these years. http://www.holley.com/HiOctn/ProdLin...CSGenInfo.html It is common knowledge that a radius reduces the chance for a stress crack by ditributing the stresses evenly across the radius. The bigger the radius, the more area to absorbs stresses. Chris "Refinish King" <noneofyourbusiness@neveryoumind.nospam.com> wrote in message news:SK4cc.4262$Em4.2316@fe03.usenetserver.com... > It's called a bearing knife or bearing scraper: > > But, if you have an excessively large fillet radius, especially in a cast > iron crankshaft. that is the perfect place for a radial crack to begin. > > The fillet radius should be ground with the stone dressed to the propper > radius for the crankshaft in the machine. > > Refinish King > > > "HLS" <Sorry@nospam> wrote in message > news:10719qskrk8ad4f@corp.supernews.com... > > > > "Refinish King" <noneofyourbusiness@neveryoumind.nospam.com> wrote in > > message news:%zNac.8164$Hs1.2774@fe03.usenetserver.com... > > > If they did that: > > > > > > They're asking for a crack to happen. Read the manual, for every crank, > > > there is a specified fillet radius! > > > > > > Refinish King > > > > A radiused fillet is less likely to crack than a sharply ground one, re > the > > stress raiser > > phenomenon we have discussed before.. I think that more often than not, > the > > fillet > > is not intented to be left overly large...it is probably a result of less > > than precise machining. > > > > It can interfere with the edge of the bearing, just as "c" said. > > > > I never heard of anyone using narrower bearings, but they do 'relieve' the > > edge of the > > bearing where it might contact the fillet. > > > > Seems I have seen a special tool to do this, but don't have one myself. > > > > > > > |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:13 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands