Re: Cover up attempt = SPAM
 

It would seem the latest scourge of Usenet or the new breed of spamming
assholes are now called Bloggers.

This is a Jeep newsgroup on Usenet. It is not a 'google group' It has
a Charter that forbids commercial posts. The Charter is located here
for your reading enjoyment:

ftp://ftp.uu.net/usenet/news.announc...rs.jeep+willys


Your -------- isn't wanted here.

If you would like, we could see if you could be made the example and see
if the blogspot folks will pull your sorry account for Spamming Usenet
by getting everyone here to register complaints.

Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view!
Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590
(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page)

Re: Cover up attempt = SPAM
 

"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:45E59BBB.4040101@sympatico.ca...
....
>
> If you would like, we could see if you could be made the example
> and see if the blogspot folks will pull your sorry account for Spamming
> Usenet by getting everyone here to register complaints.
>
I'm game for that.

Earle

Re: Cover up attempt = SPAM
 

"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:45E59BBB.4040101@sympatico.ca...
....
>
> If you would like, we could see if you could be made the example
> and see if the blogspot folks will pull your sorry account for Spamming
> Usenet by getting everyone here to register complaints.
>
I'm game for that.

Earle

Re: Cover up attempt = SPAM
 

"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:45E59BBB.4040101@sympatico.ca...
....
>
> If you would like, we could see if you could be made the example
> and see if the blogspot folks will pull your sorry account for Spamming
> Usenet by getting everyone here to register complaints.
>
I'm game for that.

Earle

Re: Cover up attempt = SPAM
 

Earle Horton wrote:
> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> news:45E59BBB.4040101@sympatico.ca...
> ...
>> If you would like, we could see if you could be made the example
>> and see if the blogspot folks will pull your sorry account for Spamming
>> Usenet by getting everyone here to register complaints.
>>
> I'm game for that.
>
> Earle
>
>

There is a 'flag' at the top for objectionable content to hit, but there
doesn't seem to be a place to complain about the 'delivery' of such content.

Mike

Re: Cover up attempt = SPAM
 

Earle Horton wrote:
> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> news:45E59BBB.4040101@sympatico.ca...
> ...
>> If you would like, we could see if you could be made the example
>> and see if the blogspot folks will pull your sorry account for Spamming
>> Usenet by getting everyone here to register complaints.
>>
> I'm game for that.
>
> Earle
>
>

There is a 'flag' at the top for objectionable content to hit, but there
doesn't seem to be a place to complain about the 'delivery' of such content.

Mike

Re: Cover up attempt = SPAM
 

Earle Horton wrote:
> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
> news:45E59BBB.4040101@sympatico.ca...
> ...
>> If you would like, we could see if you could be made the example
>> and see if the blogspot folks will pull your sorry account for Spamming
>> Usenet by getting everyone here to register complaints.
>>
> I'm game for that.
>
> Earle
>
>

There is a 'flag' at the top for objectionable content to hit, but there
doesn't seem to be a place to complain about the 'delivery' of such content.

Mike

Re: Cover up attempt = SPAM
 

"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:45e5a8a3$0$23380$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosti ng.com...
> Earle Horton wrote:
>> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
>> news:45E59BBB.4040101@sympatico.ca...
>> ...
>>> If you would like, we could see if you could be made the example
>>> and see if the blogspot folks will pull your sorry account for Spamming
>>> Usenet by getting everyone here to register complaints.
>>>
>> I'm game for that.
>>
>> Earle
>>
>>
>
> There is a 'flag' at the top for objectionable content to hit, but there
> doesn't seem to be a place to complain about the 'delivery' of such
> content.
>
> Mike

blogspot is owned by google. We could complain to google, and they could
ignore the complaints like google groups does.

Re: Cover up attempt = SPAM
 

"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:45e5a8a3$0$23380$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosti ng.com...
> Earle Horton wrote:
>> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
>> news:45E59BBB.4040101@sympatico.ca...
>> ...
>>> If you would like, we could see if you could be made the example
>>> and see if the blogspot folks will pull your sorry account for Spamming
>>> Usenet by getting everyone here to register complaints.
>>>
>> I'm game for that.
>>
>> Earle
>>
>>
>
> There is a 'flag' at the top for objectionable content to hit, but there
> doesn't seem to be a place to complain about the 'delivery' of such
> content.
>
> Mike

blogspot is owned by google. We could complain to google, and they could
ignore the complaints like google groups does.

Re: Cover up attempt = SPAM
 

"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:45e5a8a3$0$23380$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosti ng.com...
> Earle Horton wrote:
>> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
>> news:45E59BBB.4040101@sympatico.ca...
>> ...
>>> If you would like, we could see if you could be made the example
>>> and see if the blogspot folks will pull your sorry account for Spamming
>>> Usenet by getting everyone here to register complaints.
>>>
>> I'm game for that.
>>
>> Earle
>>
>>
>
> There is a 'flag' at the top for objectionable content to hit, but there
> doesn't seem to be a place to complain about the 'delivery' of such
> content.
>
> Mike

blogspot is owned by google. We could complain to google, and they could
ignore the complaints like google groups does.