Re: California Emmissions Help
 

"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
news:3F6767EB.3BEA8751@cox.net...
> Tell your friend she'll have to move and/or sell the '86 in another
> state because it's not going to be registered in Kalifornia. You add
> SMOG equipment consistent with the year of the engine, you don't take
> from the year of the vehicle, that I've heard of. For a while here we
> all swore we had 1955 Chevy engines in our 1946 Jeeps to avoid having to
> SMOG, until they finally took pity on us and exempted pre '72 cars with
> newer engines.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>


That is mostly true Bill, but not entirely. You must Smog to the year of the
motor OR the year of the vehicle, whichever is newer. If the motor is old,
then you have to smog-up to the vehicle's year. If the motor is new, then
you have to carry its smog equipment with it into the vehicle.

The original poster said the motor is a '95, so the rules for the motor will
apply. If his motor was from a '76, then it must be brought up to the '86
specs of the CJ that the motor is dropped into. Get it?

Re: California Emmissions Help
 

Yes, I use to have a SMOG license:
http://www.----------.com/oscilloscope.jpg What to you think her chances
of finding an installer to certify it without the pump?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------

Jeff Strickland wrote:
>
> That is mostly true Bill, but not entirely. You must Smog to the year of the
> motor OR the year of the vehicle, whichever is newer. If the motor is old,
> then you have to smog-up to the vehicle's year. If the motor is new, then
> you have to carry its smog equipment with it into the vehicle.
>
> The original poster said the motor is a '95, so the rules for the motor will
> apply. If his motor was from a '76, then it must be brought up to the '86
> specs of the CJ that the motor is dropped into. Get it?

Re: California Emmissions Help
 

Yes, I use to have a SMOG license:
http://www.----------.com/oscilloscope.jpg What to you think her chances
of finding an installer to certify it without the pump?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------

Jeff Strickland wrote:
>
> That is mostly true Bill, but not entirely. You must Smog to the year of the
> motor OR the year of the vehicle, whichever is newer. If the motor is old,
> then you have to smog-up to the vehicle's year. If the motor is new, then
> you have to carry its smog equipment with it into the vehicle.
>
> The original poster said the motor is a '95, so the rules for the motor will
> apply. If his motor was from a '76, then it must be brought up to the '86
> specs of the CJ that the motor is dropped into. Get it?

Re: California Emmissions Help
 

What to you think her chances
> of finding an installer to certify it without the pump?

That isn't going to happen until the motor gets 1995 Smog equipment
installed.

Re: California Emmissions Help
 

What to you think her chances
> of finding an installer to certify it without the pump?

That isn't going to happen until the motor gets 1995 Smog equipment
installed.

Re: California Emmissions Help
 

It has throttle body injection, that would dictate it has all the
the '95 stuff, computer, O2, temperature, barometer, fuel pressure and
etc. sensors.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Jeff Strickland wrote:
>
> That isn't going to happen until the motor gets 1995 Smog equipment
> installed.

Re: California Emmissions Help
 

It has throttle body injection, that would dictate it has all the
the '95 stuff, computer, O2, temperature, barometer, fuel pressure and
etc. sensors.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Jeff Strickland wrote:
>
> That isn't going to happen until the motor gets 1995 Smog equipment
> installed.

Re: California Emmissions Help
 

Apparently it hasn't got all of the stuff because it can't pass with the
headers that it has, and the headers are home to the O2 Sensor -- or at
least they are supposed to be. We already know the headers are trouble, I am
guessing the trouble is because they can not house the O2 sensor.




"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
news:3F67A69D.71D7C209@cox.net...
> It has throttle body injection, that would dictate it has all the
> the '95 stuff, computer, O2, temperature, barometer, fuel pressure and
> etc. sensors.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jeff Strickland wrote:
> >
> > That isn't going to happen until the motor gets 1995 Smog equipment
> > installed.

Re: California Emmissions Help
 

Apparently it hasn't got all of the stuff because it can't pass with the
headers that it has, and the headers are home to the O2 Sensor -- or at
least they are supposed to be. We already know the headers are trouble, I am
guessing the trouble is because they can not house the O2 sensor.




"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message
news:3F67A69D.71D7C209@cox.net...
> It has throttle body injection, that would dictate it has all the
> the '95 stuff, computer, O2, temperature, barometer, fuel pressure and
> etc. sensors.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jeff Strickland wrote:
> >
> > That isn't going to happen until the motor gets 1995 Smog equipment
> > installed.

Re: California Emmissions Help
 

That would be a good guess, I wonder what tells the computer to
change the fuel mixture.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Jeff Strickland wrote:
>
> Apparently it hasn't got all of the stuff because it can't pass with the
> headers that it has, and the headers are home to the O2 Sensor -- or at
> least they are supposed to be. We already know the headers are trouble, I am
> guessing the trouble is because they can not house the O2 sensor.