Re: 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee
04-07-2004, 05:42 PM
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee
You were not cross posting, cross posting is what the troll
Xomicron, did to this news group, if you noticed when you reply to it's
post, it has made it automatic that you too spam all over the usenet,
making it impossible to stop.
The pictures you found on the binary group:
http://www.----------.com/2005GCherokee.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Jeepers wrote:
>
> It was a rework of the 4.2, not "developed", but I digress. I
> crossposted this from alt.binaries.pictures.autos, where they had posted
> a picture of the new 2005 GC.
>
> I guess I was trolling, sorta. My apologies. I was trying to see if
> anyone here knew anything about DC's control of the project.
Xomicron, did to this news group, if you noticed when you reply to it's
post, it has made it automatic that you too spam all over the usenet,
making it impossible to stop.
The pictures you found on the binary group:
http://www.----------.com/2005GCherokee.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Jeepers wrote:
>
> It was a rework of the 4.2, not "developed", but I digress. I
> crossposted this from alt.binaries.pictures.autos, where they had posted
> a picture of the new 2005 GC.
>
> I guess I was trolling, sorta. My apologies. I was trying to see if
> anyone here knew anything about DC's control of the project.
04-07-2004, 05:42 PM
#12
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee
You were not cross posting, cross posting is what the troll
Xomicron, did to this news group, if you noticed when you reply to it's
post, it has made it automatic that you too spam all over the usenet,
making it impossible to stop.
The pictures you found on the binary group:
http://www.----------.com/2005GCherokee.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Jeepers wrote:
>
> It was a rework of the 4.2, not "developed", but I digress. I
> crossposted this from alt.binaries.pictures.autos, where they had posted
> a picture of the new 2005 GC.
>
> I guess I was trolling, sorta. My apologies. I was trying to see if
> anyone here knew anything about DC's control of the project.
Xomicron, did to this news group, if you noticed when you reply to it's
post, it has made it automatic that you too spam all over the usenet,
making it impossible to stop.
The pictures you found on the binary group:
http://www.----------.com/2005GCherokee.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Jeepers wrote:
>
> It was a rework of the 4.2, not "developed", but I digress. I
> crossposted this from alt.binaries.pictures.autos, where they had posted
> a picture of the new 2005 GC.
>
> I guess I was trolling, sorta. My apologies. I was trying to see if
> anyone here knew anything about DC's control of the project.
04-07-2004, 05:42 PM
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee
You were not cross posting, cross posting is what the troll
Xomicron, did to this news group, if you noticed when you reply to it's
post, it has made it automatic that you too spam all over the usenet,
making it impossible to stop.
The pictures you found on the binary group:
http://www.----------.com/2005GCherokee.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Jeepers wrote:
>
> It was a rework of the 4.2, not "developed", but I digress. I
> crossposted this from alt.binaries.pictures.autos, where they had posted
> a picture of the new 2005 GC.
>
> I guess I was trolling, sorta. My apologies. I was trying to see if
> anyone here knew anything about DC's control of the project.
Xomicron, did to this news group, if you noticed when you reply to it's
post, it has made it automatic that you too spam all over the usenet,
making it impossible to stop.
The pictures you found on the binary group:
http://www.----------.com/2005GCherokee.jpg
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Jeepers wrote:
>
> It was a rework of the 4.2, not "developed", but I digress. I
> crossposted this from alt.binaries.pictures.autos, where they had posted
> a picture of the new 2005 GC.
>
> I guess I was trolling, sorta. My apologies. I was trying to see if
> anyone here knew anything about DC's control of the project.
04-07-2004, 05:59 PM
#14
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee
Technically you are correct, but the 4.0 "Power Tech Six" probably
shared more components with the 2.5 four, than it did with the 4.2
six. That, along with fuel injection, essentially made it a "new"
engine. My only point was that the 4.0 was never sold prior to 1987.
----
On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 14:58:03 -0500, Jeepers
<moomesa@INVALIDfnbnet.net> wrote:
>In article <bgk870hd901cverrhsb6i0oagg640t6078@4ax.com>,
> ---- <LeadWinger> wrote:
>
>It was a rework of the 4.2, not "developed", but I digress. I
>crossposted this from alt.binaries.pictures.autos, where they had posted
>a picture of the new 2005 GC.
shared more components with the 2.5 four, than it did with the 4.2
six. That, along with fuel injection, essentially made it a "new"
engine. My only point was that the 4.0 was never sold prior to 1987.
----
On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 14:58:03 -0500, Jeepers
<moomesa@INVALIDfnbnet.net> wrote:
>In article <bgk870hd901cverrhsb6i0oagg640t6078@4ax.com>,
> ---- <LeadWinger> wrote:
>
>It was a rework of the 4.2, not "developed", but I digress. I
>crossposted this from alt.binaries.pictures.autos, where they had posted
>a picture of the new 2005 GC.
04-07-2004, 05:59 PM
#15
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee
Technically you are correct, but the 4.0 "Power Tech Six" probably
shared more components with the 2.5 four, than it did with the 4.2
six. That, along with fuel injection, essentially made it a "new"
engine. My only point was that the 4.0 was never sold prior to 1987.
----
On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 14:58:03 -0500, Jeepers
<moomesa@INVALIDfnbnet.net> wrote:
>In article <bgk870hd901cverrhsb6i0oagg640t6078@4ax.com>,
> ---- <LeadWinger> wrote:
>
>It was a rework of the 4.2, not "developed", but I digress. I
>crossposted this from alt.binaries.pictures.autos, where they had posted
>a picture of the new 2005 GC.
shared more components with the 2.5 four, than it did with the 4.2
six. That, along with fuel injection, essentially made it a "new"
engine. My only point was that the 4.0 was never sold prior to 1987.
----
On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 14:58:03 -0500, Jeepers
<moomesa@INVALIDfnbnet.net> wrote:
>In article <bgk870hd901cverrhsb6i0oagg640t6078@4ax.com>,
> ---- <LeadWinger> wrote:
>
>It was a rework of the 4.2, not "developed", but I digress. I
>crossposted this from alt.binaries.pictures.autos, where they had posted
>a picture of the new 2005 GC.
04-07-2004, 05:59 PM
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee
Technically you are correct, but the 4.0 "Power Tech Six" probably
shared more components with the 2.5 four, than it did with the 4.2
six. That, along with fuel injection, essentially made it a "new"
engine. My only point was that the 4.0 was never sold prior to 1987.
----
On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 14:58:03 -0500, Jeepers
<moomesa@INVALIDfnbnet.net> wrote:
>In article <bgk870hd901cverrhsb6i0oagg640t6078@4ax.com>,
> ---- <LeadWinger> wrote:
>
>It was a rework of the 4.2, not "developed", but I digress. I
>crossposted this from alt.binaries.pictures.autos, where they had posted
>a picture of the new 2005 GC.
shared more components with the 2.5 four, than it did with the 4.2
six. That, along with fuel injection, essentially made it a "new"
engine. My only point was that the 4.0 was never sold prior to 1987.
----
On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 14:58:03 -0500, Jeepers
<moomesa@INVALIDfnbnet.net> wrote:
>In article <bgk870hd901cverrhsb6i0oagg640t6078@4ax.com>,
> ---- <LeadWinger> wrote:
>
>It was a rework of the 4.2, not "developed", but I digress. I
>crossposted this from alt.binaries.pictures.autos, where they had posted
>a picture of the new 2005 GC.
04-07-2004, 05:59 PM
#17
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee
Technically you are correct, but the 4.0 "Power Tech Six" probably
shared more components with the 2.5 four, than it did with the 4.2
six. That, along with fuel injection, essentially made it a "new"
engine. My only point was that the 4.0 was never sold prior to 1987.
----
On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 14:58:03 -0500, Jeepers
<moomesa@INVALIDfnbnet.net> wrote:
>In article <bgk870hd901cverrhsb6i0oagg640t6078@4ax.com>,
> ---- <LeadWinger> wrote:
>
>It was a rework of the 4.2, not "developed", but I digress. I
>crossposted this from alt.binaries.pictures.autos, where they had posted
>a picture of the new 2005 GC.
shared more components with the 2.5 four, than it did with the 4.2
six. That, along with fuel injection, essentially made it a "new"
engine. My only point was that the 4.0 was never sold prior to 1987.
----
On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 14:58:03 -0500, Jeepers
<moomesa@INVALIDfnbnet.net> wrote:
>In article <bgk870hd901cverrhsb6i0oagg640t6078@4ax.com>,
> ---- <LeadWinger> wrote:
>
>It was a rework of the 4.2, not "developed", but I digress. I
>crossposted this from alt.binaries.pictures.autos, where they had posted
>a picture of the new 2005 GC.
04-07-2004, 06:26 PM
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee
In article <trt870p39d5a7j7ijsl8cjii47dtlmm9vi@4ax.com>,
---- <LeadWinger> wrote:
> Technically you are correct, but the 4.0 "Power Tech Six" probably
> shared more components with the 2.5 four, than it did with the 4.2
> six. That, along with fuel injection, essentially made it a "new"
> engine. My only point was that the 4.0 was never sold prior to 1987.
>
> ----
Agreed.
So, what do you know about Diamer's (Germany) influence/control on the
Jeep lineage?
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
---- <LeadWinger> wrote:
> Technically you are correct, but the 4.0 "Power Tech Six" probably
> shared more components with the 2.5 four, than it did with the 4.2
> six. That, along with fuel injection, essentially made it a "new"
> engine. My only point was that the 4.0 was never sold prior to 1987.
>
> ----
Agreed.
So, what do you know about Diamer's (Germany) influence/control on the
Jeep lineage?
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
04-07-2004, 06:26 PM
#19
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee
In article <trt870p39d5a7j7ijsl8cjii47dtlmm9vi@4ax.com>,
---- <LeadWinger> wrote:
> Technically you are correct, but the 4.0 "Power Tech Six" probably
> shared more components with the 2.5 four, than it did with the 4.2
> six. That, along with fuel injection, essentially made it a "new"
> engine. My only point was that the 4.0 was never sold prior to 1987.
>
> ----
Agreed.
So, what do you know about Diamer's (Germany) influence/control on the
Jeep lineage?
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
---- <LeadWinger> wrote:
> Technically you are correct, but the 4.0 "Power Tech Six" probably
> shared more components with the 2.5 four, than it did with the 4.2
> six. That, along with fuel injection, essentially made it a "new"
> engine. My only point was that the 4.0 was never sold prior to 1987.
>
> ----
Agreed.
So, what do you know about Diamer's (Germany) influence/control on the
Jeep lineage?
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
04-07-2004, 06:26 PM
#20
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee
In article <trt870p39d5a7j7ijsl8cjii47dtlmm9vi@4ax.com>,
---- <LeadWinger> wrote:
> Technically you are correct, but the 4.0 "Power Tech Six" probably
> shared more components with the 2.5 four, than it did with the 4.2
> six. That, along with fuel injection, essentially made it a "new"
> engine. My only point was that the 4.0 was never sold prior to 1987.
>
> ----
Agreed.
So, what do you know about Diamer's (Germany) influence/control on the
Jeep lineage?
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
---- <LeadWinger> wrote:
> Technically you are correct, but the 4.0 "Power Tech Six" probably
> shared more components with the 2.5 four, than it did with the 4.2
> six. That, along with fuel injection, essentially made it a "new"
> engine. My only point was that the 4.0 was never sold prior to 1987.
>
> ----
Agreed.
So, what do you know about Diamer's (Germany) influence/control on the
Jeep lineage?
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----