quick question sway bar links
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: quick question sway bar links
Did that guy yank the rear coils and put in leafs? but left the coils in
front?
Looks cool....what are the driving differences having that?
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:4089D756.6AE11B4A@***.net...
> Then of course you would be running leaf springs:
> http://www.4x4wire.com/jeep/tech/susp/tjleafsprings/
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jerry McG wrote:
> >
> > Just my $.02 worth, but I think Mike's concerns area a bit on the
extreme
> > side. I for one would not drive a TJ on the highway with the sway bar
> > disconnected, simply because they're so damn squirrely. However, if you
got
> > in a bad scrape it's highly unlikely the investigators would even notice
it
> > was unhooked.
> >
> > An issue with TJs that's been a concern since the beginning is that the
rear
> > axle can tend to "steer" the front when off road. As a result, Currie
> > developed their "Anti-Rock" sway bar, which has far less roll
resistance,
> > but enough to maintain proper transfer weight front to the rear when the
> > suspension's bound up. It's been effective enough that I'm now starting
to
> > see them fitted to SOA as well as coil sprung rigs.
front?
Looks cool....what are the driving differences having that?
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:4089D756.6AE11B4A@***.net...
> Then of course you would be running leaf springs:
> http://www.4x4wire.com/jeep/tech/susp/tjleafsprings/
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jerry McG wrote:
> >
> > Just my $.02 worth, but I think Mike's concerns area a bit on the
extreme
> > side. I for one would not drive a TJ on the highway with the sway bar
> > disconnected, simply because they're so damn squirrely. However, if you
got
> > in a bad scrape it's highly unlikely the investigators would even notice
it
> > was unhooked.
> >
> > An issue with TJs that's been a concern since the beginning is that the
rear
> > axle can tend to "steer" the front when off road. As a result, Currie
> > developed their "Anti-Rock" sway bar, which has far less roll
resistance,
> > but enough to maintain proper transfer weight front to the rear when the
> > suspension's bound up. It's been effective enough that I'm now starting
to
> > see them fitted to SOA as well as coil sprung rigs.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: quick question sway bar links
Did that guy yank the rear coils and put in leafs? but left the coils in
front?
Looks cool....what are the driving differences having that?
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:4089D756.6AE11B4A@***.net...
> Then of course you would be running leaf springs:
> http://www.4x4wire.com/jeep/tech/susp/tjleafsprings/
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jerry McG wrote:
> >
> > Just my $.02 worth, but I think Mike's concerns area a bit on the
extreme
> > side. I for one would not drive a TJ on the highway with the sway bar
> > disconnected, simply because they're so damn squirrely. However, if you
got
> > in a bad scrape it's highly unlikely the investigators would even notice
it
> > was unhooked.
> >
> > An issue with TJs that's been a concern since the beginning is that the
rear
> > axle can tend to "steer" the front when off road. As a result, Currie
> > developed their "Anti-Rock" sway bar, which has far less roll
resistance,
> > but enough to maintain proper transfer weight front to the rear when the
> > suspension's bound up. It's been effective enough that I'm now starting
to
> > see them fitted to SOA as well as coil sprung rigs.
front?
Looks cool....what are the driving differences having that?
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:4089D756.6AE11B4A@***.net...
> Then of course you would be running leaf springs:
> http://www.4x4wire.com/jeep/tech/susp/tjleafsprings/
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jerry McG wrote:
> >
> > Just my $.02 worth, but I think Mike's concerns area a bit on the
extreme
> > side. I for one would not drive a TJ on the highway with the sway bar
> > disconnected, simply because they're so damn squirrely. However, if you
got
> > in a bad scrape it's highly unlikely the investigators would even notice
it
> > was unhooked.
> >
> > An issue with TJs that's been a concern since the beginning is that the
rear
> > axle can tend to "steer" the front when off road. As a result, Currie
> > developed their "Anti-Rock" sway bar, which has far less roll
resistance,
> > but enough to maintain proper transfer weight front to the rear when the
> > suspension's bound up. It's been effective enough that I'm now starting
to
> > see them fitted to SOA as well as coil sprung rigs.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: quick question sway bar links
Did that guy yank the rear coils and put in leafs? but left the coils in
front?
Looks cool....what are the driving differences having that?
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:4089D756.6AE11B4A@***.net...
> Then of course you would be running leaf springs:
> http://www.4x4wire.com/jeep/tech/susp/tjleafsprings/
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jerry McG wrote:
> >
> > Just my $.02 worth, but I think Mike's concerns area a bit on the
extreme
> > side. I for one would not drive a TJ on the highway with the sway bar
> > disconnected, simply because they're so damn squirrely. However, if you
got
> > in a bad scrape it's highly unlikely the investigators would even notice
it
> > was unhooked.
> >
> > An issue with TJs that's been a concern since the beginning is that the
rear
> > axle can tend to "steer" the front when off road. As a result, Currie
> > developed their "Anti-Rock" sway bar, which has far less roll
resistance,
> > but enough to maintain proper transfer weight front to the rear when the
> > suspension's bound up. It's been effective enough that I'm now starting
to
> > see them fitted to SOA as well as coil sprung rigs.
front?
Looks cool....what are the driving differences having that?
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:4089D756.6AE11B4A@***.net...
> Then of course you would be running leaf springs:
> http://www.4x4wire.com/jeep/tech/susp/tjleafsprings/
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Jerry McG wrote:
> >
> > Just my $.02 worth, but I think Mike's concerns area a bit on the
extreme
> > side. I for one would not drive a TJ on the highway with the sway bar
> > disconnected, simply because they're so damn squirrely. However, if you
got
> > in a bad scrape it's highly unlikely the investigators would even notice
it
> > was unhooked.
> >
> > An issue with TJs that's been a concern since the beginning is that the
rear
> > axle can tend to "steer" the front when off road. As a result, Currie
> > developed their "Anti-Rock" sway bar, which has far less roll
resistance,
> > but enough to maintain proper transfer weight front to the rear when the
> > suspension's bound up. It's been effective enough that I'm now starting
to
> > see them fitted to SOA as well as coil sprung rigs.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: quick question sway bar links
Like that he has half a chance to be able to keep up to a CJ7 when
climbing sand pits or ravine walls.
The leaf springs are structurally more sound and they prevent the run
away wheel hop that the TJ's get when climbing.
As soon as the TJ's wheels hop airborne, they start spinning and dig
holes really fast.
Some TJ's with lockers don't do too bad trying to follow a CJ, but then
lockers are crap on the roads around here in the winter, so they are
more for 'trailer queens'.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
SB wrote:
>
> Did that guy yank the rear coils and put in leafs? but left the coils in
> front?
>
> Looks cool....what are the driving differences having that?
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:4089D756.6AE11B4A@***.net...
> > Then of course you would be running leaf springs:
> > http://www.4x4wire.com/jeep/tech/susp/tjleafsprings/
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Jerry McG wrote:
> > >
> > > Just my $.02 worth, but I think Mike's concerns area a bit on the
> extreme
> > > side. I for one would not drive a TJ on the highway with the sway bar
> > > disconnected, simply because they're so damn squirrely. However, if you
> got
> > > in a bad scrape it's highly unlikely the investigators would even notice
> it
> > > was unhooked.
> > >
> > > An issue with TJs that's been a concern since the beginning is that the
> rear
> > > axle can tend to "steer" the front when off road. As a result, Currie
> > > developed their "Anti-Rock" sway bar, which has far less roll
> resistance,
> > > but enough to maintain proper transfer weight front to the rear when the
> > > suspension's bound up. It's been effective enough that I'm now starting
> to
> > > see them fitted to SOA as well as coil sprung rigs.
climbing sand pits or ravine walls.
The leaf springs are structurally more sound and they prevent the run
away wheel hop that the TJ's get when climbing.
As soon as the TJ's wheels hop airborne, they start spinning and dig
holes really fast.
Some TJ's with lockers don't do too bad trying to follow a CJ, but then
lockers are crap on the roads around here in the winter, so they are
more for 'trailer queens'.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
SB wrote:
>
> Did that guy yank the rear coils and put in leafs? but left the coils in
> front?
>
> Looks cool....what are the driving differences having that?
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:4089D756.6AE11B4A@***.net...
> > Then of course you would be running leaf springs:
> > http://www.4x4wire.com/jeep/tech/susp/tjleafsprings/
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Jerry McG wrote:
> > >
> > > Just my $.02 worth, but I think Mike's concerns area a bit on the
> extreme
> > > side. I for one would not drive a TJ on the highway with the sway bar
> > > disconnected, simply because they're so damn squirrely. However, if you
> got
> > > in a bad scrape it's highly unlikely the investigators would even notice
> it
> > > was unhooked.
> > >
> > > An issue with TJs that's been a concern since the beginning is that the
> rear
> > > axle can tend to "steer" the front when off road. As a result, Currie
> > > developed their "Anti-Rock" sway bar, which has far less roll
> resistance,
> > > but enough to maintain proper transfer weight front to the rear when the
> > > suspension's bound up. It's been effective enough that I'm now starting
> to
> > > see them fitted to SOA as well as coil sprung rigs.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: quick question sway bar links
Like that he has half a chance to be able to keep up to a CJ7 when
climbing sand pits or ravine walls.
The leaf springs are structurally more sound and they prevent the run
away wheel hop that the TJ's get when climbing.
As soon as the TJ's wheels hop airborne, they start spinning and dig
holes really fast.
Some TJ's with lockers don't do too bad trying to follow a CJ, but then
lockers are crap on the roads around here in the winter, so they are
more for 'trailer queens'.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
SB wrote:
>
> Did that guy yank the rear coils and put in leafs? but left the coils in
> front?
>
> Looks cool....what are the driving differences having that?
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:4089D756.6AE11B4A@***.net...
> > Then of course you would be running leaf springs:
> > http://www.4x4wire.com/jeep/tech/susp/tjleafsprings/
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Jerry McG wrote:
> > >
> > > Just my $.02 worth, but I think Mike's concerns area a bit on the
> extreme
> > > side. I for one would not drive a TJ on the highway with the sway bar
> > > disconnected, simply because they're so damn squirrely. However, if you
> got
> > > in a bad scrape it's highly unlikely the investigators would even notice
> it
> > > was unhooked.
> > >
> > > An issue with TJs that's been a concern since the beginning is that the
> rear
> > > axle can tend to "steer" the front when off road. As a result, Currie
> > > developed their "Anti-Rock" sway bar, which has far less roll
> resistance,
> > > but enough to maintain proper transfer weight front to the rear when the
> > > suspension's bound up. It's been effective enough that I'm now starting
> to
> > > see them fitted to SOA as well as coil sprung rigs.
climbing sand pits or ravine walls.
The leaf springs are structurally more sound and they prevent the run
away wheel hop that the TJ's get when climbing.
As soon as the TJ's wheels hop airborne, they start spinning and dig
holes really fast.
Some TJ's with lockers don't do too bad trying to follow a CJ, but then
lockers are crap on the roads around here in the winter, so they are
more for 'trailer queens'.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
SB wrote:
>
> Did that guy yank the rear coils and put in leafs? but left the coils in
> front?
>
> Looks cool....what are the driving differences having that?
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:4089D756.6AE11B4A@***.net...
> > Then of course you would be running leaf springs:
> > http://www.4x4wire.com/jeep/tech/susp/tjleafsprings/
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Jerry McG wrote:
> > >
> > > Just my $.02 worth, but I think Mike's concerns area a bit on the
> extreme
> > > side. I for one would not drive a TJ on the highway with the sway bar
> > > disconnected, simply because they're so damn squirrely. However, if you
> got
> > > in a bad scrape it's highly unlikely the investigators would even notice
> it
> > > was unhooked.
> > >
> > > An issue with TJs that's been a concern since the beginning is that the
> rear
> > > axle can tend to "steer" the front when off road. As a result, Currie
> > > developed their "Anti-Rock" sway bar, which has far less roll
> resistance,
> > > but enough to maintain proper transfer weight front to the rear when the
> > > suspension's bound up. It's been effective enough that I'm now starting
> to
> > > see them fitted to SOA as well as coil sprung rigs.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: quick question sway bar links
Like that he has half a chance to be able to keep up to a CJ7 when
climbing sand pits or ravine walls.
The leaf springs are structurally more sound and they prevent the run
away wheel hop that the TJ's get when climbing.
As soon as the TJ's wheels hop airborne, they start spinning and dig
holes really fast.
Some TJ's with lockers don't do too bad trying to follow a CJ, but then
lockers are crap on the roads around here in the winter, so they are
more for 'trailer queens'.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
SB wrote:
>
> Did that guy yank the rear coils and put in leafs? but left the coils in
> front?
>
> Looks cool....what are the driving differences having that?
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:4089D756.6AE11B4A@***.net...
> > Then of course you would be running leaf springs:
> > http://www.4x4wire.com/jeep/tech/susp/tjleafsprings/
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Jerry McG wrote:
> > >
> > > Just my $.02 worth, but I think Mike's concerns area a bit on the
> extreme
> > > side. I for one would not drive a TJ on the highway with the sway bar
> > > disconnected, simply because they're so damn squirrely. However, if you
> got
> > > in a bad scrape it's highly unlikely the investigators would even notice
> it
> > > was unhooked.
> > >
> > > An issue with TJs that's been a concern since the beginning is that the
> rear
> > > axle can tend to "steer" the front when off road. As a result, Currie
> > > developed their "Anti-Rock" sway bar, which has far less roll
> resistance,
> > > but enough to maintain proper transfer weight front to the rear when the
> > > suspension's bound up. It's been effective enough that I'm now starting
> to
> > > see them fitted to SOA as well as coil sprung rigs.
climbing sand pits or ravine walls.
The leaf springs are structurally more sound and they prevent the run
away wheel hop that the TJ's get when climbing.
As soon as the TJ's wheels hop airborne, they start spinning and dig
holes really fast.
Some TJ's with lockers don't do too bad trying to follow a CJ, but then
lockers are crap on the roads around here in the winter, so they are
more for 'trailer queens'.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
SB wrote:
>
> Did that guy yank the rear coils and put in leafs? but left the coils in
> front?
>
> Looks cool....what are the driving differences having that?
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:4089D756.6AE11B4A@***.net...
> > Then of course you would be running leaf springs:
> > http://www.4x4wire.com/jeep/tech/susp/tjleafsprings/
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Jerry McG wrote:
> > >
> > > Just my $.02 worth, but I think Mike's concerns area a bit on the
> extreme
> > > side. I for one would not drive a TJ on the highway with the sway bar
> > > disconnected, simply because they're so damn squirrely. However, if you
> got
> > > in a bad scrape it's highly unlikely the investigators would even notice
> it
> > > was unhooked.
> > >
> > > An issue with TJs that's been a concern since the beginning is that the
> rear
> > > axle can tend to "steer" the front when off road. As a result, Currie
> > > developed their "Anti-Rock" sway bar, which has far less roll
> resistance,
> > > but enough to maintain proper transfer weight front to the rear when the
> > > suspension's bound up. It's been effective enough that I'm now starting
> to
> > > see them fitted to SOA as well as coil sprung rigs.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: quick question sway bar links
Like that he has half a chance to be able to keep up to a CJ7 when
climbing sand pits or ravine walls.
The leaf springs are structurally more sound and they prevent the run
away wheel hop that the TJ's get when climbing.
As soon as the TJ's wheels hop airborne, they start spinning and dig
holes really fast.
Some TJ's with lockers don't do too bad trying to follow a CJ, but then
lockers are crap on the roads around here in the winter, so they are
more for 'trailer queens'.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
SB wrote:
>
> Did that guy yank the rear coils and put in leafs? but left the coils in
> front?
>
> Looks cool....what are the driving differences having that?
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:4089D756.6AE11B4A@***.net...
> > Then of course you would be running leaf springs:
> > http://www.4x4wire.com/jeep/tech/susp/tjleafsprings/
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Jerry McG wrote:
> > >
> > > Just my $.02 worth, but I think Mike's concerns area a bit on the
> extreme
> > > side. I for one would not drive a TJ on the highway with the sway bar
> > > disconnected, simply because they're so damn squirrely. However, if you
> got
> > > in a bad scrape it's highly unlikely the investigators would even notice
> it
> > > was unhooked.
> > >
> > > An issue with TJs that's been a concern since the beginning is that the
> rear
> > > axle can tend to "steer" the front when off road. As a result, Currie
> > > developed their "Anti-Rock" sway bar, which has far less roll
> resistance,
> > > but enough to maintain proper transfer weight front to the rear when the
> > > suspension's bound up. It's been effective enough that I'm now starting
> to
> > > see them fitted to SOA as well as coil sprung rigs.
climbing sand pits or ravine walls.
The leaf springs are structurally more sound and they prevent the run
away wheel hop that the TJ's get when climbing.
As soon as the TJ's wheels hop airborne, they start spinning and dig
holes really fast.
Some TJ's with lockers don't do too bad trying to follow a CJ, but then
lockers are crap on the roads around here in the winter, so they are
more for 'trailer queens'.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
SB wrote:
>
> Did that guy yank the rear coils and put in leafs? but left the coils in
> front?
>
> Looks cool....what are the driving differences having that?
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:4089D756.6AE11B4A@***.net...
> > Then of course you would be running leaf springs:
> > http://www.4x4wire.com/jeep/tech/susp/tjleafsprings/
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Jerry McG wrote:
> > >
> > > Just my $.02 worth, but I think Mike's concerns area a bit on the
> extreme
> > > side. I for one would not drive a TJ on the highway with the sway bar
> > > disconnected, simply because they're so damn squirrely. However, if you
> got
> > > in a bad scrape it's highly unlikely the investigators would even notice
> it
> > > was unhooked.
> > >
> > > An issue with TJs that's been a concern since the beginning is that the
> rear
> > > axle can tend to "steer" the front when off road. As a result, Currie
> > > developed their "Anti-Rock" sway bar, which has far less roll
> resistance,
> > > but enough to maintain proper transfer weight front to the rear when the
> > > suspension's bound up. It's been effective enough that I'm now starting
> to
> > > see them fitted to SOA as well as coil sprung rigs.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: quick question sway bar links
The TJ loses that cushy ride for offroad axle control.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
SB wrote:
>
> Did that guy yank the rear coils and put in leafs? but left the coils in
> front?
>
> Looks cool....what are the driving differences having that?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
SB wrote:
>
> Did that guy yank the rear coils and put in leafs? but left the coils in
> front?
>
> Looks cool....what are the driving differences having that?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: quick question sway bar links
The TJ loses that cushy ride for offroad axle control.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
SB wrote:
>
> Did that guy yank the rear coils and put in leafs? but left the coils in
> front?
>
> Looks cool....what are the driving differences having that?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
SB wrote:
>
> Did that guy yank the rear coils and put in leafs? but left the coils in
> front?
>
> Looks cool....what are the driving differences having that?
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: quick question sway bar links
The TJ loses that cushy ride for offroad axle control.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
SB wrote:
>
> Did that guy yank the rear coils and put in leafs? but left the coils in
> front?
>
> Looks cool....what are the driving differences having that?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
SB wrote:
>
> Did that guy yank the rear coils and put in leafs? but left the coils in
> front?
>
> Looks cool....what are the driving differences having that?