Questions on Rubicon Express lift and control arms
Guest
Posts: n/a
> I think he means centering the axle front-to-rear, not side-to-side which
> you get from the adjustable track bar.
Gotcha. However as the suspension cycles the arc will change and the wheel
will constantly be off-center. Long arm kits have a longer arc and aren't as
suseptible, but then you have long arms that get hit with rocks and stuff.
>
> My $.02: I agree with Paul, you only need them if you are very particular
> in centering the axles in the wheel wells, otherwise, it's one more thing
> that will wear out...and they will wear out.
Agreed.
I believe
> RE's non adjustables are longer than stock, so that in itself will help
> with centering. I don't have them and do not need them.
Correct.
>
> tw
>
> --
> __________________________________________________ ___________________
> 2003 TJ Rubicon * 2001 XJ Sport * 1971 Bill Stroppe Baja Bronco
>
> "There is a very fine line between 'hobby' and 'mental illness'."
>
> Pronunciation: 'jEp Function: noun Date: 1940
>
> Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
> A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80" wheelbase, 1/4-ton
> capacity and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in World War II.
> __________________________________________________ ___________________
Guest
Posts: n/a
> I think he means centering the axle front-to-rear, not side-to-side which
> you get from the adjustable track bar.
Gotcha. However as the suspension cycles the arc will change and the wheel
will constantly be off-center. Long arm kits have a longer arc and aren't as
suseptible, but then you have long arms that get hit with rocks and stuff.
>
> My $.02: I agree with Paul, you only need them if you are very particular
> in centering the axles in the wheel wells, otherwise, it's one more thing
> that will wear out...and they will wear out.
Agreed.
I believe
> RE's non adjustables are longer than stock, so that in itself will help
> with centering. I don't have them and do not need them.
Correct.
>
> tw
>
> --
> __________________________________________________ ___________________
> 2003 TJ Rubicon * 2001 XJ Sport * 1971 Bill Stroppe Baja Bronco
>
> "There is a very fine line between 'hobby' and 'mental illness'."
>
> Pronunciation: 'jEp Function: noun Date: 1940
>
> Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
> A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80" wheelbase, 1/4-ton
> capacity and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in World War II.
> __________________________________________________ ___________________
Guest
Posts: n/a
Thank you Gents! As always great information. Just placed my order
with Red rock.
Was going to just run 33x12.5. Was looking at wheels now. Seems
everynoe has a different answer for backspacing. I was looking at
running 4" backspace. Would I be able to squeeze in further with say a
4.5"? I want to get the rubber as far under the fenders as possible
but I do not want steering washers or any rubbing. Thanks again!
with Red rock.
Was going to just run 33x12.5. Was looking at wheels now. Seems
everynoe has a different answer for backspacing. I was looking at
running 4" backspace. Would I be able to squeeze in further with say a
4.5"? I want to get the rubber as far under the fenders as possible
but I do not want steering washers or any rubbing. Thanks again!
Guest
Posts: n/a
Thank you Gents! As always great information. Just placed my order
with Red rock.
Was going to just run 33x12.5. Was looking at wheels now. Seems
everynoe has a different answer for backspacing. I was looking at
running 4" backspace. Would I be able to squeeze in further with say a
4.5"? I want to get the rubber as far under the fenders as possible
but I do not want steering washers or any rubbing. Thanks again!
with Red rock.
Was going to just run 33x12.5. Was looking at wheels now. Seems
everynoe has a different answer for backspacing. I was looking at
running 4" backspace. Would I be able to squeeze in further with say a
4.5"? I want to get the rubber as far under the fenders as possible
but I do not want steering washers or any rubbing. Thanks again!
Guest
Posts: n/a
Thank you Gents! As always great information. Just placed my order
with Red rock.
Was going to just run 33x12.5. Was looking at wheels now. Seems
everynoe has a different answer for backspacing. I was looking at
running 4" backspace. Would I be able to squeeze in further with say a
4.5"? I want to get the rubber as far under the fenders as possible
but I do not want steering washers or any rubbing. Thanks again!
with Red rock.
Was going to just run 33x12.5. Was looking at wheels now. Seems
everynoe has a different answer for backspacing. I was looking at
running 4" backspace. Would I be able to squeeze in further with say a
4.5"? I want to get the rubber as far under the fenders as possible
but I do not want steering washers or any rubbing. Thanks again!
Guest
Posts: n/a
in article Tjumh.1915$PN2.376@trnddc07, twaldron at twaldron@OBVIOUSspam.com
wrote on 1/2/07 8:51 AM:
> I think he means centering the axle front-to-rear, not side-to-side
> which you get from the adjustable track bar.
Yes I did. Sorry. Thanks tw
Paul
wrote on 1/2/07 8:51 AM:
> I think he means centering the axle front-to-rear, not side-to-side
> which you get from the adjustable track bar.
Yes I did. Sorry. Thanks tw
Paul
Guest
Posts: n/a
in article Tjumh.1915$PN2.376@trnddc07, twaldron at twaldron@OBVIOUSspam.com
wrote on 1/2/07 8:51 AM:
> I think he means centering the axle front-to-rear, not side-to-side
> which you get from the adjustable track bar.
Yes I did. Sorry. Thanks tw
Paul
wrote on 1/2/07 8:51 AM:
> I think he means centering the axle front-to-rear, not side-to-side
> which you get from the adjustable track bar.
Yes I did. Sorry. Thanks tw
Paul
Guest
Posts: n/a
in article Tjumh.1915$PN2.376@trnddc07, twaldron at twaldron@OBVIOUSspam.com
wrote on 1/2/07 8:51 AM:
> I think he means centering the axle front-to-rear, not side-to-side
> which you get from the adjustable track bar.
Yes I did. Sorry. Thanks tw
Paul
wrote on 1/2/07 8:51 AM:
> I think he means centering the axle front-to-rear, not side-to-side
> which you get from the adjustable track bar.
Yes I did. Sorry. Thanks tw
Paul
Guest
Posts: n/a
I use to have the teraflex lower control arms but they were a disaster.
First the bushings will go every couple of years, then you need to
unscrew them and clean them and repack the grease. I even broke one
of the teraflex arms. Both ends screw into each other and I guess all
the winter salt and water leaked in and it rusted. Then the ends
seized so they would not rotate. I ended up taking a grinder and
cutting the remaining 3 off.
I now have the rubicon express ones (non adjustable) and really like
them, you can replace all the parts, as they are sold in kits.
Disclaimer - this happened to me and could have been a result of my
driving, offroading and maintance, I am in no way stating any opinion
on Teraflex lower control arms only that mine did not last and were a
PIA to maintain.
nawt2smart wrote:
> I'm going to purchase the RE7000 lift for my TJ (4.5"). I have a
> question on the lower control arms. Should I purchase the fixed lower
> control arms or go with adjustable? Teraflex has lower adjustables and
> was wondering why Rubicon doesn't offer this standard? Are the
> adjustable lowers really needed?
>
> Who has the best prices online for these kits? Cheapest I have seen is
> red rock 4x4.
>
> Thank you! Happy new year!
First the bushings will go every couple of years, then you need to
unscrew them and clean them and repack the grease. I even broke one
of the teraflex arms. Both ends screw into each other and I guess all
the winter salt and water leaked in and it rusted. Then the ends
seized so they would not rotate. I ended up taking a grinder and
cutting the remaining 3 off.
I now have the rubicon express ones (non adjustable) and really like
them, you can replace all the parts, as they are sold in kits.
Disclaimer - this happened to me and could have been a result of my
driving, offroading and maintance, I am in no way stating any opinion
on Teraflex lower control arms only that mine did not last and were a
PIA to maintain.
nawt2smart wrote:
> I'm going to purchase the RE7000 lift for my TJ (4.5"). I have a
> question on the lower control arms. Should I purchase the fixed lower
> control arms or go with adjustable? Teraflex has lower adjustables and
> was wondering why Rubicon doesn't offer this standard? Are the
> adjustable lowers really needed?
>
> Who has the best prices online for these kits? Cheapest I have seen is
> red rock 4x4.
>
> Thank you! Happy new year!
Guest
Posts: n/a
I use to have the teraflex lower control arms but they were a disaster.
First the bushings will go every couple of years, then you need to
unscrew them and clean them and repack the grease. I even broke one
of the teraflex arms. Both ends screw into each other and I guess all
the winter salt and water leaked in and it rusted. Then the ends
seized so they would not rotate. I ended up taking a grinder and
cutting the remaining 3 off.
I now have the rubicon express ones (non adjustable) and really like
them, you can replace all the parts, as they are sold in kits.
Disclaimer - this happened to me and could have been a result of my
driving, offroading and maintance, I am in no way stating any opinion
on Teraflex lower control arms only that mine did not last and were a
PIA to maintain.
nawt2smart wrote:
> I'm going to purchase the RE7000 lift for my TJ (4.5"). I have a
> question on the lower control arms. Should I purchase the fixed lower
> control arms or go with adjustable? Teraflex has lower adjustables and
> was wondering why Rubicon doesn't offer this standard? Are the
> adjustable lowers really needed?
>
> Who has the best prices online for these kits? Cheapest I have seen is
> red rock 4x4.
>
> Thank you! Happy new year!
First the bushings will go every couple of years, then you need to
unscrew them and clean them and repack the grease. I even broke one
of the teraflex arms. Both ends screw into each other and I guess all
the winter salt and water leaked in and it rusted. Then the ends
seized so they would not rotate. I ended up taking a grinder and
cutting the remaining 3 off.
I now have the rubicon express ones (non adjustable) and really like
them, you can replace all the parts, as they are sold in kits.
Disclaimer - this happened to me and could have been a result of my
driving, offroading and maintance, I am in no way stating any opinion
on Teraflex lower control arms only that mine did not last and were a
PIA to maintain.
nawt2smart wrote:
> I'm going to purchase the RE7000 lift for my TJ (4.5"). I have a
> question on the lower control arms. Should I purchase the fixed lower
> control arms or go with adjustable? Teraflex has lower adjustables and
> was wondering why Rubicon doesn't offer this standard? Are the
> adjustable lowers really needed?
>
> Who has the best prices online for these kits? Cheapest I have seen is
> red rock 4x4.
>
> Thank you! Happy new year!


