Pink Kate
#1291
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
Earle Horton wrote:
> "Kate" <Kate@dub.dub.dub.com (please ask)> wrote in message
> news:KRW3g.20990$Kn4.3431@bignews2.bellsouth.net.. .
> ---snippy---
>
>>I didn't ask YOU - so please, on this one thing - butt out.
>>
>
> Kate,
>
> This is a public news group. Your request is out of line. Besides, Nathan
> the self-proclaimed redneck called me a "self-proclaimed intellectual". I
> have to correct the damage to my public character that this has caused. ;^)
>
> Earle
Don't worry about your rep, Earle, we never thought you were an
intellectual. Besides, Kate, the last time Earle butted out of anything,
he was breach. ;)
tw
__________________________________________________ ___________________
2003 TJ Rubicon * 2001 XJ Sport * 1971 Bill Stroppe Baja Bronco
"There is a very fine line between 'hobby' and 'mental illness'."
Pronunciation: 'jEp Function: noun Date: 1940
Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80" wheelbase, 1/4-ton
capacity and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in World War II.
__________________________________________________ ___________________
> "Kate" <Kate@dub.dub.dub.com (please ask)> wrote in message
> news:KRW3g.20990$Kn4.3431@bignews2.bellsouth.net.. .
> ---snippy---
>
>>I didn't ask YOU - so please, on this one thing - butt out.
>>
>
> Kate,
>
> This is a public news group. Your request is out of line. Besides, Nathan
> the self-proclaimed redneck called me a "self-proclaimed intellectual". I
> have to correct the damage to my public character that this has caused. ;^)
>
> Earle
Don't worry about your rep, Earle, we never thought you were an
intellectual. Besides, Kate, the last time Earle butted out of anything,
he was breach. ;)
tw
__________________________________________________ ___________________
2003 TJ Rubicon * 2001 XJ Sport * 1971 Bill Stroppe Baja Bronco
"There is a very fine line between 'hobby' and 'mental illness'."
Pronunciation: 'jEp Function: noun Date: 1940
Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80" wheelbase, 1/4-ton
capacity and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in World War II.
__________________________________________________ ___________________
#1292
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
Earle Horton wrote:
> "Kate" <Kate@dub.dub.dub.com (please ask)> wrote in message
> news:KRW3g.20990$Kn4.3431@bignews2.bellsouth.net.. .
> ---snippy---
>
>>I didn't ask YOU - so please, on this one thing - butt out.
>>
>
> Kate,
>
> This is a public news group. Your request is out of line. Besides, Nathan
> the self-proclaimed redneck called me a "self-proclaimed intellectual". I
> have to correct the damage to my public character that this has caused. ;^)
>
> Earle
Don't worry about your rep, Earle, we never thought you were an
intellectual. Besides, Kate, the last time Earle butted out of anything,
he was breach. ;)
tw
__________________________________________________ ___________________
2003 TJ Rubicon * 2001 XJ Sport * 1971 Bill Stroppe Baja Bronco
"There is a very fine line between 'hobby' and 'mental illness'."
Pronunciation: 'jEp Function: noun Date: 1940
Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80" wheelbase, 1/4-ton
capacity and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in World War II.
__________________________________________________ ___________________
> "Kate" <Kate@dub.dub.dub.com (please ask)> wrote in message
> news:KRW3g.20990$Kn4.3431@bignews2.bellsouth.net.. .
> ---snippy---
>
>>I didn't ask YOU - so please, on this one thing - butt out.
>>
>
> Kate,
>
> This is a public news group. Your request is out of line. Besides, Nathan
> the self-proclaimed redneck called me a "self-proclaimed intellectual". I
> have to correct the damage to my public character that this has caused. ;^)
>
> Earle
Don't worry about your rep, Earle, we never thought you were an
intellectual. Besides, Kate, the last time Earle butted out of anything,
he was breach. ;)
tw
__________________________________________________ ___________________
2003 TJ Rubicon * 2001 XJ Sport * 1971 Bill Stroppe Baja Bronco
"There is a very fine line between 'hobby' and 'mental illness'."
Pronunciation: 'jEp Function: noun Date: 1940
Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80" wheelbase, 1/4-ton
capacity and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in World War II.
__________________________________________________ ___________________
#1293
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
"Kate" <Kate@dub.dub.dub.com (please ask)> wrote in message
news:KRW3g.20990$Kn4.3431@bignews2.bellsouth.net.. .
---snippy---
>
> I didn't ask YOU - so please, on this one thing - butt out.
>
Kate,
This is a public news group. Your request is out of line. Besides, Nathan
the self-proclaimed redneck called me a "self-proclaimed intellectual". I
have to correct the damage to my public character that this has caused. ;^)
Earle
news:KRW3g.20990$Kn4.3431@bignews2.bellsouth.net.. .
---snippy---
>
> I didn't ask YOU - so please, on this one thing - butt out.
>
Kate,
This is a public news group. Your request is out of line. Besides, Nathan
the self-proclaimed redneck called me a "self-proclaimed intellectual". I
have to correct the damage to my public character that this has caused. ;^)
Earle
#1294
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
"Kate" <Kate@dub.dub.dub.com (please ask)> wrote in message
news:KRW3g.20990$Kn4.3431@bignews2.bellsouth.net.. .
---snippy---
>
> I didn't ask YOU - so please, on this one thing - butt out.
>
Kate,
This is a public news group. Your request is out of line. Besides, Nathan
the self-proclaimed redneck called me a "self-proclaimed intellectual". I
have to correct the damage to my public character that this has caused. ;^)
Earle
news:KRW3g.20990$Kn4.3431@bignews2.bellsouth.net.. .
---snippy---
>
> I didn't ask YOU - so please, on this one thing - butt out.
>
Kate,
This is a public news group. Your request is out of line. Besides, Nathan
the self-proclaimed redneck called me a "self-proclaimed intellectual". I
have to correct the damage to my public character that this has caused. ;^)
Earle
#1295
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack
"Kate" <Kate@dub.dub.dub.com (please ask)> wrote in message
news:KRW3g.20990$Kn4.3431@bignews2.bellsouth.net.. .
---snippy---
>
> I didn't ask YOU - so please, on this one thing - butt out.
>
Kate,
This is a public news group. Your request is out of line. Besides, Nathan
the self-proclaimed redneck called me a "self-proclaimed intellectual". I
have to correct the damage to my public character that this has caused. ;^)
Earle
news:KRW3g.20990$Kn4.3431@bignews2.bellsouth.net.. .
---snippy---
>
> I didn't ask YOU - so please, on this one thing - butt out.
>
Kate,
This is a public news group. Your request is out of line. Besides, Nathan
the self-proclaimed redneck called me a "self-proclaimed intellectual". I
have to correct the damage to my public character that this has caused. ;^)
Earle
#1296
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
No Kate, I wasn't there. But as I argued before, this is going to make me
more objective, less whacked-out if you will, than people who were there.
That is why wars are made by politicians, not soldiers. The politician sits
in his nice safe cherry wood and leather office in Washington, DC, and signs
papers, of the type, that sent tens of thousands of my generation to their
deaths, for no reason. Lot of kids said then, "This politician is full of
crap. I am not going."
In this case, who are you going to trust? You have the choice, of guys who
had the wool pulled over their eyes, or guys who didn't. If you really want
to know, you will consult both. That is why I have read a number of books,
written by people, who were there, as well as by others, who weren't. Now
by Nathan's assessment, reading books is not a valid way to acquire
knowledge. But by the same argument, reading his posts isn't either.
Earle
"Kate" <Kate@dub.dub.dub.com (please ask)> wrote in message
news:NNW3g.20980$Kn4.19231@bignews2.bellsouth.net. ..
>
> "Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote
>
> *snipped*
>
> I am just trying to teach Nathan how to argue
> : properly.
> :
> : Earle
>
> By dodging the question????
> So.. were you THERE?
>
> :
> :
>
>
more objective, less whacked-out if you will, than people who were there.
That is why wars are made by politicians, not soldiers. The politician sits
in his nice safe cherry wood and leather office in Washington, DC, and signs
papers, of the type, that sent tens of thousands of my generation to their
deaths, for no reason. Lot of kids said then, "This politician is full of
crap. I am not going."
In this case, who are you going to trust? You have the choice, of guys who
had the wool pulled over their eyes, or guys who didn't. If you really want
to know, you will consult both. That is why I have read a number of books,
written by people, who were there, as well as by others, who weren't. Now
by Nathan's assessment, reading books is not a valid way to acquire
knowledge. But by the same argument, reading his posts isn't either.
Earle
"Kate" <Kate@dub.dub.dub.com (please ask)> wrote in message
news:NNW3g.20980$Kn4.19231@bignews2.bellsouth.net. ..
>
> "Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote
>
> *snipped*
>
> I am just trying to teach Nathan how to argue
> : properly.
> :
> : Earle
>
> By dodging the question????
> So.. were you THERE?
>
> :
> :
>
>
#1297
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
No Kate, I wasn't there. But as I argued before, this is going to make me
more objective, less whacked-out if you will, than people who were there.
That is why wars are made by politicians, not soldiers. The politician sits
in his nice safe cherry wood and leather office in Washington, DC, and signs
papers, of the type, that sent tens of thousands of my generation to their
deaths, for no reason. Lot of kids said then, "This politician is full of
crap. I am not going."
In this case, who are you going to trust? You have the choice, of guys who
had the wool pulled over their eyes, or guys who didn't. If you really want
to know, you will consult both. That is why I have read a number of books,
written by people, who were there, as well as by others, who weren't. Now
by Nathan's assessment, reading books is not a valid way to acquire
knowledge. But by the same argument, reading his posts isn't either.
Earle
"Kate" <Kate@dub.dub.dub.com (please ask)> wrote in message
news:NNW3g.20980$Kn4.19231@bignews2.bellsouth.net. ..
>
> "Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote
>
> *snipped*
>
> I am just trying to teach Nathan how to argue
> : properly.
> :
> : Earle
>
> By dodging the question????
> So.. were you THERE?
>
> :
> :
>
>
more objective, less whacked-out if you will, than people who were there.
That is why wars are made by politicians, not soldiers. The politician sits
in his nice safe cherry wood and leather office in Washington, DC, and signs
papers, of the type, that sent tens of thousands of my generation to their
deaths, for no reason. Lot of kids said then, "This politician is full of
crap. I am not going."
In this case, who are you going to trust? You have the choice, of guys who
had the wool pulled over their eyes, or guys who didn't. If you really want
to know, you will consult both. That is why I have read a number of books,
written by people, who were there, as well as by others, who weren't. Now
by Nathan's assessment, reading books is not a valid way to acquire
knowledge. But by the same argument, reading his posts isn't either.
Earle
"Kate" <Kate@dub.dub.dub.com (please ask)> wrote in message
news:NNW3g.20980$Kn4.19231@bignews2.bellsouth.net. ..
>
> "Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote
>
> *snipped*
>
> I am just trying to teach Nathan how to argue
> : properly.
> :
> : Earle
>
> By dodging the question????
> So.. were you THERE?
>
> :
> :
>
>
#1298
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Off Topic: the reported bear attack
No Kate, I wasn't there. But as I argued before, this is going to make me
more objective, less whacked-out if you will, than people who were there.
That is why wars are made by politicians, not soldiers. The politician sits
in his nice safe cherry wood and leather office in Washington, DC, and signs
papers, of the type, that sent tens of thousands of my generation to their
deaths, for no reason. Lot of kids said then, "This politician is full of
crap. I am not going."
In this case, who are you going to trust? You have the choice, of guys who
had the wool pulled over their eyes, or guys who didn't. If you really want
to know, you will consult both. That is why I have read a number of books,
written by people, who were there, as well as by others, who weren't. Now
by Nathan's assessment, reading books is not a valid way to acquire
knowledge. But by the same argument, reading his posts isn't either.
Earle
"Kate" <Kate@dub.dub.dub.com (please ask)> wrote in message
news:NNW3g.20980$Kn4.19231@bignews2.bellsouth.net. ..
>
> "Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote
>
> *snipped*
>
> I am just trying to teach Nathan how to argue
> : properly.
> :
> : Earle
>
> By dodging the question????
> So.. were you THERE?
>
> :
> :
>
>
more objective, less whacked-out if you will, than people who were there.
That is why wars are made by politicians, not soldiers. The politician sits
in his nice safe cherry wood and leather office in Washington, DC, and signs
papers, of the type, that sent tens of thousands of my generation to their
deaths, for no reason. Lot of kids said then, "This politician is full of
crap. I am not going."
In this case, who are you going to trust? You have the choice, of guys who
had the wool pulled over their eyes, or guys who didn't. If you really want
to know, you will consult both. That is why I have read a number of books,
written by people, who were there, as well as by others, who weren't. Now
by Nathan's assessment, reading books is not a valid way to acquire
knowledge. But by the same argument, reading his posts isn't either.
Earle
"Kate" <Kate@dub.dub.dub.com (please ask)> wrote in message
news:NNW3g.20980$Kn4.19231@bignews2.bellsouth.net. ..
>
> "Earle Horton" <NurseBustersNoSpam@msn.com> wrote
>
> *snipped*
>
> I am just trying to teach Nathan how to argue
> : properly.
> :
> : Earle
>
> By dodging the question????
> So.. were you THERE?
>
> :
> :
>
>
#1299
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack now very OT
"Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote
> there is no confusion. a baby in its mothers womb is still a child. its
> pretty undeniable once a heartbeat exists.
>
Nope! You are thoroughly confused and should seek instruction in vocabulary, or
even mental counseling. The parasite in a woman's womb is an embryo then a
fetus, not a baby and certainly not a child. In fact even a baby is not a
child. I lacks the nerve system needed to control its bowels and has the throat
of an animal, allowing it to suckle but not speak.
Heartbeat? Even worms have heartbeat. Does that mean a tapeworm is a child?
> there is no confusion. a baby in its mothers womb is still a child. its
> pretty undeniable once a heartbeat exists.
>
Nope! You are thoroughly confused and should seek instruction in vocabulary, or
even mental counseling. The parasite in a woman's womb is an embryo then a
fetus, not a baby and certainly not a child. In fact even a baby is not a
child. I lacks the nerve system needed to control its bowels and has the throat
of an animal, allowing it to suckle but not speak.
Heartbeat? Even worms have heartbeat. Does that mean a tapeworm is a child?
#1300
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: the reported bear attack now very OT
"Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote
> there is no confusion. a baby in its mothers womb is still a child. its
> pretty undeniable once a heartbeat exists.
>
Nope! You are thoroughly confused and should seek instruction in vocabulary, or
even mental counseling. The parasite in a woman's womb is an embryo then a
fetus, not a baby and certainly not a child. In fact even a baby is not a
child. I lacks the nerve system needed to control its bowels and has the throat
of an animal, allowing it to suckle but not speak.
Heartbeat? Even worms have heartbeat. Does that mean a tapeworm is a child?
> there is no confusion. a baby in its mothers womb is still a child. its
> pretty undeniable once a heartbeat exists.
>
Nope! You are thoroughly confused and should seek instruction in vocabulary, or
even mental counseling. The parasite in a woman's womb is an embryo then a
fetus, not a baby and certainly not a child. In fact even a baby is not a
child. I lacks the nerve system needed to control its bowels and has the throat
of an animal, allowing it to suckle but not speak.
Heartbeat? Even worms have heartbeat. Does that mean a tapeworm is a child?