Oxygen sensor question
09-06-2006, 10:18 AM
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Oxygen sensor question
the cheaper one will not have the plug on it.. you will have to splice and
connect the wires together.
--
"Jeffrey DeWitt" <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:HbrLg.6125$Md4.5915@tornado.southeast.rr.com. ..
> The check engine light on my 96 Cherokee is on, and the code is calling
> out the rear (after converter) oxygen sensor.
>
> Auto Zone lists two sensors, both made by Bosch, one "O.E." type for $120
> and a universal type for $55.
>
> Money IS an object here, is there any huge hassle in using the cheaper
> universal sensor? Is there any overriding reason that I should spend the
> extra money for the O.E. sensor?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jeff DeWitt
connect the wires together.
--
"Jeffrey DeWitt" <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:HbrLg.6125$Md4.5915@tornado.southeast.rr.com. ..
> The check engine light on my 96 Cherokee is on, and the code is calling
> out the rear (after converter) oxygen sensor.
>
> Auto Zone lists two sensors, both made by Bosch, one "O.E." type for $120
> and a universal type for $55.
>
> Money IS an object here, is there any huge hassle in using the cheaper
> universal sensor? Is there any overriding reason that I should spend the
> extra money for the O.E. sensor?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jeff DeWitt
09-06-2006, 10:18 AM
#12
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Oxygen sensor question
the cheaper one will not have the plug on it.. you will have to splice and
connect the wires together.
--
"Jeffrey DeWitt" <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:HbrLg.6125$Md4.5915@tornado.southeast.rr.com. ..
> The check engine light on my 96 Cherokee is on, and the code is calling
> out the rear (after converter) oxygen sensor.
>
> Auto Zone lists two sensors, both made by Bosch, one "O.E." type for $120
> and a universal type for $55.
>
> Money IS an object here, is there any huge hassle in using the cheaper
> universal sensor? Is there any overriding reason that I should spend the
> extra money for the O.E. sensor?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jeff DeWitt
connect the wires together.
--
"Jeffrey DeWitt" <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:HbrLg.6125$Md4.5915@tornado.southeast.rr.com. ..
> The check engine light on my 96 Cherokee is on, and the code is calling
> out the rear (after converter) oxygen sensor.
>
> Auto Zone lists two sensors, both made by Bosch, one "O.E." type for $120
> and a universal type for $55.
>
> Money IS an object here, is there any huge hassle in using the cheaper
> universal sensor? Is there any overriding reason that I should spend the
> extra money for the O.E. sensor?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jeff DeWitt
09-06-2006, 10:18 AM
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Oxygen sensor question
the cheaper one will not have the plug on it.. you will have to splice and
connect the wires together.
--
"Jeffrey DeWitt" <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:HbrLg.6125$Md4.5915@tornado.southeast.rr.com. ..
> The check engine light on my 96 Cherokee is on, and the code is calling
> out the rear (after converter) oxygen sensor.
>
> Auto Zone lists two sensors, both made by Bosch, one "O.E." type for $120
> and a universal type for $55.
>
> Money IS an object here, is there any huge hassle in using the cheaper
> universal sensor? Is there any overriding reason that I should spend the
> extra money for the O.E. sensor?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jeff DeWitt
connect the wires together.
--
"Jeffrey DeWitt" <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:HbrLg.6125$Md4.5915@tornado.southeast.rr.com. ..
> The check engine light on my 96 Cherokee is on, and the code is calling
> out the rear (after converter) oxygen sensor.
>
> Auto Zone lists two sensors, both made by Bosch, one "O.E." type for $120
> and a universal type for $55.
>
> Money IS an object here, is there any huge hassle in using the cheaper
> universal sensor? Is there any overriding reason that I should spend the
> extra money for the O.E. sensor?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jeff DeWitt
09-06-2006, 07:51 PM
#14
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Oxygen sensor question
Hi Jeff,
There are much cheaper original manufacture replacements. But a word
of warning if you chose one that must be adapted, do it per instructions
as any change in the length of their wires throws something off! like
they breath through the wire mech. Examples:
http://www.----------.com/95YJo2sensor.jpg
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Jeffrey DeWitt wrote:
>
> The check engine light on my 96 Cherokee is on, and the code is calling
> out the rear (after converter) oxygen sensor.
>
> Auto Zone lists two sensors, both made by Bosch, one "O.E." type for
> $120 and a universal type for $55.
>
> Money IS an object here, is there any huge hassle in using the cheaper
> universal sensor? Is there any overriding reason that I should spend
> the extra money for the O.E. sensor?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jeff DeWitt
There are much cheaper original manufacture replacements. But a word
of warning if you chose one that must be adapted, do it per instructions
as any change in the length of their wires throws something off! like
they breath through the wire mech. Examples:
http://www.----------.com/95YJo2sensor.jpg
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Jeffrey DeWitt wrote:
>
> The check engine light on my 96 Cherokee is on, and the code is calling
> out the rear (after converter) oxygen sensor.
>
> Auto Zone lists two sensors, both made by Bosch, one "O.E." type for
> $120 and a universal type for $55.
>
> Money IS an object here, is there any huge hassle in using the cheaper
> universal sensor? Is there any overriding reason that I should spend
> the extra money for the O.E. sensor?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jeff DeWitt
09-06-2006, 07:51 PM
#15
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Oxygen sensor question
Hi Jeff,
There are much cheaper original manufacture replacements. But a word
of warning if you chose one that must be adapted, do it per instructions
as any change in the length of their wires throws something off! like
they breath through the wire mech. Examples:
http://www.----------.com/95YJo2sensor.jpg
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Jeffrey DeWitt wrote:
>
> The check engine light on my 96 Cherokee is on, and the code is calling
> out the rear (after converter) oxygen sensor.
>
> Auto Zone lists two sensors, both made by Bosch, one "O.E." type for
> $120 and a universal type for $55.
>
> Money IS an object here, is there any huge hassle in using the cheaper
> universal sensor? Is there any overriding reason that I should spend
> the extra money for the O.E. sensor?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jeff DeWitt
There are much cheaper original manufacture replacements. But a word
of warning if you chose one that must be adapted, do it per instructions
as any change in the length of their wires throws something off! like
they breath through the wire mech. Examples:
http://www.----------.com/95YJo2sensor.jpg
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Jeffrey DeWitt wrote:
>
> The check engine light on my 96 Cherokee is on, and the code is calling
> out the rear (after converter) oxygen sensor.
>
> Auto Zone lists two sensors, both made by Bosch, one "O.E." type for
> $120 and a universal type for $55.
>
> Money IS an object here, is there any huge hassle in using the cheaper
> universal sensor? Is there any overriding reason that I should spend
> the extra money for the O.E. sensor?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jeff DeWitt
09-06-2006, 07:51 PM
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Oxygen sensor question
Hi Jeff,
There are much cheaper original manufacture replacements. But a word
of warning if you chose one that must be adapted, do it per instructions
as any change in the length of their wires throws something off! like
they breath through the wire mech. Examples:
http://www.----------.com/95YJo2sensor.jpg
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Jeffrey DeWitt wrote:
>
> The check engine light on my 96 Cherokee is on, and the code is calling
> out the rear (after converter) oxygen sensor.
>
> Auto Zone lists two sensors, both made by Bosch, one "O.E." type for
> $120 and a universal type for $55.
>
> Money IS an object here, is there any huge hassle in using the cheaper
> universal sensor? Is there any overriding reason that I should spend
> the extra money for the O.E. sensor?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jeff DeWitt
There are much cheaper original manufacture replacements. But a word
of warning if you chose one that must be adapted, do it per instructions
as any change in the length of their wires throws something off! like
they breath through the wire mech. Examples:
http://www.----------.com/95YJo2sensor.jpg
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------
Jeffrey DeWitt wrote:
>
> The check engine light on my 96 Cherokee is on, and the code is calling
> out the rear (after converter) oxygen sensor.
>
> Auto Zone lists two sensors, both made by Bosch, one "O.E." type for
> $120 and a universal type for $55.
>
> Money IS an object here, is there any huge hassle in using the cheaper
> universal sensor? Is there any overriding reason that I should spend
> the extra money for the O.E. sensor?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jeff DeWitt
09-07-2006, 01:42 AM
#17
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Oxygen sensor question
In message <cxrLg.9989$JR5.6771@dukeread11>, "DougW" wrote:
>Jeffrey DeWitt wrote:
>> The check engine light on my 96 Cherokee is on, and the code is
>> calling out the rear (after converter) oxygen sensor.
>>
>> Auto Zone lists two sensors, both made by Bosch, one "O.E." type for
>> $120 and a universal type for $55.
>>
>> Money IS an object here, is there any huge hassle in using the cheaper
>> universal sensor? Is there any overriding reason that I should spend
>> the extra money for the O.E. sensor?
>
>1996 XJ? I don't show a rear O2 sensor for that model.
>and the OEM forward O2 sensor is only $63 from chryslerpartsdirect.com
>The rear sensor started in 1997 and lists as $76.13 OEM
You need a new book. OBDII and cat monitoring started in '96.
>
>The only real difference in universal vs OEM is having to connectorize it.
>Sometimes that can be a real pain in the ***.
I see tons of failed aftermarket Bosch O2 sensors, and the universal ones are
the worst.
>
>You can just put up with the CE light as all the rear
>O2 sensor does is check to see if the cat is working properly.
>Only the forward O2 sensor controls engine mixture.
Not entirely true.
>
>One thing to try first is to get under, disconnect the harness
>from the sensor then spray the connector with some contact cleaner.
>Then put it back together. Don't spray the sensor.
>Jeffrey DeWitt wrote:
>> The check engine light on my 96 Cherokee is on, and the code is
>> calling out the rear (after converter) oxygen sensor.
>>
>> Auto Zone lists two sensors, both made by Bosch, one "O.E." type for
>> $120 and a universal type for $55.
>>
>> Money IS an object here, is there any huge hassle in using the cheaper
>> universal sensor? Is there any overriding reason that I should spend
>> the extra money for the O.E. sensor?
>
>1996 XJ? I don't show a rear O2 sensor for that model.
>and the OEM forward O2 sensor is only $63 from chryslerpartsdirect.com
>The rear sensor started in 1997 and lists as $76.13 OEM
You need a new book. OBDII and cat monitoring started in '96.
>
>The only real difference in universal vs OEM is having to connectorize it.
>Sometimes that can be a real pain in the ***.
I see tons of failed aftermarket Bosch O2 sensors, and the universal ones are
the worst.
>
>You can just put up with the CE light as all the rear
>O2 sensor does is check to see if the cat is working properly.
>Only the forward O2 sensor controls engine mixture.
Not entirely true.
>
>One thing to try first is to get under, disconnect the harness
>from the sensor then spray the connector with some contact cleaner.
>Then put it back together. Don't spray the sensor.
09-07-2006, 01:42 AM
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Oxygen sensor question
In message <cxrLg.9989$JR5.6771@dukeread11>, "DougW" wrote:
>Jeffrey DeWitt wrote:
>> The check engine light on my 96 Cherokee is on, and the code is
>> calling out the rear (after converter) oxygen sensor.
>>
>> Auto Zone lists two sensors, both made by Bosch, one "O.E." type for
>> $120 and a universal type for $55.
>>
>> Money IS an object here, is there any huge hassle in using the cheaper
>> universal sensor? Is there any overriding reason that I should spend
>> the extra money for the O.E. sensor?
>
>1996 XJ? I don't show a rear O2 sensor for that model.
>and the OEM forward O2 sensor is only $63 from chryslerpartsdirect.com
>The rear sensor started in 1997 and lists as $76.13 OEM
You need a new book. OBDII and cat monitoring started in '96.
>
>The only real difference in universal vs OEM is having to connectorize it.
>Sometimes that can be a real pain in the ***.
I see tons of failed aftermarket Bosch O2 sensors, and the universal ones are
the worst.
>
>You can just put up with the CE light as all the rear
>O2 sensor does is check to see if the cat is working properly.
>Only the forward O2 sensor controls engine mixture.
Not entirely true.
>
>One thing to try first is to get under, disconnect the harness
>from the sensor then spray the connector with some contact cleaner.
>Then put it back together. Don't spray the sensor.
>Jeffrey DeWitt wrote:
>> The check engine light on my 96 Cherokee is on, and the code is
>> calling out the rear (after converter) oxygen sensor.
>>
>> Auto Zone lists two sensors, both made by Bosch, one "O.E." type for
>> $120 and a universal type for $55.
>>
>> Money IS an object here, is there any huge hassle in using the cheaper
>> universal sensor? Is there any overriding reason that I should spend
>> the extra money for the O.E. sensor?
>
>1996 XJ? I don't show a rear O2 sensor for that model.
>and the OEM forward O2 sensor is only $63 from chryslerpartsdirect.com
>The rear sensor started in 1997 and lists as $76.13 OEM
You need a new book. OBDII and cat monitoring started in '96.
>
>The only real difference in universal vs OEM is having to connectorize it.
>Sometimes that can be a real pain in the ***.
I see tons of failed aftermarket Bosch O2 sensors, and the universal ones are
the worst.
>
>You can just put up with the CE light as all the rear
>O2 sensor does is check to see if the cat is working properly.
>Only the forward O2 sensor controls engine mixture.
Not entirely true.
>
>One thing to try first is to get under, disconnect the harness
>from the sensor then spray the connector with some contact cleaner.
>Then put it back together. Don't spray the sensor.
09-07-2006, 01:42 AM
#19
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Oxygen sensor question
In message <cxrLg.9989$JR5.6771@dukeread11>, "DougW" wrote:
>Jeffrey DeWitt wrote:
>> The check engine light on my 96 Cherokee is on, and the code is
>> calling out the rear (after converter) oxygen sensor.
>>
>> Auto Zone lists two sensors, both made by Bosch, one "O.E." type for
>> $120 and a universal type for $55.
>>
>> Money IS an object here, is there any huge hassle in using the cheaper
>> universal sensor? Is there any overriding reason that I should spend
>> the extra money for the O.E. sensor?
>
>1996 XJ? I don't show a rear O2 sensor for that model.
>and the OEM forward O2 sensor is only $63 from chryslerpartsdirect.com
>The rear sensor started in 1997 and lists as $76.13 OEM
You need a new book. OBDII and cat monitoring started in '96.
>
>The only real difference in universal vs OEM is having to connectorize it.
>Sometimes that can be a real pain in the ***.
I see tons of failed aftermarket Bosch O2 sensors, and the universal ones are
the worst.
>
>You can just put up with the CE light as all the rear
>O2 sensor does is check to see if the cat is working properly.
>Only the forward O2 sensor controls engine mixture.
Not entirely true.
>
>One thing to try first is to get under, disconnect the harness
>from the sensor then spray the connector with some contact cleaner.
>Then put it back together. Don't spray the sensor.
>Jeffrey DeWitt wrote:
>> The check engine light on my 96 Cherokee is on, and the code is
>> calling out the rear (after converter) oxygen sensor.
>>
>> Auto Zone lists two sensors, both made by Bosch, one "O.E." type for
>> $120 and a universal type for $55.
>>
>> Money IS an object here, is there any huge hassle in using the cheaper
>> universal sensor? Is there any overriding reason that I should spend
>> the extra money for the O.E. sensor?
>
>1996 XJ? I don't show a rear O2 sensor for that model.
>and the OEM forward O2 sensor is only $63 from chryslerpartsdirect.com
>The rear sensor started in 1997 and lists as $76.13 OEM
You need a new book. OBDII and cat monitoring started in '96.
>
>The only real difference in universal vs OEM is having to connectorize it.
>Sometimes that can be a real pain in the ***.
I see tons of failed aftermarket Bosch O2 sensors, and the universal ones are
the worst.
>
>You can just put up with the CE light as all the rear
>O2 sensor does is check to see if the cat is working properly.
>Only the forward O2 sensor controls engine mixture.
Not entirely true.
>
>One thing to try first is to get under, disconnect the harness
>from the sensor then spray the connector with some contact cleaner.
>Then put it back together. Don't spray the sensor.
09-11-2006, 02:54 PM
#20
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Oxygen sensor question
I recommend getting a sensor that is a direct plug-in, NOT a universal one
that has to be spliced.
"Jeffrey DeWitt" <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:HbrLg.6125$Md4.5915@tornado.southeast.rr.com. ..
> The check engine light on my 96 Cherokee is on, and the code is calling
> out the rear (after converter) oxygen sensor.
>
> Auto Zone lists two sensors, both made by Bosch, one "O.E." type for $120
> and a universal type for $55.
>
> Money IS an object here, is there any huge hassle in using the cheaper
> universal sensor? Is there any overriding reason that I should spend the
> extra money for the O.E. sensor?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jeff DeWitt
that has to be spliced.
"Jeffrey DeWitt" <JeffDeWitt@nc.rr.com> wrote in message
news:HbrLg.6125$Md4.5915@tornado.southeast.rr.com. ..
> The check engine light on my 96 Cherokee is on, and the code is calling
> out the rear (after converter) oxygen sensor.
>
> Auto Zone lists two sensors, both made by Bosch, one "O.E." type for $120
> and a universal type for $55.
>
> Money IS an object here, is there any huge hassle in using the cheaper
> universal sensor? Is there any overriding reason that I should spend the
> extra money for the O.E. sensor?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jeff DeWitt