This ought to put a smile on Nathan's face...
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
This ought to put a smile on Nathan's face...
A bit of poetic justice, perhaps?
--
SCO Goes After DaimlerChrysler
By Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols
March 3, 2004
Only hours after The SCO Group Inc. opened a lawsuit against AutoZone Inc. in a
Nevada courtroom, SCO sued DaimlerChrysler AG in a Michigan state court for Unix
contract violations and Linux copyright issues.
Darl McBride, SCO's CEO said on Wednesday that SCO will enforce its legal
contract and copyright rights in the United States and around the world.
According to McBride, DaimlerChrysler is a licensee of Unix System V source code
and the company had refused SCO's request to certify that the source code was
protected so that none of it could have been stolen away into Linux. This
refusal resulted in today's legal action.
McBride said that "SCO had alerted DaimlerChrysler in December of last year that
they needed to certify their code but DaimlerChrysler did not respond." Further,
for SCO the action was simply a matter of "protecting its contract and copyright
rights," he said, adding that DaimlerChrysler was only one of many companies
that SCO demanded Unix source code certification from.
--
Full story at "http://tinyurl.com/2kh92"
--
SCO Goes After DaimlerChrysler
By Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols
March 3, 2004
Only hours after The SCO Group Inc. opened a lawsuit against AutoZone Inc. in a
Nevada courtroom, SCO sued DaimlerChrysler AG in a Michigan state court for Unix
contract violations and Linux copyright issues.
Darl McBride, SCO's CEO said on Wednesday that SCO will enforce its legal
contract and copyright rights in the United States and around the world.
According to McBride, DaimlerChrysler is a licensee of Unix System V source code
and the company had refused SCO's request to certify that the source code was
protected so that none of it could have been stolen away into Linux. This
refusal resulted in today's legal action.
McBride said that "SCO had alerted DaimlerChrysler in December of last year that
they needed to certify their code but DaimlerChrysler did not respond." Further,
for SCO the action was simply a matter of "protecting its contract and copyright
rights," he said, adding that DaimlerChrysler was only one of many companies
that SCO demanded Unix source code certification from.
--
Full story at "http://tinyurl.com/2kh92"
#2
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: This ought to put a smile on Nathan's face...
Too bad that suit has less merit than the one DC brought against Nathan.
In <c2b40g010vv@drn.newsguy.com> tthomas@[REMOVE_TO_REPLY]ogre.net wrote:
> A bit of poetic justice, perhaps?
>
> --
> SCO Goes After DaimlerChrysler
> By Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols
> March 3, 2004
<snip>
> Full story at "http://tinyurl.com/2kh92"
----------------------------------------------------
Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
In <c2b40g010vv@drn.newsguy.com> tthomas@[REMOVE_TO_REPLY]ogre.net wrote:
> A bit of poetic justice, perhaps?
>
> --
> SCO Goes After DaimlerChrysler
> By Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols
> March 3, 2004
<snip>
> Full story at "http://tinyurl.com/2kh92"
----------------------------------------------------
Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
#3
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: This ought to put a smile on Nathan's face...
Too bad that suit has less merit than the one DC brought against Nathan.
In <c2b40g010vv@drn.newsguy.com> tthomas@[REMOVE_TO_REPLY]ogre.net wrote:
> A bit of poetic justice, perhaps?
>
> --
> SCO Goes After DaimlerChrysler
> By Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols
> March 3, 2004
<snip>
> Full story at "http://tinyurl.com/2kh92"
----------------------------------------------------
Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
In <c2b40g010vv@drn.newsguy.com> tthomas@[REMOVE_TO_REPLY]ogre.net wrote:
> A bit of poetic justice, perhaps?
>
> --
> SCO Goes After DaimlerChrysler
> By Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols
> March 3, 2004
<snip>
> Full story at "http://tinyurl.com/2kh92"
----------------------------------------------------
Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
#4
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: This ought to put a smile on Nathan's face...
Too bad that suit has less merit than the one DC brought against Nathan.
In <c2b40g010vv@drn.newsguy.com> tthomas@[REMOVE_TO_REPLY]ogre.net wrote:
> A bit of poetic justice, perhaps?
>
> --
> SCO Goes After DaimlerChrysler
> By Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols
> March 3, 2004
<snip>
> Full story at "http://tinyurl.com/2kh92"
----------------------------------------------------
Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
In <c2b40g010vv@drn.newsguy.com> tthomas@[REMOVE_TO_REPLY]ogre.net wrote:
> A bit of poetic justice, perhaps?
>
> --
> SCO Goes After DaimlerChrysler
> By Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols
> March 3, 2004
<snip>
> Full story at "http://tinyurl.com/2kh92"
----------------------------------------------------
Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
#5
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: This ought to put a smile on Nathan's face...
true Sco has yet to prove thier code is even in 2.4 kernal
"Del Rawlins" <del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org> wrote in message
news:20040305163751204-0900@enews.newsguy.com...
> Too bad that suit has less merit than the one DC brought against Nathan.
>
> In <c2b40g010vv@drn.newsguy.com> tthomas@[REMOVE_TO_REPLY]ogre.net wrote:
> > A bit of poetic justice, perhaps?
> >
> > --
> > SCO Goes After DaimlerChrysler
> > By Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols
> > March 3, 2004
> <snip>
> > Full story at "http://tinyurl.com/2kh92"
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
> Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
> Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
> http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
"Del Rawlins" <del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org> wrote in message
news:20040305163751204-0900@enews.newsguy.com...
> Too bad that suit has less merit than the one DC brought against Nathan.
>
> In <c2b40g010vv@drn.newsguy.com> tthomas@[REMOVE_TO_REPLY]ogre.net wrote:
> > A bit of poetic justice, perhaps?
> >
> > --
> > SCO Goes After DaimlerChrysler
> > By Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols
> > March 3, 2004
> <snip>
> > Full story at "http://tinyurl.com/2kh92"
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
> Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
> Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
> http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
#6
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: This ought to put a smile on Nathan's face...
true Sco has yet to prove thier code is even in 2.4 kernal
"Del Rawlins" <del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org> wrote in message
news:20040305163751204-0900@enews.newsguy.com...
> Too bad that suit has less merit than the one DC brought against Nathan.
>
> In <c2b40g010vv@drn.newsguy.com> tthomas@[REMOVE_TO_REPLY]ogre.net wrote:
> > A bit of poetic justice, perhaps?
> >
> > --
> > SCO Goes After DaimlerChrysler
> > By Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols
> > March 3, 2004
> <snip>
> > Full story at "http://tinyurl.com/2kh92"
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
> Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
> Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
> http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
"Del Rawlins" <del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org> wrote in message
news:20040305163751204-0900@enews.newsguy.com...
> Too bad that suit has less merit than the one DC brought against Nathan.
>
> In <c2b40g010vv@drn.newsguy.com> tthomas@[REMOVE_TO_REPLY]ogre.net wrote:
> > A bit of poetic justice, perhaps?
> >
> > --
> > SCO Goes After DaimlerChrysler
> > By Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols
> > March 3, 2004
> <snip>
> > Full story at "http://tinyurl.com/2kh92"
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
> Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
> Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
> http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
#7
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: This ought to put a smile on Nathan's face...
true Sco has yet to prove thier code is even in 2.4 kernal
"Del Rawlins" <del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org> wrote in message
news:20040305163751204-0900@enews.newsguy.com...
> Too bad that suit has less merit than the one DC brought against Nathan.
>
> In <c2b40g010vv@drn.newsguy.com> tthomas@[REMOVE_TO_REPLY]ogre.net wrote:
> > A bit of poetic justice, perhaps?
> >
> > --
> > SCO Goes After DaimlerChrysler
> > By Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols
> > March 3, 2004
> <snip>
> > Full story at "http://tinyurl.com/2kh92"
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
> Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
> Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
> http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
"Del Rawlins" <del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org> wrote in message
news:20040305163751204-0900@enews.newsguy.com...
> Too bad that suit has less merit than the one DC brought against Nathan.
>
> In <c2b40g010vv@drn.newsguy.com> tthomas@[REMOVE_TO_REPLY]ogre.net wrote:
> > A bit of poetic justice, perhaps?
> >
> > --
> > SCO Goes After DaimlerChrysler
> > By Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols
> > March 3, 2004
> <snip>
> > Full story at "http://tinyurl.com/2kh92"
>
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
> Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
> Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
> http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)