OT: Spyware
05-14-2004, 10:34 PM
#51
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Spyware
In news:inepc.9973$KE6.5968@newsread3.news.atl.earthl ink.net,
Jo from <jo_ratner@NOSPAMyahoo.com> was injured because:
| Yeah Mike... I like messages that don't reference anything...
| they ar ethe way to go!!
|
| Daniel Melameth wrote:
|
|| Mike,
||
|| No offense, but you might want to learn how to thread
|| newsgroup messages... Then you wouldn't have to waste
|| bandwidth and storage space by uselessly quoting people...
Kids....
--
--
Joe Pribe
NC
jpribe 'at' nc.rr.com
jegp 'at' hotmail.com
---- I Love My O|||||||O TJ
Jo from <jo_ratner@NOSPAMyahoo.com> was injured because:
| Yeah Mike... I like messages that don't reference anything...
| they ar ethe way to go!!
|
| Daniel Melameth wrote:
|
|| Mike,
||
|| No offense, but you might want to learn how to thread
|| newsgroup messages... Then you wouldn't have to waste
|| bandwidth and storage space by uselessly quoting people...
Kids....
--
--
Joe Pribe
NC
jpribe 'at' nc.rr.com
jegp 'at' hotmail.com
---- I Love My O|||||||O TJ
05-14-2004, 10:34 PM
#52
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Spyware
In news:inepc.9973$KE6.5968@newsread3.news.atl.earthl ink.net,
Jo from <jo_ratner@NOSPAMyahoo.com> was injured because:
| Yeah Mike... I like messages that don't reference anything...
| they ar ethe way to go!!
|
| Daniel Melameth wrote:
|
|| Mike,
||
|| No offense, but you might want to learn how to thread
|| newsgroup messages... Then you wouldn't have to waste
|| bandwidth and storage space by uselessly quoting people...
Kids....
--
--
Joe Pribe
NC
jpribe 'at' nc.rr.com
jegp 'at' hotmail.com
---- I Love My O|||||||O TJ
Jo from <jo_ratner@NOSPAMyahoo.com> was injured because:
| Yeah Mike... I like messages that don't reference anything...
| they ar ethe way to go!!
|
| Daniel Melameth wrote:
|
|| Mike,
||
|| No offense, but you might want to learn how to thread
|| newsgroup messages... Then you wouldn't have to waste
|| bandwidth and storage space by uselessly quoting people...
Kids....
--
--
Joe Pribe
NC
jpribe 'at' nc.rr.com
jegp 'at' hotmail.com
---- I Love My O|||||||O TJ
05-14-2004, 10:34 PM
#53
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Spyware
In news:inepc.9973$KE6.5968@newsread3.news.atl.earthl ink.net,
Jo from <jo_ratner@NOSPAMyahoo.com> was injured because:
| Yeah Mike... I like messages that don't reference anything...
| they ar ethe way to go!!
|
| Daniel Melameth wrote:
|
|| Mike,
||
|| No offense, but you might want to learn how to thread
|| newsgroup messages... Then you wouldn't have to waste
|| bandwidth and storage space by uselessly quoting people...
Kids....
--
--
Joe Pribe
NC
jpribe 'at' nc.rr.com
jegp 'at' hotmail.com
---- I Love My O|||||||O TJ
Jo from <jo_ratner@NOSPAMyahoo.com> was injured because:
| Yeah Mike... I like messages that don't reference anything...
| they ar ethe way to go!!
|
| Daniel Melameth wrote:
|
|| Mike,
||
|| No offense, but you might want to learn how to thread
|| newsgroup messages... Then you wouldn't have to waste
|| bandwidth and storage space by uselessly quoting people...
Kids....
--
--
Joe Pribe
NC
jpribe 'at' nc.rr.com
jegp 'at' hotmail.com
---- I Love My O|||||||O TJ
05-15-2004, 05:53 AM
#54
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Spyware
On Fri, 14 May 2004 20:30:37 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
wrote:
>I view messages by date/time posted, not by the thread. Viewing by
>thread takes 'way' too much time.
>
>It 'is' proper newsgroup etiquette to give folks at least half a clue
>what you are talking about.
>
>Useless stuff should be snipped agreed, but your last post right out of
>the blue made no sense at all if I just viewed it..
>
>Now if you want replies in the context given by you, I will have some
>great fun with you...
>;-)
>
>Mike
It's also proper newsgroup etiquette to not top-post... Personally I
don't always agree with that and I know there are frequent holy wars
waged over top vs bottom posting but the "general rule" is that
top-posting is in bad form. Just figured I'd throw that in while
we're in "lecture mode." :-)
>
>Daniel Melameth wrote:
>>
>> Mike,
>>
>> No offense, but you might want to learn how to thread newsgroup messages...
>> Then you wouldn't have to waste bandwidth and storage space by uselessly
>> quoting people...
--
Less drivel, more Dremel.
wrote:
>I view messages by date/time posted, not by the thread. Viewing by
>thread takes 'way' too much time.
>
>It 'is' proper newsgroup etiquette to give folks at least half a clue
>what you are talking about.
>
>Useless stuff should be snipped agreed, but your last post right out of
>the blue made no sense at all if I just viewed it..
>
>Now if you want replies in the context given by you, I will have some
>great fun with you...
>;-)
>
>Mike
It's also proper newsgroup etiquette to not top-post... Personally I
don't always agree with that and I know there are frequent holy wars
waged over top vs bottom posting but the "general rule" is that
top-posting is in bad form. Just figured I'd throw that in while
we're in "lecture mode." :-)
>
>Daniel Melameth wrote:
>>
>> Mike,
>>
>> No offense, but you might want to learn how to thread newsgroup messages...
>> Then you wouldn't have to waste bandwidth and storage space by uselessly
>> quoting people...
--
Less drivel, more Dremel.
05-15-2004, 05:53 AM
#55
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Spyware
On Fri, 14 May 2004 20:30:37 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
wrote:
>I view messages by date/time posted, not by the thread. Viewing by
>thread takes 'way' too much time.
>
>It 'is' proper newsgroup etiquette to give folks at least half a clue
>what you are talking about.
>
>Useless stuff should be snipped agreed, but your last post right out of
>the blue made no sense at all if I just viewed it..
>
>Now if you want replies in the context given by you, I will have some
>great fun with you...
>;-)
>
>Mike
It's also proper newsgroup etiquette to not top-post... Personally I
don't always agree with that and I know there are frequent holy wars
waged over top vs bottom posting but the "general rule" is that
top-posting is in bad form. Just figured I'd throw that in while
we're in "lecture mode." :-)
>
>Daniel Melameth wrote:
>>
>> Mike,
>>
>> No offense, but you might want to learn how to thread newsgroup messages...
>> Then you wouldn't have to waste bandwidth and storage space by uselessly
>> quoting people...
--
Less drivel, more Dremel.
wrote:
>I view messages by date/time posted, not by the thread. Viewing by
>thread takes 'way' too much time.
>
>It 'is' proper newsgroup etiquette to give folks at least half a clue
>what you are talking about.
>
>Useless stuff should be snipped agreed, but your last post right out of
>the blue made no sense at all if I just viewed it..
>
>Now if you want replies in the context given by you, I will have some
>great fun with you...
>;-)
>
>Mike
It's also proper newsgroup etiquette to not top-post... Personally I
don't always agree with that and I know there are frequent holy wars
waged over top vs bottom posting but the "general rule" is that
top-posting is in bad form. Just figured I'd throw that in while
we're in "lecture mode." :-)
>
>Daniel Melameth wrote:
>>
>> Mike,
>>
>> No offense, but you might want to learn how to thread newsgroup messages...
>> Then you wouldn't have to waste bandwidth and storage space by uselessly
>> quoting people...
--
Less drivel, more Dremel.
05-15-2004, 05:53 AM
#56
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Spyware
On Fri, 14 May 2004 20:30:37 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
wrote:
>I view messages by date/time posted, not by the thread. Viewing by
>thread takes 'way' too much time.
>
>It 'is' proper newsgroup etiquette to give folks at least half a clue
>what you are talking about.
>
>Useless stuff should be snipped agreed, but your last post right out of
>the blue made no sense at all if I just viewed it..
>
>Now if you want replies in the context given by you, I will have some
>great fun with you...
>;-)
>
>Mike
It's also proper newsgroup etiquette to not top-post... Personally I
don't always agree with that and I know there are frequent holy wars
waged over top vs bottom posting but the "general rule" is that
top-posting is in bad form. Just figured I'd throw that in while
we're in "lecture mode." :-)
>
>Daniel Melameth wrote:
>>
>> Mike,
>>
>> No offense, but you might want to learn how to thread newsgroup messages...
>> Then you wouldn't have to waste bandwidth and storage space by uselessly
>> quoting people...
--
Less drivel, more Dremel.
wrote:
>I view messages by date/time posted, not by the thread. Viewing by
>thread takes 'way' too much time.
>
>It 'is' proper newsgroup etiquette to give folks at least half a clue
>what you are talking about.
>
>Useless stuff should be snipped agreed, but your last post right out of
>the blue made no sense at all if I just viewed it..
>
>Now if you want replies in the context given by you, I will have some
>great fun with you...
>;-)
>
>Mike
It's also proper newsgroup etiquette to not top-post... Personally I
don't always agree with that and I know there are frequent holy wars
waged over top vs bottom posting but the "general rule" is that
top-posting is in bad form. Just figured I'd throw that in while
we're in "lecture mode." :-)
>
>Daniel Melameth wrote:
>>
>> Mike,
>>
>> No offense, but you might want to learn how to thread newsgroup messages...
>> Then you wouldn't have to waste bandwidth and storage space by uselessly
>> quoting people...
--
Less drivel, more Dremel.
05-15-2004, 05:53 AM
#57
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Spyware
On Fri, 14 May 2004 20:30:37 -0400, Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca>
wrote:
>I view messages by date/time posted, not by the thread. Viewing by
>thread takes 'way' too much time.
>
>It 'is' proper newsgroup etiquette to give folks at least half a clue
>what you are talking about.
>
>Useless stuff should be snipped agreed, but your last post right out of
>the blue made no sense at all if I just viewed it..
>
>Now if you want replies in the context given by you, I will have some
>great fun with you...
>;-)
>
>Mike
It's also proper newsgroup etiquette to not top-post... Personally I
don't always agree with that and I know there are frequent holy wars
waged over top vs bottom posting but the "general rule" is that
top-posting is in bad form. Just figured I'd throw that in while
we're in "lecture mode." :-)
>
>Daniel Melameth wrote:
>>
>> Mike,
>>
>> No offense, but you might want to learn how to thread newsgroup messages...
>> Then you wouldn't have to waste bandwidth and storage space by uselessly
>> quoting people...
--
Less drivel, more Dremel.
wrote:
>I view messages by date/time posted, not by the thread. Viewing by
>thread takes 'way' too much time.
>
>It 'is' proper newsgroup etiquette to give folks at least half a clue
>what you are talking about.
>
>Useless stuff should be snipped agreed, but your last post right out of
>the blue made no sense at all if I just viewed it..
>
>Now if you want replies in the context given by you, I will have some
>great fun with you...
>;-)
>
>Mike
It's also proper newsgroup etiquette to not top-post... Personally I
don't always agree with that and I know there are frequent holy wars
waged over top vs bottom posting but the "general rule" is that
top-posting is in bad form. Just figured I'd throw that in while
we're in "lecture mode." :-)
>
>Daniel Melameth wrote:
>>
>> Mike,
>>
>> No offense, but you might want to learn how to thread newsgroup messages...
>> Then you wouldn't have to waste bandwidth and storage space by uselessly
>> quoting people...
--
Less drivel, more Dremel.
05-15-2004, 06:16 AM
#58
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Spyware
But not required by RFC 1855.
--
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"Shaggie" <blah@blah.com> wrote in message
news:s0qba05imj7vsg6sv0voo0dicjtb3eqlld@4ax.com...
> It's also proper newsgroup etiquette to not top-post... Personally I
> don't always agree with that and I know there are frequent holy wars
> waged over top vs bottom posting but the "general rule" is that
> top-posting is in bad form. Just figured I'd throw that in while
> we're in "lecture mode." :-)
> >> No offense, but you might want to learn how to thread newsgroup
messages...
> >> Then you wouldn't have to waste bandwidth and storage space by
uselessly
> >> quoting people...
>
But not required by RFC 1855.
--
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"Shaggie" <blah@blah.com> wrote in message
news:s0qba05imj7vsg6sv0voo0dicjtb3eqlld@4ax.com...
> It's also proper newsgroup etiquette to not top-post... Personally I
> don't always agree with that and I know there are frequent holy wars
> waged over top vs bottom posting but the "general rule" is that
> top-posting is in bad form. Just figured I'd throw that in while
> we're in "lecture mode." :-)
> >> No offense, but you might want to learn how to thread newsgroup
messages...
> >> Then you wouldn't have to waste bandwidth and storage space by
uselessly
> >> quoting people...
>
But not required by RFC 1855.
05-15-2004, 06:16 AM
#59
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Spyware
But not required by RFC 1855.
--
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"Shaggie" <blah@blah.com> wrote in message
news:s0qba05imj7vsg6sv0voo0dicjtb3eqlld@4ax.com...
> It's also proper newsgroup etiquette to not top-post... Personally I
> don't always agree with that and I know there are frequent holy wars
> waged over top vs bottom posting but the "general rule" is that
> top-posting is in bad form. Just figured I'd throw that in while
> we're in "lecture mode." :-)
> >> No offense, but you might want to learn how to thread newsgroup
messages...
> >> Then you wouldn't have to waste bandwidth and storage space by
uselessly
> >> quoting people...
>
But not required by RFC 1855.
--
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"Shaggie" <blah@blah.com> wrote in message
news:s0qba05imj7vsg6sv0voo0dicjtb3eqlld@4ax.com...
> It's also proper newsgroup etiquette to not top-post... Personally I
> don't always agree with that and I know there are frequent holy wars
> waged over top vs bottom posting but the "general rule" is that
> top-posting is in bad form. Just figured I'd throw that in while
> we're in "lecture mode." :-)
> >> No offense, but you might want to learn how to thread newsgroup
messages...
> >> Then you wouldn't have to waste bandwidth and storage space by
uselessly
> >> quoting people...
>
But not required by RFC 1855.
05-15-2004, 06:16 AM
#60
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Spyware
But not required by RFC 1855.
--
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"Shaggie" <blah@blah.com> wrote in message
news:s0qba05imj7vsg6sv0voo0dicjtb3eqlld@4ax.com...
> It's also proper newsgroup etiquette to not top-post... Personally I
> don't always agree with that and I know there are frequent holy wars
> waged over top vs bottom posting but the "general rule" is that
> top-posting is in bad form. Just figured I'd throw that in while
> we're in "lecture mode." :-)
> >> No offense, but you might want to learn how to thread newsgroup
messages...
> >> Then you wouldn't have to waste bandwidth and storage space by
uselessly
> >> quoting people...
>
But not required by RFC 1855.
--
Dave Milne, Scotland
'91 Grand Wagoneer, '99 TJ
"Shaggie" <blah@blah.com> wrote in message
news:s0qba05imj7vsg6sv0voo0dicjtb3eqlld@4ax.com...
> It's also proper newsgroup etiquette to not top-post... Personally I
> don't always agree with that and I know there are frequent holy wars
> waged over top vs bottom posting but the "general rule" is that
> top-posting is in bad form. Just figured I'd throw that in while
> we're in "lecture mode." :-)
> >> No offense, but you might want to learn how to thread newsgroup
messages...
> >> Then you wouldn't have to waste bandwidth and storage space by
uselessly
> >> quoting people...
>
But not required by RFC 1855.