|
OT- Oil Prices
Spotted this while researching something else:
http://www.truckflix.com/news_article.php?newsid=1089 I don't know if this is a typo, a horrendous prediction or reason to hope. Note the date of the article. Pasted from link above: Report predicts oil at $51 a barrel in 2025 04/19/2004 - 9:25:29 am Crude oil prices will eventually reach $51 a barrel by 2025 because of inflation and rising energy needs in developing nations, according to an Energy Department projection. The report by the DOE`s Energy Information Administration said strong economic growth in Asia would drive world energy prices in the next decade. The developing world`s demand for energy will nearly double by 2025 with oil, coal and natural gas leading the way. The report projects global energy demand to grow about 54 percent by 2025. But China, India and other developing countries will see a 91 percent jump as these countries continue rapid industrial development, said the EIA. OPEC producers are expected to still be the major oil suppliers in 2025, the report said. They now account for about a third of the oil being pumped. The current average U.S. retail price of diesel fuel is $1.679 - the highest prices are in California, where the average is $2.162. |
Re: OT- Oil Prices
Seems a very optimistic prediction more than a year ago. Didn't quite work
out that way eh? By 2025, the demand for oil will be either (1) quite less due to the hydrogen fuel automobile. (2) quite low due to the outlaw of privately owned conveyances - hence mass transit mandates, or (3) Significantly more due to WWIII over the last petroleum reserves on the planet. Can you imagine how much a horse will cost then? Scott "Cherokee-Ltd" <nospam@home.com> wrote in message news:j9adnZ2dnZ0oRT6OnZ2dnZNtnd6dnZ2dRVn-y52dnZ0@rogers.com... > Spotted this while researching something else: > http://www.truckflix.com/news_article.php?newsid=1089 > > I don't know if this is a typo, a horrendous prediction or reason to hope. > Note the date of the article. > > Pasted from link above: > > Report predicts oil at $51 a barrel in 2025 > 04/19/2004 - 9:25:29 am > > Crude oil prices will eventually reach $51 a barrel by 2025 because of > inflation and rising energy needs in developing nations, according to an > Energy Department projection. > > The report by the DOE`s Energy Information Administration said strong > economic growth in Asia would drive world energy prices in the next > decade. The developing world`s demand for energy will nearly double by > 2025 with oil, coal and natural gas leading the way. > > The report projects global energy demand to grow about 54 percent by 2025. > But China, India and other developing countries will see a 91 percent jump > as these countries continue rapid industrial development, said the EIA. > > OPEC producers are expected to still be the major oil suppliers in 2025, > the report said. They now account for about a third of the oil being > pumped. > > The current average U.S. retail price of diesel fuel is $1.679 - the > highest prices are in California, where the average is $2.162. > > |
Re: OT- Oil Prices
Seems a very optimistic prediction more than a year ago. Didn't quite work
out that way eh? By 2025, the demand for oil will be either (1) quite less due to the hydrogen fuel automobile. (2) quite low due to the outlaw of privately owned conveyances - hence mass transit mandates, or (3) Significantly more due to WWIII over the last petroleum reserves on the planet. Can you imagine how much a horse will cost then? Scott "Cherokee-Ltd" <nospam@home.com> wrote in message news:j9adnZ2dnZ0oRT6OnZ2dnZNtnd6dnZ2dRVn-y52dnZ0@rogers.com... > Spotted this while researching something else: > http://www.truckflix.com/news_article.php?newsid=1089 > > I don't know if this is a typo, a horrendous prediction or reason to hope. > Note the date of the article. > > Pasted from link above: > > Report predicts oil at $51 a barrel in 2025 > 04/19/2004 - 9:25:29 am > > Crude oil prices will eventually reach $51 a barrel by 2025 because of > inflation and rising energy needs in developing nations, according to an > Energy Department projection. > > The report by the DOE`s Energy Information Administration said strong > economic growth in Asia would drive world energy prices in the next > decade. The developing world`s demand for energy will nearly double by > 2025 with oil, coal and natural gas leading the way. > > The report projects global energy demand to grow about 54 percent by 2025. > But China, India and other developing countries will see a 91 percent jump > as these countries continue rapid industrial development, said the EIA. > > OPEC producers are expected to still be the major oil suppliers in 2025, > the report said. They now account for about a third of the oil being > pumped. > > The current average U.S. retail price of diesel fuel is $1.679 - the > highest prices are in California, where the average is $2.162. > > |
Re: OT- Oil Prices
Seems a very optimistic prediction more than a year ago. Didn't quite work
out that way eh? By 2025, the demand for oil will be either (1) quite less due to the hydrogen fuel automobile. (2) quite low due to the outlaw of privately owned conveyances - hence mass transit mandates, or (3) Significantly more due to WWIII over the last petroleum reserves on the planet. Can you imagine how much a horse will cost then? Scott "Cherokee-Ltd" <nospam@home.com> wrote in message news:j9adnZ2dnZ0oRT6OnZ2dnZNtnd6dnZ2dRVn-y52dnZ0@rogers.com... > Spotted this while researching something else: > http://www.truckflix.com/news_article.php?newsid=1089 > > I don't know if this is a typo, a horrendous prediction or reason to hope. > Note the date of the article. > > Pasted from link above: > > Report predicts oil at $51 a barrel in 2025 > 04/19/2004 - 9:25:29 am > > Crude oil prices will eventually reach $51 a barrel by 2025 because of > inflation and rising energy needs in developing nations, according to an > Energy Department projection. > > The report by the DOE`s Energy Information Administration said strong > economic growth in Asia would drive world energy prices in the next > decade. The developing world`s demand for energy will nearly double by > 2025 with oil, coal and natural gas leading the way. > > The report projects global energy demand to grow about 54 percent by 2025. > But China, India and other developing countries will see a 91 percent jump > as these countries continue rapid industrial development, said the EIA. > > OPEC producers are expected to still be the major oil suppliers in 2025, > the report said. They now account for about a third of the oil being > pumped. > > The current average U.S. retail price of diesel fuel is $1.679 - the > highest prices are in California, where the average is $2.162. > > |
Re: OT- Oil Prices
Seems a very optimistic prediction more than a year ago. Didn't quite work
out that way eh? By 2025, the demand for oil will be either (1) quite less due to the hydrogen fuel automobile. (2) quite low due to the outlaw of privately owned conveyances - hence mass transit mandates, or (3) Significantly more due to WWIII over the last petroleum reserves on the planet. Can you imagine how much a horse will cost then? Scott "Cherokee-Ltd" <nospam@home.com> wrote in message news:j9adnZ2dnZ0oRT6OnZ2dnZNtnd6dnZ2dRVn-y52dnZ0@rogers.com... > Spotted this while researching something else: > http://www.truckflix.com/news_article.php?newsid=1089 > > I don't know if this is a typo, a horrendous prediction or reason to hope. > Note the date of the article. > > Pasted from link above: > > Report predicts oil at $51 a barrel in 2025 > 04/19/2004 - 9:25:29 am > > Crude oil prices will eventually reach $51 a barrel by 2025 because of > inflation and rising energy needs in developing nations, according to an > Energy Department projection. > > The report by the DOE`s Energy Information Administration said strong > economic growth in Asia would drive world energy prices in the next > decade. The developing world`s demand for energy will nearly double by > 2025 with oil, coal and natural gas leading the way. > > The report projects global energy demand to grow about 54 percent by 2025. > But China, India and other developing countries will see a 91 percent jump > as these countries continue rapid industrial development, said the EIA. > > OPEC producers are expected to still be the major oil suppliers in 2025, > the report said. They now account for about a third of the oil being > pumped. > > The current average U.S. retail price of diesel fuel is $1.679 - the > highest prices are in California, where the average is $2.162. > > |
Re: OT- Oil Prices
Yeah, but it was before the election. If the Energy Dept predicted $60+ per
barrel in 16 months, it may have pushed Ohio over the edge. Now that W doesn't need to run again, he can do all he can to keep his oil buddies rich... "reconair" <reconair@staffnet.com> wrote in message news:11g2a21d71rt698@corp.supernews.com... > Seems a very optimistic prediction more than a year ago. Didn't quite > work out that way eh? By 2025, the demand for oil will be either (1) > quite less due to the hydrogen fuel automobile. (2) quite low due to the > outlaw of privately owned conveyances - hence mass transit mandates, or > (3) Significantly more due to WWIII over the last petroleum reserves on > the planet. Can you imagine how much a horse will cost then? > > Scott > "Cherokee-Ltd" <nospam@home.com> wrote in message > news:j9adnZ2dnZ0oRT6OnZ2dnZNtnd6dnZ2dRVn-y52dnZ0@rogers.com... >> Spotted this while researching something else: >> http://www.truckflix.com/news_article.php?newsid=1089 >> >> I don't know if this is a typo, a horrendous prediction or reason to >> hope. Note the date of the article. >> >> Pasted from link above: >> >> Report predicts oil at $51 a barrel in 2025 >> 04/19/2004 - 9:25:29 am >> >> Crude oil prices will eventually reach $51 a barrel by 2025 because of >> inflation and rising energy needs in developing nations, according to an >> Energy Department projection. >> >> The report by the DOE`s Energy Information Administration said strong >> economic growth in Asia would drive world energy prices in the next >> decade. The developing world`s demand for energy will nearly double by >> 2025 with oil, coal and natural gas leading the way. >> >> The report projects global energy demand to grow about 54 percent by >> 2025. But China, India and other developing countries will see a 91 >> percent jump as these countries continue rapid industrial development, >> said the EIA. >> >> OPEC producers are expected to still be the major oil suppliers in 2025, >> the report said. They now account for about a third of the oil being >> pumped. >> >> The current average U.S. retail price of diesel fuel is $1.679 - the >> highest prices are in California, where the average is $2.162. >> >> > > |
Re: OT- Oil Prices
Yeah, but it was before the election. If the Energy Dept predicted $60+ per
barrel in 16 months, it may have pushed Ohio over the edge. Now that W doesn't need to run again, he can do all he can to keep his oil buddies rich... "reconair" <reconair@staffnet.com> wrote in message news:11g2a21d71rt698@corp.supernews.com... > Seems a very optimistic prediction more than a year ago. Didn't quite > work out that way eh? By 2025, the demand for oil will be either (1) > quite less due to the hydrogen fuel automobile. (2) quite low due to the > outlaw of privately owned conveyances - hence mass transit mandates, or > (3) Significantly more due to WWIII over the last petroleum reserves on > the planet. Can you imagine how much a horse will cost then? > > Scott > "Cherokee-Ltd" <nospam@home.com> wrote in message > news:j9adnZ2dnZ0oRT6OnZ2dnZNtnd6dnZ2dRVn-y52dnZ0@rogers.com... >> Spotted this while researching something else: >> http://www.truckflix.com/news_article.php?newsid=1089 >> >> I don't know if this is a typo, a horrendous prediction or reason to >> hope. Note the date of the article. >> >> Pasted from link above: >> >> Report predicts oil at $51 a barrel in 2025 >> 04/19/2004 - 9:25:29 am >> >> Crude oil prices will eventually reach $51 a barrel by 2025 because of >> inflation and rising energy needs in developing nations, according to an >> Energy Department projection. >> >> The report by the DOE`s Energy Information Administration said strong >> economic growth in Asia would drive world energy prices in the next >> decade. The developing world`s demand for energy will nearly double by >> 2025 with oil, coal and natural gas leading the way. >> >> The report projects global energy demand to grow about 54 percent by >> 2025. But China, India and other developing countries will see a 91 >> percent jump as these countries continue rapid industrial development, >> said the EIA. >> >> OPEC producers are expected to still be the major oil suppliers in 2025, >> the report said. They now account for about a third of the oil being >> pumped. >> >> The current average U.S. retail price of diesel fuel is $1.679 - the >> highest prices are in California, where the average is $2.162. >> >> > > |
Re: OT- Oil Prices
Yeah, but it was before the election. If the Energy Dept predicted $60+ per
barrel in 16 months, it may have pushed Ohio over the edge. Now that W doesn't need to run again, he can do all he can to keep his oil buddies rich... "reconair" <reconair@staffnet.com> wrote in message news:11g2a21d71rt698@corp.supernews.com... > Seems a very optimistic prediction more than a year ago. Didn't quite > work out that way eh? By 2025, the demand for oil will be either (1) > quite less due to the hydrogen fuel automobile. (2) quite low due to the > outlaw of privately owned conveyances - hence mass transit mandates, or > (3) Significantly more due to WWIII over the last petroleum reserves on > the planet. Can you imagine how much a horse will cost then? > > Scott > "Cherokee-Ltd" <nospam@home.com> wrote in message > news:j9adnZ2dnZ0oRT6OnZ2dnZNtnd6dnZ2dRVn-y52dnZ0@rogers.com... >> Spotted this while researching something else: >> http://www.truckflix.com/news_article.php?newsid=1089 >> >> I don't know if this is a typo, a horrendous prediction or reason to >> hope. Note the date of the article. >> >> Pasted from link above: >> >> Report predicts oil at $51 a barrel in 2025 >> 04/19/2004 - 9:25:29 am >> >> Crude oil prices will eventually reach $51 a barrel by 2025 because of >> inflation and rising energy needs in developing nations, according to an >> Energy Department projection. >> >> The report by the DOE`s Energy Information Administration said strong >> economic growth in Asia would drive world energy prices in the next >> decade. The developing world`s demand for energy will nearly double by >> 2025 with oil, coal and natural gas leading the way. >> >> The report projects global energy demand to grow about 54 percent by >> 2025. But China, India and other developing countries will see a 91 >> percent jump as these countries continue rapid industrial development, >> said the EIA. >> >> OPEC producers are expected to still be the major oil suppliers in 2025, >> the report said. They now account for about a third of the oil being >> pumped. >> >> The current average U.S. retail price of diesel fuel is $1.679 - the >> highest prices are in California, where the average is $2.162. >> >> > > |
Re: OT- Oil Prices
Yeah, but it was before the election. If the Energy Dept predicted $60+ per
barrel in 16 months, it may have pushed Ohio over the edge. Now that W doesn't need to run again, he can do all he can to keep his oil buddies rich... "reconair" <reconair@staffnet.com> wrote in message news:11g2a21d71rt698@corp.supernews.com... > Seems a very optimistic prediction more than a year ago. Didn't quite > work out that way eh? By 2025, the demand for oil will be either (1) > quite less due to the hydrogen fuel automobile. (2) quite low due to the > outlaw of privately owned conveyances - hence mass transit mandates, or > (3) Significantly more due to WWIII over the last petroleum reserves on > the planet. Can you imagine how much a horse will cost then? > > Scott > "Cherokee-Ltd" <nospam@home.com> wrote in message > news:j9adnZ2dnZ0oRT6OnZ2dnZNtnd6dnZ2dRVn-y52dnZ0@rogers.com... >> Spotted this while researching something else: >> http://www.truckflix.com/news_article.php?newsid=1089 >> >> I don't know if this is a typo, a horrendous prediction or reason to >> hope. Note the date of the article. >> >> Pasted from link above: >> >> Report predicts oil at $51 a barrel in 2025 >> 04/19/2004 - 9:25:29 am >> >> Crude oil prices will eventually reach $51 a barrel by 2025 because of >> inflation and rising energy needs in developing nations, according to an >> Energy Department projection. >> >> The report by the DOE`s Energy Information Administration said strong >> economic growth in Asia would drive world energy prices in the next >> decade. The developing world`s demand for energy will nearly double by >> 2025 with oil, coal and natural gas leading the way. >> >> The report projects global energy demand to grow about 54 percent by >> 2025. But China, India and other developing countries will see a 91 >> percent jump as these countries continue rapid industrial development, >> said the EIA. >> >> OPEC producers are expected to still be the major oil suppliers in 2025, >> the report said. They now account for about a third of the oil being >> pumped. >> >> The current average U.S. retail price of diesel fuel is $1.679 - the >> highest prices are in California, where the average is $2.162. >> >> > > |
Re: OT- Oil Prices
Who are President Bush's oil buddies??????? And how would they
benefit from higher product costs?????? God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Matt Macchiarolo wrote: > > Yeah, but it was before the election. If the Energy Dept predicted $60+ per > barrel in 16 months, it may have pushed Ohio over the edge. > > Now that W doesn't need to run again, he can do all he can to keep his oil > buddies rich... |
Re: OT- Oil Prices
Who are President Bush's oil buddies??????? And how would they
benefit from higher product costs?????? God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Matt Macchiarolo wrote: > > Yeah, but it was before the election. If the Energy Dept predicted $60+ per > barrel in 16 months, it may have pushed Ohio over the edge. > > Now that W doesn't need to run again, he can do all he can to keep his oil > buddies rich... |
Re: OT- Oil Prices
Who are President Bush's oil buddies??????? And how would they
benefit from higher product costs?????? God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Matt Macchiarolo wrote: > > Yeah, but it was before the election. If the Energy Dept predicted $60+ per > barrel in 16 months, it may have pushed Ohio over the edge. > > Now that W doesn't need to run again, he can do all he can to keep his oil > buddies rich... |
Re: OT- Oil Prices
Who are President Bush's oil buddies??????? And how would they
benefit from higher product costs?????? God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Matt Macchiarolo wrote: > > Yeah, but it was before the election. If the Energy Dept predicted $60+ per > barrel in 16 months, it may have pushed Ohio over the edge. > > Now that W doesn't need to run again, he can do all he can to keep his oil > buddies rich... |
Re: OT- Oil Prices
The ones who sell us the oil:
http://www.consortiumnews.com/2000/081400a1.html http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0111-01.htm Wasn't it Exxon Mobil who posted a 66% increase in retail profits in the 2nd quarter of 2005? In spite of relatively flat production? "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message news:43012C94.368BE7EB@cox.net... > Who are President Bush's oil buddies??????? And how would they > benefit from higher product costs?????? > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > Matt Macchiarolo wrote: >> >> Yeah, but it was before the election. If the Energy Dept predicted $60+ >> per >> barrel in 16 months, it may have pushed Ohio over the edge. >> >> Now that W doesn't need to run again, he can do all he can to keep his >> oil >> buddies rich... |
Re: OT- Oil Prices
The ones who sell us the oil:
http://www.consortiumnews.com/2000/081400a1.html http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0111-01.htm Wasn't it Exxon Mobil who posted a 66% increase in retail profits in the 2nd quarter of 2005? In spite of relatively flat production? "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message news:43012C94.368BE7EB@cox.net... > Who are President Bush's oil buddies??????? And how would they > benefit from higher product costs?????? > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > Matt Macchiarolo wrote: >> >> Yeah, but it was before the election. If the Energy Dept predicted $60+ >> per >> barrel in 16 months, it may have pushed Ohio over the edge. >> >> Now that W doesn't need to run again, he can do all he can to keep his >> oil >> buddies rich... |
Re: OT- Oil Prices
The ones who sell us the oil:
http://www.consortiumnews.com/2000/081400a1.html http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0111-01.htm Wasn't it Exxon Mobil who posted a 66% increase in retail profits in the 2nd quarter of 2005? In spite of relatively flat production? "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message news:43012C94.368BE7EB@cox.net... > Who are President Bush's oil buddies??????? And how would they > benefit from higher product costs?????? > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > Matt Macchiarolo wrote: >> >> Yeah, but it was before the election. If the Energy Dept predicted $60+ >> per >> barrel in 16 months, it may have pushed Ohio over the edge. >> >> Now that W doesn't need to run again, he can do all he can to keep his >> oil >> buddies rich... |
Re: OT- Oil Prices
The ones who sell us the oil:
http://www.consortiumnews.com/2000/081400a1.html http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0111-01.htm Wasn't it Exxon Mobil who posted a 66% increase in retail profits in the 2nd quarter of 2005? In spite of relatively flat production? "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message news:43012C94.368BE7EB@cox.net... > Who are President Bush's oil buddies??????? And how would they > benefit from higher product costs?????? > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > Matt Macchiarolo wrote: >> >> Yeah, but it was before the election. If the Energy Dept predicted $60+ >> per >> barrel in 16 months, it may have pushed Ohio over the edge. >> >> Now that W doesn't need to run again, he can do all he can to keep his >> oil >> buddies rich... |
Re: OT- Oil Prices
This isn't all bad, Matt. After all, I do have some energy stocks in my
retirement portfolio. ;o) Earle "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message news:hoadnYOsUpL835zeRVn-1g@comcast.com... > The ones who sell us the oil: > > http://www.consortiumnews.com/2000/081400a1.html > > http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0111-01.htm > > Wasn't it Exxon Mobil who posted a 66% increase in retail profits in the 2nd > quarter of 2005? In spite of relatively flat production? > > "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message > news:43012C94.368BE7EB@cox.net... > > Who are President Bush's oil buddies??????? And how would they > > benefit from higher product costs?????? > > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > > > Matt Macchiarolo wrote: > >> > >> Yeah, but it was before the election. If the Energy Dept predicted $60+ > >> per > >> barrel in 16 months, it may have pushed Ohio over the edge. > >> > >> Now that W doesn't need to run again, he can do all he can to keep his > >> oil > >> buddies rich... > > |
Re: OT- Oil Prices
This isn't all bad, Matt. After all, I do have some energy stocks in my
retirement portfolio. ;o) Earle "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message news:hoadnYOsUpL835zeRVn-1g@comcast.com... > The ones who sell us the oil: > > http://www.consortiumnews.com/2000/081400a1.html > > http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0111-01.htm > > Wasn't it Exxon Mobil who posted a 66% increase in retail profits in the 2nd > quarter of 2005? In spite of relatively flat production? > > "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message > news:43012C94.368BE7EB@cox.net... > > Who are President Bush's oil buddies??????? And how would they > > benefit from higher product costs?????? > > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > > > Matt Macchiarolo wrote: > >> > >> Yeah, but it was before the election. If the Energy Dept predicted $60+ > >> per > >> barrel in 16 months, it may have pushed Ohio over the edge. > >> > >> Now that W doesn't need to run again, he can do all he can to keep his > >> oil > >> buddies rich... > > |
Re: OT- Oil Prices
This isn't all bad, Matt. After all, I do have some energy stocks in my
retirement portfolio. ;o) Earle "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message news:hoadnYOsUpL835zeRVn-1g@comcast.com... > The ones who sell us the oil: > > http://www.consortiumnews.com/2000/081400a1.html > > http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0111-01.htm > > Wasn't it Exxon Mobil who posted a 66% increase in retail profits in the 2nd > quarter of 2005? In spite of relatively flat production? > > "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message > news:43012C94.368BE7EB@cox.net... > > Who are President Bush's oil buddies??????? And how would they > > benefit from higher product costs?????? > > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > > > Matt Macchiarolo wrote: > >> > >> Yeah, but it was before the election. If the Energy Dept predicted $60+ > >> per > >> barrel in 16 months, it may have pushed Ohio over the edge. > >> > >> Now that W doesn't need to run again, he can do all he can to keep his > >> oil > >> buddies rich... > > |
Re: OT- Oil Prices
This isn't all bad, Matt. After all, I do have some energy stocks in my
retirement portfolio. ;o) Earle "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message news:hoadnYOsUpL835zeRVn-1g@comcast.com... > The ones who sell us the oil: > > http://www.consortiumnews.com/2000/081400a1.html > > http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0111-01.htm > > Wasn't it Exxon Mobil who posted a 66% increase in retail profits in the 2nd > quarter of 2005? In spite of relatively flat production? > > "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message > news:43012C94.368BE7EB@cox.net... > > Who are President Bush's oil buddies??????? And how would they > > benefit from higher product costs?????? > > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O > > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > > > Matt Macchiarolo wrote: > >> > >> Yeah, but it was before the election. If the Energy Dept predicted $60+ > >> per > >> barrel in 16 months, it may have pushed Ohio over the edge. > >> > >> Now that W doesn't need to run again, he can do all he can to keep his > >> oil > >> buddies rich... > > |
Re: OT- Oil Prices
Matt,
Do you expect anyone to take: [The Bush Family "Oiligarchy"] and "The Barreling Bushes" from pipe dreams, seriously??????? That sixty six percent is still less than six percent: http://www.gasandoil.com/goc/features/fex90607.htm Like you'd sell one of your antiques for a six percent profit. I think you should sell your store and invest in oil stocks. <ROTFLMAO> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Matt Macchiarolo wrote: > > The ones who sell us the oil: > > http://www.consortiumnews.com/2000/081400a1.html > > http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0111-01.htm > > Wasn't it Exxon Mobil who posted a 66% increase in retail profits in the 2nd > quarter of 2005? In spite of relatively flat production? |
Re: OT- Oil Prices
Matt,
Do you expect anyone to take: [The Bush Family "Oiligarchy"] and "The Barreling Bushes" from pipe dreams, seriously??????? That sixty six percent is still less than six percent: http://www.gasandoil.com/goc/features/fex90607.htm Like you'd sell one of your antiques for a six percent profit. I think you should sell your store and invest in oil stocks. <ROTFLMAO> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Matt Macchiarolo wrote: > > The ones who sell us the oil: > > http://www.consortiumnews.com/2000/081400a1.html > > http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0111-01.htm > > Wasn't it Exxon Mobil who posted a 66% increase in retail profits in the 2nd > quarter of 2005? In spite of relatively flat production? |
Re: OT- Oil Prices
Matt,
Do you expect anyone to take: [The Bush Family "Oiligarchy"] and "The Barreling Bushes" from pipe dreams, seriously??????? That sixty six percent is still less than six percent: http://www.gasandoil.com/goc/features/fex90607.htm Like you'd sell one of your antiques for a six percent profit. I think you should sell your store and invest in oil stocks. <ROTFLMAO> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Matt Macchiarolo wrote: > > The ones who sell us the oil: > > http://www.consortiumnews.com/2000/081400a1.html > > http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0111-01.htm > > Wasn't it Exxon Mobil who posted a 66% increase in retail profits in the 2nd > quarter of 2005? In spite of relatively flat production? |
Re: OT- Oil Prices
Matt,
Do you expect anyone to take: [The Bush Family "Oiligarchy"] and "The Barreling Bushes" from pipe dreams, seriously??????? That sixty six percent is still less than six percent: http://www.gasandoil.com/goc/features/fex90607.htm Like you'd sell one of your antiques for a six percent profit. I think you should sell your store and invest in oil stocks. <ROTFLMAO> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Matt Macchiarolo wrote: > > The ones who sell us the oil: > > http://www.consortiumnews.com/2000/081400a1.html > > http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0111-01.htm > > Wasn't it Exxon Mobil who posted a 66% increase in retail profits in the 2nd > quarter of 2005? In spite of relatively flat production? |
Re: OT- Oil Prices
That better than Enron.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Earle Horton wrote: > > This isn't all bad, Matt. After all, I do have some energy stocks in my > retirement portfolio. ;o) > > Earle |
Re: OT- Oil Prices
That better than Enron.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Earle Horton wrote: > > This isn't all bad, Matt. After all, I do have some energy stocks in my > retirement portfolio. ;o) > > Earle |
Re: OT- Oil Prices
That better than Enron.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Earle Horton wrote: > > This isn't all bad, Matt. After all, I do have some energy stocks in my > retirement portfolio. ;o) > > Earle |
Re: OT- Oil Prices
That better than Enron.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Earle Horton wrote: > > This isn't all bad, Matt. After all, I do have some energy stocks in my > retirement portfolio. ;o) > > Earle |
Re: OT- Oil Prices
Bill,
While energy stocks can be a good investment, they should be considered as part of a balanced investment strategy, for long term performance. Investing the whole store in any one sector can have a negative impact on both long and short term gains. <LOL> Earle "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message news:43014CA8.1814C1CF@cox.net... > Matt, > Do you expect anyone to take: [The Bush Family "Oiligarchy"] and > "The Barreling Bushes" from pipe dreams, seriously??????? > That sixty six percent is still less than six percent: > http://www.gasandoil.com/goc/features/fex90607.htm Like you'd sell one > of your antiques for a six percent profit. I think you should sell your > store and invest in oil stocks. <ROTFLMAO> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > Matt Macchiarolo wrote: > > > > The ones who sell us the oil: > > > > http://www.consortiumnews.com/2000/081400a1.html > > > > http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0111-01.htm > > > > Wasn't it Exxon Mobil who posted a 66% increase in retail profits in the 2nd > > quarter of 2005? In spite of relatively flat production? |
Re: OT- Oil Prices
Bill,
While energy stocks can be a good investment, they should be considered as part of a balanced investment strategy, for long term performance. Investing the whole store in any one sector can have a negative impact on both long and short term gains. <LOL> Earle "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message news:43014CA8.1814C1CF@cox.net... > Matt, > Do you expect anyone to take: [The Bush Family "Oiligarchy"] and > "The Barreling Bushes" from pipe dreams, seriously??????? > That sixty six percent is still less than six percent: > http://www.gasandoil.com/goc/features/fex90607.htm Like you'd sell one > of your antiques for a six percent profit. I think you should sell your > store and invest in oil stocks. <ROTFLMAO> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > Matt Macchiarolo wrote: > > > > The ones who sell us the oil: > > > > http://www.consortiumnews.com/2000/081400a1.html > > > > http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0111-01.htm > > > > Wasn't it Exxon Mobil who posted a 66% increase in retail profits in the 2nd > > quarter of 2005? In spite of relatively flat production? |
Re: OT- Oil Prices
Bill,
While energy stocks can be a good investment, they should be considered as part of a balanced investment strategy, for long term performance. Investing the whole store in any one sector can have a negative impact on both long and short term gains. <LOL> Earle "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message news:43014CA8.1814C1CF@cox.net... > Matt, > Do you expect anyone to take: [The Bush Family "Oiligarchy"] and > "The Barreling Bushes" from pipe dreams, seriously??????? > That sixty six percent is still less than six percent: > http://www.gasandoil.com/goc/features/fex90607.htm Like you'd sell one > of your antiques for a six percent profit. I think you should sell your > store and invest in oil stocks. <ROTFLMAO> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > Matt Macchiarolo wrote: > > > > The ones who sell us the oil: > > > > http://www.consortiumnews.com/2000/081400a1.html > > > > http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0111-01.htm > > > > Wasn't it Exxon Mobil who posted a 66% increase in retail profits in the 2nd > > quarter of 2005? In spite of relatively flat production? |
Re: OT- Oil Prices
Bill,
While energy stocks can be a good investment, they should be considered as part of a balanced investment strategy, for long term performance. Investing the whole store in any one sector can have a negative impact on both long and short term gains. <LOL> Earle "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message news:43014CA8.1814C1CF@cox.net... > Matt, > Do you expect anyone to take: [The Bush Family "Oiligarchy"] and > "The Barreling Bushes" from pipe dreams, seriously??????? > That sixty six percent is still less than six percent: > http://www.gasandoil.com/goc/features/fex90607.htm Like you'd sell one > of your antiques for a six percent profit. I think you should sell your > store and invest in oil stocks. <ROTFLMAO> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > Matt Macchiarolo wrote: > > > > The ones who sell us the oil: > > > > http://www.consortiumnews.com/2000/081400a1.html > > > > http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0111-01.htm > > > > Wasn't it Exxon Mobil who posted a 66% increase in retail profits in the 2nd > > quarter of 2005? In spite of relatively flat production? |
Re: OT- Oil Prices
Remember when AT&T was great, it would keep splitting, my
Grandmother's twenty thousands parlayed to over half a million, before my Mom sold it and gave it to a bank investor. God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Earle Horton wrote: > > Bill, > > While energy stocks can be a good investment, they should be considered as > part of a balanced investment strategy, for long term performance. > Investing the whole store in any one sector can have a negative impact on > both long and short term gains. <LOL> > > Earle |
Re: OT- Oil Prices
Remember when AT&T was great, it would keep splitting, my
Grandmother's twenty thousands parlayed to over half a million, before my Mom sold it and gave it to a bank investor. God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Earle Horton wrote: > > Bill, > > While energy stocks can be a good investment, they should be considered as > part of a balanced investment strategy, for long term performance. > Investing the whole store in any one sector can have a negative impact on > both long and short term gains. <LOL> > > Earle |
Re: OT- Oil Prices
Remember when AT&T was great, it would keep splitting, my
Grandmother's twenty thousands parlayed to over half a million, before my Mom sold it and gave it to a bank investor. God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Earle Horton wrote: > > Bill, > > While energy stocks can be a good investment, they should be considered as > part of a balanced investment strategy, for long term performance. > Investing the whole store in any one sector can have a negative impact on > both long and short term gains. <LOL> > > Earle |
Re: OT- Oil Prices
Remember when AT&T was great, it would keep splitting, my
Grandmother's twenty thousands parlayed to over half a million, before my Mom sold it and gave it to a bank investor. God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Earle Horton wrote: > > Bill, > > While energy stocks can be a good investment, they should be considered as > part of a balanced investment strategy, for long term performance. > Investing the whole store in any one sector can have a negative impact on > both long and short term gains. <LOL> > > Earle |
Re: OT- Oil Prices
66% INCREASE in profits, not a 66% markup. If you can't or won't see the oil
connection to the Bush family, no one can help you. Denial is not just a river in Egypt, Bill. I wish I had invested in oil stocks five years ago...I could retire by age 40... "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message news:43014CA8.1814C1CF@cox.net... > Matt, > Do you expect anyone to take: [The Bush Family "Oiligarchy"] and > "The Barreling Bushes" from pipe dreams, seriously??????? > That sixty six percent is still less than six percent: > http://www.gasandoil.com/goc/features/fex90607.htm Like you'd sell one > of your antiques for a six percent profit. I think you should sell your > store and invest in oil stocks. <ROTFLMAO> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > Matt Macchiarolo wrote: >> >> The ones who sell us the oil: >> >> http://www.consortiumnews.com/2000/081400a1.html >> >> http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0111-01.htm >> >> Wasn't it Exxon Mobil who posted a 66% increase in retail profits in the >> 2nd >> quarter of 2005? In spite of relatively flat production? |
Re: OT- Oil Prices
66% INCREASE in profits, not a 66% markup. If you can't or won't see the oil
connection to the Bush family, no one can help you. Denial is not just a river in Egypt, Bill. I wish I had invested in oil stocks five years ago...I could retire by age 40... "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message news:43014CA8.1814C1CF@cox.net... > Matt, > Do you expect anyone to take: [The Bush Family "Oiligarchy"] and > "The Barreling Bushes" from pipe dreams, seriously??????? > That sixty six percent is still less than six percent: > http://www.gasandoil.com/goc/features/fex90607.htm Like you'd sell one > of your antiques for a six percent profit. I think you should sell your > store and invest in oil stocks. <ROTFLMAO> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > Matt Macchiarolo wrote: >> >> The ones who sell us the oil: >> >> http://www.consortiumnews.com/2000/081400a1.html >> >> http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0111-01.htm >> >> Wasn't it Exxon Mobil who posted a 66% increase in retail profits in the >> 2nd >> quarter of 2005? In spite of relatively flat production? |
Re: OT- Oil Prices
66% INCREASE in profits, not a 66% markup. If you can't or won't see the oil
connection to the Bush family, no one can help you. Denial is not just a river in Egypt, Bill. I wish I had invested in oil stocks five years ago...I could retire by age 40... "L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message news:43014CA8.1814C1CF@cox.net... > Matt, > Do you expect anyone to take: [The Bush Family "Oiligarchy"] and > "The Barreling Bushes" from pipe dreams, seriously??????? > That sixty six percent is still less than six percent: > http://www.gasandoil.com/goc/features/fex90607.htm Like you'd sell one > of your antiques for a six percent profit. I think you should sell your > store and invest in oil stocks. <ROTFLMAO> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > Matt Macchiarolo wrote: >> >> The ones who sell us the oil: >> >> http://www.consortiumnews.com/2000/081400a1.html >> >> http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0111-01.htm >> >> Wasn't it Exxon Mobil who posted a 66% increase in retail profits in the >> 2nd >> quarter of 2005? In spite of relatively flat production? |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:09 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands