"MWarren" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:d9da0o02ffm@enews4.newsguy.com...
> Along with everything else that has come up, two stroke engines may
produce
> more power per pound, but they have a very narrow power band. I believe
> this applies to the Detroits as well, that's why they have like 400 gears.
> It is also why they are used in things that run at one speed, usually wide
> open (chainsaws, weedeaters,etc). Snowmobile pulleys keep the engine in
> that band as long as possible.


The other advantage of the two stroke is
> that they can run at any angle.
>

This feature would seemingly make them ideal for a Jeep. Of couser, a Jeep
with 400 gears would suck.

 

"MWarren" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:d9da0o02ffm@enews4.newsguy.com...
> Along with everything else that has come up, two stroke engines may
produce
> more power per pound, but they have a very narrow power band. I believe
> this applies to the Detroits as well, that's why they have like 400 gears.
> It is also why they are used in things that run at one speed, usually wide
> open (chainsaws, weedeaters,etc). Snowmobile pulleys keep the engine in
> that band as long as possible.


The other advantage of the two stroke is
> that they can run at any angle.
>

This feature would seemingly make them ideal for a Jeep. Of couser, a Jeep
with 400 gears would suck.

 

"MWarren" <notme@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:d9da0o02ffm@enews4.newsguy.com...
> Along with everything else that has come up, two stroke engines may
produce
> more power per pound, but they have a very narrow power band. I believe
> this applies to the Detroits as well, that's why they have like 400 gears.
> It is also why they are used in things that run at one speed, usually wide
> open (chainsaws, weedeaters,etc). Snowmobile pulleys keep the engine in
> that band as long as possible.


The other advantage of the two stroke is
> that they can run at any angle.
>

This feature would seemingly make them ideal for a Jeep. Of couser, a Jeep
with 400 gears would suck.

 

"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42BAFC2F.62D05E6B@***.net...
> Until you learn you have to lay your jeep on it's side to clean it
> out.


Clean it out, or empty it out? Either way, I'm not clear on what the down
side is.

 

"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42BAFC2F.62D05E6B@***.net...
> Until you learn you have to lay your jeep on it's side to clean it
> out.


Clean it out, or empty it out? Either way, I'm not clear on what the down
side is.

 

"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42BAFC2F.62D05E6B@***.net...
> Until you learn you have to lay your jeep on it's side to clean it
> out.


Clean it out, or empty it out? Either way, I'm not clear on what the down
side is.

 

"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42BAFC2F.62D05E6B@***.net...
> Until you learn you have to lay your jeep on it's side to clean it
> out.


Clean it out, or empty it out? Either way, I'm not clear on what the down
side is.