Not funny! I just got tired of telling him that most long haul
truckers are independent businessman, and probably run two log books to
make it. And that all the retail companies got out of the transportation
business twenty years ago. Except government subsidized businesses, like
the Railroads. Those that can't understand that fact, are hopelessly
ignorant!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Brian wrote:
>
> Let's see, when confronted with legitimate arguments, Bill ultimately
> turns to personal insults - a typical tactic of weenie liberals. ;)
>
> B

 

Not funny! I just got tired of telling him that most long haul
truckers are independent businessman, and probably run two log books to
make it. And that all the retail companies got out of the transportation
business twenty years ago. Except government subsidized businesses, like
the Railroads. Those that can't understand that fact, are hopelessly
ignorant!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Brian wrote:
>
> Let's see, when confronted with legitimate arguments, Bill ultimately
> turns to personal insults - a typical tactic of weenie liberals. ;)
>
> B

 

Not funny! I just got tired of telling him that most long haul
truckers are independent businessman, and probably run two log books to
make it. And that all the retail companies got out of the transportation
business twenty years ago. Except government subsidized businesses, like
the Railroads. Those that can't understand that fact, are hopelessly
ignorant!
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Brian wrote:
>
> Let's see, when confronted with legitimate arguments, Bill ultimately
> turns to personal insults - a typical tactic of weenie liberals. ;)
>
> B

 

But "most long haul truckers are independent businessman, and probably run
two log books to make it" wasn't what you said in your original statement.
There were no "most" and "probably" qualifiers. Actually, the only qualifier
in your original statement was "every:"

"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:418D44FB.FB3F8490@***.net...
> Nope, every trucker runs two logs to make the payments, and drives
> twenty hours, thousand miles a day.

Ted was taking issue with your assumptions that EVERY trucker is an OO and
EVERY trucker runs two logs. (I assume that's illegal, I'm not a trucker.)
And you're the only one that brought up retail companies, and no one was
referring to them...only trucking companies.

Your flip-flops would make a liberal weenie proud....

"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:419C1F06.5A848FF6@***.net...
> Not funny! I just got tired of telling him that most long haul
truckers are independent businessman, and probably run two log books to
make it. And that all the retail companies got out of the transportation
> business twenty years ago. Except government subsidized businesses, like
> the Railroads. Those that can't understand that fact, are hopelessly
> ignorant!
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Brian wrote:
> >
> > Let's see, when confronted with legitimate arguments, Bill ultimately
> > turns to personal insults - a typical tactic of weenie liberals. ;)
> >
> > B

 

But "most long haul truckers are independent businessman, and probably run
two log books to make it" wasn't what you said in your original statement.
There were no "most" and "probably" qualifiers. Actually, the only qualifier
in your original statement was "every:"

"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:418D44FB.FB3F8490@***.net...
> Nope, every trucker runs two logs to make the payments, and drives
> twenty hours, thousand miles a day.

Ted was taking issue with your assumptions that EVERY trucker is an OO and
EVERY trucker runs two logs. (I assume that's illegal, I'm not a trucker.)
And you're the only one that brought up retail companies, and no one was
referring to them...only trucking companies.

Your flip-flops would make a liberal weenie proud....

"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:419C1F06.5A848FF6@***.net...
> Not funny! I just got tired of telling him that most long haul
truckers are independent businessman, and probably run two log books to
make it. And that all the retail companies got out of the transportation
> business twenty years ago. Except government subsidized businesses, like
> the Railroads. Those that can't understand that fact, are hopelessly
> ignorant!
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Brian wrote:
> >
> > Let's see, when confronted with legitimate arguments, Bill ultimately
> > turns to personal insults - a typical tactic of weenie liberals. ;)
> >
> > B

 

But "most long haul truckers are independent businessman, and probably run
two log books to make it" wasn't what you said in your original statement.
There were no "most" and "probably" qualifiers. Actually, the only qualifier
in your original statement was "every:"

"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:418D44FB.FB3F8490@***.net...
> Nope, every trucker runs two logs to make the payments, and drives
> twenty hours, thousand miles a day.

Ted was taking issue with your assumptions that EVERY trucker is an OO and
EVERY trucker runs two logs. (I assume that's illegal, I'm not a trucker.)
And you're the only one that brought up retail companies, and no one was
referring to them...only trucking companies.

Your flip-flops would make a liberal weenie proud....

"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:419C1F06.5A848FF6@***.net...
> Not funny! I just got tired of telling him that most long haul
truckers are independent businessman, and probably run two log books to
make it. And that all the retail companies got out of the transportation
> business twenty years ago. Except government subsidized businesses, like
> the Railroads. Those that can't understand that fact, are hopelessly
> ignorant!
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Brian wrote:
> >
> > Let's see, when confronted with legitimate arguments, Bill ultimately
> > turns to personal insults - a typical tactic of weenie liberals. ;)
> >
> > B

 

Matt, it's really very hard for me to believe you own any type of
business, you seem so... naive about how we shirt the laws, and find
loop holes, it's a must! And you apparently never bother to figure out
what you actually make an hour. That's like a common denominator we can
use to see now we measure up against others in your High School class,
are you interested?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> But "most long haul truckers are independent businessman, and probably run
> two log books to make it" wasn't what you said in your original statement.
> There were no "most" and "probably" qualifiers. Actually, the only qualifier
> in your original statement was "every:"
>
> Ted was taking issue with your assumptions that EVERY trucker is an OO and
> EVERY trucker runs two logs. (I assume that's illegal, I'm not a trucker.)
> And you're the only one that brought up retail companies, and no one was
> referring to them...only trucking companies.
>
> Your flip-flops would make a liberal weenie proud....

 

Matt, it's really very hard for me to believe you own any type of
business, you seem so... naive about how we shirt the laws, and find
loop holes, it's a must! And you apparently never bother to figure out
what you actually make an hour. That's like a common denominator we can
use to see now we measure up against others in your High School class,
are you interested?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> But "most long haul truckers are independent businessman, and probably run
> two log books to make it" wasn't what you said in your original statement.
> There were no "most" and "probably" qualifiers. Actually, the only qualifier
> in your original statement was "every:"
>
> Ted was taking issue with your assumptions that EVERY trucker is an OO and
> EVERY trucker runs two logs. (I assume that's illegal, I'm not a trucker.)
> And you're the only one that brought up retail companies, and no one was
> referring to them...only trucking companies.
>
> Your flip-flops would make a liberal weenie proud....

 

Matt, it's really very hard for me to believe you own any type of
business, you seem so... naive about how we shirt the laws, and find
loop holes, it's a must! And you apparently never bother to figure out
what you actually make an hour. That's like a common denominator we can
use to see now we measure up against others in your High School class,
are you interested?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> But "most long haul truckers are independent businessman, and probably run
> two log books to make it" wasn't what you said in your original statement.
> There were no "most" and "probably" qualifiers. Actually, the only qualifier
> in your original statement was "every:"
>
> Ted was taking issue with your assumptions that EVERY trucker is an OO and
> EVERY trucker runs two logs. (I assume that's illegal, I'm not a trucker.)
> And you're the only one that brought up retail companies, and no one was
> referring to them...only trucking companies.
>
> Your flip-flops would make a liberal weenie proud....

 

Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message news:<419B6887.E8194BA8@sympatico.ca>...
> Ted Azito wrote:
> >
> > Since anyone can confirm this for themselves, it just goes to show
> > that you are apparently a victim of CJD or "mad cow" disease or early
> > onset Alzheimer's. No other explanation fits the facts.
>
>
> And you must be a Jerk that just likes talking off topic bull #### to
> start fights.
>

No, I responded to to your good buddy fellow TFID when HE posted off
topic erroneous and wrong-headed, peckerwood mentality crap.
"Professional" drivers who grossly violate houirs of service
regulations are not professional drivers, they're criminals, no
different from punks who drag race for money on public streets and
both deserve to lose their toys and be publicly paddled like children
if I had anything to say about it. Make these redneck ########' kids
watch as tough Daddy gets his *** beat and Tabasco put on the open
wounds.